Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Skip to content
Supervision and Regulation Function
Payment System Policy and Oversight Function
Disseminating Goals and Objectives and Holding Managers Accountable for Results
Interagency Coordination of Cross-cutting Issues
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the Board) is one component of the nation's central bank. See appendix 1 for a complete description of the Federal Reserve System (the System).
The mission of the Board is to foster the stability, integrity, and efficiency of the nation's monetary, financial, and payment systems to promote optimal macroeconomic performance.
The following values of the Board guide its organizational decisions and its employees' actions.
The Board has six primary goals with interrelated and mutually reinforcing elements:
The Board employs a comprehensive planning, budget formulation, and budget execution process to ensure the identification, prioritization, and accomplishment of goals and objectives. Planning is coordinated throughout the System by the Strategic Framework (discussed below). Monetary policy work is coordinated through the structure of the Federal Open Market Committee. Supervision and regulation planning is coordinated by the Board's Division of Banking Supervision and Regulation and Division of Consumer and Community Affairs in collaboration with the Strategic Plan Steering Committee, which is composed of senior Board officials and the officer-in-charge of supervision at each Reserve Bank. The Board's budget and accounting systems are closely linked to ensure that expenses can be compared with plans. This process integrates strategic planning, allocation of resources among competing priorities, performance measurement, and ongoing review of the need for existing programs.
In the face of accelerating change in the economy and banking system brought about by numerous factors--including globalization, technology, bank consolidation, and the evolution of payment systems--the Federal Reserve recognized the need for a more comprehensive planning framework. In 1995, a System Strategic Planning Coordinating Group, consisting of Board members, Reserve Bank presidents, and senior managers representing the full range of the Federal Reserve's activities was appointed. This group developed an "umbrella" strategic framework under which the Board, the Reserve Banks, and the product offices develop their own more detailed plans and decision documents. This framework was the basis for the Board's first Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) Planning Document, setting forth the mission, values, and goals of the System. The framework was updated in 2003 and is incorporated in this strategic planning document. Key assumptions and external and internal factors that could affect the achievement of those goals, and associated objectives, were reviewed and updated in 2007 as part of the biennial planning process and are discussed in the following section.
The Board's strategic planning effort recognizes key differences between government and private-sector strategic planning and measurement of results. Measures of costs and revenue derived from prices determined in competitive markets can be used in private planning; the results of that planning are reflected in the ability of the private entity to prosper over time. The government does not have direct competition in certain areas and has a monopoly in others (monetary policy, for example), and establishing a proxy for costs and prices is extraordinarily difficult. Moreover, the results are judged relative to public policy objectives embodied in law, which often are not readily measurable. The Board tries to effectively accomplish its mission while creating the efficiencies that come from strategic planning. The Board's central planning objective is oriented toward achieving effectiveness and efficiency specific to the functions it serves.
In monetary policy, for example, the Federal Reserve exerts only partial and indirect influence on the economy. Because the Federal Reserve's performance therefore cannot be measured solely in terms of economic outcomes, the appropriate judgment must be whether our research technology is successful in analyzing problems and changes in the economy. In the area of bank supervision, the mission of contributing to a viable, competitive, efficient banking system demands a sharing of risks between the central bank and private banks, which serve the crucial function of managing the risk of investing in illiquid loans. As a regulator, the Federal Reserve's job is to ensure that the financial institutions it regulates are allowed to take on appropriate degrees of risk in fulfilling their function in the economy, but not to the point that they impose risks on the financial system in general. Measures of our success would include whether the banking system is performing its functions and whether systemic risk is appropriately contained during periods of challenge to individual institutions or groups of institutions.
To sharpen the focus on strategic priorities, the Board's budget and planning process was restructured in 1997 to lengthen the planning and budgeting horizons and to increase Board member involvement in the setting of priorities. A four-year planning horizon and a two-year budget were adopted.
In developing plans and budgets under the strategic framework, the director of each Board division or office updates divisionwide plans, coordinating efforts with other division directors and Reserve Banks as necessary. These plans and resulting resource requests are reviewed by the Committee on Board Affairs (composed of two or three Board members), which then makes recommendations to the full Board. A Staff Planning Group (SPG) and the Board's Planning and Budget Section provide support to the committee during the planning process by identifying issues and providing analysis of the budget options.
For this 2008-11 strategic plan, the SPG reviewed the planning materials submitted by the Board's divisions and offices and identified the following common themes having Boardwide impact over the planning period:
Conduct monetary policy that promotes the achievement of the statutory objectives of maximum employment and stable prices
This goal will be attained through the following five objectives:
Stay abreast of recent developments in and prospects for the U.S. economy and financial markets, and in those abroad, so that monetary policy decisions will be well informed.
This objective will be pursued in part through the following actions:
Enhance our knowledge of the structural and behavioral relationships in the macroeconomic and financial markets, and improve the quality of the data used to gauge economic performance, through developmental research activities.
This objective will be pursued in part through the following action:
Implement monetary policy effectively in rapidly changing economic circumstances and in an evolving financial market structure.
This objective will be pursued in part through the following actions:
Contribute to the development of U.S. international policies and procedures, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of the Treasury and other agencies.
This objective will be pursued in part through the following actions:
Promote understanding of Federal Reserve policy among other government policy officials and the general public.
This objective will be pursued in part through the following actions:
The Congress has authorized the Federal Reserve to pay interest on reserve balances and to reduce required reserve ratios to as low as zero. However, these new authorities are not effective until October 2011. The Federal Reserve continues to recommend that the Congress eliminate the statutory prohibition against the payment of interest on demand deposits. This statutory provision provides incentives for the private sector to expend resources in a manner that is not productive for the economy as a whole.
The performance of monetary policy in relation to evolving economic and financial circumstances will continue to be reviewed by the Congress in the context of the Board's semiannual monetary policy report and the accompanying testimony. It is recognized that monetary policy has only a partial and indirect influence on economic performance.
Safety and Soundness. Promote a safe, sound, competitive, and accessible banking system and stable financial markets
Consumer Protection. Develop regulations, policies, and programs designed to inform and protect consumers, to enforce federal consumer protection laws, to strengthen market competition, and to promote access to banking services in historically underserved markets
The safety and soundness goal will be attained through the following four objectives:
The consumer protection goal will be attained through the following two objectives:
Promote overall financial stability, manage and contain systemic risk, and identify emerging financial problems early so that crises can be averted.
This objective will be pursued in part through the following actions:
Discussion
Within its regulatory framework, the Federal Reserve will continue its efforts to ensure the stability and soundness of the banking system and financial markets by promoting sound domestic and international risk-management, accounting, disclosure, and auditing standards and overall market transparency.
The problems that occurred in the financial markets in 2007 served to re-emphasize the critical role that sound risk management and measurement practices play in promoting confidence in the financial system. Moreover, recent events have highlighted the need to ensure that the sophistication of risk management and measurement systems keep pace with financial product innovations.
In the coming year, the Federal Reserve and the other banking agencies will be looking at lessons that can be learned from recent experiences. This analysis will lead to appropriate changes in supervisory programs and guidance. In the interim, a number of important supervisory initiatives are already underway that will enhance supervisors' ability to better understand emerging risks.
One of the most critical achievements for the U.S. banking agencies in 2007 was issuance of the final rule for the Basel II capital accord. The Basel II rule will apply to the largest and most complex U.S. banking organizations. Implementation of Basel II is anticipated to improve the alignment of regulatory capital requirements with risk and foster continued improvement in risk management. The agencies also believe that the Basel II regulatory framework will be much better able than the Basel I rule to adapt to financial product innovations.
During 2008, the Supervision function and Reserve Bank staff will be working closely with the other U.S. banking agencies to oversee implementation of the Basel II rule as well as identifying possible areas of refinement during the transitional implementation phase. The agencies will also continue their work on a notice of proposed rulemaking for a standardized approach that would offer other banks the option to adopt some of the simpler approaches for credit and operational risk in Basel II.
In the coming year, Supervision function staff will continue to encourage high quality accounting standards and work with supervisory staff to promote reliable regulatory financial reports. Supervision function staff will encourage financial institutions to improve their public disclosure. Supervision function and supervisory staff will also be assessing the reliability of institutions' fair value estimates, including the assessment of market liquidity in valuation methodologies. To further improve the quality of institution public disclosures, Supervision function staff will support Reserve Bank supervision staff in addressing other accounting and corporate governance issues, such as the accounting of allowances for loan and lease losses. Another initiative for the coming year is the development of reporting requirements and interagency supervisory guidance on the Fair Value Option.
Provide a safe, sound, competitive, and accessible banking system through comprehensive and effective supervision of U.S. banks, bank and financial holding companies, foreign banking organizations, and related entities. At the same time, remain sensitive to the burden on supervised institutions.
This objective will be pursued in part through the following actions:
Discussion
Continuing growth in the size and complexity of the structure and activities of many banking organizations exposes these firms to a wide array of potential risks, while at the same time making it more difficult for a single primary supervisory or functional regulator to have a complete view of firm-wide risks and controls.
The Federal Reserve, in its role as consolidated supervisor and in its interest in fostering financial stability, is continuing to refine and enhance its programs for the consolidated supervision of bank holding companies (BHCs) and the combined U.S. operations of foreign banking organizations (FBOs). An important initiative for the Supervision function in 2008 will be to continue its work on refining supervisory guidance for the consolidated supervision of BHCs and FBOs. The primary objectives of the guidance are to further specify areas of focus for consolidated supervision activities and thereby provide for consistent Federal Reserve supervisory practices and assessments across institutions with similar activities and risks.
The Board is under a statutory obligation to ensure that the individual Reserve Banks' supervisory operations are conducted in an effective and efficient manner. During the coming planning period, local and Board level oversight of supervisory operations across the System will be further strengthened through the increased use of off-site monitoring, performance metrics, and horizontal reviews across business lines and portfolios to provide in-depth analysis in support of our assessment of Reserve Bank performance.
In the coming year, the Supervision function will continue to actively participate in Basel Committee on Bank Supervision initiatives. Several of the Committee's ongoing initiatives will help address issues and risks arising from recent market events. For example, earlier in 2007, the Committee initiated a review of jurisdictions' approaches to supervising and regulating funding liquidity risk. This review will take into account lessons learned from recent market events, including how liquidity risk is assessed by banks and supervisors under stressed market conditions and the risks related to off-balance sheet exposures. Earlier this year, the Committee launched an initiative to assess the reliability and auditability of fair value estimates, including the assessment of market liquidity in valuation methodologies.
An assessment of the U.S. financial sector under the Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP) is scheduled to begin in mid-2009. The purpose of the FSAP, which is a voluntary program, is to strengthen the financial systems of member countries through early detection of vulnerabilities and the development of recommendations for addressing any vulnerabilities that are noted. Because of its nature, the FSAP review will encompass a number of U.S. oversight agencies and require extensive preparatory work.
Enhance efficiency and effectiveness, while remaining sensitive to the burden on supervised institutions, by addressing the supervision function's procedures, technology, resource allocation, and staffing issues.
This objective will be pursued in part through the following actions:
Discussion
The industry's continued expansion into new activities calls for supervisory tools and staff that are capable of analyzing individual institutions and various types of risks. Examination staff must have the necessary authority, skills, and expertise to manage information and reach informed judgments.
Greater consistency and coordination in banking supervision ultimately rely on the ability to access, analyze, and share information in a timely and effective manner. Technological advances in processing information have brought continued improvements to the effectiveness and efficiency of bank supervision. These efforts will need to continue, in light of recent laws and regulations that have new information-sharing requirements.
Promote compliance by domestic and foreign banking organizations supervised by the Federal Reserve with applicable laws, rules, regulations, policies, and guidelines through a comprehensive and effective supervision program.
This objective will be pursued in part through the following actions:
Discussion
The evolution of the banking industry, the recent accounting-related scandals, the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the USA Patriot Act, and recent anti-money laundering cases have further raised concerns about compliance, governance, conflicts of interest, and reputation risks. Promoting greater understanding and awareness by financial institutions of compliance risk--the risk that a financial institution will be harmed by its failure to comply with laws and regulations, prudent ethical standards, or contractual obligations--while also conducting more intensive monitoring for adherence is an integral component of the supervision function's risk-focused framework.
Be a leader in, and help shape the national dialogue on, consumer protection in financial services.
This objective will be pursued in part through the following actions:
Discussion
Financial institutions continue to develop innovative and fee-based products, such as subprime mortgages, stored-value cards, and bounced-check protection services and because of their structure, costs, and fees, many of these products present high risk in the consumer compliance arena. Additionally, the banking industry continues to highlight areas of regulatory burden and seek streamlining of regulations. At the same time, consumer advocates underscore consumer protection concerns, seeking new protections and urging that existing consumer protections be retained, enhanced, and more vigorously enforced.
Promote, develop, and strengthen effective communications and collaborations within the Board, the Federal Reserve Banks, and other agencies and organizations.
This objective will be pursued in part through the following actions:
Discussion
Surveys indicate that many consumers do not have an adequate understanding of financial matters. At the same time, consumers are increasingly faced with more sophisticated financial products, ranging from a wide array of complex mortgage products to credit cards with a variety of features that are not always clear or well-disclosed. Interagency involvement at the Federal level in rulewriting and policy development regarding consumer protection matters has increased, as has the role of the states in this arena, as reflected by the recent addition of the state supervisors to full Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council membership.
The nature of banking risks has become more complex, creating the need for more effective and more robust systems for identifying, measuring, monitoring, and controlling risk-taking. The New Basel Capital Accord, popularly known as Basel II, seeks to build on and advance emerging risk management techniques at large banking organizations and to provide incentives to improve risk management through greater reliance on internal risk measurement systems and on market discipline. Moreover, the USA Patriot Act of 2001, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and the recent changes in the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act impose new requirements on the banking industry and highlight the importance of managing operational, legal, and other risks.
Finally, and importantly, the future role of the Federal Reserve in supervision is subject to ongoing debate. Treasury's Blue Print for Financial Regulatory Structure Reform would broaden the role of the Federal Reserve in promoting financial stability. On the other hand, the reform proposal has the potential to reduce the role of the Federal Reserve in the supervision of bank holding companies and banks. During the planning horizon, Federal Reserve leadership will consider its needs with respect to the supervision function, including the role needed to remain effective as a "lender of last resort."
Oversight. Provide high-quality professional oversight of Reserve Banks
Policy. Foster the integrity, efficiency, and accessibility of U.S. payment and settlement systems
The oversight goal will be attained through the following objective:
The policy goal will be attained through the following objectives:
Produce high-quality assessments and oversight of Federal Reserve System strategies, projects, and operations, including adoption of technology to the business and operational needs of the Federal Reserve. The oversight process and outputs should help Federal Reserve management foster and strengthen sound internal control systems, efficient and reliable operations, effective performance, and sound project management, and also should assist the Board in the effective discharge of its oversight responsibilities.
The Board will continue efforts to integrate its approach to Reserve Bank oversight across individual programs, strengthen off-site monitoring capabilities, and focus attention primarily on strategic Federal Reserve District and System initiatives and key processes and controls.
This objective will be pursued in part through the following actions:
Board staff will monitor and evaluate the results of the external audit of the Reserve Banks' control assertions consistent with the requirements of Sarbanes-Oxley. Additionally, Board staff will monitor the System's enterprise risk management activities. Staff will also continue to monitor the Reserve Banks' information security program, refinements to information systems governance, and compliance with the Federal Information Security Management Act, as applicable.
Board staff will assess the implications for the financial services, accounting, and related programs of specific monetary policy options and develop proposals for these programs that help to address issues raised by potential changes in policy.
Develop sound, effective policies and regulations that foster payment system integrity, efficiency, and accessibility. Support and assist the Board in overseeing U.S. dollar payment and securities settlement systems by assessing their risks and risk management approaches against relevant policy objectives and standards.
This objective will be pursued in part through the following actions:
Board staff issued for public comment in the first quarter of 2008 proposed revisions to the payments system risk policy and will analyze comments received. Board staff will recommend that the Board approve a final revised policy, if appropriate, and will collaborate with the Reserve Banks on related implementation matters.
Board staff will collaborate with the Legal Division to consider comments received and finalize regulations, jointly with U.S. Department of the Treasury, to implement the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act.
Conduct research and analysis that contributes to policy development and increases the Board's and others' understanding of payment system dynamics and risk.
This objective will be pursued in part through the following action:
Board staff will conduct further analysis of data collected on the use of retail payments and publish the results in a Federal Reserve Bulletin article.
Foster the integrity, efficiency, and effectiveness of Board programs
This goal will be attained through the following six objectives:
Develop appropriate policies, oversight mechanisms, and measurement criteria to ensure that the recruiting, training, and retention of staff meet Board needs.
This objective will be pursued in part through the following actions:
Discussion
Effective management of human resources is one of the most critical tasks facing the Board through the planning period. Changing requirements associated with technology, communications, demographics, employee needs and expectations, performance measurement, and market rates of pay are among the factors that will cause the Board to focus more carefully on steps to attract, retain, and train staff to meet increasingly complex requirements.
Establish, encourage, and enforce a climate of fair and equitable treatment for all employees regardless of race, creed, color, national origin, age, or sex.
This objective will be pursued in part through the following actions:
Discussion
The Board of Governors is committed to the hiring, development, compensation, and promotion of staff based on an individual's qualifications, abilities, and job performance. The policy of the Board is to promote equal opportunity in every aspect of employment.
The Board's policies and practices address the issue of equal treatment of all employees in employment practices and hiring initiatives and include targeted initiatives for women, people of color, and those with disabilities. The Board emphasizes that equal employment opportunity is part of effective management, as well as a legal requirement, because it focuses on using the talents of all human capital. The Board's Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Program Director continually reviews the criteria for measuring success in accomplishing the Board's EEO objectives; validates Board practices, programs, and procedures against those objectives; and continuously monitors results and discusses issues with division directors and their oversight committees, and with employees, in order to establish and maintain an equitable and fair environment in which all employees have the opportunity to attain their full potential.
Provide strategic planning and financial management support needed for sound business decisions.
This objective will be pursued in part through the following actions:
Discussion
The Board's financial management system must continue to provide high-quality, timely data that managers need in order to make decisions between competing priorities, operational procedures, and investments. The current budget and accounting systems are closely linked to one another and to payroll and benefits, information technology, and procurement systems that generate critical data. These data must be timely and easily available to all managers. Further, these data must provide information about the costs of major Board programs, such as monetary policy, for decision-making by the Board as well as for performance measurement. The Management Division provides regular analyses of the information to the Board and its managers.
Unlike the budgets of most other government agencies, the Board's budget is not subject to the congressional appropriations process or to review by the administration through the Office of Management and Budget. The Board, like the framers of the Federal Reserve Act, considers the continuance of its budgetary independence directly relevant to the Board's independence in managing monetary policy. The Board demonstrates effective and efficient use of its financial resources by establishing budget formulation procedures, conducting strategic planning to identify changes to its critical activities and the proper amount and allocation of resources to support its mission, approving its budget, and providing various reports and budget testimony to the Congress.
Provide cost-effective and secure information resource management services to Board divisions, support divisional distributed-processing requirements, and provide analysis on information technology issues to the Board, the Reserve Banks, other financial regulatory institutions, and central banks.
This objective will be pursued in part through the following actions:
Discussion
Changes in technology have significantly altered the issues facing the Board in the monetary policy and supervision and regulation areas. Fortunately, the very advances in technology that have caused these adjustments have also enhanced our ability to conduct real-time surveillance. Nevertheless, obtaining the benefits from technology requires ongoing investment in a mix of mainframe and distributed-processing equipment; communications capability, including appropriate bandwidth; and a well-trained and motivated staff. Investments in human capital and technology must be made carefully to ensure that the results are timely and effective. The infrastructure for maintaining these investments must be efficient and effective in meeting the diverse needs of the organization. The infrastructure must provide security for data, software, and communications and the redundancy needed for rapid recovery of operations at other facilities. Finally, the work at the Board must be carefully synchronized and coordinated with that at the Reserve Banks and frequently with other agencies, particularly in support of large databases and software required for the supervision and regulation function.
Efficiently provide safe, modern, secure facilities and necessary support for activities conducive to efficient and effective Board operations.
This objective will be pursued in part through the following actions:
Discussion
The Board will continue to maintain the infrastructure (including electrical, plumbing, and safety infrastructure) of its current facilities and physical plant. Employee safety, continuity of operations, and enhancement of facilities security will remain key priorities.
Five standing committees, each made up of up to three Board members, administer the activities of the Federal Reserve Board. These committees include the Committee on Consumer and Community Affairs; the Committee on Economic Affairs; the Committee on Federal Reserve Bank Affairs; the Committee on Supervisory and Regulatory Affairs; and the Committee on Board Affairs. These standing committees, in cooperation with the division directors, determine any adjustments to strategic goals and review and adjust priorities to help establish resource levels. The Committee on Board Affairs oversees the planning and budget process, which includes preparation of the Board's Government Performance Results Act (GPRA) materials.
The Board's goals and objectives are communicated to the staff by division directors and by the strategic plan. Managers and the staff are held accountable for meeting the objectives that support these goals through the Board's performance management program, which ties base compensation and a modest amount of variable pay to achievement of specific objectives. The Board's goals and objectives are also posted on the Board's public and internal web sites where the strategic plan is posted for employees.
The Board maintains vigorous public affairs and publications programs to assist the public in understanding the actions, regulations, and rules of the Board. It also disseminates a large number of educational materials, many dealing with consumer affairs issues, to assist the public. Increased emphasis on e-government and the electronic availability of data and reports has led to changes in the Board's distribution of information. Electronic distribution of Board materials, via the Board's public web site, helps ensure the efficient dissemination of this information to the public on a timely basis.
The Board voluntarily complies with the GPRA and distributes the resulting reports, including its Strategic Plan, Performance Plan, and Performance Report, via its public web site under "Annual Reports to the Congress".
The activities of the Board are critical to the economic well-being of the country. The Federal Reserve affects the lives of American citizens through its monetary policy actions, supervision and regulation activities, consumer affairs regulation, and payment systems policies and oversight activities. These effects are significant, ongoing, and highly visible. It is essential that the analyses performed by the staff to influence policy decisions be reviewed at later dates to determine whether the desired effect was achieved and if the benefits of the activity outweighed its costs. The effectiveness of Board programs is subject to review by the Office of Inspector General, which provides copies of its reports to the Congress. Many functions of the Board are also subject to review by the General Accounting Office.
The Federal Reserve's conduct of monetary policy is evaluated frequently through a number of means. First, the Federal Reserve Act, as amended, requires the Board of Governors to report to the Congress semiannually on the conduct of monetary policy. The Chairman of the Board of Governors presents testimony to Senate and House committees on these reports. More generally, Federal Reserve policymakers testify frequently before congressional committees on monetary policy and other Federal Reserve responsibilities, and from time to time congressional hearings include evaluations of monetary policy by academic and other experts from outside the Federal Reserve. As a matter of critical national importance, national and business newspapers and magazines report on and analyze monetary policy decisions and their effects on a daily basis.
As part of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991, the Inspector General of the Federal Reserve is required to review any failure of a state member bank that results in a material loss to the Bank Insurance Fund. The purposes of this review are to identify the cause of the failure, to determine whether supervision was in accordance with policy standards, and, if so, to determine whether policies and standards are in need of revision.
The effectiveness of the consumer protection function is also subject to review by the Office of Inspector General. In addition, a system of metrics is being developed to assess the effectiveness and efficiency of the consumer compliance and complaint processes.
The effectiveness of the Payment System Policy and Oversight function is subject to review by the Office of Inspector General and the General Accounting Office. In addition, the effectiveness of this function is evaluated on the basis of feedback received from the Reserve Banks, the financial industry, the Congress, and others and the extent to which staff's research is accepted and cited by others. Another factor in evaluating the effectiveness of this function is the extent to which the staff brings to the attention of the Board members issues that may hamper the Reserve Banks' ability to comply with the Monetary Control Act.
The effectiveness of Board support programs is subject to review by various management sources. Financial operations are reviewed annually by an outside independent auditor. Information technology activities are subject to competitive pressures because operating divisions may use allocated resources to purchase support from the Division of Information Technology or outside vendors, or may provide the support themselves. Human resource operations are evaluated by management on the basis of the ability of the operating divisions to attract and retain the high-quality staff required for Board operations. All of these activities are subject to review by the Office of Inspector General.
While many aspects of the Board's mission are unique to the organization, the Board does not operate in a vacuum. To coordinate its activities, the staff works closely with a wide variety of organizations and individuals on a daily basis. Regular meetings with senior officials from the U.S. Department of the Treasury, regulatory agencies such as the Securities and Exchange Commission, and other executive branch agencies help ensure consistency of purpose and coordination of actions. One area of the Board's mission, supervision and regulation of financial institutions, is shared with other regulatory agencies. As required by the GPRA and in conformance with past practice, the Board works closely with other federal agencies to consider plans and strategies for programs, such as bank supervision, that transcend the jurisdiction of any one agency. Coordination of activities with the U.S. Department of the Treasury and other agencies is evident throughout both the strategic and performance plans.
Given the degree of similarity in missions and the existence of the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC), the most formal effort has occurred with the other depository institution regulatory agencies (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, National Credit Union Administration, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and Office of Thrift Supervision). The FFIEC promotes uniformity in the supervision of financial institutions by the five federal regulatory agencies. It was established in 1979 pursuant to title X of the Financial Institutions Regulatory and Interest Rate Control Act of 1978. It is a formal interagency body empowered to prescribe uniform principles, standards, and report forms for the federal examination of financial institutions and to make recommendations to promote uniformity in the supervision of financial institutions. In addition, the FFIEC provides uniform examiner training and has taken a lead in developing standardized software needed for major data collection programs to support the requirements of the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) and the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA). These actions have eliminated redundancy and lowered costs and, in the case of the HMDA and the CRA, have significantly lowered compliance costs while enhancing public access to the data.
In connection with the GPRA, a coordinating committee of the depository institution regulatory agencies was created to address and report on issues of mutual concern. The interagency working group has been meeting since June 1997 to work on issues related to those general goals and objectives that cross agency functions, programs, and activities. The results of the interagency coordination, whether effected through the FFIEC, the coordinating group, or interaction between staff, have been positive and have yielded better plans, creating substantial benefits to the public.
The goals and objectives of the Board have been developed keeping in mind feedback regularly received from the public, the Congress, industry groups, federal and state regulators, academics, and others. The Board relies heavily on advisory and working committees to provide input on a wide variety of issues. These committees include the Federal Advisory Council, which provides input on economic and banking matters; the Consumer Advisory Council, which provides input on consumer protection matters; the Thrift Institutions Advisory Council, which provides input on the needs and problems of thrift institutions; and Federal Reserve Bank advisory committees, which provide advice to Reserve Banks on agriculture and small business matters. The Board also consults regularly with a variety of banking and financial services industry groups. Strategic initiatives are developed and implemented in close coordination with other federal and state banking regulatory agencies through participation in the FFIEC and with state banking regulators through regular consultations.
The Federal Reserve System is the central bank of the United States, established by the Congress to provide the nation with a safer, more flexible, and more stable monetary and financial system. Over the years, its role in banking and the economy has expanded, and today the Federal Reserve's duties fall into five general areas.
The Federal Reserve System was created by passage of the Federal Reserve Act, which President Woodrow Wilson signed into law on December 23, 1913. The act stated that its purposes were "to provide for the establishment of Federal reserve banks, to furnish an elastic currency, to afford means of rediscounting commercial paper, to establish a more effective supervision of banking in the United States, and for other purposes."
Soon after the creation of the Federal Reserve, it became clear that the act had broader implications for national economic and financial policy. As time has passed, further legislation has clarified and supplemented the original purposes. Key laws affecting the Federal Reserve have been the Banking Act of 1935; the Employment Act of 1946; the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 and the amendments of 1970; the International Banking Act of 1978; the Full Employment and Balanced Growth Act of 1978; the Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980; the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989; the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991; the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999; and the Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act of 2003. The Congress defined the primary objectives of national economic policy in the Employment Act of 1946, in an amendment to the Federal Reserve Act in 1977, and in the Full Employment and Balanced Growth Act of 978, which is sometimes called the Humphrey-Hawkins Act after its original sponsors. These objectives include economic growth in line with the economy's potential to expand; a high level of employment; stable prices (that is, stability in the purchasing power of the dollar); and moderate long-term interest rates. Major financial services reform legislation, incorporated in the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, reflects changes in the nature of the industry and the economy in general. Both the legislation and the underlying changes that had been occurring will continue to have a significant effect on the operations and workload of the Federal Reserve.
Since the late 1960s, the number of federal laws intended to protect consumers in credit and other financial transactions has been growing. The Congress has assigned to the Federal Reserve the duty of implementing these laws to ensure that consumers receive comprehensive information and fair treatment. Thus, consumer protection laws such as the 1968 Truth in Lending Act, the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977, the Expedited Funds Availability Act of 1987, the Truth in Savings Act of 1991, the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003, and others have given the Federal Reserve rule-writing, compliance, and consumer education responsibilities.
The Federal Reserve System is an independent central bank, but only in the sense that its decisions do not have to be ratified by the President or anyone else in the executive branch of government. The entire System is subject to oversight by the Congress because the Constitution gives to the Congress the power to coin money and set its value--and that power was delegated to the Federal Reserve by the Federal Reserve Act. The Federal Reserve must work within the framework of the overall objectives of economic and financial policy established by the government; therefore, the description of the System as "independent within the government" is more accurate than "independent."
The Board of Governors is composed of seven members appointed by the President of the United States and confirmed by the U.S. Senate. The full term of a Board member is fourteen years; the appointments are staggered so that one term expires on January 31 of each even-numbered year. The Chairman and the Vice Chairman of the Board are also appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate. The nominees to these posts must already be members of the Board or must be simultaneously appointed to the Board. The terms for these positions are four years.
The Federal Reserve System was structured by the Congress to give it a broad perspective on the economy and on economic activity in all parts of the nation. It is a federal system, composed of the Board of Governors in Washington, D.C. and twelve regional Federal Reserve Banks located throughout the nation. These components share responsibility for supervising and regulating certain financial institutions and activities, for providing banking services to depository institutions and the federal government, and for ensuring that consumers receive adequate information and fair treatment in their business with the banking system.
A major component of the System is the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), which is made up of the seven members of the Board of Governors, the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, and presidents of four other Federal Reserve Banks, who serve on a rotating basis. The FOMC is charged under law with overseeing open market operations, the principal tool of monetary policy. The FOMC also directs operations undertaken by the Federal Reserve in foreign exchange markets.
The latest strategic planning exercise did not identify material changes in the mission or goals of the Board. There was a strengthening of programs for managing and developing human capital as workload demands increase, and emphasis on information security and dissemination was increased.
Because of the complexity, scope, and volume of the Board's responsibilities, a highly qualified and trained staff is necessary to accomplish its mission. The Board has developed programs to provide the salary and benefits needed to compete in the market for a diverse, highly skilled workforce as well as training programs to maintain skills necessary in a dynamic, financial, and regulatory environment. The Board also requires the ability to gather, store, retrieve, and analyze large quantities of complex economic and financial data. Doing these things requires modern automation and telecommunications capabilities and a supporting infrastructure. The Board emphasizes the need to ensure that appropriate resources are devoted to maintain this infrastructure.
The Board is organized along division lines; each division with specific functions. The divisions conducting the basic programs and activities of the Board are described below:
The Division of Research and Statistics
The Division of Monetary Affairs
The Division of International Finance
The Division of Banking Supervision and Regulation
The Division of Consumer and Community Affairs
The Legal Division
The Division of Reserve Bank Operations and Payment Systems