The Federal Reserve Board eagle logo links to home page

Building Sustainable Homeownership:
Responsible Lending and Informed Consumer Choice

Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia
10 Independence Mall, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106
June 9, 2006



Agenda | Transcript printable Printable version (249 KB PDF)

Pages 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75 | 76-100 | 101-125 | 126-150 | 151-175 | 176-200 | 201-221

TranscriptLinePage
gotten a prime loan as opposed to a subprime loan, 151
where their credit score fell.  But the credit 251
score is not the sole determinant of how you make 351
the credit decision. 451
           The underlying part of the discussion, 551
is that's, sort of, an implicit assumption that 651
every lender has, what an economist would call, 751
the same objective and the same appetite for risk 851
and they have the same appetite for product 951
diversification or assets in the portfolio. 1051
That's an invalid assumption.  When we have 8 to 1151
9000 banks out there, each of whom has there 1251
specific stockholders' interest in how much risk 1351
they want to take in what kind of areas.  The idea 1451
that two separate institutions would look at the 1551
same borrower and come to exactly the same 1651
conclusion is probably not accurate.  Although, on 1751
broad averages, across the entire population of 1851
lending institutions, it will come to the central 1951
tendency decision. 2051
           MR. ZORN:  This is, sort of, an 2151
interesting experiment, but we had a couple 2251
hundred thousand loans, which are the combination 2351
of prime lenders, who have reported rate 2451
spreads -- that is, loans from prime lenders with 152
reported rate spreads, loans from what we 252
identified as subprime lenders, that were not 352
reported rate spreads.  Then you look at the micro 452
score distributions of those two sets of 552
borrowers, they're right on top of each other. 652
           GOVERNOR OLSON:  Bring that to a 752
conclusion.  What did you learn from that? 852
           MR. ZORN:  I learned, isn't life funny. 952
What I think would be the initially -- I also 1052
learned that rate spread doesn't really tell you 1152
everything you want to learn about price, for 1252
reasons that everybody knows, but in some sense, 1352
what we thought we were doing when we first did 1452
this, was, we looked at what are the higher cost, 1552
higher risk loans being made by prime lenders, how 1652
do they look compared to the lower risk loans of 1752
subprime lenders.  And the answer is, from micro 1852
score distribution tests, almost identical.  So, 1952
that is, this gets to the point -- it comes back 2052
to that.  This is 2005 origination. 2152
           GOVERNOR OLSON:  Janice, we've been 2252
discussing at the macro level, now let me come 2352
back and ask -- part of what we're getting at here 2452
is the shopping, if you will.  I think your 153
perspective would be very interesting in this 253
sense.  The mortgage product and the mortgage 353
industry is open to an enormous amount of scrutiny 453
because of the information available.  The product 553
is publicly identified, in many respects, the many 653
characteristics, but there is a tremendous amount 753
of other shopping for financial products that 853
don't receive that kind of scrutiny, and I'm sure 953
the same asymmetry exists, in terms of knowledge, 1053
but also some of the same confusion.  But where do 1153
you see -- how does this product differ, for 1253
example, from the sale of life insurance or other 1353
consumer products, or perhaps, even, other 1453
consumer products that are not financial products 1553
in terms of A, the marketing or the assistance, or 1653
the shopping process in the community? 1753
           MS. BOWDLER:  I think there's some 1853
differences and some similarities.  Let me start 1953
there.  One of the biggest differences is that 2053
when you're shopping for a mortgage or when you're 2153
not shopping for a mortgage, but obtaining a 2253
mortgage -- 2353
           GOVERNOR OLSON:  The mortgage shops for 2453
you. 154
           MS. BOWDLER:  When the mortgage shops 254
for me, it's a much bigger decision, and I think 354
people are very aware of that fact, and for that 454
reason seek out more counsel, going back to points 554
that I think all of us have made, that this 654
shopping is much more relationship based.  And I 754
think that financial products that rely on 854
brokers, in general, and there's a lot of other 954
financial products, such as insurance or stocks 1054
and securities, that rely on that market 1154
intermediary function, are shopped for very 1254
similarly, based on relationships and less on the 1354
actual product.  Other consumer products say, 1454
remittances, which we know there's a lot of 1554
financial abuse there, heavily used in the Latino 1654
community, that's more geographic. 1754
           GOVERNOR OLSON:  What do you mean by 1854
"geographic"? 1954
           MS. BOWDLER:  Whatever's closest or 2054
more convenient.  So if it's on your way home from 2154
work, or if it's close to your house or where you 2254
grocery shop, than that tends to be more 2354
geographic. 2454
           MS. BRAUNSTEIN:  And mortgages are not 155
-- you don't think people are going to the folks 255
who are either in the neighborhood or marketing 355
the neighborhood? 455
           MS. BOWDLER:  I think they do.  But 555
here, I think that relationships are much more 655
important.  For example, just to pick up on your 755
question from earlier, you asked if there wasn't 855
some self selection into the subprime market, 955
based on people's perception of their own credit 1055
score.  I don't think people make that kind of 1155
decision.  I don't think people think to 1255
themselves, especially in the Latino community, 1355
I'm a subprime borrower, I need to go find a 1455
subprime lender.  That calculation doesn't happen. 1555
           What happens is, that they know a 1655
bilingual or bicultural broker because their 1755
sister or their family member, or they go to the 1855
same church, or they somehow know each other from 1955
some other social connection.  So it could be that 2055
they also happen to be in the same neighborhood, 2155
but I don't think that's always true.  For banking 2255
that's more true, but for shopping for a mortgage, 2355
I think it's less true. 2455
           MS. BRAUNSTEIN:  Have you found, and 156
any of you can address this, but I know Janice, 256
you said that when you looked at the newspapers 356
and listened to the radio ads, that there were 456
some subprime lenders that were marketing, but 556
they were marketing subprime products.  To me, 656
that raised a question.  If a borrower goes into a 756
prime lender, even though they're responding to an 856
ad for a subprime product, and when the 956
underwriting takes place, if that lender finds 1056
that this person actually could qualify for a 1156
prime product, is that kind of referral going on 1256
or are they just given the subprime product they 1356
walked in from the ad where they walked in the 1456
door?  Do you have any knowledge of whether that's 1556
happening, and any of you can go about this if you 1656
know that that's happening in your member 1756
institutions. 1856
           MS. BOWDLER:  I'm going to make a 1956
guess.  Research came out recently from the 2056
Consumer Federation, that I think the number -- 2156
don't quote me on the number -- somewhere around 2256
40 percent, that payment option mortgages were 40 2356
percent of the loans last year.  So there's been a 2456
dramatic increase.  I might have that statistical 157
data, but I think we'd all agree that there's been 257
a dramatic increase in those mortgages. 357
           Now, I was part of an FTC panel a 457
couple of weeks ago, where a prime lender 557
presented and explained to us that his 657
underwriting standards for underwriting a payment 757
option mortgage was to underwrite a consumer at 857
the rate that he expected the loan to jump to in 957
that first year.  So if you got a 1 percent rate 1057
for the first month or maybe six months, however 1157
that product was structured, and in that year, if 1257
they expected that the product would go to 7 1357
percent, they underwrote to 7 percent. 1457
           So my question would be, if that person 1557
is an underwritable for 7 percent, all other 1657
things being equal, how do they end up in a 1757
payment option mortgage versus your standard 1857
30-year fixed for even a fully amortizing ARM. 1957
And the only conclusion there is, it's more 2057
profitable to be in a payment option mortgage than 2157
it is to be in a 30-year fixed.  I think profit 2257
motivation is very natural and important in this 2357
market to do what they need to do, but it tells me 2457
that we need some more accountability to offset 158
those motivations. 258
           MR. DUNCAN:  I was actually at the same 358
FTC thing, and you're right about the 458
underwriting.  I think the initial question was 558
whether or not the consumer could qualify for a 658
different loan, and the lender explained that they 758
underwrote at a fully fixed rate so that even if 858
there was negative amortization, the increase to 958
the maximum over a three-year period, would be a 1058
14 percent increase in the payment from the 1158
qualifying level.  Then the question was, whether 1258
the consumer chose the 1 percent teaser rate 1358
because they had other use for those funds in the 1458
interim, and if they managed that loan they were 1558
well-positioned to make the payments. 1658
           It's not true today that all lenders 1758
have a specific referral process, but many lenders 1858
have a specific referral process internally.  So 1958
that if a borrower were to come in, selling to us 2058
as a subprime and after the qualification process 2158
were complete, they were determined to be eligible 2258
for a prime loan, they would be referred to a 2358
prime channel. 2458
           The reason for that is, the comment 159
that I made earlier, about the increased 259
competition in the subprime arena, if you went 359
back ten years ago you would have a lot of 459
independent finance companies.  Today it's 559
migrated to many more subsidiaries and diversified 659
financial service companies, which have more 759
serious capital investments and reputational 859
investments in the industry, and those 959
institutions are subject to CRA rules and things 1059
like that, and are much more sensitive about the 1159
proper classification of borrowers according to 1259
their regulations. 1359
           MS. BOWDLER:  If I could just add one 1459
thing to that.  We've heard similar things from 1559
financial institutions that have both prime and 1659
subprime ARMs, or subsidiaries within their 1759
structure, that there is this referral method to 1859
refer up and not just refer down.  And we have 1959
partnerships with several -- several lenders 2059
through our housing counseling network that meet 2159
with lenders on a regular basis and ask them all 2259
for example loans where that's happened, and for 2359
documentation on policies of exactly how that's 2459
supposed to work, and I have yet to see it.  So I 160
think there are policies out there that, just like 260
the nontraditional credit company products, I just 360
don't know that they're used. 460
           GOVERNOR OLSON:  In fairness, we did 560
hear on Wednesday in Chicago from a panelist where 660
that partnership did work, so we know it does, 760
although I'm sure that there are gaps. 860
           Let me come back to one other element 960
that is really critical to the subprime question. 1060
Is the significant change that's taken place in 1160
the last four years in the secondary market, 1260
especially secondary markets' appetites now for 1360
the nontraditional product -- let me pose it, make 1460
my point, and then have anybody -- Ira, you've 1560
already referred to Adam Smith, so if you want to 1660
comment on this as well you're welcome to. 1760
           In my early experience the subprime 1860
market was geared toward taking the conforming 1960
product and that was the product that was 2060
available in the secondary market.  In recent 2160
years, and I think a combination of flat yield 2260
curve, very liquid secondary market and a shift, 2360
therefore, in investors looking for a risk premium 2460
as opposed to a term premium, there has been a lot 161
of appetite for that, for the nontraditional 261
product.  And it's not clear to us that the 361
underwriting standards in the secondary market 461
brackets are as tight as it is with the conforming 561
product. 661
           It comes back to a point we were 761
talking about earlier, we may have lost some of 861
the discipline of the underwriting process at the 961
point in which the application is taken, because 1061
of the fact that we've had this explosion of 1161
interest in the secondary market of the 1261
nontraditional product.  I'd be interested in any 1361
of your comments about that. 1461
           MR. ZORN:  I would make a personal 1561
statement, not speaking for any of the people 1661
paying my salary.  I, personally, believe credit 1761
spreads in the subprime market are too low. 1861
           GOVERNOR OLSON:  Another way to say 1961
that is that they haven't fully priced in the risk 2061
associated with this product. 2161
           MR. ZORN:  Correct. 2261
           MR. DUNCAN:  I think the root question 2361
is whether, in global capital markets, credit 2461
spreads are appropriate.  In the U.S. -- by 162
"appropriate", I mean, reflecting historical 262
norms.  And I think most people, including, back 362
in Chairman Greenspan's tenure, when he 462
reintroduced us to the word conundrum.  I think 562
that was a part of what he was expressing.  In a 662
market which is very efficient and where capital 762
explosions relate to demand on capital, whatever 862
those measurements are, they will be passed 962
through ultimately -- 1062
           GOVERNOR OLSON:  In the mornings, when 1162
I'm a macro economist, I think that's a wonderful 1262
thing.  Because what it means is, we have reduced 1362
the price, to the consumer, of that product.  In 1462
the afternoon, when I'm looking at consumer 1562
interest, I see the other side of it, which is to 1662
say that there is a relaxation of the underwriting 1762
and it may have put people in products for which 1862
they are ill-suited.  And in the macro world, we 1962
have a significant dispersion of risk exposures, 2062
now, in pricing, appropriately or inappropriately. 2162
When it comes back to the individual consumer, 2262
then it becomes, in that context, irrelevant, 2362
because you've got a consumer in a product where 2462
they don't belong. 163
           I think this is an area where all of us 263
need to recognize that explosion, that plethora of 363
opportunity, is causing some people to be in 463
inappropriate products, perhaps, and I'd be 563
interested in any reaction as to how we can deal 663
with that fundamental issue. 763
           MR. GOLDSTEIN:  My observation, if I 863
could, is that you're exactly correct, that there 963
are a massive number of people who are in products 1063
that are entirely inappropriate for them, if, for 1163
no other reason than, that they don't understand. 1263
They don't know what's going to happen to them a 1363
year out, two years out, three years out. 1463
           I'll give you a quick story.  The 1563
sheriff of Philadelphia announced that the number 1663
of sheriff sales was going down, and he was 1763
pleased to announce that 2005 had substantially 1863
less than 2004.  And part of his announcement was, 1963
he wanted to have some borrowers, some people who 2063
had been in trouble, talk about how they had their 2163
circumstance remedied, and they were not subject 2263
to having their home sold at the auction block in 2363
Philadelphia where hundreds of homes are sold on a 2463
monthly basis.  This is somebody who was in deep, 164
deep, deep trouble, and it took months of 264
intensive effort by local housing counseling, and 364
in the end, when she was trying to express what 464
happened to her, she could neither express what 564
happened to her nor how she got out of trouble, 664
only that she was helped. 764
           So after months of very intensive work 864
between her and a housing counselor, her situation 964
was so complicated that she could still not 1064
understand what she had to do. 1164
           MR. CHANIN:  I want to return to this 1264
issue of shopping, which is, if not a solution, 1364
part of a solution to this issue of people -- 1464
where they're getting a suitable product or 1564
looking into suitable products.  Obviously, one of 1664
the issues that we will have to deal with is, 1764
trying to make the disclosures more comprehensible 1864
to people and also make them simpler, which is no 1964
small task given the complexity of these products. 2064
           Aside from that small issue, is the 2164
question of how do we ensure or try to ensure that 2264
the consumers do shop and, if you will, don't 2364
evolve into this notion of a trusted relationship 2464
in relying on someone who may not provide all of 165
the information that, ideally, the consumer should 265
get from this person. 365
           So do you have suggestions that we can 465
use or think about, of, how do we get people to 565
shop more so for these products and make sure we 665
get the product that best suits their needs? 765
           MR. GOLDSTEIN:  One possibility, I 865
think that the data from mortgages bankers these 965
days and from mortgages brokers suggest, probably, 1065
an excess of two-thirds of mortgages that are 1165
originated, originated through brokers.  And one 1265
way to ensure a wide review of that market is to 1365
look to, not only incentivize borrowers to shop -- 1465
there are clearly incentives for borrowers to 1565
shop, because if they do it properly, they'll end 1665
up with a better product.  But to incentivize or 1765
regulate brokers, so that they're truly shopping 1865
and acting on behalf of the borrowers themselves. 1965
           So if a broker, like the one I 2065
described or others that we've had relationships 2165
and contacts with, if they're only taking their 2265
customer to one lender or two lenders, it's not a 2365
matter of the consumer's shopping behavior, in a 2465
way, it's more a matter of the broker's shopping 166
behavior. 266
           MS. BOWDLER:  I think that's right.  I 366
think it would be a mistake to assume, and I don't 466
think anybody here has suggested this, but a 566
perfectly educated borrower is going to regulate 666
the market.  It's not going to happen.  So, even 766
the most astute borrower who shops, is still going 866
to have missed steps if there's not some 966
protection or suitability standard to back them 1066
up. 1166
           So, the mortgage market is not -- 1266
you're not going to have loan officers or brokers 1366
telling families, your situation isn't quite 1466
right, you need to wait a year and come back. 1566
Well, I have this other product; it's a little 1666
more expensive, I can get you in right now. 1766
That's always going to be the answer.  So, there 1866
needs to be something to offset that. 1966
           MR. COLLINS:  Doug, if you could go 2066
back to some of the statistics you cited in your 2166
opening comments around foreclosures.  I think you 2266
had numbers for 2001 and 2005, but at the same 2366
time, you stated that there's a lot of conversions 2466
in the prime and subprime markets, and a lot of 167
advances in the marketplace since 2001.  How do 267
you see the outcomes of the decisions today, as 367
the Governor's indicated, do you have a good sense 467
of whether or not those numbers are comparable? 567
           MR. DUNCAN:  Sure.  We surveyed 667
delinquencies, about 42 million loans at this 767
point in our data base, on a quarterly basis, and 867
we have been, for about the last year, suggesting 967
that there were about four reasons that we should 1067
expect to see delinquencies in foreclosure rates 1167
rise. 1267
           Those four reasons are:  First, any 1367
loan peaks in its probability of delinquency in 1467
three to five years of its life and less than half 1567
of all loans outstanding today are more than three 1667
years old.  So this puts an upward pressure on 1767
delinquencies. 1867
           The second thing is that, as after 1967
every re-fi, after this re-fi we've seen an ARM 2067
boom, and that's because of the way the yield 2167
curve works, long rates rise and short rates stay 2267
low so consumers shift into ARMs.  Then when the 2367
short end of the yield curve comes up, then they 2467
shift back to fixed-rate products.  That's been 168
underway for the last couple of quarters.  This 268
ARM process was extended because of the production 368
of the new loans that you referred to, various 468
alternative adjustable processes.  ARM loans 568
always have a higher delinquency rate than 668
fixed-rate loans, so the market expects that. 768
           The third factor is the growth of the 868
subprime market, which we're talking about here. 968
Relative to the total portfolio, subprime has 1068
grown faster because of those things I talked 1168
about earlier, lowering the cost hurdles.  All 1268
three of these forces will combine with what has 1368
been recently rising interest rates to put upward 1468
pressure on delinquency. 1568
           The primary factor operating in the 1668
other direction is the single most important 1768
factor in predicting foreclosure or delinquency 1868
foreclosure, which is employment.  As the 1968
economy's been adding two million jobs, roughly, 2068
per year for the last two and a half years or so, 2168
that puts downward pressure on foreclosure. 2268
           This is the number one, most important 2368
thing, employment and real income growth.  If we 2468
were to see a significant climb in employment, we 169
would see a different behavior in delinquencies, 269
but we do expect, over the next couple of years, 369
modest rises in delinquencies, and we saw it in 469
the fourth quarter, modest rise in delinquencies. 569
They went from, in the third quarter, 4.40 percent 669
to 4.70 percent delinquent, but we put a caveat in 769
there because .157 of that increase was Katrina. 869
If we stripped that out, it went from 4.40 to 969
4.45.  The way we stripped it out, we just said, 1069
what if they stayed constant at the same rate of 1169
increases as every other state.  So, as we've been 1269
suggesting, we will expect to see modest rises in 1369
delinquencies. 1469
           One other thing to think about is, as 1569
we're trying to determine whether we're at the 1669
cusp of a slow down, whether monetary policies are 1769
properly positioned, it's also the place where the 1869
yield curve has been flat, and that's the 1969
inflexion point for the mortgage bracket, where 2069
underwriting stresses are the most difficult in 2169
terms of predicting into the macro economic 2269
environment.  So we would expect to see that as 2369
something that causes delinquencies and 2469
foreclosures as well. 170
           GOVERNOR OLSON:  Two questions.  One, 270
let me come back to you, Doug, and this is for 370
clarification, and then I want to come back to Ira 470
on the sheriff.  We think, in most of the rest of 570
the country, we think of some of these products as 670
being very new.  The option Alt A payments, if you 770
will, and the negative AM payments, and they are 870
relatively new in the east, but they're old 970
products, 25 years, in some cases, in the West 1070
Coast.  So we have a long history of those kinds 1170
of products in the West Coast.  Do the statistics 1270
that you cite -- and we have seen those products 1370
-- we have history of those products going through 1470
rate cycles, and Peter, you would, perhaps, help 1570
with this.  What has the market's experience been 1670
with those products through rate cycles? 1770
           MR. ZORN:  You go, and then I'll go. 1870
           MR. DUNCAN:  Well, the -- I think the 1970
difference is the volume of them that's been done 2070
relative to the size of the market, and we don't 2170
know whether that's going to reveal a performance 2270
difference today from what would have historically 2370
been the case.  Historically, lots of those loans 2470
were held in portfolios with regulated lenders. 171
           GOVERNOR OLSON:  It's a huge 271
difference. 371
           MR. DUNCAN:  That's right.  And they 471
performed well in those institutions but the 571
expansion outside of that, leaves open an 671
empirical question which we won't know until it 771
plays out. 871
           MR. ZORN:  Our experience is historical 971
experiences.  They, in our portfolio, overperform. 1071
That is, they are our best credit risk that 1171
reflects, I believe, the changes -- 1271
           GOVERNOR OLSON:  Sorting out your 1371
insider jargon.  The interest lending loans 1471
perform better than the other product in terms of 1571
their delinquency. 1671
           MR. ZORN:  Correct.  Historically. 1771
Which I think has almost nothing to do with how 1871
the current -- 1971
           GOVERNOR OLSON:  Okay.  Ira, the 2071
sheriff.  In my lending days, we would do anything 2171
to avoid a foreclosure.  In a foreclosure, from 2271
the time we initiated the foreclosure -- from the 2371
time the sheriff got involved in Minnesota, it was 2471
a one-year period before we could do anything with 172
that property.  The value of the property 272
disappeared, or at least declined.  It was 372
enormously expensive. 472
           Foreclosure -- I don't know what the 572
laws are in Pennsylvania, but the laws 672
significantly protected the interest of consumers 772
in that respect and provided the lenders with a 872
significant incentive to avoid the foreclosure 972
process.  And now I'm hearing that -- in fact, we 1072
heard this on Wednesday, that the initial notice 1172
of foreclosure -- by the grace of God I'm not 1272
burdened with a law degree, so I don't know the 1372
legal terms, but the initial notice of 1472
foreclosure, in fact, triggered other lenders to 1572
come in, or pass the buck artists, more likely, to 1672
come in and provide what they perceived to be 1772
solutions, but, in fact, put them in deeper 1872
trouble.  The Neighbor Works tell us, who have a 1972
great service of assisting people who are, 2072
perhaps, facing foreclosure, the greatest 2172
difficulty that they have is finding the people 2272
who may be in need of the counseling.  So bring me 2372
current, if you will, on how that process works 2472
and to who's advantage it works, if anyone. 173
           MR. GOLDSTEIN:  I, too, am not burdened 273
by a law degree.  I'm burdened by a degree in 373
sociology; it's a different kind of burden. 473
           In Pennsylvania, one gets, first, a 573
notice, by law, by state law, that you are in 673
trouble and that your lender is going to 773
foreclose. 873
           GOVERNOR OLSON:  And that's typically 973
with what, a 180-day delinquency? 1073
           MR. GOLDSTEIN:  It varies dramatically 1173
from 90 to -- 1273
           GOVERNOR OLSON:  But the lender 1373
definition of going into foreclosure. 1473
           MR. GOLDSTEIN:  Exactly.  They get that 1573
notice, and in Pennsylvania, they have an 1673
opportunity to apply to a state program, which, 1773
under certain circumstances, it will bring them 1873
current if they apply and are approved.  It's 1973
called the HEMAP, Homeowners Emergency Mortgage 2073
Assistance Program, and it's been in the state of 2173
Pennsylvania for 25 or 30 years.  It's designed to 2273
get people past the point in time when they are in 2373
trouble, essentially, through no fault of their 2473
own, and manifest some likelihood of being able to 174
get back on their feet again at some point in the 274
future. 374
           So people make application to this 474
program through an approved state housing 574
counseling agency.  If they are approved, the 674
state gives them a loan, which brings them 774
current.  It sits out there as a second loan. 874
They make a minimal monthly payment until such 974
time as they can pay, both, their existing 1074
mortgage and this other mortgage.  That is not 1174
available, by the way, to people with FHA loans. 1274
It was designed at a time when FHA had a different 1374
set of loss mitigation things than they have 1474
today. 1574
           Assuming that they're not successful 1674
there, a piece of paper, a lawsuit, is essentially 1774
filed with the prothonotary or the clerk of courts 1874
in the various counties of Pennsylvania, and at 1974
that point, having worked with the prothonotary 2074
somewhat, we find that those lists are oftentimes 2174
sold to two parties, one party being attorneys 2274
looking to represent people, and secondly to 2374
lenders or brokers who are looking to make those 2474
loans that you were describing. 175
           That process can stretch out over a 275
year to, maybe, even five years, depending on the 375
kinds of things that people do to defend against 475
the foreclosure, if anything, including an 575
affirmative defense that something went wrong in 675
the transaction or a bankruptcy or something else 775
of that nature.  Ultimately -- and during that 875
period of time, obviously, they could make some 975
other kinds of arrangement to become current. 1075
           At the end of that process, if the 1175
lender succeeds in the foreclosure action, the 1275
house is listed for sheriff's sale and then is 1375
sent to the auction block, and that could take a 1475
year as well.  It's not a speedy process.  In 1575
fact, I would say that Philadelphia and 1675
Pennsylvania, generally, is relatively slow in the 1775
process, and we've observed, for example, in 1875
Delaware or Maryland, our experience in Baltimore 1975
is, a year from start to finish; you're out.  It's 2075
quick and certain. 2175
           But that is the way it works in 2275
Pennsylvania.  And I would say that in terms of 2375
the lenders appetite for not wanting to foreclose, 2475

Class Act Reporting Agency, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 215-928-9760

Pages 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75 | 76-100 | 101-125 | 126-150 | 151-175 | 176-200 | 201-221


2006 Hearings