The Federal Reserve Board eagle logo links to home page

Building Sustainable Homeownership:
Responsible Lending and Informed Consumer Choice

Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia
10 Independence Mall, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106
June 9, 2006



Agenda | Transcript printable Printable version (249 KB PDF)

Pages 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75 | 76-100 | 101-125 | 126-150 | 151-175 | 176-200 | 201-221

TranscriptLinePage
to look like years from now.  We sort of have a 1201
choice here, either we will let it continue on its 2201
way on an aggressive sales force that sells a 3201
limited range of products and doesn't care so much 4201
about the customer, or it becomes more like what 5201
the prime market has done, which is much more 6201
customer focused and they want to retain the 7201
customer.  That means, then, your idea is not that 8201
the loan -- you only have a loan for two years, 9201
which is exactly what these people all talk about 10201
when talking with the senior managers.  Nobody 11201
believes that their loans are going to be around 12201
for more than two years.  They think they'll all 13201
be refinanced.  But if they would use long term 14201
loans, and the relationship with the customer was 15201
long term, and you make your money on the length 16201
of the loan servicing rights, as it is in the 17201
prime market, you then have a much different 18201
relationship with the customer and you're moving 19201
forward in a more rational market. 20201
           GOVERNOR OLSON:  But in fairness, it 21201
isn't the loan that's long term for the prime 22201
market, it's the customer that's long term.  Isn't 23201
that correct?  I had one CEO of a major bank say 24201
to me, many years ago, they were buying a mortgage 1202
company, said, we don't care about the mortgage 2202
product.  There's a million mortgages out there. 3202
We want a million customers.  But in the prime 4202
market -- but your point is still the same, that 5202
it is the relationship that is critical as opposed 6202
to the mortgage product, and to the extent that a 7202
product is a one off, you never get repeated 8202
opportunity, that's an entirely different 9202
paradigm.  Is that consistent with your view also? 10202
           MR. DORPALEN:  When you say, "one off", 11202
you mean exception, that they don't routinely do? 12202
           GOVERNOR OLSON:  It is not focused on 13202
the customer, it's focused on the transaction. 14202
           MR. DORPALEN:  That changes everything, 15202
absolutely. 16202
           MR. CHANIN:  Let me follow-up.  One 17202
thing a number of you mentioned, and that is, kind 18202
of, comparing the options out there today with 19202
some more suitable product, the 30-year ARM, or 20202
30-year fixed-rate, and how you dealt with 21202
consumers who have been approached with -- whether 22202
it's for purchase money or refinancing 23202
transaction, the fact that, oftentimes, they can 24202
get more house, that is, if they qualify for an 1203
ARM versus a 30-year, they're able to buy more 2203
house, or two, they can have a lower payment with 3203
an ARM, or three, maybe the time it takes to 4203
process -- anecdotally we've heard, I can put you 5203
in a loan by the end of the day, and if you have 6203
counseling and so forth, it takes much more time. 7203
So have you encountered consumer resistance 8203
because of the time, or the payment amount, or the 9203
amount of the loan they can get?  How have you 10203
dealt with those issues? 11203
           MR. DORPALEN:  We do this routinely. 12203
Our product's overwhelmingly a 30-year fixed rate 13203
product.  And we certainly have some people coming 14203
in thinking they'd like to get an adjustable rate, 15203
because they're thinking, I've got this payment. 16203
They're not quite sure how it all works.  We work 17203
on a particular market.  We are not an upper 18203
middle-income program.  We are a low to 19203
moderate-income program.  But we put product and 20203
expenses and long-term expenses on parallel 21203
columns and let people take a look at what choices 22203
they're making.  A few people have gone adjustable 23203
rate, but it's very unusual for us. 24203
           Where we're feeling a lot of pressure 1204
is in the California and the Boston markets, where 2204
housing products have really skyrocketed, and, 3204
frankly, we've had to raise our income ceiling of 4204
who we can work with in order to use our program. 5204
We've worked wonders about reducing rates.  We 6204
also have some, what we would say, not so bad 7204
choices that we've worked out with people so that 8204
they are not going to be hit with rate shock.  We 9204
have never -- pretty much it's our view that 10204
adjustable rates in an up marketplace, if your 11204
income's not going to be going up rapidly, it's 12204
just too much of a gamble for the value of the 13204
property. 14204
           MR. STEIN:  Particularly with the 15204
flatter yield curve, the argument about the lower 16204
rates with ARM, really, is only because of the 17204
teaser rate, and it's only a short term teaser 18204
rate.  So, if someone's entered into a long term 19204
interest, then they can point out what's going to 20204
happen in two years.  Problem is, oftentimes, 21204
there isn't an ACORN there to advise people.  And 22204
one other thing that subprime lenders, oftentimes, 23204
do, is that they don't escrow back to the 24204
insurance, so the payments are initially low, but 1205
then every year there's two flipping 2205
opportunities.  People need a large lump sum to 3205
pay their taxes or their insurances, where that's 4205
a known cost that everyone knows you're going to 5205
have to pay, but the technology's there in escrow, 6205
it's just not done as a marketing ploy. 7205
           MR. COLLINS:  Eric Eve and Loretta, 8205
I'll address this question to you.  This morning 9205
we had a discussion about the role of mortgage 10205
brokers in the subprime market, and I'm curious 11205
about what you consider best practice is in your 12205
institution in terms of the relationship with 13205
brokers.  How do you monitor them?  How do you 14205
measure the value that they bring?  I think, Eric, 15205
I heard you mention, you severed some 16205
relationships over time with mortgage brokers. 17205
Could you address the best practices in your 18205
perspective? 19205
           MR. EVE:  Sure.  Within the Citi 20205
Financial branch network and the Citi Financial 21205
Mortgage Company we post our associates 22205
acquisition.  We went through a thorough review of 23205
many of the mortgage broker relationships and set 24205
up a series of criteria or standards that we felt 1206
critical in order to sustain the integrity of the 2206
brokerage process moving forward.  Some brokers 3206
Governor Olson mentioned earlier, some just walked 4206
away.  It's not a standard to which we wish to be 5206
held, and some would urge -- but at the end of the 6206
day, it's -- you walk with your -- in grave 7206
detail, it's a combination of ongoing review, 8206
regular quarterly review, of the performance of 9206
those brokers' active loans, their rates, how 10206
they're marketing, and the process by which 11206
they're bringing loans to us. 12206
           And we feel, actually, very good.  I 13206
mean, I shouldn't only focus on the negative. 14206
There are, again, many thousands of great brokers 15206
with access to communities that we don't have.  I 16206
think, at the same time, it's critical on the one 17206
hand, it's important to highlight and recognize 18206
those that are providing access, providing 19206
service, and doing it the right way.  And so we 20206
want to acknowledge those who are doing it well at 21206
the same time. 22206
           MS. ABRAMS:  I would say we do very 23206
similar things, very aggressive compliance 24206
reviews, audit reviews.  We have a tangible 1207
benefit requirement that the broker signs that he 2207
says, he's not going to submit an application to 3207
us, he's not going to take an application that is 4207
not of benefit to the consumer.  The consumer also 5207
signs the statement that says, I understand that 6207
this loan is going to be a benefit to me. 7207
           We track the licensing and follow 8207
through and make sure that their licenses are 9207
appropriately maintained.  We have an ineligible 10207
list that is public and posted on our Web site. 11207
So we take the same approach and we're very, very 12207
careful with making sure that we're doing business 13207
with the very best of the brokers that are out 14207
there. 15207
           MS. BRAUNSTEIN:  Loretta, are you also 16207
making sure that if you have brokers bringing in 17207
customers to subprime products that if those 18207
people are actually eligible for prime, that 19207
you're upstreaming them for prime? 20207
           MS. ABRAMS:  What we do, we don't have 21207
a refer up or down process within our businesses. 22207
Our mortgage business is all separate, but we do 23207
have a full spectrum of products within each of 24207
those distribution channels.  So within the 1208
consumer lending branch, for example, it's 2208
automatically priced, and the pricing is automatic 3208
and the consumer gets the best rate for which he's 4208
qualified, based on the product type, credit score 5208
etcetera, and that happens automatically.  So that 6208
is not a manual process. 7208
           It's a similar process; it's not as 8208
automated in the other distribution channels, but 9208
there is a full range of products available.  So 10208
we don't send a person from one office to a bank 11208
office, but we have a host of products there, 12208
available to them. 13208
           MS. BRAUNSTEIN:  Everyone?  You're 14208
saying everyone? 15208
           MS. ABRAMS:  I'm pretty sure.  I'll 16208
double check that. 17208
           MR. EVE:  We have a similar process at 18208
Citi.  We tried a referral up initiative a number 19208
of years ago and customers leaving to -- coming to 20208
a Citi Financial branch, and we give you an 800 21208
number, or a Web site, or put you on the phone 22208
with someone, or sent you down to the corner to 23208
the prime channel, and the fall off, in terms of 24208
customers, some people don't want to dial a 1209
number, or they don't trust the Internet.  They, 2209
in fact, want to be able to go see someone who can 3209
walk them through the process.  So with our 4209
referral up program, which was before I started, 5209
four or five years ago, we just lost customers. 6209
They either went to other institutions or just 7209
went on. 8209
           MS. BRAUNSTEIN:  Just one more 9209
follow-up on that.  Based on what we heard this 10209
morning in terms of talking with brokers, if a 11209
broker sends a customer to you for a particular 12209
product, and the broker has underwritten that 13209
person for that product and it is a subprime 14209
product, do you second guess the broker's 15209
underwriting?  Even though you say you have all 16209
those products available, but maybe the broker did 17209
not underwrite this person for the prime product. 18209
Do you second guess the broker's underwriting or 19209
overwrite it and say, actually, they could get a 20209
better deal in this other product? 21209
           MS. ABRAMS:  I do not believe that 22209
they're doing that in any of our distributions 23209
from the brokers. 24209
           MS. BRAUNSTEIN:  So you're still 1210
depending on the broker to make that call? 2210
           MS. ABRAMS:  Yes. 3210
           MR. EVE:  It's dependent upon the loan 4210
that we're involved with.  If the loan's closed 5210
before it's gotten to us, no, we're not involved 6210
in the process.  If we are involved in the 7210
origination of the loan from the broker, then, 8210
yes, we would overwrite it before the closing of 9210
that loan so it can perform to our underwriting 10210
criteria. 11210
           MR. DORPALEN:  This broker question, 12210
one of the things that we find is that people who 13210
-- they end up one lender -- if the lender's 14210
paying a lot of attention, then just simply go to 15210
others.  There still in business.  And it would 16210
probably be great if there was some way to have an 17210
industry repository, but I don't know how all that 18210
works.  And I think the other is that I think that 19210
the suitability issue is important and that 20210
applies not just to the institution. 21210
           MR. COLLINS:  Just to follow-up on the 22210
broker question.  There appears to be some 23210
confusion over the roles that the numerous parties 24210
play in the mortgage action.  And if you have a 1211
customer sign off, let's say, HSBC, if that loan 2211
was a benefit to them, is there a sense about the 3211
magnitude of benefit?  Certainly, they get the 4211
loan, but are they aware they could have gotten 5211
the loan at a better price or a different price? 6211
           MS. ABRAMS:  I can look into that.  I 7211
don't have all of those details.  I can tell you 8211
that the channel that I'm most familiar with, is 9211
very specific about how much the benefit must be 10211
in order to count.  So can't be $5 on your monthly 11211
payment.  That wouldn't be enough.  So there are 12211
minimum standards, and I will check to see if 13211
those are the same standards as the broker 14211
channels. 15211
           MR. CHANIN:  Eric, let me follow-up on 16211
one of the comments you made.  So if I understand 17211
the way the process works, if the broker brings 18211
you a loan, it's preconsumation, and they say 19211
we've underwritten this.  Let's say the person has 20211
a relatively high credit score, 700 or something, 21211
they've underwritten it for X, but under your 22211
standards, the rates would be lower.  So do I 23211
understand that you will then push back to the 24211
broker and say, we originate this at X rate, a 1212
lower rate, which may or may not affect the 2212
broker's revenue on that? 3212
           MR. EVE:  Actually, in terms of the 4212
process, I don't know if it is something we do for 5212
each loan or during the course of the ongoing 6212
review from our broker who found that he or she 7212
had the number of prior loans originated outside 8212
of our criteria, but it's something I can 9212
follow-up on with, exactly, the process, the 10212
timing which we intervene in the closing. 11212
           GOVERNOR OLSON:  So you may or may not 12212
be intervening with the flow, but your evaluation 13212
of the broker is on going; is that right? 14212
           MR. EVE:  Right. 15212
           MR. COLLINS:  Just for all the 16212
panelists, are there any best practices that 17212
haven't worked? 18212
           MR. STEIN:  I think that we helped 19212
write and negotiate the North Carolina law and it 20212
was associate brokers that led us into that.  They 21212
were quite egregious, and I do have to say that 22212
the city really has cleaned up their broker act. 23212
And the associates were notorious for flipping, 24212
for continually doing refinancing that don't 1213
benefit the borrower.  And the formulation we came 2213
up with is not great, although we couldn't think 3213
it better than that tangible benefits considering 4213
all the circumstances.  The motivation for that is 5213
exactly the same as in the investment suitability, 6213
which are vague standards, unfair and deceptive, 7213
it's a vague standard.  A lot of people don't like 8213
it because it's vague, but I'm not sure it's 9213
really addressed to flipping. 10213
           I think a lot of it is broker driven, 11213
but the average lives are just too short, of 12213
loans, in people's interest, and I'm not really 13213
positive how to go about doing it.  I think it 14213
helps that somebody has to think about it, and I 15213
think HSBC, particularly -- and probably Citi, I'm 16213
just not aware of Citi, of what, specifically, you 17213
mean by they've done the best job that I know of 18213
in terms of making sure the loan is right for the 19213
person, but in terms of the market as a whole, I'm 20213
not sure that that really explains -- 21213
           MS. BRAUNSTEIN:  Because I wondered 22213
about that, because if part of the tangible is 23213
whether or not it's a lower payment, and even if 24213
it's significantly lower, some of the products 1214
that we hear the worst stories about -- it could 2214
be an IO, that you moved somebody from a fixed 3214
rate into an IO and their payment fell 4214
significantly, but is that really a net tangible 5214
benefit to the consumer.  So how do you -- 6214
           MS. ABRAMS:  For us, that's part of the 7214
option too.  We look at the product's life, and we 8214
look at, for example, taking someone from a fixed 9214
rate product into an adjustable rate product -- 10214
there has to be more than one benefit of the 11214
possibilities, and that would be one of them, so 12214
it would have to be something else on top of that. 13214
So we've sort of allowed for that, as well, in the 14214
past. 15214
           MR. CHANIN:  Please don't ask the Fed 16214
to define that tangible benefit. 17214
           MR. DORPALEN:  We were hoping to 18214
improve -- that these hearings are, sort of, a 19214
process to improve the strength on regulations in 20214
the market and the problems you're addressing.  Is 21214
that the expectation? 22214
           MS. BRAUNSTEIN:  We want to look at 23214
what the issues are out there and how the issues 24214
have changed and evolved over the last six years 1215
and then make some determinations as to what we do 2215
about them.  I don't think any decisions have been 3215
made, at all, as to exactly what we will do at 4215
this point.  That's why we're out gathering 5215
information about the markets. 6215
           MR. PINSKY:  My response to the 7215
question about best practices, is that I think the 8215
best practice we have was that if we couldn't do 9215
this right, we didn't want to do it.  And in some 10215
ways, I think that was a mistake.  This was years 11215
ago, and it kept us from doing anything.  And I 12215
think that because of what Self Help has done and 13215
or because of other partners and some of the 14215
banks, in fact, things have moved forward.  I 15215
think the lesson in that is, don't let the broker 16215
be the enemy in this, and I would say that, in 17215
response to what you're saying, we need to keep 18215
moving forward, as aggressively and responsibly 19215
with regulation.  Broker licensing laws in the 20215
states are not a perfect tool.  It doesn't mean we 21215
shouldn't try to move forward.  I know you will. 22215
           GOVERNOR OLSON:  It seems to me, the 23215
greater comfort level the secondary market 24215
ultimately gets for the subprime product so that 1216
the pricing disparities can go a long way and the 2216
opportunities for pricing mischief can be 3216
identified and dealt with and isolated.  It seems 4216
to me that will go a long way.  There really is 5216
discipline in the marketplace and it isn't 6216
perfect.  It's imperfect and that's why, sitting 7216
at this table, we all have jobs.  And that's part 8216
of our role.  It's that interaction to know when 9216
to interfere with the market as it works, and when 10216
to supplement what is happening in the market. 11216
It's a very subtle but a critically important 12216
distinction. 13216
           MR. PINSKY:  We're glad you're doing 14216
it.  I think what I said earlier, that it's a 15216
both/and solution, both policy and market, I think 16216
that's right.  I mean, part of our job is to 17216
figure out how to feed that secondary market with 18216
responsible, fairly priced mortgage financing in a 19216
sense, so that there is a market, and the market 20216
will come to that. 21216
           MR. DORPALEN:  Some of the solution, I 22216
think, is to figure out how to properly fund the 23216
tools to the business, housing counseling, and 24216
there are some interesting other pieces out there 1217
that are really marketing pieces.  A number of 2217
lenders were participating and Neighbor Works are 3217
participating in a program to get ad counsel to 4217
advertising around foreclosure prevention and 5217
alerting people that, when they have 6217
delinquencies, that they should contact a housing 7217
counseling agency or their lender.  And I'm not 8217
sure we figured out -- the problem with 9217
delinquency counseling, which we do a lot of, is, 10217
you get people in crisis, and you'd really like to 11217
get it when people are at 60 days.  If there's a 12217
way to make that happen efficiently, that's really 13217
valuable. 14217
           I think there's other things that we 15217
mentioned earlier about getting people when 16217
they're thinking about remodeling their bathroom 17217
and not making a refinancing decision, and helping 18217
people understand that moment.  And I think it's 19217
marketing not education.  There has to be some 20217
presence to that. 21217
           And the third piece, what I mentioned 22217
earlier, that we really do need a much better 23217
funding stream for paying for housing counseling. 24217
Because what it does now, it's just inadequate 1218
because there's not enough of it. 2218
           GOVERNOR OLSON:  I wasn't part of the 3218
efforts six years ago, but it would be interesting 4218
to go back and look at the transcripts and look at 5218
the summaries, but I think the issues that are 6218
being discussed were not predictable six years 7218
ago, because of the evolution of the marketplace 8218
and how much it's changed.  And my real concern, 9218
why we're here, it is possible for to us look at 10218
revisions in law and find that we've missed a 11218
point.  We're fighting the last war.  I think that 12218
the real challenge is the extraordinary knowledge 13218
asymmetry in the marketplace today, given the 14218
range of new products in the market, the 15218
opportunities for new products, but also the 16218
opportunities for all those new products to be 17218
misused, or people who are not fully informed and 18218
taken advantage of.  It seems to me that I would 19218
not have articulated it that way even six months 20218
ago. 21218
           MS. BRAUNSTEIN:  I think that's 22218
absolutely right.  Six years ago, we were hearing 23218
about different issues, very different issues. 24218
           GOVERNOR OLSON:  Eric, do you have 1219
something you want to add? 2219
           MR. STEIN:  I was just going to address 3219
your points about pricing, because I think we have 4219
objective underwriting and pricing in the subprime 5219
market because of the secondary market.  However, 6219
the discretionary pricing of brokers was 60 to 65 7219
percent of the subprime market, and they have 8219
those subjective boxes, but then they have the 9219
ability to do yield spread premiums, which can be 10219
limited or unlimited depending on the lender. 11219
           I don't know if you saw our HMDA 12219
report, which came out last week, which builds on 13219
the work that the Fed did, where it looked at the 14219
disparities in the pricing among African-Americans 15219
and Latinos versus whites on HMDA pricing 16219
overlaying that the credit risks, LTB and FICO, 17219
and there's documentation to that, but it still 18219
exists.  There's 30 percent greater likelihood 19219
than many products.  I think that's due to 20219
discretionary pricing by brokers.  If you look at 21219
the car lending lawsuits, and they say -- they're 22219
essentially yield spread premiums for cars when 23219
dealer originates the loan and sells it, and they 24219
get more money the higher the interest rate.  If 1220
you look at the impact of that group, it's 2220
discriminatory by race, by affect, and I think 3220
that's the pricing mischief that occurs just in 4220
the market, because there aren't limits on the 5220
discretionary pricing by brokers.  Who can they 6220
get more money from, and it tends to be people in 7220
less financial sophistication, not all women, not 8220
all minorities, but people they can get more money 9220
from. 10220
           GOVERNOR OLSON:  Thank you very much. 11220
We thank each of you and thank everybody who is 12220
here.  We are 15 minutes ahead of time.  We said 13220
at 3 o'clock, but for people who wish -- let's 14220
find out now if there's people who would care to 15220
-- we thank everyone of you for being here.  That 16220
then concludes our program.  Have a wonderful time 17220
in Philadelphia.  If I could hum the theme song 18220
from Rocky, I would.  You are spared.  Thanks to 19220
the panel, and Mike, thanks again for being a 20220
host. 21220
           (Whereupon, the proceedings concluded 22220
at 3:00 p.m.) 23220
  24220
         C E R T I F I C A T I O N 1221
  2221
           I, EMILIE S. PAKMAN, a Professional 3221
Reporter and Notary Public, do hereby certify that 4221
I reported the deposition in the above-captioned 5221
matter; that the witness was duly sworn by me; 6221
that the foregoing is a true and correct 7221
transcript of the stenographic notes of testimony 8221
taken by me in the above-captioned matter. 9221
           I FURTHER CERTIFY that I am not an 10221
attorney or counsel of any of the parties, nor a 11221
relative or employee of any attorney or counsel in 12221
connection with the action, nor financially 13221
interested in the action. 14221
  15221
  16221
  17221
  18221
                           EMILIE S. PAKMAN 19221
  20221
  21221
           DATED: 22221
  23221
  24221

Class Act Reporting Agency, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 215-928-9760

Pages 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75 | 76-100 | 101-125 | 126-150 | 151-175 | 176-200 | 201-221


2006 Hearings