C.1. Non-real-estate Farm Lending Compared with a Year Earlier Percent ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Demand for loans Funds availability Loan repayment rate Renewals or extensions Collateral required ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Quarter Lower Same Higher Lower Same Higher Lower Same Higher Lower Same Higher Lower Same Higher ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Seventh (Chicago) Federal Reserve District (IL*, IN*, IA, MI*, WI*) ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 2001: Q2... | 23 48 29 13 65 22 31 65 4 4 60 36 0 77 23 Q3... | 28 54 18 8 57 35 21 72 7 8 70 22 1 77 22 Q4... | 23 52 24 6 60 34 33 59 8 7 59 34 0 76 24 2002: Q1... | 19 55 27 10 62 28 38 57 4 6 55 39 0 69 31 Q2... | 21 52 26 7 66 27 32 65 3 4 65 31 0 78 22 Q3... | 25 51 24 8 61 31 30 64 6 6 64 30 1 78 21 Q4... | 23 52 25 6 58 36 29 55 16 14 60 25 0 81 18 2003: Q1... | 22 46 31 6 57 36 31 60 9 7 61 31 1 73 26 Q2... | 24 53 23 4 54 42 22 71 6 6 70 24 1 80 19 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Tenth (Kansas City) Federal Reserve District (CO, KS, MO*, NE, NM*, OK, WY) ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 2001: Q2... | 14 62 25 17 65 17 26 72 2 2 76 22 1 81 18 Q3... | 19 63 18 11 61 28 21 76 3 4 78 19 0 83 17 Q4... | 21 61 19 9 63 27 24 70 6 6 73 21 1 80 19 2002: Q1... | 19 63 18 8 69 24 30 67 4 4 71 25 0 80 20 Q2... | 15 60 25 11 73 16 34 64 2 3 63 34 0 75 24 Q3... | 18 58 24 10 72 18 40 57 4 2 59 39 0 75 25 Q4... | 20 56 24 8 69 23 38 54 8 1 58 41 0 75 25 2003: Q1... | 21 52 26 5 71 24 49 48 4 1 50 48 0 71 29 Q2... | 19 58 23 5 67 28 27 64 10 6 67 27 0 78 22 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Eleventh (Dallas) Federal Reserve District (LA*, NM*, TX) ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 2001: Q2... | 22 55 23 10 69 21 27 66 7 7 62 31 0 73 27 Q3... | 27 55 18 10 68 22 18 77 5 8 75 17 0 77 23 Q4... | 24 58 18 8 69 23 28 61 11 7 68 25 1 77 22 2002: Q1... | 25 60 16 9 72 20 24 70 6 8 68 25 0 74 26 Q2... | 35 54 11 6 72 22 25 70 5 8 69 23 0 76 24 Q3... | 24 61 15 10 71 19 22 72 7 8 73 18 0 79 21 Q4... | 22 61 16 6 74 20 21 69 10 7 73 20 0 79 21 2003: Q1... | 25 63 12 6 68 26 19 73 8 8 73 19 0 80 19 Q2... | 19 66 15 3 70 27 15 75 10 8 77 15 0 81 19 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 31 C.1. Non-real-estate Farm Lending Compared with a Year Earlier (continued) Percent ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Demand for loans Funds availability Loan repayment rate Renewals or extensions Collateral required ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Quarter Lower Same Higher Lower Same Higher Lower Same Higher Lower Same Higher Lower Same Higher ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ninth (Minneapolis) Federal Reserve District (MI*, MN, MT, ND, SD, WI*) ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 2001: Q2... | n.a. n.a. n.a. 14 62 24 15 72 12 6 71 23 2 82 17 Q3... | n.a. n.a. n.a. 13 58 30 15 77 8 13 76 11 0 82 18 Q4... | n.a. n.a. n.a. 3 49 49 17 74 9 3 79 18 0 83 17 2002: Q1... | n.a. n.a. n.a. 27 73 0 6 55 39 35 59 6 25 75 0 Q2... | n.a. n.a. n.a. 10 72 19 33 64 4 2 60 38 0 78 22 Q3... | n.a. n.a. n.a. 8 77 15 33 62 6 3 66 31 0 86 14 Q4... | n.a. n.a. n.a. 6 64 31 28 56 16 13 57 30 0 80 20 2003: Q1... | n.a. n.a. n.a. 5 69 26 34 52 14 10 60 30 1 80 20 Q2... | n.a. n.a. n.a. 3 76 21 20 73 7 7 69 24 1 81 19 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Fifth (Richmond) Federal Reserve District (MD, NC, SC, VA, WV*) ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 2001: Q2... | 24 70 6 3 76 21 15 85 0 6 82 12 0 74 26 Q3... | 40 56 4 0 56 44 4 92 4 8 84 8 4 71 25 Q4... | 29 61 11 4 64 32 11 86 4 7 79 14 0 75 25 2002: Q1... | 23 73 3 7 63 30 7 93 0 0 97 3 0 77 23 Q2... | 30 60 10 10 67 23 10 90 0 3 93 3 3 69 28 Q3... | 41 52 7 19 59 22 30 70 0 11 70 19 11 59 30 Q4... | 24 62 14 5 67 29 38 62 0 0 67 33 0 62 38 2003: Q1... | 36 55 9 5 68 27 27 73 0 5 77 18 0 59 41 Q2... | 27 73 0 5 62 33 23 77 0 9 68 23 9 55 36 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ * State falls only partly within the indicated Reserve District. n.a. Not available. Source. Federal Reserve Bank quarterly surveys of agricultural credit conditions at commercial banks. 32