Agencies Propose Disciplinary Action Rules for Accountants
and Accounting Firms Performing Certain Audit Services
The federal bank and thrift regulatory agencies today invited public comment
on proposed rules governing their authority to take disciplinary actions
against independent public accountants and accounting firms that perform
audit and attestation services required by section 36 of the Federal Deposit
Insurance Act.
The proposed rules would establish procedures under which the agencies
could, for good cause, remove, suspend, or bar an accountant or firm from
performing audit and attestation services for insured depository institutions
with assets of $500 million or more. They would permit immediate suspensions
in limited circumstances.
Under the proposed rules, violations of law, certain negligent conduct,
reckless violations of professional standards or lack of qualifications
to perform auditing services would be considered good cause to remove,
suspend or bar an accountant or firm from providing services for such
an insured institution. Also, under the proposed rules an accountant or
accounting firm may not perform audit services as prescribed under section
36 if the accountant or firm has been removed, suspended, or debarred
by one of the agencies, or if the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board, the Securities and Exchange Commission, or a state licensing authority
takes certain disciplinary actions against the accountant or firm.
The proposed rules are being issued by the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Office of Thrift Supervision.
While they would amend each agency’s rules of practice separately,
they would have uniform application for each agency.
Comments are due 60 days after publication in the Federal Register.
Attachment (124 KB PDF)
|