December 2001 Government Performance and Results Act Strategic Planning Document, 2001-05 A report by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Introduction The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve ("the Board") is one component of the nation's central bank. See Appendix 1 for a complete description of the Federal Reserve System. The mission of the Board is to foster the stability, integrity, and efficiency of the nation's monetary, financial, and payment systems so as to promote optimal macroeconomic performance. The values of the Board, which guide its organizational decisions and its employees' actions, include:
The Board has three primary goals with interrelated and mutually reinforcing elements:
Achievement of Goals and Objectives The Board employs a comprehensive planning, budget formulation, and budget execution process to ensure the identification, prioritization, and accomplishment of goals and objectives. Planning is coordinated throughout the System by the Strategic Framework (discussed below) and by committees responsible for information technology and supervision and regulation. Monetary policy work is coordinated through the structure of the Federal Open Market Committee. The budget and accounting systems are closely linked to ensure that expenses can be compared with plans. This process integrates strategic planning, allocation of resources among competing priorities, performance measurement, and ongoing review of the need for existing programs. Background In the face of accelerating change in the economy and banking system brought about by numerous factors--including globalization, technology, evolution of payment systems, and bank consolidation--the Federal Reserve recognized the need for a more comprehensive planning framework. In 1995, a System Strategic Planning Coordinating Group was appointed, consisting of Board members, Reserve Bank Presidents, and senior managers, representing the full range of the Federal Reserve's activities. This group produced an "umbrella" strategic framework under which the Board, the Reserve Banks, and the product offices produce their own more-detailed plans and decision documents. This framework was the basis for the Board's first Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) Planning Document, setting forth the mission, values, and goals of the System. This has remained essentially unchanged and is incorporated in this plan. Key assumptions and external and internal factors that could affect the achievement of those goals and objectives were reviewed and updated in 2001 as part of the biennial planning process and are discussed in the following section. The Board's strategic planning efforts recognize key differences between government and private sector strategic planning and results measurement. Private planning can use measures of costs and revenue derived from prices determined in competitive markets; the results of that planning are reflected in the ability of the private entity to prosper over time. The government does not have direct competition in certain areas and has a monopoly in others (monetary policy, for example) and establishing a proxy for costs and prices is extraordinarily difficult. Moreover, the results are judged relative to public policy objectives embodied in law, which often are not readily measurable. Nonetheless, the government should try to effectively accomplish its mission while creating the efficiencies that come from strategic planning, recognizing that analogies are just that. Thus, the Board's central planning objective is oriented toward achieving effectiveness and efficiency specific to the functions we serve. In monetary policy, for example, the Federal Reserve exerts only partial and indirect influence on the economy. Because the Federal Reserve's performance therefore cannot be measured solely in terms of economic outcomes, the appropriate judgment must be whether our research technology is successful in anticipating problems and changes in the economy. In the bank supervision function, the mission of contributing to a viable, competitive, efficient banking system demands a sharing of risks between the central bank and private banks, which serve the crucial function of managing the risk of investing in illiquid loans. As a regulator, our job is to ensure that banks are allowed to take on appropriate degrees of risk in fulfilling their function in the economy, but not to the point that they impose risks to the financial system in general. Measures of our success would include whether the banking system is performing its functions and whether systemic risk is appropriately contained during periods of challenge to individual institutions or groups of institutions. In financial services, where direct competition exists, the Federal Reserve is able to more directly measure its performance. Unlike its competitors, however, the appropriate goal is not to maximize profits, but to enhance the efficiency and integrity of the nation's payment systems while recovering costs, both actual and imputed. A delicate balancing of marketplace performance and public policy is required. Return to contents listStrategic Planning and the Budgeting Process In order to enhance the focus on strategic priorities, in 1997 the Board restructured its budget and planning process to lengthen the planning and budgeting horizons and involve the Board itself more heavily in setting priorities. The Board adopted a four-year planning horizon and a two-year budget. In developing plans and budgets under the strategic framework, the director of each Board division updates division-wide plans, coordinating efforts with other directors and Reserve Banks as necessary. These plans and resulting resource requests are reviewed by the Committee on Board Affairs to make recommendations to the full Board. A Staff Planning Group and the Board's Program Analysis and Budget Section provide support to the Committee during the planning process by identifying issues and providing analysis of the Board's budget options. The Reserve Bank planning and budget process provides a similar level of review and oversight for the Reserve Banks. On an annual basis, the Reserve Bank budgets are considered by the Board following review by the Committee on Federal Reserve Bank Affairs. .Staff of the Division of Reserve Bank Operations and Payment Systems support the Committee. Planning Background In 2001, working with the management of each division, the Staff Planning Group identified several ongoing trends that are reflected in this strategic plan:
In consultation with senior managers throughout the Board, six overarching issues affecting planning were identified.
Monetary Policy Function Goal Conduct monetary policy that promotes the achievement of maximum sustainable long-term growth; price stability fosters that goal. This goal will be attained through the following objectives:
Objective 1 Staying abreast of recent and prospective developments. This objective will be pursued in part through the following activities:
Objective 2 Enhancing knowledge of macroeconomic and financial relationships. This objective will be pursued in part through the following activities:
Objective 3 Implementing monetary policy effectively. This objective will be pursued in part through the following activities:
Objective 4 Contributing to international policy. This objective will be pursued in part through the following activities:
Objective 5 Ensuring understanding of Federal Reserve policy. This objective will be pursued in part through the following activities:
External Factors
Legislative Changes Authorization by the Congress to pay interest on reserve balances and explicit interest on contractual clearing balances would help ensure that the level of such balances remains adequate, thereby promoting the continued smooth implementation of monetary policy. Also, coupled with legislation to permit increased flexibility in setting required reserve ratios, interest on reserves and clearing balances might permit reductions in reserve requirements and, possibly, their eventual elimination. These measures would help to increase efficiency in the financial system by largely removing the incentives for depository institutions to expend resources to avoid reserve requirements. Performance Measures It is recognized that monetary policy has only a partial and indirect influence on economic performance and the Congress has not chosen to establish quantitative objectives for monetary policy in statute. The performance of monetary policy in relation to evolving economic and financial circumstances will continue to be reviewed by the Congress in the context of the Board's semiannual monetary policy report and the accompanying testimony. Return to contents listBanking Supervision and Regulation Function Goal Promote a safe, sound, competitive, and accessible banking system and stable financial markets. This goal will be attained through the following objectives.
Objective 1 Provide comprehensive and effective supervision of U.S. banks, bank and financial holding companies, U.S. operations of foreign banking organizations, and related entities. Discussion As described in the Federal Reserve Act, a fundamental responsibility of the central bank is to establish more effective supervision of banking in the United States. Supervisors may undertake many preventative measures during stable periods of economic expansion to ensure the safety and soundness of the banking system. However, to measure the effectiveness of past and current supervisory practices, the performance and stability of the banking system should be evaluated over a full economic cycle that reveals its soundness and resiliency under stressful conditions. One of the Federal Reserve's key strategies for maintaining effective supervision under both favorable and unfavorable banking conditions has been to focus supervision on areas of highest risk to individual organizations and the financial system as a whole. The risk-focused approach emphasizes pre-examination planning and prioritizes examination resources based on an organization's risk profile. Significantly, this approach also places greater emphasis on evaluating the integrity of an institution's own ongoing system for managing risk, rather than point-in-time transaction testing. The process promotes sound practices for managing risk at banking organizations by checking for strong internal controls, active boards of directors, and senior management oversight and accountability. Focusing resources on the areas of highest risk as well as testing an appropriate level of transactions to verify critical controls and processes makes this approach more effective and less burdensome, while accomplishing the secondary goal of reducing costs for the financial institution and the Federal Reserve. In addition, the pre-examination planning is more comprehensive by integrating information from various functions of the Federal Reserve. The risk-focused approach has been coordinated with other banking regulators. Coordination is also being effected with other regulators to ensure that the Federal Reserve properly fulfills its role as an umbrella supervisor for each component of financial holding companies. This objective requires that the supervision staff understand and accommodate the effects of financial innovation and technology on the operations and risk profile of banking organizations and the payment system. Supervision staff must also ensure that supervisory programs accommodate prudent advances that benefit consumers and businesses or improve risk management. New technologies and financial innovation have changed the nature of banking products and services and opened advanced electronic delivery mechanisms that raise many important issues for supervisors. Devising appropriate supervisory responses in terms of sound practice guidance, interpretations, or new rulemakings to safeguard banks and payment systems has become more challenging. At the same time, regulators must ensure that supervisory responses provide a balance between allowing prudent risk taking by banking organizations and safeguarding against excessive practices or deteriorating credit conditions. As part of this objective, the System must help improve international banking by refining and strengthening supervisory policies and practices and foreign banking organizations (FBOs) programs. The Federal Reserve continues to work with other supervisors through the Basel Supervisors Committee to promote standards and core principles for consolidated supervision. To this end the System will provide education, training, and other resources to international supervisors who play a significant role in the U.S. or global economies. In regard to FBOs, the System will develop a process for coordinating supervisory processes more closely with the home country; focus on methods to better track and evaluate increasing exposures from non-G-10 countries; and develop supervisory strategies to address problem credit concentrations. Objective 2 Promote overall financial stability, manage and contain systemic risk, and ensure that emerging financial crises are identified early and successfully resolved. Discussion Recognizing that capital requirements cannot substitute for effective risk management and internal controls in financial institutions, the Federal Reserve, along with other international and domestic supervisors, has placed increasing emphasis on risk- management practices. This focus has resulted in a series of instructions, policy statements, and examination manuals that stress the importance of managing all risks inherent in the business of banking, including market and credit risks, and liquidity, legal, international, and operational risks. At the core of this focus are four basic elements of sound risk management: 1) active oversight roles by bank boards of directors and senior management; 2) adequate policies, limits, and procedures; 3) adequate risk measurement, monitoring, and management information systems; and, 4) adequate internal controls and audits. Internal controls are receiving increased attention because breakdowns, or absences, of controls have been key to most of the recent financial problems encountered by large financial institutions. In recent years, sound practice guidance for examiners and financial institutions has covered trading activities, non-trading securities and derivative end-user activities, interest rate risk, private banking, and secondary market credit activities, among others. The dissemination of this guidance has clarified our expectations for the institutions we supervise, improved the quality of examinations in these areas, and led to improved practices by many institutions. Objective 3 Improve efficiency and effectiveness and reduce burden on supervised institutions. Discussion The Federal Reserve will conduct seamless supervision of state member banks, financial and bank holding companies, and foreign banking organizations (FBOs) through ongoing and improved coordination with state, federal, and foreign bank supervisors and appropriate state and federal functional supervisors. Planning for all aspects of supervising institutions is coordinated with the appropriate state bank supervisors, functional regulators, and the FDIC and OCC as necessary. Such efforts ensure that state banking organizations with operations that cross state boundaries involving multiple regulators are not disadvantaged compared with nationally chartered banks. Efforts to remove unnecessary banking restrictions consistent with safety, soundness, and consumer protection will continue. Procedures or regulations that initially serve an important safety and soundness or consumer safeguard purpose may become outmoded. The rate of obsolescence has increased in recent years as the industry has reacted to rapid changes in the financial marketplace and as recent financial modernization legislation has been passed. It is critical that the System harnesses the benefits of technology in carrying out responsibilities to improve supervisory efficiency and consistency. Technological advances in developing and maintaining databases, in processing information, and in telecommunication have brought continued improvements to the process of bank supervision. By developing a comprehensive common approach for developing and utilizing information systems and automated examination tools, the System can lower supervisory costs, improve consistency, and reduce the burden on banking organizations. To help accomplish this work we will continue to develop and improve the National Information Center as a central source of regulatory data. Investments to improve the access and ease of use of database-driven tools, such as the National Examination Data System and Banking Organization National Desktop (BOND), will continue and access will be provided to other federal and state regulators. Automating examination efforts should assist in the Federal Reserve's efforts to be less intrusive while improving effectiveness by reducing the time and effort spent on-site collecting and analyzing examination data. It will also speed the documentation of work and the production of examination reports. Using statistical techniques for sampling loan portfolios should reduce burden on the institutions while improving the effectiveness of the loan review. The workstations will also allow for a more sophisticated review of the risk profile of the institution using both regulatory and internal data from the institution. Changes in the financial services industry and, more recently, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley legislation will continue to require changes in the System's organizational structure so that it is sufficiently flexible to allocate well-trained resources in response to identified risk. A review of various options for reallocating functions or responsibilities in the System that might improve the effectiveness and efficiency of supervision is currently under way and will be completed within this planning period. Finally, a set of qualitative performance measures or benchmarks that identify how efficiently resources are being allocated and employed throughout the System is being developed. Objective 4 Promote equal access to banking services. Discussion In its examination of state member banks, the Federal Reserve administers and enforces the regulations that apply to all lenders subject to the Equal Credit Opportunity and Home Mortgage Disclosure Acts, as well as the Fair Housing Act and Community Reinvestment Act (CRA). Industry-wide consolidation makes fulfillment of these responsibilities more complicated and has required more effective use of automation to analyze available data in a manner that ensures sound policy decisions. In addition to investigations of consumer complaints alleging discrimination, the Federal Reserve provides training, communication, and outreach programs as part of a wide range of activities designed to prompt banks to engage in community development lending. The System will promote greater understanding and compliance by state member banks of consumer regulatory issues. Outreach efforts will focus on methods to encourage compliance with consumer protection laws and regulations. The basic premise is that the more informed state member banks become about the regulatory environment in which they operate, the more they will achieve compliance on their own, which benefits the consumer in the long run. In addition, compliance with CRA will be encouraged by examinations that focus on the performance of financial institutions in meeting community needs and through applications analyses that focus on CRA records. Objective 5 Administer and ensure compliance with consumer protection statutes relating to consumer financial transactions (Truth in Lending, Truth in Savings, Consumer Leasing, and Electronic Funds Transfer) to carry out congressional intent, striking the proper balance between protection of consumers and burden to the industry. Discussion The Federal Reserve is charged with writing the regulations implementing a wide range of consumer protections for financial transactions, including borrowing and savings disclosures, limits on liability for lost or stolen credit and debit cards, resolving errors in credit and debit transactions, and protections against abusive practices. These rules apply to all institutions serving customers, whether banks, finance companies, mortgage brokers, retailers, or others. To be effective, the rules must be updated and interpreted to take account of changing business practices and augmented by effective consumer education. External Factors
Program Changes In late 2000, the Board approved a major realignment of supervision staff to fulfill better the Federal Reserve's chief supervisory responsibilities. The changes in the organizational structure improve coordination and consistency of supervision, particularly in regard to policy development, coordination of System automation projects, and supervision of global financial institutions. Further anticipated organizational changes should enhance important policymaking activity needed to ensure that the System as a whole is prepared to deal with changes in the industry and the recent financial modernization legislation. Realignments will also improve utilization of information technology by better planning and coordinating actions throughout the system. Performance Measures
Payment System Policy and Oversight Goal Effectively oversee Reserve Bank operations and foster the integrity, efficiency, and accessibility of U.S. payment and settlement systems. This goal will be attained through the following three objectives:
Objective 1 Develop sound, effective policies and regulations that foster payment system integrity, efficiency, and accessibility. This objective will be pursued in part through the following initiatives:
Objective 2 Produce high-quality assessments of Federal Reserve Bank operations, projects, and initiatives that assist Federal Reserve management in fostering and strengthening sound internal control systems and efficient and effective performance. The Division of Reserve Bank Operations and Payment Systems is reengineering its approach to Reserve Bank oversight by integrating various division processes, strengthening its monitoring capabilities, increasing reliance on Reserve Bank audit departments, and focusing more on strategic initiatives and key processes across Reserve Banks. This objective will be pursued in part through the following initiatives:
Objective 3 Conduct research and analysis that contributes to policy development and/or increases the Board's and others' understanding of payment system dynamics and risk. This objective will be pursued in part through the following initiatives:
External Factors
Internal Factors
Performance Measures
Foster the integrity, efficiency, and effectiveness of Board programs. This goal will be attained through the following six objectives.
Objective 1 Oversee a planning and budget process that clearly identifies the Board's mission, results in concise plans for the effective accomplishment of operations, transmits to the staff the information needed to attain objectives efficiently, and provides the public the capability to measure our accomplishments. Discussion Unlike most other government agencies, the Board budget is not subject to the congressional appropriations process or to review by the Administration through the Office of Management and Budget. Rather, the Board establishes its budget formulation procedures, conducts strategic planning to identify the proper amount and allocation of resources, approves its budget, and provides various reports and budget testimony to the Congress. The Board, like the framers of the Federal Reserve Act, considers the continuance of its budgetary independence as directly relevant to the Board's independence in managing monetary policy. To maintain budgetary independence, the Board believes that it must demonstrate effective and efficient use of its financial resources. Resource management begins with a clear mission statement, identification of goals, a review of factors that might affect the long-term attainment of the goals and possible responses to those factors. With the establishment of objectives to attain those goals and identification of the resources needed to accomplish them, the Board develops the budget necessary to implement the strategic plan. Objective 2 Develop appropriate policies, oversight mechanisms, and measurement criteria to ensure that the recruiting, training, and retention of staff meet Board needs. Discussion Management of human resources will be one of the most essential tasks facing the Board through the planning period. Changing requirements associated with technology, communications, demographics, employee needs and expectations, and market rates of pay are among the factors that will cause the Board to focus more carefully on steps to attract, retain, and train staff to meet increasingly complex requirements. New forms of pay and benefits will have to be reviewed, particularly concepts such as variable pay that are more sensitive to changing market conditions. Methods to assist managers in assessing, reporting, and improving employee performance will gain importance. Inclusion of all Board staff in advances made possible by technology and organizational realignment will be important and will require management training and support for senior staff and functional and technical training for staff. Objective 3 Establish, encourage, and enforce a climate of fair and equitable treatment for all employees regardless of race, creed, color, national origin, age, or sex. Discussion The Board of Governors is committed to the hiring, development, compensation, and promotion of staff based on an individual's qualifications, abilities, and job performance. The policy of the Board is to promote equal opportunity in every aspect of employment. The Board's policies and practices address the issue of equal treatment in employment practices and hiring initiatives for all employees, and include targeted initiatives for women, people of color, and those with disabilities. The Board's view emphasizes that equal employment opportunity is part of effective management, as well as a legal requirement, because it focuses on using the talents of all human capital. The Board's EEO Program Director continuously reviews the success criteria for accomplishing the Board's EEO objectives; validates Board practices, programs, and procedures against those objectives; and continuously monitors results and discusses issues with employees in order to establish and maintain an equitable and fair environment in which all employees can attain their full potential. Objective 4 Provide financial management support needed for sound business decisions. Discussion The Board's financial management system must continue to provide high-quality, timely data that managers need in order to make decisions between competing priorities, operational procedures, and investments. The current budget and accounting systems are closely linked to one another and to the human resource (payroll and benefits), information technology, and procurement systems that generate critical data. The data must be timely and easily available to all managers. The data must also provide information about the costs of major Board programs, such as monetary policy, for decisions by the Board as well as for performance measurement. The Management Division provides regular analyses of the information to the Board and its managers. Objective 5 Provide cost-effective secure information resources and technology management services to Board divisions, support divisional distributed processing requirements, and provide analysis on information technology issues to the Board, Reserve Banks, other financial regulatory institutions, and central banks. DiscussionChanges in technology have significantly altered the issues facing the Board in the monetary policy and supervision and regulation areas. Fortunately, the very advances in technology that have caused these adjustments have also enhanced our capacity for real-time surveillance. Nevertheless, to obtain the required benefits from technology requires continuous investment in a mix of mainframe and distributed processing equipment, communications capability, including appropriate bandwidth, and a well-trained and motivated staff. Investments in human capital and technology must be made carefully to ensure that the results are timely and effective. The infrastructure for maintaining these investments must be efficient and effective in meeting the diverse needs of the organization. The infrastructure must provide security for data, software, and communications, and redundancy needed for rapid recovery of operations at other facilities. Finally, the work at the Board must be carefully synchronized and coordinated with that at the Reserve Banks, particularly in support of large databases and software required for the supervision and regulation function. Objective 6 Efficiently provide modern, safe, secure facilities and necessary support activities conducive to efficient and effective Board operations. Discussion The Board will upgrade the infrastructure (including electrical work, plumbing, safety, and asbestos removal) of its current facilities. The capital plan to replace and upgrade equipment in the physical plant will be updated and current projects will be completed. Emergency planning, including work to provide backup electrical power will continue. Actions to evaluate and, where necessary, enhance the security of facilities to provide for the safety of employees and continuity of operations are a priority. External Factors
Performance Measures
Disseminating Goals and Objectives and Holding Managers Accountable for Results Five standing committees, each comprising up to three governors, administer the activities of the Federal Reserve Board. These committees include: the Committee on Consumer and Community Affairs, the Committee on Economic Affairs, the Committee on Federal Reserve Bank Affairs, the Committee on Supervisory and Regulatory Affairs, and the Committee on Board Affairs. The standing committees, in conjunction with the division directors, determine any adjustments to strategic goals and review and adjust priorities to help establish resource levels. The Committee on Board Affairs oversees the planning and budget process, which includes preparation of the Board's GPRA materials. The Board's goals and objectives are communicated to staff by division directors and by the strategic plan. Managers and staff are held accountable for meeting objectives which support these goals through the Board's performance management program, which ties base compensation and a modest amount of variable pay to achievement of specific objectives. The Board's goals and objectives are also shown on the Board's web site where the Strategic Plan is posted for employees. The Board maintains a vigorous Public Affairs Program and Publications Program to assist the public in understanding the actions, regulations, and rules of the Board. In addition, an extensive collection of educational materials, many dealing with consumer affairs issues, is created to assist the public. Electronic distribution of these materials, using the Board's public web site, helps to ensure the efficient dissemination, on a timely basis, of this information to the public. Return to contents listThe activities of the Board are critical to the economic well-being of the country. The Federal Reserve affects the lives of American citizens through its monetary policy actions, supervision and regulation activities, and payment systems policies and oversight activities. These effects are significant, ongoing, and highly visible. It is essential that the analyses performed by staff to influence policy decisions be reviewed at later dates to determine whether the desired effect was achieved and if the benefits of the activity outweighed its costs. The effectiveness of Board programs is subject to review by the Office of the Inspector General, which provides copies of its reports to Congress. Many functions of the Board are also subject to review by the General Accounting Office. Monetary PolicyThe Federal Reserve's conduct of monetary policy is evaluated frequently through a number of vehicles. First, the Federal Reserve Act, as amended, requires the Board of Governors to report to the Congress semiannually on the conduct of monetary policy. The Chairman of the Board of Governors presents testimony to Senate and House committees on these reports. More generally, Federal Reserve policymakers testify frequently before congressional committees on monetary policy and other Federal Reserve responsibilities, and from time to time congressional hearings include evaluations of monetary policy by academic and other experts from outside the Federal Reserve. As a matter of critical national importance, national and business newspapers and magazines report on and analyze monetary policy decisions and their effects on a daily basis. Banking Supervision and Regulation As part of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (FDICIA), the Inspector General of the Federal Reserve is required to review any failure of a state member bank that results in a material loss to the Bank Insurance Fund (BIF). The purpose of this review is to identify the cause of the failure, determine whether supervision was in accordance with policy standards, and, if so, whether policies and standards are in need of revision. There have been no such material loss reviews required in the past four years. Payment System Policy and Oversight Function The effectiveness of the Payment System Policy and Oversight Function is subject to review by the Office of the Inspector General and the General Accounting Office. In addition, the effectiveness of this function is evaluated based on feedback received from the Reserve Banks, financial industry, Congress, and others, and the extent to which staff's research is accepted and cited by others. Another factor in evaluating the effectiveness of this function is the extent to which staff brings to the attention of the governors issues that may hamper the Reserve Banks' ability to comply with the Monetary Control Act. Board Support The effectiveness of Board support programs is subject to review from various management sources. Financial operations are reviewed annually by an outside independent auditor. Information technology activities are subject to competitive pressures because operating divisions may use allocated resources to purchase support from the Division of Information Technology or outside vendors, or provide the support themselves. The human resource operations are evaluated by management based on the ability of the operating divisions to attract and retain the high quality staff required for Board operations. All of these activities are subject to review by the Office of the Inspector General. Return to contents listInteragency Cooperation and Cross Cutting Issues While many aspects of the Board's mission is unique to the organization, the Board does not operate in a vacuum. To coordinate its activities, the staff works closely with a broad variety of organizations and individuals on a daily basis. Regular meetings with senior officials from the Department of the Treasury, regulatory agencies such as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and other executive branch agencies help ensure consistency of purpose and coordination of actions. One area of the Board's mission, supervision and regulation of financial institutions, is shared with other regulatory agencies. We work closely with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Office of Thrift Supervision, the National Credit Union Administration, and state banking regulatory agencies to ensure the safety and soundness of the nation's financial institutions and to enforce consumer safeguards. The primary mechanism to ensure coordinated and non-duplicative activity is the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC), established by the Congress in 1979. The Board and other federal and state financial regulatory agencies are represented on the council. Major regulatory policy actions, data collection, and other activities are coordinated through that body to ensure efficiency and minimize regulatory burden consistent with safety and soundness and fair treatment of consumers. A second source of coordination is active participation in the GPRA working group. This group includes representatives from all of the financial regulators, Treasury, SEC, and Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO). This group shares planning data, coordinates cross cutting issues, and reviews best practices in planning and in developing GPRA documentation. Return to contents listStakeholder Consultations The goals and objectives of the Board have been developed keeping in mind feedback regularly received from the public, the Congress, industry groups, federal and state regulators, academics, and others. The Board relies heavily on advisory and working committees to provide input on a wide variety of issues. These committees include: the Federal Advisory Council, which provides input on economic and banking matters; the Consumer Advisory Council, which provides input on consumer protection matters; the Thrift Institutions Advisory Council, which provides input on the needs and problems of thrift institutions; and Federal Reserve Bank advisory committees, which provide advice to Reserve Banks on agriculture and small business matters. The Board also consults regularly with a broad variety of banking and financial service industry groups. Strategic initiatives are developed and carried out in close coordination with other federal and state banking regulatory agencies through participation in the Federal Financial Institutions Examinations Council and with state banking regulators through regular consultations. Return to contents listThe Federal Reserve: The Nation's Central Bank The Federal Reserve System is the central bank of the United States. It was founded by the Congress to provide the nation with a safer, more flexible, and more stable monetary and financial system. Over the years, its role in banking and the economy has expanded. Today the Federal Reserve's duties fall into three general areas:
The Federal Reserve System was created by passage of the Federal Reserve Act, which President Woodrow Wilson signed into law on December 23, 1913. The act stated that its purposes were "to provide for the establishment of Federal Reserve banks, to furnish an elastic currency, to afford means of rediscounting commercial paper, to establish a more effective supervision of banking in the United States, and for other purposes." Soon after the creation of the Federal Reserve, it became clear that the act had broader implications for national economic and financial policy. As time has passed, further legislation has clarified and supplemented the original purposes. Key laws affecting the Federal Reserve have been the Banking Act of 1935; the Employment Act of 1946; the 1970 amendments to the Bank Holding Company Act; the International Banking Act of 1978; the Full Employment and Balanced Growth Act of 1978; the Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980; the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989; the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991; and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999. The Congress defined the primary objectives of national economic policy in the Employment Act of 1946 and in an amendment to the Federal Reserve Act in 1977. These objectives include economic growth in line with the economy's potential to expand; a high level of employment; stable prices (that is, stability in the purchasing power of the dollar); and moderate long-term interest rates. Major financial services reform legislation, incorporated in the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, reflects changes in the nature of the industry and the economy in general. Both the legislation and the underlying changes that had been occurring will have a significant affect on the operations and workload of the Federal Reserve. Since the late 1960s, the number of federal laws intended to protect consumers in credit and other financial transactions has been growing. The Congress has assigned the Federal Reserve the duty of implementing these laws to ensure that consumers receive comprehensive information and fair treatment. Thus, consumer protection laws such as the 1968 Truth in Lending Act, the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977, the Expedited Funds Availability Act of 1987, the Truth in Savings Act of 1991 and others have given the Federal Reserve rule-writing, compliance and consumer education responsibilities. The Federal Reserve System is considered to be an independent central bank. It is so, however, only in the sense that its decisions do not have to be ratified by the President or anyone else in the executive branch of government. The entire System is subject to oversight by the U.S. Congress because the Constitution gives to the Congress the power to coin money and set its value -- a power that, in the 1913 act, the Congress itself delegated to the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve works within the framework of the overall objectives of economic policy established by the government, and thus the description of the System as "independent within the government" is more accurate. Board of Governors The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System was established as a federal government agency. It is made up of seven members appointed by the President of the United States and confirmed by the U.S. Senate. The full term of a Board member is fourteen years; the appointments are staggered so that one term expires on January 31 of each even numbered year. The Chairman and the Vice Chairman of the Board are also appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate. The nominees to these posts must already be members of the Board or must be simultaneously appointed to the Board. The terms for these positions are four years. Structure of the System The Federal Reserve System has a structure designed by the Congress to give it a broad perspective on the economy and on economic activity in all parts of the nation. It is a federal system, composed basically of a central, governmental agency -- the Board of Governors -- in Washington, D.C., and twelve regional Federal Reserve Banks, located in major cities throughout the nation. These components share responsibility for supervising and regulating certain financial institutions and activities; for providing banking services to depository institutions and to the federal government; and for ensuring that consumers receive adequate information and fair treatment in their business with the banking system. While the regional structure is not changing in regard to the monetary policy function, consolidation and the creation of large complex banking organizations is causing a shift from largely regional oversight to a more functional approach within both the supervision and regulation and payment systems areas. A major component of the System is the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), which is made up of the seven members of the Board of Governors, the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, and presidents of four other Federal Reserve Banks, who serve on a rotating basis. The FOMC is charged under law with overseeing open market operations, the principal tool of national monetary policy. The FOMC also directs operations undertaken by the Federal Reserve in foreign exchange markets. Return to contents listManagement Issues The latest strategic planning exercise did not identify material changes in the mission or goals of the Board. There were adjustments to remove completed objectives, particularly the successful completion of the Century Date Change Project, changes in the methods for dealing with large complex banking organizations, a strengthening of programs to manage and develop human capital, and increased emphasis on information and physical security. Because of the complexity, scope and volume of its responsibilities, a highly qualified and trained staff is necessary to carry out the Board's mission. The Board has developed programs to provide the salary and benefits needed to compete in the market for a diverse, highly skilled workforce and training programs to maintain required skills in a dynamic financial and regulatory environment. The Board also requires the ability to gather, store, retrieve, and analyze large quantities of complex economic and financial data. This requires modern automation and telecommunications capabilities and a supporting infrastructure. The Board emphasizes the need to ensure that appropriate resources are devoted to maintain this infrastructure. The Board is organized along division lines with specific functions. The divisions conducting the basic programs and activities of the Board are described below: Monetary Policy Function The Division of Research and Statistics
The Division of Monetary Affairs
The Division of International Finance
Supervision and Regulation Function The Division of Banking Supervision and Regulation
The Division of Consumer and Community Affairs
The Legal Division
Payment System Policy and Oversight Function The Division of Reserve Bank Operations and Payment Systems
Home | Publications | Reports to the Congress Accessibility To comment on this site, please fill out our feedback form. Last update: January 18, 2002 |