Accessible version of figures
Senior Credit Officer Opinion Survey on Dealer Financing Terms
Exhibit 1: Management of Concentrated Credit Exposures and Indicators of Supply of Credit
Date |
Panel 1: Respondents increasing resources and attention to management of concentrated exposure to: Dealers |
Panel 2: Respondents increasing resources and attention to management of concentrated exposure to: Central counterparties |
Panel 3: Respondents tightening price terms to: Hedge funds |
Panel 3: Respondents tightening price terms to: Trading REITs |
Panel 3: Respondents tightening price terms to: Mutual funds |
Panel 4: Respondents tightening price terms to: Insurance companies |
Panel 4: Respondents tightening price terms to: Separately managed accounts |
Panel 4: Respondents tightening price terms to: Nonfinancial corporations |
Panel 5: Respondents tightening nonprice terms to: Hedge funds |
Panel 5: Respondents tightening nonprice terms to: Trading REITs |
Panel 5: Respondents tightening nonprice terms to: Mutual funds |
Panel 6: Respondents tightening nonprice terms to: Insurance companies |
Panel 6: Respondents tightening nonprice terms to: Separately managed accounts |
Panel 6: Respondents tightening nonprice terms to: Nonfinancial corporations |
2010:Q2 |
55 |
NC |
-15 |
NC |
NC |
-10 |
NC |
-25 |
-25 |
NC |
NC |
-10 |
NC |
-15 |
2010:Q3 |
10 |
NC |
-15 |
NC |
NC |
-15 |
NC |
-15 |
-25 |
NC |
NC |
-25 |
NC |
-20 |
2010:Q4 |
15 |
NC |
-25 |
NC |
NC |
-10 |
NC |
-15 |
-45 |
NC |
NC |
-15 |
NC |
-15 |
2011:Q1 |
25 |
NC |
-30 |
NC |
NC |
-10 |
NC |
-30 |
-35 |
NC |
NC |
-25 |
NC |
-10 |
2011:Q2 |
25 |
NC |
-40 |
NC |
NC |
-30 |
NC |
-35 |
-35 |
NC |
NC |
-25 |
NC |
-10 |
2011:Q3 |
76.19 |
57.14 |
4.76 |
16.67 |
0 |
4.76 |
0 |
19.05 |
-23.81 |
5.26 |
-9.52 |
0 |
-4.76 |
9.52 |
2011:Q4 |
90 |
65 |
30 |
23.53 |
0 |
5.26 |
5 |
35 |
25 |
16.67 |
0 |
-10.53 |
-5.26 |
20 |
2012:Q1 |
30 |
55 |
-10 |
-6 |
-10 |
5 |
-11 |
-10 |
-10 |
-11 |
-5 |
5 |
-5 |
0 |
2012:Q2 |
45.45 |
68.18 |
4.55 |
17.65 |
-9.09 |
0 |
-14.29 |
-4.55 |
-4.55 |
-5.56 |
-9.09 |
-4.76 |
-4.76 |
4.55 |
2012:Q3 |
36.36 |
59.09 |
0 |
0 |
-4.55 |
-9.52 |
-4.55 |
-13.64 |
0 |
-22.22 |
-13.64 |
-14.29 |
-9.09 |
-9.09 |
2012:Q4 |
23 |
64 |
5 |
18 |
4 |
5 |
-5 |
0 |
0 |
-5 |
5 |
-10 |
-5 |
-9 |
2013:Q1 |
9 |
59 |
-9 |
6 |
-5 |
-5 |
-5 |
-18 |
-9 |
0 |
0 |
-5 |
-5 |
-9 |
2013:Q2 |
5 |
64 |
-9 |
-12 |
-4 |
0 |
-5 |
9 |
-9 |
-12 |
-9 |
-5 |
-5 |
0 |
2013:Q3 |
23 |
55 |
14 |
12 |
9 |
5 |
5 |
0 |
5 |
22 |
-5 |
-5 |
0 |
-14 |
2013:Q4 |
18 |
46 |
4 |
0 |
-5 |
0 |
0 |
-9 |
-5 |
22 |
-5 |
0 |
-5 |
-14 |
2014:Q1 |
14 |
31 |
0 |
6 |
-5 |
0 |
-5 |
0 |
-9 |
17 |
0 |
-5 |
-5 |
-9 |
2014:Q2 |
5 |
18 |
4 |
-12 |
0 |
0 |
-5 |
-9 |
-9 |
-6 |
0 |
-14 |
0 |
-14 |
2014:Q3 |
14 |
23 |
-5 |
0 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
-4 |
-18 |
0 |
0 |
-9 |
0 |
-10 |
2014:Q4 |
5 |
18 |
18 |
12 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
-5 |
-6 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
2015:Q1 |
19 |
33 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
-5 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
5 |
10 |
2015:Q2 |
14 |
38 |
19 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
-5 |
0 |
5 |
Return to page
Exhibit 2: Use of Financial Leverage
Date |
Panel 1: Respondents reporting increased use of leverage by: Hedge Funds |
Panel 2: Respondents reporting increased use of leverage by: Trading REITs |
Panel 3: Respondents reporting increased use of leverage by: Insurance Companies |
Panel 4: Respondents reporting increased use of leverage by: Separately Managed Accounts |
Panel 5: Respondents reporting increased use of leverage by: Mutual Funds |
Panel 5: Respondents reporting increased use of leverage by: Exchange-Traded Funds |
Panel 6: Respondents reporting increased use of leverage by: Pension Funds |
Panel 6: Respondents reporting increased use of leverage by: Endowments |
2011:Q3 |
-42.86 |
NC |
15 |
4.76 |
5 |
6.25 |
0 |
0 |
2011:Q4 |
-55 |
0 |
0 |
-5 |
0 |
0 |
5.26 |
0 |
2012:Q1 |
-20 |
15 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
6 |
5 |
5 |
2012:Q2 |
-22.73 |
4.55 |
4.76 |
-9.52 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2012:Q3 |
-4.55 |
5.88 |
-4.76 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2012:Q4 |
9 |
17 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
2013:Q1 |
27 |
6 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
2013:Q2 |
22 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2013:Q3 |
-18 |
-33 |
-5 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
2013:Q4 |
-9 |
-33 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
2014:Q1 |
0 |
-39 |
0 |
5 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2014:Q2 |
4 |
-6 |
-5 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2014:Q3 |
23 |
12 |
-5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2014:Q4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2015:Q1 |
14 |
-6 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2015:Q2 |
0 |
12 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Return to page
Exhibit 3: Measures of Demand for Funding and Market Functioning
Date |
Panel 1: Respondents reporting increased demand for funding of: High-grade corporate bonds |
Panel 1: Respondents reporting increased demand for funding of: High-yield corporate bonds |
Panel 2: Respondents reporting increased demand for funding of: Equities |
Panel 2: Respondents reporting increased demand for funding of: CMBS |
Panel 3: Respondents reporting increased demand for funding of: Agency RMBS |
Panel 3: Respondents reporting increased demand for funding of: Non-agency RMBS |
Panel 4: Respondents reporting increased demand for funding of: Consumer ABS |
Panel 5: Respondents reporting an improvement in liquidity and functioning in the underlying markets for: High-grade corporate bonds |
Panel 5: Respondents reporting an improvement in liquidity and functioning in the underlying markets for: High-yield corporate bonds |
Panel 5: Respondents reporting an improvement in liquidity and functioning in the underlying markets for: CMBS |
Panel 6: Respondents reporting an improvement in liquidity and functioning in the underlying markets for: Agency RMBS |
Panel 6: Respondents reporting an improvement in liquidity and functioning in the underlying markets for: Non-agency RMBS |
Panel 6: Respondents reporting an improvement in liquidity and functioning in the underlying markets for: Consumer ABS |
2010:Q2 |
23.53 |
NC |
25 |
NC |
33.33 |
NC |
NC |
-5.88 |
NC |
NC |
5.56 |
NC |
NC |
2010:Q3 |
26.67 |
NC |
5.26 |
NC |
29.41 |
NC |
NC |
40 |
NC |
NC |
11.76 |
NC |
NC |
2010:Q4 |
20 |
NC |
30 |
NC |
27.78 |
NC |
NC |
40 |
NC |
NC |
11.11 |
NC |
NC |
2011:Q1 |
33.33 |
NC |
27.78 |
NC |
52.94 |
NC |
NC |
40 |
NC |
NC |
17.65 |
NC |
NC |
2011:Q2 |
31.25 |
NC |
-5 |
NC |
33.33 |
NC |
NC |
50 |
NC |
NC |
22.22 |
NC |
NC |
2011:Q3 |
18.75 |
23.08 |
-5 |
-15.38 |
31.58 |
12.5 |
0 |
-31.25 |
-57.14 |
-61.54 |
-31.58 |
-26.67 |
-36.36 |
2011:Q4 |
0 |
7.14 |
0 |
0 |
-5.56 |
-13.33 |
16.67 |
-33.33 |
-50 |
-45.45 |
-38.89 |
-50 |
-50 |
2012:Q1 |
13 |
20 |
15 |
15 |
12 |
13 |
18 |
25 |
19 |
31 |
18 |
21 |
27 |
2012:Q2 |
16.67 |
18.75 |
4.55 |
-7.69 |
45 |
18.75 |
0 |
0 |
-6.25 |
-7.69 |
-5 |
0 |
8.33 |
2012:Q3 |
0 |
11.11 |
4.55 |
14.29 |
25 |
37.5 |
-8.33 |
10.53 |
5.88 |
35.71 |
10 |
37.5 |
8.33 |
2012:Q4 |
11 |
0 |
5 |
15 |
29 |
13 |
0 |
11 |
5 |
31 |
-10 |
27 |
0 |
2013:Q1 |
12 |
25 |
13 |
38 |
40 |
64 |
0 |
12 |
18 |
23 |
0 |
21 |
20 |
2013:Q2 |
21 |
33 |
9 |
29 |
10 |
40 |
14 |
21 |
6 |
14 |
-10 |
20 |
7 |
2013:Q3 |
0 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
-27 |
13 |
0 |
-22 |
6 |
-30 |
-26 |
-40 |
-31 |
2013:Q4 |
6 |
7 |
-5 |
31 |
5 |
33 |
8 |
6 |
-6 |
23 |
-5 |
20 |
8 |
2014:Q1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
44 |
0 |
11 |
11 |
15 |
5 |
33 |
-8 |
2014:Q2 |
6 |
12 |
9 |
13 |
15 |
44 |
7 |
5 |
6 |
20 |
-5 |
31 |
0 |
2014:Q3 |
-5 |
12 |
0 |
21 |
0 |
36 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
0 |
7 |
0 |
2014:Q4 |
0 |
24 |
5 |
13 |
5 |
33 |
7 |
-6 |
12 |
0 |
-15 |
7 |
0 |
2015:Q1 |
-6 |
25 |
10 |
17 |
6 |
29 |
8 |
-6 |
-7 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
0 |
2015:Q2 |
-6 |
12 |
19 |
7 |
0 |
29 |
14 |
0 |
-12 |
7 |
-11 |
7 |
0 |
Return to page