Accessible Version
Meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee
June 21-22, 2011 Presentation Materials
Pages 224 to 282 of the Transcript
Appendix 1: Materials used by Mr. Dotsey
Material for
FOMC Briefing on DSGE Models
Michael Dotsey
June 21, 2011
DSGE Project
Exhibit 1
Overview of Models
- DSGE = Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium
- Small to medium size models (smaller than FRB/US, larger than your typical VAR)
- Models include households, firms, fiscal policy and monetary policy
- Private agents optimize and are forward-looking
- Expectations are endogenous
- General Equilibrium -
- Prices, wages and interest rates adjust to clear markets
- Models include economic disturbances (productivity, aggregate demand, policy, etc)
- Models are estimated
- Can characterize uncertainty
Exhibit 2
Structure
Firms
- Employ workers and rent capital
- Set prices and prices adjust slowly
- Pricing behavior produces a Phillips Curve
- Shocks
- Productivity
- Price mark-up
Household Sector
- Own firms and capital
- Supply labor
- Make consumption and saving decisions
- Wages adjust slowly
- Shocks
- Efficiency of investment shocks
- Labor supply shocks
- Intertemporal Preference Shocks (affect consumption relative to saving)
Policy
- Fiscal Policy
- Monetary Policy
- Shocks
- Government spending shocks
- Monetary policy shocks
Exhibit 3
Implementation and Uses
- Estimation
- Incorporate priors based on microdata
- Characterize uncertainty
- Uses
- Forecasting
- Variables used in estimating the model
- Variables not in the model
- Nowcasting
- Identification
- Identify economic disturbances
- Alternative policies
- Structural nature of models lets one analyze alternative policies
- Forecasting
Pitfalls
- Models are relatively small
- Models are approximations
- Models lack features important for some applications
- Some parameters are more policy invariant than others
Exhibit 4
Great Recession - Key Variables
Top-left panel
Year-over-Year Growth
Period | GDP | Consumption | Bus Fix Inv |
---|---|---|---|
2007:Q1 | 1.34 | 2.77 | -3.30 |
2007:Q2 | 1.79 | 2.61 | -1.95 |
2007:Q3 | 2.33 | 2.41 | -0.99 |
2007:Q4 | 2.32 | 1.75 | -0.84 |
2008:Q1 | 1.91 | 0.96 | -2.17 |
2008:Q2 | 1.25 | 0.60 | -4.19 |
2008:Q3 | -0.34 | -0.71 | -6.89 |
2008:Q4 | -2.77 | -1.88 | -12.26 |
2009:Q1 | -3.80 | -1.82 | -20.09 |
2009:Q2 | -4.11 | -2.24 | -21.28 |
2009:Q3 | -2.74 | -0.89 | -18.61 |
2009:Q4 | 0.19 | 0.18 | -12.85 |
2010:Q1 | 2.39 | 0.78 | -1.98 |
Top-right panel
Year-over-Year Hours
Period | Percent Year-over-Year |
---|---|
2007:Q1 | 1.00 |
2007:Q2 | 1.16 |
2007:Q3 | 0.32 |
2007:Q4 | -0.26 |
2008:Q1 | -0.56 |
2008:Q2 | -1.32 |
2008:Q3 | -2.13 |
2008:Q4 | -4.32 |
2009:Q1 | -6.47 |
2009:Q2 | -8.12 |
2009:Q3 | -8.18 |
2009:Q4 | -5.81 |
2010:Q1 | -3.25 |
Middle-left panel
Core PCE Inflation
Period | Percent Log Annualized |
---|---|
2007:Q1 | 2.90 |
2007:Q2 | 1.69 |
2007:Q3 | 2.13 |
2007:Q4 | 2.78 |
2008:Q1 | 2.52 |
2008:Q2 | 2.61 |
2008:Q3 | 2.13 |
2008:Q4 | 0.62 |
2009:Q1 | 0.88 |
2009:Q2 | 2.25 |
2009:Q3 | 1.50 |
2009:Q4 | 2.05 |
2010:Q1 | 1.22 |
Middle-right panel
Spread of Baa to 10yr CMT
Period | Percent |
---|---|
2007:Q1 | 1.62 |
2007:Q2 | 1.65 |
2007:Q3 | 1.90 |
2007:Q4 | 2.25 |
2008:Q1 | 3.09 |
2008:Q2 | 3.10 |
2008:Q3 | 3.34 |
2008:Q4 | 5.60 |
2009:Q1 | 5.48 |
2009:Q2 | 4.67 |
2009:Q3 | 3.14 |
2009:Q4 | 2.87 |
2010:Q1 | 2.57 |
Note: The gray shaded bars indicate a period of business recession as defined by the National Bureau of Economic Research: December 2007-June 2009.
Bottom panel
Great Recession
- Important for its severity and its lingering effect on current forecasts
- Above figure displays some key variables
- Sharpest 4 quarter decline in GDP since Great Depression
- Decline in BFI especially severe
- Large and persistent job losses
- Only a subdued decline in inflation
- Challenge for models because only New York includes a fully developed financial sector
- Nevertheless models reach broadly similar conclusions
- New York model indicates the disturbance was associated with an increase in spreads
- EDO attributes much of what occurred to an increase in risk premia
- Chicago and Philadelphia find that investment efficiency shocks and discount rate shocks are the prime drivers
- These shocks reduce aggregate demand and have a financial interpretation
- Zero lower bound on interest rates also played a significant role in some of the models
Exhibit 5
Summary Table
Federal Reserve Bank |
Output Growth (Q4/Q4) | Inflation (Q4/Q4) | Federal Funds Rate (Q4) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | |
Philadelphia | 3.3 (1.4,6.4) | 5.1 (0.9,8.7) | 4.7 (0.1,8.3) | 1.3 (0.4,2.1) | 1.1 (-0.3,2.7) | 1.3 (-0.2,3.0) | 0.2 (0.0,1.2) | 0.6 (0.0,2.4) | 1.4 (0.0,3.9) |
New York | 2.1 (0.7,3.2) | 2.0 (-1.3,4.6) | 1.9 (-1.2,5.2) | 1.4 (1.0,1.7) | 1.1 (0.3,1.8) | 1.5 (0.6,2.3) | 0.3 (0.3,1.1) | 0.9 (0.3,2.1) | 1.8 (0.5,3.3) |
Chicago | 3.1 (.,.) | 4.5 (.,.) | 4.4 (.,.) | 1.4 (.,.) | 0.6 (.,.) | 0.3 (.,.) | 0.1 (.,.) | 1.0 (.,.) | 2.6 (.,.) |
Board of Governors | 2.8 (1.8,3.5) | 2.6 (1.1,3.8) | 2.5 (1.1,3.9) | 1.5 (1.3,1.7) | 1.4 (0.8,1.9) | 1.4 (0.8,2.0) | 0.4 (0.2,1.4) | 1.6 (0.6,2.9) | 2.4 (1.1,3.8) |
Median Forecast* | 2.9 | 3.5 | 3.4 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 2.1 |
For each individual forecast, the numbers in parentheses represent 68% bands.
* The median forecast is calculated as the median of the Q4/Q4 projections from the forecasters. Return to table
Exhibit 6
GDP
Top panel
- Economy is in recovery with 3 models forecasting above trend output growth
- Philadelphia and Chicago foresee a strong recovery
- Due to the internal dynamics of models as effects of negative demand shocks dissipate
- EDO envisions approximately trend growth
- New York expects slightly below trend growth
- Financial headwinds have lingering effects in the latter two models
- Philadelphia and Chicago foresee a strong recovery
Bottom panel
Real GDP Growth
Period | Chicago | New York | Philadelphia | Board |
---|---|---|---|---|
2007:Q1 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.88 |
2007:Q2 | 3.24 | 3.24 | 3.24 | 3.24 |
2007:Q3 | 2.27 | 2.27 | 2.27 | 2.27 |
2007:Q4 | 2.89 | 2.89 | 2.89 | 2.89 |
2008:Q1 | -0.73 | -0.73 | -0.73 | -0.73 |
2008:Q2 | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.60 |
2008:Q3 | -4.00 | -4.00 | -4.00 | -4.00 |
2008:Q4 | -6.77 | -6.77 | -6.77 | -6.77 |
2009:Q1 | -4.87 | -4.87 | -4.87 | -4.87 |
2009:Q2 | -0.70 | -0.70 | -0.70 | -0.70 |
2009:Q3 | 1.60 | 1.60 | 1.60 | 1.60 |
2009:Q4 | 5.01 | 5.01 | 5.01 | 5.01 |
2010:Q1 | 3.73 | 3.73 | 3.73 | 3.73 |
2010:Q2 | 1.72 | 1.72 | 1.72 | 1.72 |
2010:Q3 | 2.56 | 2.56 | 2.56 | 2.56 |
2010:Q4 | 3.11 | 3.11 | 3.11 | 3.11 |
2011:Q1 | 1.84 | 1.84 | 1.84 | 1.84 |
2011:Q2 | 2.40 | 2.24 | 2.43 | 2.32 |
2011:Q3 | 3.79 | 2.20 | 4.16 | 3.51 |
2011:Q4 | 4.26 | 2.31 | 4.64 | 3.17 |
2012:Q1 | 4.50 | 2.18 | 4.91 | 2.87 |
2012:Q2 | 4.54 | 2.05 | 5.01 | 2.63 |
2012:Q3 | 4.49 | 1.94 | 5.00 | 2.49 |
2012:Q4 | 4.43 | 1.91 | 4.94 | 2.42 |
2013:Q1 | 4.41 | 1.91 | 4.84 | 2.41 |
2013:Q2 | 4.41 | 1.96 | 4.72 | 2.43 |
2013:Q3 | 4.42 | 2.00 | 4.58 | 2.46 |
2013:Q4 | 4.42 | 2.03 | 4.44 | 2.50 |
Exhibit 7
Inflation
Top panel
- Inflation remains subdued over the forecast horizon
- New York forecasts 1.5% inflation by the end of 2013
- EDO and Philadelphia expect inflation to be between 1.3% and 1.4% at the end of the forecast horizon
- In EDO this is a result of labor market slack
- Chicago projects a sharp decline in inflation
Bottom panel
Core PCE Inflation
Period | Chicago | New York | Philadelphia | Board |
---|---|---|---|---|
2007:Q1 | 2.94 | 2.94 | 2.94 | 2.94 |
2007:Q2 | 1.70 | 1.70 | 1.70 | 1.70 |
2007:Q3 | 2.15 | 2.15 | 2.15 | 2.15 |
2007:Q4 | 2.82 | 2.82 | 2.82 | 2.82 |
2008:Q1 | 2.55 | 2.55 | 2.55 | 2.55 |
2008:Q2 | 2.65 | 2.65 | 2.65 | 2.65 |
2008:Q3 | 2.15 | 2.15 | 2.15 | 2.15 |
2008:Q4 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.62 |
2009:Q1 | 0.89 | 0.89 | 0.89 | 0.89 |
2009:Q2 | 2.28 | 2.28 | 2.28 | 2.28 |
2009:Q3 | 1.51 | 1.51 | 1.51 | 1.51 |
2009:Q4 | 2.07 | 2.07 | 2.07 | 2.07 |
2010:Q1 | 1.23 | 1.23 | 1.23 | 1.23 |
2010:Q2 | 1.04 | 1.04 | 1.04 | 1.04 |
2010:Q3 | 0.53 | 0.53 | 0.53 | 0.53 |
2010:Q4 | 0.43 | 0.43 | 0.43 | 0.43 |
2011:Q1 | 1.43 | 1.43 | 1.43 | 1.43 |
2011:Q2 | 1.60 | 1.82 | 1.68 | 1.83 |
2011:Q3 | 1.52 | 1.24 | 1.13 | 1.32 |
2011:Q4 | 1.23 | 1.07 | 1.06 | 1.27 |
2012:Q1 | 0.93 | 1.05 | 1.07 | 1.31 |
2012:Q2 | 0.68 | 1.09 | 1.11 | 1.34 |
2012:Q3 | 0.49 | 1.19 | 1.14 | 1.37 |
2012:Q4 | 0.35 | 1.28 | 1.18 | 1.38 |
2013:Q1 | 0.27 | 1.36 | 1.22 | 1.39 |
2013:Q2 | 0.24 | 1.44 | 1.25 | 1.39 |
2013:Q3 | 0.24 | 1.51 | 1.28 | 1.38 |
2013:Q4 | 0.28 | 1.59 | 1.32 | 1.37 |
Exhibit 8
Monetary Policy
Top panel
- Paths for monetary policy are somewhat different but none of the models project significant tightening
- Philadelphia, NY, and Chicago impose an "extended period" of zero interest rates until mid 2012.
- By the end of 2012 the models expect the funds rate to be 0.6% (Philadelphia), 0.9% (NY), 1.0% (Chicago), and 1.6% (EDO)
- The modest to measured policy response is largely due to the benign projections for inflation
Bottom panel
Federal Funds Rate
Period | Chicago | New York | Philadelphia | Board |
---|---|---|---|---|
2007:Q1 | 5.26 | 5.26 | 5.26 | 5.26 |
2007:Q2 | 5.25 | 5.25 | 5.25 | 5.25 |
2007:Q3 | 5.09 | 5.09 | 5.09 | 5.09 |
2007:Q4 | 4.49 | 4.49 | 4.49 | 4.49 |
2008:Q1 | 3.18 | 3.18 | 3.18 | 3.18 |
2008:Q2 | 2.09 | 2.09 | 2.09 | 2.09 |
2008:Q3 | 1.96 | 1.96 | 1.96 | 1.96 |
2008:Q4 | 0.53 | 0.53 | 0.53 | 0.53 |
2009:Q1 | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.19 |
2009:Q2 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.18 |
2009:Q3 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 |
2009:Q4 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.12 |
2010:Q1 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.13 |
2010:Q2 | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.19 |
2010:Q3 | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.19 |
2010:Q4 | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.19 |
2011:Q1 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.16 |
2011:Q2 | 0.10 | 0.09 | 0.16 | 0.10 |
2011:Q3 | 0.09 | 0.25 | 0.19 | 0.16 |
2011:Q4 | 0.10 | 0.25 | 0.19 | 0.36 |
2012:Q1 | 0.13 | 0.25 | 0.19 | 0.66 |
2012:Q2 | 0.17 | 0.24 | 0.19 | 0.98 |
2012:Q3 | 0.23 | 0.60 | 0.41 | 1.30 |
2012:Q4 | 0.98 | 0.87 | 0.62 | 1.59 |
2013:Q1 | 1.55 | 1.11 | 0.82 | 1.84 |
2013:Q2 | 1.98 | 1.34 | 1.02 | 2.07 |
2013:Q3 | 2.32 | 1.55 | 1.21 | 2.26 |
2013:Q4 | 2.60 | 1.75 | 1.39 | 2.42 |
Appendix 2: Materials used by Chairman Bernanke
Material for
FOMC Discussion of Exit Strategy Principles
June 21, 2011
Exit Strategy Principles
In light of discussions at the April and June FOMC meetings, the Committee has reached broad agreement on the key elements of the strategy that it expects to follow in normalizing the stance and conduct of monetary policy:
- The Committee will determine the timing and pace of policy normalization to promote its statutory mandate of maximum employment and price stability.
- To begin the process of policy normalization, the Committee will likely first cease reinvesting some or all payments of principal on the securities holdings in the System Open Market Account (SOMA).
- At the same time or relatively soon thereafter, the Committee will modify its forward guidance on the path of the federal funds rate and will initiate temporary reserve-draining operations aimed at supporting the implementation of increases in the federal funds rate when appropriate.
- When economic conditions warrant, the Committee's next step in the process of policy normalization will be to begin raising its target for the federal funds rate. [The Committee currently anticipates that the first increase will be three to six months after the modification of the forward guidance.] , and fFrom that point on, changing the level or range of the federal funds rate target will be the primary means of adjusting the stance of monetary policy. During the normalization process, adjustments to the interest rate on excess reserves and to the level of reserves in the banking system will be used to bring the funds rate toward its target.
- Sales of agency securities from the SOMA will likely commence sometime after the first increase in the target for the federal funds rate, probably within a few months. The timing and pace of sales will be communicated to the public in advance; that pace is anticipated to be relatively gradual and steady, but it could be adjusted in response to material changes in the economic outlook or financial conditions.
- The pace of sales is expected to be aimed at eliminating our holdings of agency securities over a period of four to five years, thereby minimizing the extent to which the SOMA portfolio might affect the allocation of credit across sectors of the economy. Sales at this pace would be expected to normalize the size of the SOMA securities portfolio over a period of about three years. In particular, the size of the securities portfolio and the associated quantity of bank reserves are expected to be reduced to levels that would be consistent with the implementation of monetary policy through the use of conventional open market operations to keep the federal funds rate [near its target | within a corridor defined below by the interest rate paid on excess reserves and above by the primary credit rate].
- The Committee is prepared to make adjustments to its exit strategy if necessary in light of economic and financial developments.
Appendix 3: Materials used by Mr. Sack
Material for FOMC Presentation:
Financial Market Developments and Desk Operations
Brian Sack
June 21, 2011
Exhibit 1
Top-left panel
(1)
Title: Implied Federal Funds Rate Path
Series: Future federal funds rates implied by Eurodollar and federal funds futures contracts
Horizon: 4/26/11, 6/17/11
Description: The implied federal funds rate path moved down during the intermeeting period.
Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Top-right panel
(2)
Title: Probability Distribution of First Increase in Federal Funds Target Rate
Series: April and June Policy Survey
Horizon: 2011:Q2 to 2013:Q1 and later
Description: Survey respondents pushed back their expectations for an increase in the Federal Funds target rate.
Average response from dealer survey.
Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York Policy Survey
Middle-left panel
(3)
Title: Economic News Index
Series: Citigroup economic surprise index
Horizon: August 3, 2009 - June 17, 2011
Description: During the intermeeting period the economic surprise index fell drastically.
Positive readings correspond to stronger than expected economic releases.
Source: Citigroup
Middle-right panel
(4)
Title: Treasury Yields
Series: 2-year, 5-year, and 10-year Treasury yields
Horizon: August 3, 2009 - June 17, 2011
Description: Treasury yields ended the period lower than their levels at the time of the last FOMC meeting.
Source: Bloomberg
Bottom-left panel
(5)
Title: Breakeven Inflation Rates
Series: 5-year spot and 5-year, 5-year forward rates
Horizon: January 1, 2010 - June 17, 2011
Description: Breakeven inflation rates fell during the intermeeting period.
Source: Federal Reserve Board of Governors
Bottom-right panel
(6)
Title: Implied Probability of Deflation over Next Several Years
Series: Deflation probability informed by model based on yields on TIPS maturing in April 2014
Horizon: January 1, 2010 - June 13, 2011
Description: The implied probability of deflation has stayed relatively flat since the last FOMC meeting.
Markets Group deflation probability model based on TIPS security maturing in April 2014.
Source: Barclays Capital, Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Exhibit 2
Top-left panel
(7)
Title: Equities and High Yield Spread
Series: S&P 500 price (indexed to 08/03/09) and Bank of America Merrill Lynch US High Yield Master II Option-Adjusted Spread
Horizon: August 3, 2009 - June 17, 2011
Description: Equity prices dropped sharply since the previous FOMC meeting, concurrent with a rise in the spread between the high-yield debt yield curve and the Treasury curve.
Source: Bloomberg, Bank of America
Top-right panel
(8)
Title: Non-Agency RMBS Price
Series: 07-01 AAA ABX index
Horizon: August 3, 2009 - June 17, 2011
Description: Credit default swap prices for non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities have declined since the previous meeting.
Source: JPMorgan Chase
Middle-left panel
(9)
Title: U.S. Bank Index
Series: KBW bank index
Horizon: August 3, 2009 - June 17, 2011
Description: The index's decline shows perceived weakness in bank stocks.
Source: Bloomberg
Middle-right panel
(10)
Title: Broad Dollar Index
Series: Broad Dollar Index
Horizon: August 3, 2009 - June 17, 2011
Description: The broad dollar appreciated slightly in the intermeeting period.
Source: Federal Reserve Board of Governors
Bottom-left panel
(11)
Title: Euro Area Sovereign Debt Spreads
Series: Spreads on 2-year Greek bonds & Spanish bonds as compared to Germany
Horizon: August 3, 2009 - June 17, 2011
Description: The spread on Greek debt rose sharply in the latter portion of the intermeeting period, while the spread on Spanish debt increased only slightly.
Source: Bloomberg
Bottom-right panel
(12)
Title: Libor Spread over OIS (Three-month Rate)
Series: Three-month forward Libor-OIS spread and spot Libor-OIS spread
Horizon: August 3, 2009 - June 17, 2011
Description: The spot spread between the Libor rate and the overnight index swap rate dropped slightly but largely remained steady at roughly 10 basis points, while the three-month forward spread increased sharply in the last few days of the intermeeting period.
Source: Bloomberg
Exhibit 3
Top-left panel
(13)
Title: Treasury Debt Outstanding
Series: Past and forecast Treasury debt outstanding, and current debt limit
Horizon: October 1, 2010 - October 1, 2011
Description: Treasury reached the current debt limit, and the amount of debt outstanding has flattened accordingly. The current limit will be exceeded after August 2nd.
Source: Federal Reserve Board of Governors
Top-right panel
(14)
Title: Treasury Principal and Interest Payments Due after August 2nd
Series: Marketable Treasury principal and interest payments due
Horizon: August 2, 2011 - August 31, 2011
Description: Treasury has debt payments on the order of hundreds of billions of dollars due in August 2011, most of which is comprised by principal payments.
Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Middle-left panel
(15)
Title: Treasury Bill Curve
Series: Treasury bill curve
Horizon: June 15, 2011 - December 15, 2011
Description: The Treasury bill term structure is relatively normal, with the market apparently not exhibiting any sharp price increase in bills maturing after the possible debt default date of August 2nd.
Source: Bloomberg
Middle-right panel
(16)
Title: Implied Volatility of Ten-Year Yield (Over Next Three Months)
Series: Implied volatility of ten-year yield over the next three months, derived from swaption prices
Horizon: August 3, 2009 - June 17, 2011
Description: The volatility of ten-year Treasury yields implied by swaption prices has held steady for the last few months, with a slight uptick in recent weeks.
Source: Barclays Capital
Bottom-left panel
(17) Operational Challenges for SOMA
- Outright purchases of Treasury securities
- Rollover of maturing Treasury securities
- Securities lending activity
- Ability to conduct repurchase agreements
- Accounting and reporting of SOMA
Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Bottom-right panel
(18)
Title: Short-Term Funding Rates
Series: 5-day moving average of Treasury GC repo, 1-month Treasury bill, and Federal Funds rate
Horizon: August 3, 2009 - June 17, 2011
Description: While the Federal Funds rate and 1-month Treasury bill rate have remained steady since the previous FOMC meeting (with a rise and subsequent fall in the Treasury bill rate), the haircut on Treasury general collateral used in repurchase agreements has increased.
Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Exhibit 4
Top-left panel
(19)
Title: SOMA Purchases of Treasury Securities
Series: Past and projected SOMA purchases of Treasury securities through LSAP 2 and reinvestments
Horizon: June 2010 - December 2011
Description: The SOMA purchase schedule continues as planned, with LSAP 2 purchases complete at the end of June and reinvestments from principal repayment continuing after this date.
*Projection reflects assumption that reinvestments continue through year end.
Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Top-right panel
(20) Proposed Distribution of Reinvestments Compared to LSAP 2
LSAP 2 | Reinvestments | ||
---|---|---|---|
Maturity | Allocation | Maturity | Allocation |
1.5 to 2.5 | 5% | 1.5 to 2.5 | 5% |
2.5 to 4 | 20% | 2.5 to 4 | 20% |
4 to 5.5 | 20% | 4 to 5.5 | 20% |
5.5 to 7 | 23% | 5.5 to 7 | 23% |
7 to 10 | 23% | 7 to 10 | 23% |
10 to 17 | 2% | 10 to 30 | 6% |
17 to 30 | 4% | ||
TIPS | 3% | TIPS | 3% |
Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
Middle-left panel
(21)
Title: SOMA Holdings as a Percent of Outstanding
Series: Past and current SOMA holdings as a percent of outstanding Treasury debt
Horizon: January 3, 2007 - June 17, 2011
Description: SOMA holdings as a percentage of outstanding Treasury debt have ticked up significantly in recent months given the continuation of the LSAP program.
Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York, U.S. Department of Treasury
Middle-right panel
(22)
Title: 10-Year Treasury Bid-Ask Spread
Series: Bid-ask spread for on-the-run 10-year Treasury
Horizon: June 23, 2009 - June 17, 2011
Description: Aside from a momentary spike early in the LSAP 2 period, the bid-ask spread has remained relatively constant since the announcement of the purchase program in November, indicating that these purchases have not had noticeably detrimental effects in the liquidity or functioning of the market for Treasuries.
Source: BrokerTec
Bottom-left panel
(23)
Title: Probability of Asset Purchases and Sales over 2-Year Horizon
Series: Probability of Treasury and MBS purchases and sales: June survey median, June survey interquartile range, and March survey median
Horizon: March 2011, June 2011
Description: Surveyed market participants believe there is a low probability of any new policy initiative to purchase more MBS or Treasuries, while their assessments of the probability of Treasury and MBS sales have increased since March (especially for MBS).
Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York Policy Survey
Bottom-right panel
(24)
Title: Expected Size of Domestic Assets in SOMA
Series: Estimates of size of SOMA from Tealbook, June survey median, and June survey interquartile range
Horizon: End-of-year 2009 - End-of-year 2015
Description: Tealbook estimates and June policy survey estimates track quite closely over the coming years, and there is broad agreement that the end of 2011 will mark the balance sheet's high point for the near future.
Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York Policy Survey
Appendix 4: Materials used by Mr. Slifman, Ms. Wilson, Mr. Reeve, and Mr. Covitz
Material for Staff Presentation on the Economic Outlook
June 21-22, 2011
Exhibit 1
Recent Indicators
Top-left panel
Change in Private Payroll Employment
Period | Thousands of employees | Three-month moving average |
---|---|---|
January 2007 | 190 | ND |
February 2007 | 58 | ND |
March 2007 | 200 | 149.33 |
April 2007 | 57 | 105.00 |
May 2007 | 111 | 122.67 |
June 2007 | 50 | 72.67 |
July 2007 | 17 | 59.33 |
August 2007 | -95 | -9.33 |
September 2007 | 5 | -24.33 |
October 2007 | 74 | -5.33 |
November 2007 | 98 | 59.00 |
December 2007 | 38 | 70.00 |
January 2008 | 4 | 46.67 |
February 2008 | -128 | -28.67 |
March 2008 | -87 | -70.33 |
April 2008 | -186 | -133.67 |
May 2008 | -240 | -171.00 |
June 2008 | -217 | -214.33 |
July 2008 | -265 | -240.67 |
August 2008 | -317 | -266.33 |
September 2008 | -434 | -338.67 |
October 2008 | -491 | -414.00 |
November 2008 | -787 | -570.67 |
December 2008 | -636 | -638.00 |
January 2009 | -841 | -754.67 |
February 2009 | -721 | -732.67 |
March 2009 | -787 | -783.00 |
April 2009 | -773 | -760.33 |
May 2009 | -326 | -628.67 |
June 2009 | -438 | -512.33 |
July 2009 | -287 | -350.33 |
August 2009 | -215 | -313.33 |
September 2009 | -213 | -238.33 |
October 2009 | -250 | -226.00 |
November 2009 | -34 | -165.67 |
December 2009 | -102 | -128.67 |
January 2010 | -42 | -59.33 |
February 2010 | -21 | -55.00 |
March 2010 | 144 | 27.00 |
April 2010 | 229 | 117.33 |
May 2010 | 48 | 140.33 |
June 2010 | 65 | 114.00 |
July 2010 | 93 | 68.67 |
August 2010 | 110 | 89.33 |
September 2010 | 109 | 104.00 |
October 2010 | 143 | 120.67 |
November 2010 | 128 | 126.67 |
December 2010 | 167 | 146.00 |
January 2011 | 94 | 129.67 |
February 2011 | 261 | 174.00 |
March 2011 | 219 | 191.33 |
April 2011 | 251 | 243.67 |
May 2011 | 83 | 184.33 |
Top-right panel
Manufacturing IP
Period | April Tealbook | June Tealbook |
---|---|---|
2010:Q3 | ND | 5.1 |
2010:Q4 | ND | 3.4 |
2011:Q1 | 9.1 | 6.5 |
Forecast | ||
2011:Q2 | 5.0 | 1.4 |
Middle-left panel
Consumer Spending
- News for consumer outlays disappointing.
- Revised down level of real DPI nearly $70 billion in Q1.
- Consumer sentiment remains low.
- Real PCE up at only a 1½ percent rate in Q2.
Middle-right panel
Business Conditions Index
Period | ISM-PMI | Empire State | Philadelphia |
---|---|---|---|
January 2007 | 49.9 | 56.02 | 52.45 |
February 2007 | 52.0 | 61.13 | 51.85 |
March 2007 | 51.3 | 54.04 | 52.70 |
April 2007 | 52.6 | 53.68 | 52.75 |
May 2007 | 52.3 | 55.72 | 54.20 |
June 2007 | 52.4 | 59.15 | 57.25 |
July 2007 | 51.7 | 60.96 | 53.90 |
August 2007 | 50.2 | 60.43 | 51.10 |
September 2007 | 50.0 | 55.62 | 55.25 |
October 2007 | 50.9 | 60.65 | 51.85 |
November 2007 | 51.5 | 61.23 | 52.40 |
December 2007 | 49.0 | 55.32 | 54.85 |
January 2008 | 51.1 | 50.88 | 44.30 |
February 2008 | 48.9 | 48.11 | 45.90 |
March 2008 | 49.0 | 48.94 | 48.10 |
April 2008 | 48.8 | 50.28 | 43.00 |
May 2008 | 48.8 | 50.48 | 48.75 |
June 2008 | 49.0 | 48.07 | 40.80 |
July 2008 | 49.6 | 51.43 | 42.50 |
August 2008 | 48.0 | 47.93 | 41.45 |
September 2008 | 43.8 | 49.80 | 51.55 |
October 2008 | 38.4 | 38.93 | 35.10 |
November 2008 | 36.9 | 39.40 | 33.85 |
December 2008 | 33.3 | 38.40 | 35.55 |
January 2009 | 35.7 | 38.43 | 39.85 |
February 2009 | 36.0 | 38.73 | 35.50 |
March 2009 | 36.6 | 28.11 | 32.45 |
April 2009 | 39.9 | 47.58 | 38.95 |
May 2009 | 41.9 | 45.82 | 38.80 |
June 2009 | 44.7 | 45.93 | 44.20 |
July 2009 | 49.0 | 51.98 | 47.45 |
August 2009 | 51.4 | 56.26 | 51.05 |
September 2009 | 53.2 | 58.48 | 51.30 |
October 2009 | 55.8 | 64.19 | 54.00 |
November 2009 | 54.7 | 58.36 | 55.50 |
December 2009 | 56.4 | 51.12 | 52.35 |
January 2010 | 58.3 | 60.16 | 54.00 |
February 2010 | 57.1 | 56.71 | 61.15 |
March 2010 | 60.4 | 62.09 | 56.20 |
April 2010 | 59.6 | 64.05 | 57.00 |
May 2010 | 57.8 | 57.49 | 53.25 |
June 2010 | 55.3 | 58.78 | 52.90 |
July 2010 | 55.1 | 54.65 | 47.75 |
August 2010 | 55.2 | 49.60 | 46.25 |
September 2010 | 55.3 | 51.94 | 46.30 |
October 2010 | 56.9 | 55.01 | 48.35 |
November 2010 | 58.2 | 38.10 | 54.00 |
December 2010 | 58.5 | 51.02 | 55.30 |
January 2011 | 60.8 | 56.20 | 61.80 |
February 2011 | 61.4 | 55.90 | 61.85 |
March 2011 | 61.2 | 52.91 | 70.15 |
April 2011 | 60.4 | 61.17 | 59.40 |
May 2011 | 53.5 | 58.60 | 52.70 |
June 2011 | ND | 46.11 | 46.15 |
Bottom-left panel
Transitory Influences on GDP Growth Rate
- Effects of the disasters in Japan on U.S. production of motor vehicles and parts.
- Higher price of imported oil.
- Temporary drop in defense purchases.
Bottom-right panel
GDP Projection
2011 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | ||
1. | Real GDP | 2.1 | 1.9 | 3.9 |
2. | Apr. TB | 1.7 | 3.1 | 4.1 |
Excluding earthquake effects | ||||
3. | Real GDP | 2.7 | 2.9 | |
4. | Apr. TB | 3.4 | 3.6 |
Exhibit 2
Sluggish Recovery
Top-left panel
Real GDP
Quarter, from NBER peak |
Peak 1973:Q4 | Peak 1981:Q3 | Peak 2007:Q4, Jan. 2010 TB |
Peak 2007:Q4, Current |
---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
1 | 99.12 | 98.75 | 99.82 | 99.82 |
2 | 99.38 | 97.13 | 99.97 | 99.97 |
3 | 98.39 | 97.66 | 98.95 | 98.95 |
4 | 98.01 | 97.28 | 97.23 | 97.23 |
5 | 96.81 | 97.36 | 96.03 | 96.03 |
6 | 97.55 | 98.57 | 95.86 | 95.86 |
7 | 99.20 | 100.79 | 96.24 | 96.24 |
8 | 100.49 | 102.77 | 97.42 | 97.42 |
Forecast | ||||
9 | 102.78 | 104.90 | 98.09 | 98.32 |
10 | 103.55 | 106.93 | 99.02 | 98.74 |
11 | 104.06 | 108.78 | 99.96 | 99.36 |
12 | 104.81 | 109.84 | 100.94 | 100.13 |
13 | 106.03 | 110.73 | 102.00 | 100.59 |
Forecast | ||||
14 | 108.14 | 111.78 | 103.19 | 101.13 |
15 | 110.07 | 112.72 | 104.43 | 102.11 |
16 | 110.05 | 114.48 | 105.71 | 102.84 |
Top-right panel
Real PCE
Quarter, from NBER peak |
Peak 1973:Q4 | Peak 1981:Q3 | Peak 2007:Q4, Jan. 2010 TB |
Peak 2007:Q4, Current |
---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
1 | 99.12 | 99.24 | 99.81 | 99.81 |
2 | 99.47 | 99.89 | 99.83 | 99.83 |
3 | 99.88 | 100.24 | 98.94 | 98.94 |
4 | 98.42 | 101.01 | 98.12 | 98.12 |
5 | 99.24 | 102.85 | 97.99 | 97.99 |
6 | 100.90 | 103.86 | 97.59 | 97.59 |
7 | 102.33 | 105.93 | 98.07 | 98.07 |
8 | 103.42 | 107.80 | 98.29 | 98.29 |
Forecast | ||||
9 | 105.49 | 109.51 | 98.96 | 98.75 |
10 | 106.45 | 110.44 | 99.63 | 99.29 |
11 | 107.58 | 112.02 | 100.35 | 99.88 |
12 | 108.98 | 112.89 | 101.05 | 100.86 |
13 | 110.23 | 114.38 | 101.87 | 101.41 |
Forecast | ||||
14 | 110.84 | 116.32 | 102.78 | 101.81 |
15 | 111.89 | 117.38 | 103.77 | 102.46 |
16 | 113.58 | 119.61 | 104.80 | 103.08 |
Middle-left panel
Real Residential Construction
Quarter, from NBER peak |
Peak 1973:Q4 | Peak 1981:Q3 | Peak 2007:Q4, Jan. 2010 TB |
Peak 2007:Q4, Current |
---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
1 | 92.67 | 89.76 | 92.15 | 92.15 |
2 | 88.63 | 84.58 | 88.75 | 88.75 |
3 | 85.70 | 81.91 | 83.24 | 83.24 |
4 | 74.43 | 81.65 | 75.43 | 75.43 |
5 | 69.83 | 87.63 | 67.40 | 67.40 |
6 | 71.33 | 102.57 | 63.81 | 63.81 |
7 | 76.30 | 114.72 | 65.43 | 65.43 |
8 | 79.64 | 126.08 | 65.30 | 65.30 |
Forecast | ||||
9 | 87.78 | 131.41 | 65.51 | 63.19 |
10 | 90.30 | 135.06 | 67.56 | 66.90 |
11 | 88.83 | 137.56 | 66.87 | 61.78 |
12 | 100.15 | 136.24 | 68.83 | 62.28 |
13 | 103.17 | 136.38 | 71.92 | 61.82 |
Forecast | ||||
14 | 114.98 | 135.96 | 76.56 | 62.21 |
15 | 114.61 | 137.05 | 81.41 | 62.84 |
16 | 113.10 | 138.78 | 85.92 | 62.95 |
Middle-right panel
Real Equipment and Software
Quarter, from NBER peak |
Peak 1973:Q4 | Peak 1981:Q3 | Peak 2007:Q4, Jan. 2010 TB |
Peak 2007:Q4, Current |
---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
1 | 100.17 | 99.11 | 100.74 | 100.74 |
2 | 100.06 | 97.37 | 99.19 | 99.19 |
3 | 100.74 | 93.67 | 96.30 | 96.30 |
4 | 97.04 | 91.96 | 88.24 | 88.24 |
5 | 90.54 | 90.29 | 80.26 | 80.26 |
6 | 88.74 | 89.98 | 80.29 | 80.29 |
7 | 89.72 | 94.60 | 81.12 | 81.12 |
8 | 90.96 | 100.11 | 83.93 | 83.93 |
Forecast | ||||
9 | 92.17 | 108.71 | 85.63 | 87.92 |
10 | 94.04 | 110.82 | 88.31 | 92.92 |
11 | 96.67 | 116.29 | 91.60 | 96.31 |
12 | 99.44 | 120.20 | 94.72 | 98.12 |
13 | 105.43 | 124.04 | 98.16 | 100.51 |
Forecast | ||||
14 | 108.04 | 123.32 | 101.51 | 102.23 |
15 | 110.61 | 126.17 | 104.95 | 105.46 |
16 | 115.74 | 124.63 | 108.38 | 107.89 |
Bottom-left panel
Why is Consumer Spending So Sluggish?
- One-fourth of mortgage borrowers underwater.
- Few resources available to smooth consumption.
- Reduced income expectations; higher precautionary saving.
Bottom-right panel
Median Expected Change in Family Income
Period | Three-month moving average |
---|---|
January 1985 | 3.33 |
February 1985 | 3.00 |
March 1985 | 2.67 |
April 1985 | 2.63 |
May 1985 | 2.57 |
June 1985 | 2.90 |
July 1985 | 2.87 |
August 1985 | 3.03 |
September 1985 | 2.83 |
October 1985 | 2.83 |
November 1985 | 2.77 |
December 1985 | 2.93 |
January 1986 | 3.10 |
February 1986 | 3.17 |
March 1986 | 2.97 |
April 1986 | 3.10 |
May 1986 | 3.10 |
June 1986 | 3.17 |
July 1986 | 3.20 |
August 1986 | 3.27 |
September 1986 | 3.23 |
October 1986 | 3.23 |
November 1986 | 3.23 |
December 1986 | 3.23 |
January 1987 | 3.13 |
February 1987 | 2.93 |
March 1987 | 2.57 |
April 1987 | 2.50 |
May 1987 | 2.47 |
June 1987 | 2.77 |
July 1987 | 2.67 |
August 1987 | 2.93 |
September 1987 | 2.77 |
October 1987 | 2.93 |
November 1987 | 3.10 |
December 1987 | 3.27 |
January 1988 | 3.17 |
February 1988 | 3.17 |
March 1988 | 3.37 |
April 1988 | 3.13 |
May 1988 | 2.73 |
June 1988 | 2.53 |
July 1988 | 2.90 |
August 1988 | 3.40 |
September 1988 | 3.67 |
October 1988 | 3.53 |
November 1988 | 3.50 |
December 1988 | 3.40 |
January 1989 | 3.47 |
February 1989 | 3.33 |
March 1989 | 3.17 |
April 1989 | 3.27 |
May 1989 | 3.10 |
June 1989 | 3.07 |
July 1989 | 2.77 |
August 1989 | 2.87 |
September 1989 | 2.93 |
October 1989 | 3.30 |
November 1989 | 3.50 |
December 1989 | 3.70 |
January 1990 | 3.60 |
February 1990 | 3.20 |
March 1990 | 3.10 |
April 1990 | 3.37 |
May 1990 | 3.50 |
June 1990 | 3.47 |
July 1990 | 3.40 |
August 1990 | 3.30 |
September 1990 | 3.17 |
October 1990 | 2.70 |
November 1990 | 2.60 |
December 1990 | 2.57 |
January 1991 | 2.67 |
February 1991 | 2.60 |
March 1991 | 2.73 |
April 1991 | 2.70 |
May 1991 | 2.33 |
June 1991 | 2.33 |
July 1991 | 2.30 |
August 1991 | 2.40 |
September 1991 | 2.30 |
October 1991 | 2.40 |
November 1991 | 2.80 |
December 1991 | 2.73 |
January 1992 | 2.33 |
February 1992 | 2.00 |
March 1992 | 1.80 |
April 1992 | 2.20 |
May 1992 | 2.37 |
June 1992 | 2.67 |
July 1992 | 2.20 |
August 1992 | 2.07 |
September 1992 | 2.10 |
October 1992 | 2.47 |
November 1992 | 2.80 |
December 1992 | 2.93 |
January 1993 | 3.03 |
February 1993 | 2.93 |
March 1993 | 2.40 |
April 1993 | 2.10 |
May 1993 | 2.03 |
June 1993 | 2.30 |
July 1993 | 2.33 |
August 1993 | 2.10 |
September 1993 | 2.27 |
October 1993 | 2.43 |
November 1993 | 2.83 |
December 1993 | 2.63 |
January 1994 | 2.37 |
February 1994 | 2.23 |
March 1994 | 2.13 |
April 1994 | 2.47 |
May 1994 | 2.43 |
June 1994 | 2.50 |
July 1994 | 2.17 |
August 1994 | 2.03 |
September 1994 | 2.17 |
October 1994 | 2.43 |
November 1994 | 2.60 |
December 1994 | 2.63 |
January 1995 | 2.70 |
February 1995 | 2.67 |
March 1995 | 2.53 |
April 1995 | 2.33 |
May 1995 | 2.37 |
June 1995 | 2.47 |
July 1995 | 2.60 |
August 1995 | 2.63 |
September 1995 | 2.43 |
October 1995 | 2.43 |
November 1995 | 2.37 |
December 1995 | 2.40 |
January 1996 | 2.43 |
February 1996 | 2.37 |
March 1996 | 2.63 |
April 1996 | 2.53 |
May 1996 | 2.50 |
June 1996 | 2.23 |
July 1996 | 2.30 |
August 1996 | 2.47 |
September 1996 | 2.73 |
October 1996 | 2.80 |
November 1996 | 2.77 |
December 1996 | 2.63 |
January 1997 | 2.63 |
February 1997 | 2.77 |
March 1997 | 2.77 |
April 1997 | 2.73 |
May 1997 | 2.67 |
June 1997 | 2.70 |
July 1997 | 2.70 |
August 1997 | 2.60 |
September 1997 | 2.43 |
October 1997 | 2.47 |
November 1997 | 2.57 |
December 1997 | 2.73 |
January 1998 | 2.70 |
February 1998 | 2.83 |
March 1998 | 2.70 |
April 1998 | 2.70 |
May 1998 | 2.47 |
June 1998 | 2.57 |
July 1998 | 2.60 |
August 1998 | 2.73 |
September 1998 | 2.87 |
October 1998 | 2.77 |
November 1998 | 2.70 |
December 1998 | 2.67 |
January 1999 | 2.73 |
February 1999 | 2.77 |
March 1999 | 2.77 |
April 1999 | 2.73 |
May 1999 | 2.77 |
June 1999 | 2.90 |
July 1999 | 3.03 |
August 1999 | 3.17 |
September 1999 | 3.13 |
October 1999 | 3.13 |
November 1999 | 3.03 |
December 1999 | 2.90 |
January 2000 | 2.97 |
February 2000 | 3.00 |
March 2000 | 3.17 |
April 2000 | 3.10 |
May 2000 | 3.07 |
June 2000 | 3.00 |
July 2000 | 3.00 |
August 2000 | 3.00 |
September 2000 | 3.10 |
October 2000 | 3.07 |
November 2000 | 3.13 |
December 2000 | 3.00 |
January 2001 | 2.97 |
February 2001 | 2.93 |
March 2001 | 3.00 |
April 2001 | 2.90 |
May 2001 | 2.87 |
June 2001 | 2.63 |
July 2001 | 2.53 |
August 2001 | 2.47 |
September 2001 | 2.27 |
October 2001 | 2.10 |
November 2001 | 1.90 |
December 2001 | 2.27 |
January 2002 | 2.57 |
February 2002 | 2.87 |
March 2002 | 2.67 |
April 2002 | 2.70 |
May 2002 | 2.57 |
June 2002 | 2.73 |
July 2002 | 2.87 |
August 2002 | 2.83 |
September 2002 | 2.80 |
October 2002 | 2.60 |
November 2002 | 2.57 |
December 2002 | 2.60 |
January 2003 | 2.53 |
February 2003 | 2.40 |
March 2003 | 2.33 |
April 2003 | 2.37 |
May 2003 | 2.53 |
June 2003 | 2.53 |
July 2003 | 2.80 |
August 2003 | 2.73 |
September 2003 | 2.67 |
October 2003 | 2.27 |
November 2003 | 2.33 |
December 2003 | 2.43 |
January 2004 | 2.67 |
February 2004 | 2.67 |
March 2004 | 2.67 |
April 2004 | 2.47 |
May 2004 | 2.43 |
June 2004 | 2.43 |
July 2004 | 2.57 |
August 2004 | 2.63 |
September 2004 | 2.53 |
October 2004 | 2.43 |
November 2004 | 2.43 |
December 2004 | 2.57 |
January 2005 | 2.80 |
February 2005 | 2.77 |
March 2005 | 2.63 |
April 2005 | 2.33 |
May 2005 | 2.23 |
June 2005 | 2.03 |
July 2005 | 2.27 |
August 2005 | 2.20 |
September 2005 | 2.33 |
October 2005 | 2.27 |
November 2005 | 2.33 |
December 2005 | 2.57 |
January 2006 | 2.50 |
February 2006 | 2.47 |
March 2006 | 2.17 |
April 2006 | 2.23 |
May 2006 | 2.13 |
June 2006 | 2.23 |
July 2006 | 2.13 |
August 2006 | 2.27 |
September 2006 | 2.13 |
October 2006 | 2.37 |
November 2006 | 2.50 |
December 2006 | 2.77 |
January 2007 | 2.70 |
February 2007 | 2.67 |
March 2007 | 2.67 |
April 2007 | 2.63 |
May 2007 | 2.50 |
June 2007 | 2.37 |
July 2007 | 2.37 |
August 2007 | 2.47 |
September 2007 | 2.40 |
October 2007 | 2.30 |
November 2007 | 2.33 |
December 2007 | 2.40 |
January 2008 | 2.40 |
February 2008 | 2.17 |
March 2008 | 2.23 |
April 2008 | 1.80 |
May 2008 | 1.83 |
June 2008 | 1.60 |
July 2008 | 1.93 |
August 2008 | 2.00 |
September 2008 | 2.20 |
October 2008 | 1.93 |
November 2008 | 1.67 |
December 2008 | 1.07 |
January 2009 | 0.83 |
February 2009 | 0.50 |
March 2009 | 0.37 |
April 2009 | 0.30 |
May 2009 | 0.23 |
June 2009 | 0.30 |
July 2009 | 0.27 |
August 2009 | 0.33 |
September 2009 | 0.27 |
October 2009 | 0.30 |
November 2009 | 0.27 |
December 2009 | 0.37 |
January 2010 | 0.37 |
February 2010 | 0.33 |
March 2010 | 0.27 |
April 2010 | 0.27 |
May 2010 | 0.30 |
June 2010 | 0.30 |
July 2010 | 0.27 |
August 2010 | 0.27 |
September 2010 | 0.30 |
October 2010 | 0.33 |
November 2010 | 0.37 |
December 2010 | 0.37 |
January 2011 | 0.33 |
February 2011 | 0.27 |
March 2011 | 0.20 |
April 2011 | 0.23 |
May 2011 | 0.27 |
Note: Expected family income change during the next 12 months. The gray shaded bars indicate a period of business recession as defined by the National Bureau of Economic Research: July 1990-March 1991, March 2001-November 2001, and December 2007-June 2009.
Source: Thompson Reuters/University of Michigan Surveys of Consumers.
Exhibit 3
Medium-term Forecast
Top-left panel
Real GDP
Period | April Tealbook | June Tealbook |
---|---|---|
2011:H1* | 2.6 | 2.4 |
2011:H2* | 3.8 | 3.0 |
2012 | 4.2 | 3.5 |
* Excluding earthquake effects. Return to table
Top-right panel
Unemployment Rate
Period | April Tealbook | Current |
---|---|---|
2007:Q1 | ND | 4.50 |
2007:Q2 | ND | 4.50 |
2007:Q3 | ND | 4.70 |
2007:Q4 | ND | 4.80 |
2008:Q1 | ND | 5.00 |
2008:Q2 | ND | 5.30 |
2008:Q3 | ND | 6.00 |
2008:Q4 | ND | 6.90 |
2009:Q1 | ND | 8.20 |
2009:Q2 | ND | 9.30 |
2009:Q3 | ND | 9.70 |
2009:Q4 | ND | 10.00 |
2010:Q1 | ND | 9.70 |
2010:Q2 | ND | 9.60 |
2010:Q3 | ND | 9.60 |
2010:Q4 | ND | 9.60 |
2011:Q1 | 8.93 | 8.93 |
Forecast | ||
2011:Q2 | 8.85 | 9.02 |
2011:Q3 | 8.78 | 9.00 |
2011:Q4 | 8.68 | 8.86 |
2012:Q1 | 8.45 | 8.79 |
2012:Q2 | 8.19 | 8.63 |
2012:Q3 | 7.93 | 8.42 |
2012:Q4 | 7.66 | 8.13 |
Middle-left panel
Factors Influencing Contour of the Forecast
Positives
- Accommodative montary policy, lower dollar, increasing credit availability, waning effects of earlier wealth declines.
- Household and business confidence recuperate.
But…
- Impetus may be smaller than previously thought.
Middle-right panel
Equipment and Software Capital Stock
Period | Percent change, Q4/Q4 |
---|---|
1960 | 2.90 |
1961 | 2.21 |
1962 | 3.47 |
1963 | 4.04 |
1964 | 5.28 |
1965 | 7.25 |
1966 | 8.60 |
1967 | 6.64 |
1968 | 6.48 |
1969 | 6.74 |
1970 | 5.17 |
1971 | 4.28 |
1972 | 5.35 |
1973 | 7.30 |
1974 | 6.30 |
1975 | 3.44 |
1976 | 3.67 |
1977 | 5.08 |
1978 | 6.44 |
1979 | 6.60 |
1980 | 4.48 |
1981 | 4.18 |
1982 | 2.14 |
1983 | 2.22 |
1984 | 4.28 |
1985 | 3.99 |
1986 | 3.16 |
1987 | 2.46 |
1988 | 2.95 |
1989 | 3.19 |
1990 | 2.40 |
1991 | 1.48 |
1992 | 1.90 |
1993 | 3.24 |
1994 | 4.24 |
1995 | 5.05 |
1996 | 5.49 |
1997 | 6.17 |
1998 | 6.91 |
1999 | 7.41 |
2000 | 7.39 |
2001 | 4.42 |
2002 | 2.57 |
2003 | 2.25 |
2004 | 2.85 |
2005 | 3.48 |
2006 | 4.14 |
2007 | 3.87 |
2008 | 2.40 |
2009 | -0.83 |
2010 | 1.41 |
Forecast | |
2011 | 2.75 |
2012 | 3.48 |
Bottom-left panel
Real PCE
Period | April Tealbook | June Tealbook |
---|---|---|
2009 | ND | 0.18 |
2010 | ND | 2.61 |
Forecast | ||
2011 | 2.92 | 2.20 |
2012 | 3.73 | 2.79 |
Bottom-right panel
Single-family Housing Starts
Period | April Tealbook | Current |
---|---|---|
2007:Q1 | ND | 1.17 |
2007:Q2 | ND | 1.15 |
2007:Q3 | ND | 0.98 |
2007:Q4 | ND | 0.84 |
2008:Q1 | ND | 0.74 |
2008:Q2 | ND | 0.67 |
2008:Q3 | ND | 0.59 |
2008:Q4 | ND | 0.47 |
2009:Q1 | ND | 0.36 |
2009:Q2 | ND | 0.43 |
2009:Q3 | ND | 0.50 |
2009:Q4 | ND | 0.49 |
2010:Q1 | ND | 0.52 |
2010:Q2 | ND | 0.49 |
2010:Q3 | ND | 0.43 |
2010:Q4 | ND | 0.44 |
2011:Q1 | 0.41 | 0.41 |
Forecast | ||
2011:Q2 | 0.42 | 0.41 |
2011:Q3 | 0.44 | 0.42 |
2011:Q4 | 0.45 | 0.42 |
2012:Q1 | 0.47 | 0.43 |
2012:Q2 | 0.48 | 0.44 |
2012:Q3 | 0.52 | 0.47 |
2012:Q4 | 0.56 | 0.50 |
Exhibit 4
Inflation Projection
Top-left panel
Reserve Bank Inquiries of Their District Business Contacts
Question | Percent |
---|---|
Plan to increase employment | 45 |
Skill shortages restraining hiring | 21 |
Raise starting pay for recruiting | 6 |
Expected wage change less than 2.5 percent* | 56 |
* Includes underchanged and decrease. Return to table
Top-right panel
Compensation per Hour*
Period | Percent change, Q4/Q4 |
---|---|
2005-07 | 3.87 |
2008 | 2.30 |
2009 | 2.80 |
2010 | 1.36 |
Forecast | |
2011 | 2.11 |
2012 | 2.49 |
* Nonfarm business sector. Return to text
Middle-left panel
PCE Price Projection
2011 | 2012 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
H1 | H2 | |||
1. | PCE price index | 3.6 | 1.1 | 1.5 |
2. | Apr. TB | 3.3 | 1.2 | 1.2 |
3. | Food | 6.5 | 2.5 | 1.4 |
4. | Energy | 28.9 | -6.1 | 1.0 |
5. | Core PCE | 1.8 | 1.6 | 1.5 |
6. | Apr. TB | 1.5 | 1.3 | 1.4 |
Middle-right panel
Retail Price of Gasoline
Date | Dollars per gallon |
---|---|
10 January 2011 | 3.14 |
17 January 2011 | 3.12 |
24 January 2011 | 3.13 |
31 January 2011 | 3.14 |
7 February 2011 | 3.18 |
14 February 2011 | 3.21 |
21 February 2011 | 3.26 |
28 February 2011 | 3.44 |
7 March 2011 | 3.57 |
14 March 2011 | 3.60 |
21 March 2011 | 3.59 |
28 March 2011 | 3.63 |
4 April 2011 | 3.73 |
11 April 2011 | 3.84 |
18 April 2011 | 3.89 |
25 April 2011 | 3.89 |
2 May 2011 | 3.93 |
9 May 2011 | 3.89 |
16 May 2011 | 3.84 |
23 May 2011 | 3.71 |
30 May 2011 | 3.66 |
6 June 2011 | 3.65 |
13 June 2011 | 3.58 |
Note: Seasonally adjusted price of regular unleaded gasoline.
Bottom-left panel
Unemployment Rate
Period | Unemployment rate | NAIRU* | NAIRU with EEB** |
---|---|---|---|
2007:Q1 | 4.51 | 5.00 | ND |
2007:Q2 | 4.49 | 5.00 | ND |
2007:Q3 | 4.67 | 5.00 | ND |
2007:Q4 | 4.81 | 5.00 | ND |
2008:Q1 | 4.96 | 5.00 | 5.00 |
2008:Q2 | 5.32 | 5.00 | 5.00 |
2008:Q3 | 6.04 | 5.17 | 5.30 |
2008:Q4 | 6.91 | 5.33 | 5.48 |
2009:Q1 | 8.21 | 5.49 | 5.76 |
2009:Q2 | 9.27 | 5.66 | 6.03 |
2009:Q3 | 9.67 | 5.82 | 6.35 |
2009:Q4 | 9.99 | 5.99 | 6.60 |
2010:Q1 | 9.69 | 5.99 | 6.74 |
2010:Q2 | 9.65 | 5.99 | 6.64 |
2010:Q3 | 9.58 | 5.99 | 6.64 |
2010:Q4 | 9.62 | 5.99 | 6.59 |
2011:Q1 | 8.93 | 6.00 | 6.55 |
Forecast | |||
2011:Q2 | 9.02 | 6.00 | 6.57 |
2011:Q3 | 9.00 | 6.00 | 6.55 |
2011:Q4 | 8.86 | 6.00 | 6.54 |
2012:Q1 | 8.79 | 6.00 | 6.48 |
2012:Q2 | 8.63 | 6.00 | 6.37 |
2012:Q3 | 8.42 | 6.00 | 6.26 |
2012:Q4 | 8.13 | 6.00 | 6.15 |
As shown in the chart, when unemployment rate is above NAIRU with EEB, the region between them is shaded light tan and is labeled "Labor market slack." When unemployment rate is below NAIRU, the region between them is shaded light gray.
* Staff estimate. Return to table
** Emergency unemployment compensation and state-federal extended benefits programs. Return to table
Bottom-right panel
Inflation Expectations
Period | Next twelve months | Next five to ten years |
---|---|---|
January 2004 | 2.7 | 2.8 |
February 2004 | 2.6 | 2.9 |
March 2004 | 2.9 | 2.9 |
April 2004 | 3.2 | 2.7 |
May 2004 | 3.3 | 2.8 |
June 2004 | 3.3 | 2.9 |
July 2004 | 3.0 | 2.8 |
August 2004 | 2.8 | 2.7 |
September 2004 | 2.8 | 2.8 |
October 2004 | 3.1 | 2.8 |
November 2004 | 2.8 | 2.7 |
December 2004 | 3.0 | 2.8 |
January 2005 | 2.9 | 2.7 |
February 2005 | 2.9 | 2.8 |
March 2005 | 3.2 | 2.9 |
April 2005 | 3.3 | 3.0 |
May 2005 | 3.2 | 2.9 |
June 2005 | 3.2 | 2.8 |
July 2005 | 3.0 | 2.9 |
August 2005 | 3.1 | 2.8 |
September 2005 | 4.3 | 3.1 |
October 2005 | 4.6 | 3.2 |
November 2005 | 3.3 | 3.0 |
December 2005 | 3.1 | 3.1 |
January 2006 | 3.0 | 2.9 |
February 2006 | 3.0 | 2.9 |
March 2006 | 3.0 | 2.9 |
April 2006 | 3.3 | 3.1 |
May 2006 | 4.0 | 3.2 |
June 2006 | 3.3 | 2.9 |
July 2006 | 3.2 | 2.9 |
August 2006 | 3.8 | 3.2 |
September 2006 | 3.1 | 3.0 |
October 2006 | 3.1 | 3.1 |
November 2006 | 3.0 | 3.0 |
December 2006 | 2.9 | 3.0 |
January 2007 | 3.0 | 3.0 |
February 2007 | 3.0 | 2.9 |
March 2007 | 3.0 | 2.9 |
April 2007 | 3.3 | 3.1 |
May 2007 | 3.3 | 3.1 |
June 2007 | 3.4 | 2.9 |
July 2007 | 3.4 | 3.1 |
August 2007 | 3.2 | 2.9 |
September 2007 | 3.1 | 2.9 |
October 2007 | 3.1 | 2.8 |
November 2007 | 3.4 | 2.9 |
December 2007 | 3.4 | 3.1 |
January 2008 | 3.4 | 3.0 |
February 2008 | 3.6 | 3.0 |
March 2008 | 4.3 | 2.9 |
April 2008 | 4.8 | 3.2 |
May 2008 | 5.2 | 3.4 |
June 2008 | 5.1 | 3.4 |
July 2008 | 5.1 | 3.2 |
August 2008 | 4.8 | 3.2 |
September 2008 | 4.3 | 3.0 |
October 2008 | 3.9 | 2.9 |
November 2008 | 2.9 | 2.9 |
December 2008 | 1.7 | 2.6 |
January 2009 | 2.2 | 2.9 |
February 2009 | 1.9 | 3.1 |
March 2009 | 2.0 | 2.6 |
April 2009 | 2.8 | 2.8 |
May 2009 | 2.8 | 2.9 |
June 2009 | 3.1 | 3.0 |
July 2009 | 2.9 | 3.0 |
August 2009 | 2.8 | 2.8 |
September 2009 | 2.2 | 2.8 |
October 2009 | 2.9 | 2.9 |
November 2009 | 2.7 | 3.0 |
December 2009 | 2.5 | 2.7 |
January 2010 | 2.8 | 2.9 |
February 2010 | 2.7 | 2.7 |
March 2010 | 2.7 | 2.7 |
April 2010 | 2.9 | 2.7 |
May 2010 | 3.2 | 2.9 |
June 2010 | 2.8 | 2.8 |
July 2010 | 2.7 | 2.9 |
August 2010 | 2.7 | 2.8 |
September 2010 | 2.2 | 2.7 |
October 2010 | 2.7 | 2.8 |
November 2010 | 3.0 | 2.8 |
December 2010 | 3.0 | 2.8 |
January 2011 | 3.4 | 2.9 |
February 2011 | 3.4 | 2.9 |
March 2011 | 4.6 | 3.2 |
April 2011 | 4.6 | 2.9 |
May 2011 | 4.1 | 2.9 |
June 2011 | 4.0 | 3.0 |
Source: Thomson Reuters/University of Michigan Surveys of Consumers.
Exhibit 5
Europe
Top-left panel
10-year Sovereign Bonds Spreads*
Date | Greece | Ireland | Portugal | Spain | Italy | Belgium |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 October 2008 | 89.3 | 58.7 | 67.8 | 55.5 | 83.7 | 59.4 |
2 October 2008 | 89.8 | 58.2 | 66.7 | 55.6 | 82.6 | 59.6 |
3 October 2008 | 86.7 | 58.4 | 64.5 | 55.1 | 80.0 | 56.7 |
6 October 2008 | 89.2 | 58.9 | 65.8 | 55.3 | 82.3 | 56.5 |
7 October 2008 | 90.9 | 59.4 | 66.0 | 56.0 | 82.9 | 56.3 |
8 October 2008 | 94.4 | 59.4 | 69.4 | 60.0 | 85.6 | 56.2 |
9 October 2008 | 97.0 | 60.6 | 70.0 | 60.8 | 86.1 | 57.1 |
10 October 2008 | 99.2 | 63.3 | 70.5 | 64.0 | 87.3 | 60.3 |
13 October 2008 | 93.5 | 65.4 | 66.3 | 62.0 | 80.6 | 58.6 |
14 October 2008 | 86.1 | 61.6 | 56.9 | 56.0 | 74.0 | 53.9 |
15 October 2008 | 83.6 | 59.9 | 49.4 | 47.2 | 68.7 | 46.7 |
16 October 2008 | 85.4 | 60.3 | 50.8 | 47.5 | 70.5 | 47.1 |
17 October 2008 | 88.2 | 60.2 | 53.1 | 49.1 | 72.9 | 47.5 |
20 October 2008 | 89.2 | 60.5 | 52.0 | 49.2 | 72.0 | 47.5 |
21 October 2008 | 92.1 | 60.3 | 53.8 | 48.3 | 75.3 | 47.3 |
22 October 2008 | 100.6 | 65.5 | 58.1 | 52.1 | 82.2 | 51.1 |
23 October 2008 | 108.3 | 70.5 | 63.4 | 56.4 | 87.7 | 54.8 |
24 October 2008 | 115.5 | 74.3 | 68.9 | 61.8 | 92.3 | 57.6 |
27 October 2008 | 119.9 | 79.7 | 72.2 | 61.8 | 96.2 | 57.8 |
28 October 2008 | 122.1 | 83.2 | 72.7 | 61.6 | 100.1 | 60.9 |
29 October 2008 | 149.0 | 87.0 | 81.7 | 63.7 | 111.6 | 64.9 |
30 October 2008 | 157.8 | 89.6 | 88.1 | 67.7 | 121.3 | 69.7 |
31 October 2008 | 161.2 | 96.0 | 92.4 | 70.7 | 124.8 | 73.0 |
3 November 2008 | 164.6 | 101.5 | 93.3 | 71.5 | 119.6 | 74.7 |
4 November 2008 | 154.6 | 102.2 | 93.6 | 72.6 | 106.9 | 75.8 |
5 November 2008 | 150.4 | 98.5 | 90.3 | 68.2 | 101.6 | 73.9 |
6 November 2008 | 151.0 | 97.2 | 86.3 | 62.8 | 96.8 | 73.4 |
7 November 2008 | 140.1 | 92.9 | 77.0 | 56.2 | 92.8 | 69.5 |
10 November 2008 | 136.8 | 83.3 | 75.6 | 56.0 | 91.5 | 68.2 |
11 November 2008 | 139.3 | 84.1 | 75.1 | 55.3 | 94.9 | 67.4 |
12 November 2008 | 146.6 | 85.8 | 78.1 | 55.1 | 103.3 | 65.5 |
13 November 2008 | 151.1 | 85.3 | 78.5 | 55.8 | 105.1 | 65.8 |
14 November 2008 | 138.5 | 78.0 | 70.0 | 46.2 | 94.7 | 57.4 |
17 November 2008 | 146.7 | 79.1 | 72.3 | 49.6 | 102.0 | 58.6 |
18 November 2008 | 142.7 | 79.3 | 71.0 | 49.1 | 100.5 | 60.8 |
19 November 2008 | 143.8 | 79.3 | 71.8 | 49.8 | 101.0 | 61.8 |
20 November 2008 | 146.2 | 82.5 | 71.6 | 47.9 | 104.0 | 64.1 |
21 November 2008 | 150.4 | 83.8 | 73.5 | 49.8 | 107.1 | 68.1 |
24 November 2008 | 149.2 | 87.3 | 74.4 | 52.6 | 105.9 | 71.5 |
25 November 2008 | 154.8 | 87.5 | 75.0 | 55.1 | 108.9 | 71.6 |
26 November 2008 | 157.9 | 88.9 | 75.0 | 58.9 | 111.7 | 71.5 |
27 November 2008 | 161.1 | 88.1 | 75.9 | 60.5 | 116.5 | 71.6 |
28 November 2008 | 158.1 | 90.8 | 77.0 | 63.2 | 120.4 | 72.9 |
1 December 2008 | 166.2 | 94.4 | 80.8 | 70.4 | 125.6 | 78.0 |
2 December 2008 | 164.3 | 101.6 | 80.4 | 71.6 | 126.4 | 78.5 |
3 December 2008 | 163.1 | 103.4 | 79.4 | 71.2 | 125.8 | 76.7 |
4 December 2008 | 167.0 | 103.4 | 85.8 | 76.0 | 133.0 | 78.7 |
5 December 2008 | 168.5 | 113.5 | 91.4 | 78.0 | 140.7 | 81.0 |
8 December 2008 | 169.1 | 116.9 | 93.3 | 79.9 | 137.9 | 82.7 |
9 December 2008 | 167.9 | 117.9 | 91.6 | 78.6 | 130.7 | 83.5 |
10 December 2008 | 169.7 | 118.3 | 92.5 | 78.4 | 126.9 | 82.8 |
11 December 2008 | 191.1 | 118.8 | 90.7 | 77.0 | 127.7 | 80.0 |
12 December 2008 | 206.5 | 121.4 | 93.2 | 77.6 | 132.2 | 80.0 |
15 December 2008 | 220.6 | 130.6 | 99.1 | 81.3 | 137.4 | 83.2 |
16 December 2008 | 219.2 | 127.2 | 97.4 | 82.8 | 132.5 | 83.6 |
17 December 2008 | 223.9 | 127.7 | 96.1 | 84.3 | 134.1 | 83.6 |
18 December 2008 | 228.2 | 130.0 | 96.1 | 84.5 | 134.8 | 83.0 |
19 December 2008 | 225.9 | 129.9 | 96.3 | 83.8 | 135.8 | 82.6 |
22 December 2008 | 230.7 | 131.2 | 100.5 | 85.1 | 137.1 | 83.4 |
23 December 2008 | 228.0 | 131.6 | 100.8 | 85.5 | 134.6 | 82.8 |
24 December 2008 | 226.5 | 132.8 | 101.2 | 85.4 | 134.8 | 82.9 |
25 December 2008 | 226.6 | 133.5 | 100.7 | 85.5 | 134.9 | 82.9 |
26 December 2008 | 227.1 | 133.5 | 100.7 | 85.5 | 134.9 | 82.9 |
29 December 2008 | 228.9 | 132.1 | 102.4 | 85.1 | 141.4 | 82.3 |
30 December 2008 | 227.8 | 130.9 | 102.6 | 86.6 | 142.6 | 83.0 |
31 December 2008 | 227.4 | 131.5 | 102.2 | 86.0 | 143.1 | 82.4 |
1 January 2009 | 227.5 | 131.6 | 103.2 | 86.1 | 143.1 | 82.6 |
2 January 2009 | 223.1 | 128.7 | 100.7 | 83.7 | 135.9 | 79.0 |
5 January 2009 | 214.7 | 127.5 | 99.9 | 83.4 | 130.7 | 79.2 |
6 January 2009 | 215.0 | 139.3 | 101.5 | 83.4 | 130.3 | 80.4 |
7 January 2009 | 211.0 | 138.3 | 96.6 | 79.8 | 124.6 | 79.7 |
8 January 2009 | 212.1 | 138.8 | 98.3 | 79.3 | 125.8 | 81.7 |
9 January 2009 | 225.6 | 142.7 | 99.2 | 82.5 | 131.4 | 86.3 |
12 January 2009 | 234.6 | 155.3 | 107.2 | 90.9 | 138.6 | 89.3 |
13 January 2009 | 239.1 | 156.7 | 112.9 | 98.5 | 140.7 | 94.7 |
14 January 2009 | 244.6 | 163.7 | 116.7 | 100.9 | 146.3 | 96.1 |
15 January 2009 | 253.8 | 173.5 | 129.8 | 114.7 | 151.9 | 99.5 |
16 January 2009 | 251.9 | 185.0 | 127.3 | 118.8 | 146.9 | 117.2 |
19 January 2009 | 251.7 | 207.2 | 125.5 | 115.6 | 142.5 | 118.4 |
20 January 2009 | 268.4 | 226.5 | 137.7 | 117.9 | 149.5 | 121.2 |
21 January 2009 | 278.4 | 264.6 | 146.2 | 123.3 | 156.8 | 130.8 |
22 January 2009 | 291.4 | 272.5 | 159.1 | 121.3 | 154.5 | 137.7 |
23 January 2009 | 296.8 | 271.7 | 151.4 | 118.2 | 155.2 | 134.3 |
26 January 2009 | 285.2 | 269.8 | 141.9 | 115.0 | 151.0 | 131.3 |
27 January 2009 | 276.7 | 254.0 | 140.0 | 113.7 | 158.6 | 125.6 |
28 January 2009 | 266.1 | 234.2 | 133.5 | 113.1 | 153.4 | 119.1 |
29 January 2009 | 247.2 | 221.8 | 125.4 | 109.5 | 142.4 | 112.5 |
30 January 2009 | 251.9 | 222.0 | 129.2 | 109.8 | 141.8 | 110.6 |
2 February 2009 | 251.4 | 215.6 | 127.9 | 110.2 | 134.2 | 111.1 |
3 February 2009 | 244.8 | 214.8 | 123.7 | 105.5 | 127.3 | 108.0 |
4 February 2009 | 232.6 | 208.3 | 110.5 | 94.8 | 116.8 | 94.7 |
5 February 2009 | 236.3 | 200.5 | 110.7 | 92.4 | 122.8 | 95.3 |
6 February 2009 | 233.5 | 199.4 | 108.9 | 110.4 | 119.7 | 95.2 |
9 February 2009 | 222.5 | 194.0 | 103.2 | 100.1 | 114.2 | 93.8 |
10 February 2009 | 229.0 | 192.5 | 105.2 | 99.9 | 118.7 | 93.1 |
11 February 2009 | 247.4 | 202.9 | 120.5 | 103.6 | 132.5 | 99.7 |
12 February 2009 | 264.2 | 223.2 | 129.8 | 116.6 | 140.8 | 106.0 |
13 February 2009 | 274.6 | 234.9 | 137.8 | 116.9 | 147.1 | 107.7 |
16 February 2009 | 291.4 | 247.8 | 155.7 | 125.4 | 154.7 | 120.1 |
17 February 2009 | 299.0 | 253.6 | 163.0 | 128.0 | 157.5 | 124.8 |
18 February 2009 | 291.2 | 252.2 | 158.8 | 121.7 | 150.7 | 119.3 |
19 February 2009 | 268.0 | 242.5 | 146.1 | 119.5 | 140.2 | 116.6 |
20 February 2009 | 250.5 | 237.0 | 143.1 | 115.0 | 142.1 | 116.1 |
23 February 2009 | 239.6 | 233.7 | 147.7 | 112.9 | 143.1 | 110.7 |
24 February 2009 | 248.3 | 239.3 | 154.5 | 117.6 | 151.6 | 112.7 |
25 February 2009 | 245.9 | 241.5 | 147.2 | 117.7 | 157.2 | 111.3 |
26 February 2009 | 245.5 | 237.5 | 147.7 | 118.0 | 154.6 | 109.4 |
27 February 2009 | 256.6 | 239.3 | 146.7 | 117.2 | 156.9 | 108.7 |
2 March 2009 | 258.7 | 245.7 | 149.7 | 118.1 | 156.7 | 109.5 |
3 March 2009 | 267.0 | 248.0 | 146.9 | 116.0 | 156.0 | 108.4 |
4 March 2009 | 269.3 | 254.3 | 142.5 | 109.2 | 149.8 | 104.6 |
5 March 2009 | 272.4 | 255.6 | 140.2 | 104.7 | 149.4 | 104.6 |
6 March 2009 | 280.6 | 267.4 | 150.0 | 110.2 | 156.1 | 108.5 |
9 March 2009 | 275.8 | 269.3 | 150.8 | 106.3 | 152.4 | 108.0 |
10 March 2009 | 275.1 | 266.3 | 149.6 | 104.1 | 149.4 | 105.8 |
11 March 2009 | 269.0 | 274.2 | 145.2 | 100.1 | 145.5 | 102.6 |
12 March 2009 | 300.3 | 277.8 | 149.8 | 102.5 | 151.6 | 101.1 |
13 March 2009 | 297.9 | 277.3 | 164.9 | 100.4 | 145.8 | 98.5 |
16 March 2009 | 294.1 | 274.3 | 155.7 | 98.2 | 137.1 | 91.1 |
17 March 2009 | 281.3 | 274.4 | 153.1 | 99.1 | 133.3 | 91.1 |
18 March 2009 | 275.3 | 275.8 | 153.3 | 99.5 | 131.1 | 90.0 |
19 March 2009 | 275.9 | 283.5 | 157.7 | 104.8 | 134.3 | 91.8 |
20 March 2009 | 265.9 | 275.8 | 152.3 | 104.7 | 128.8 | 89.0 |
23 March 2009 | 261.7 | 272.6 | 152.8 | 102.4 | 131.9 | 88.1 |
24 March 2009 | 260.2 | 248.0 | 150.2 | 100.8 | 130.1 | 87.9 |
25 March 2009 | 249.3 | 234.7 | 145.5 | 98.5 | 124.8 | 86.7 |
26 March 2009 | 251.9 | 224.6 | 141.8 | 95.1 | 125.1 | 86.4 |
27 March 2009 | 256.8 | 228.8 | 145.9 | 96.3 | 128.1 | 87.3 |
30 March 2009 | 271.8 | 237.7 | 151.7 | 103.0 | 140.1 | 92.7 |
31 March 2009 | 274.6 | 246.9 | 155.9 | 105.7 | 140.0 | 94.9 |
1 April 2009 | 271.2 | 238.9 | 155.1 | 106.2 | 134.4 | 96.3 |
2 April 2009 | 260.2 | 226.2 | 148.5 | 100.6 | 127.5 | 91.3 |
3 April 2009 | 248.7 | 208.6 | 139.0 | 94.0 | 118.3 | 83.9 |
6 April 2009 | 241.4 | 201.7 | 134.1 | 87.9 | 118.1 | 76.9 |
7 April 2009 | 243.8 | 204.2 | 137.9 | 91.6 | 122.6 | 79.4 |
8 April 2009 | 238.8 | 213.2 | 138.8 | 93.5 | 122.6 | 77.9 |
9 April 2009 | 230.4 | 214.6 | 135.3 | 90.8 | 118.3 | 75.7 |
10 April 2009 | 230.2 | 215.3 | 136.7 | 89.6 | 117.6 | 75.5 |
13 April 2009 | 229.9 | 214.7 | 137.6 | 89.1 | 117.4 | 75.7 |
14 April 2009 | 231.8 | 216.0 | 136.9 | 90.2 | 119.3 | 75.2 |
15 April 2009 | 232.7 | 221.1 | 138.7 | 92.2 | 118.9 | 75.2 |
16 April 2009 | 227.2 | 209.1 | 136.4 | 89.0 | 114.5 | 74.1 |
17 April 2009 | 221.7 | 208.6 | 131.9 | 86.0 | 109.5 | 71.7 |
20 April 2009 | 222.9 | 208.8 | 132.8 | 86.2 | 115.7 | 72.8 |
21 April 2009 | 232.3 | 210.8 | 136.7 | 86.9 | 119.7 | 74.0 |
22 April 2009 | 221.1 | 209.9 | 132.9 | 82.4 | 115.7 | 71.3 |
23 April 2009 | 211.0 | 197.4 | 121.2 | 78.6 | 108.7 | 67.0 |
24 April 2009 | 212.1 | 198.0 | 123.6 | 81.6 | 111.9 | 69.8 |
27 April 2009 | 214.5 | 203.7 | 123.8 | 82.0 | 113.5 | 70.2 |
28 April 2009 | 215.3 | 205.8 | 123.5 | 81.5 | 115.3 | 70.6 |
29 April 2009 | 218.6 | 205.1 | 120.3 | 77.4 | 114.3 | 70.4 |
30 April 2009 | 214.0 | 202.1 | 114.7 | 74.8 | 109.9 | 69.0 |
1 May 2009 | 214.6 | 203.4 | 114.6 | 74.9 | 110.6 | 69.1 |
4 May 2009 | 209.0 | 198.2 | 103.8 | 71.6 | 101.0 | 66.1 |
5 May 2009 | 201.2 | 189.7 | 99.4 | 69.8 | 98.4 | 63.7 |
6 May 2009 | 198.5 | 186.6 | 94.0 | 68.8 | 96.2 | 62.8 |
7 May 2009 | 174.0 | 170.1 | 84.8 | 64.7 | 85.1 | 59.1 |
8 May 2009 | 162.5 | 163.8 | 80.5 | 59.4 | 80.5 | 56.3 |
11 May 2009 | 169.0 | 166.9 | 79.8 | 59.3 | 84.0 | 57.4 |
12 May 2009 | 179.5 | 172.6 | 79.6 | 61.5 | 91.1 | 61.3 |
13 May 2009 | 186.7 | 175.8 | 89.3 | 62.9 | 96.7 | 64.3 |
14 May 2009 | 192.8 | 185.4 | 95.8 | 69.1 | 101.6 | 69.8 |
15 May 2009 | 179.5 | 180.7 | 83.3 | 67.5 | 92.9 | 66.9 |
18 May 2009 | 178.5 | 180.9 | 82.7 | 67.4 | 93.3 | 66.8 |
19 May 2009 | 170.0 | 177.2 | 78.0 | 67.4 | 88.0 | 63.7 |
20 May 2009 | 167.8 | 176.6 | 79.3 | 66.6 | 86.9 | 62.3 |
21 May 2009 | 176.5 | 182.8 | 88.2 | 74.2 | 93.8 | 65.9 |
22 May 2009 | 168.2 | 172.4 | 78.5 | 65.8 | 82.1 | 55.8 |
25 May 2009 | 166.8 | 170.7 | 74.9 | 67.3 | 80.0 | 56.7 |
26 May 2009 | 171.2 | 171.0 | 77.7 | 67.2 | 82.7 | 56.1 |
27 May 2009 | 173.4 | 175.8 | 75.8 | 65.5 | 83.5 | 55.3 |
28 May 2009 | 182.5 | 177.0 | 77.8 | 67.0 | 88.4 | 56.7 |
29 May 2009 | 185.7 | 186.6 | 82.5 | 69.6 | 89.4 | 59.2 |
1 June 2009 | 183.5 | 184.5 | 78.5 | 68.9 | 82.5 | 57.9 |
2 June 2009 | 183.0 | 184.2 | 78.9 | 75.5 | 85.0 | 55.5 |
3 June 2009 | 187.3 | 192.9 | 85.5 | 76.3 | 90.2 | 56.4 |
4 June 2009 | 192.8 | 201.3 | 94.0 | 81.2 | 94.0 | 59.8 |
5 June 2009 | 186.2 | 199.4 | 91.0 | 74.2 | 89.6 | 57.2 |
8 June 2009 | 185.7 | 201.7 | 91.8 | 73.0 | 101.0 | 56.5 |
9 June 2009 | 189.0 | 206.0 | 94.6 | 73.4 | 105.2 | 56.6 |
10 June 2009 | 183.9 | 202.8 | 91.2 | 73.4 | 104.8 | 56.2 |
11 June 2009 | 177.3 | 199.9 | 90.1 | 73.1 | 104.2 | 56.9 |
12 June 2009 | 171.9 | 194.1 | 92.2 | 74.9 | 105.3 | 57.4 |
15 June 2009 | 171.2 | 196.7 | 94.6 | 77.9 | 108.0 | 58.9 |
16 June 2009 | 172.1 | 195.9 | 96.0 | 79.7 | 109.8 | 58.8 |
17 June 2009 | 176.3 | 195.7 | 97.3 | 82.3 | 111.0 | 59.3 |
18 June 2009 | 176.2 | 196.9 | 96.4 | 79.4 | 108.0 | 58.5 |
19 June 2009 | 175.0 | 220.1 | 96.0 | 77.1 | 108.0 | 57.3 |
22 June 2009 | 182.0 | 223.6 | 99.0 | 79.0 | 113.0 | 57.6 |
23 June 2009 | 186.2 | 229.6 | 102.3 | 78.0 | 114.9 | 58.6 |
24 June 2009 | 180.1 | 241.7 | 100.9 | 75.4 | 111.7 | 58.6 |
25 June 2009 | 176.2 | 244.6 | 101.6 | 74.1 | 111.6 | 57.7 |
26 June 2009 | 175.7 | 244.8 | 102.6 | 75.2 | 111.7 | 59.0 |
29 June 2009 | 168.0 | 239.1 | 102.1 | 74.8 | 106.3 | 58.6 |
30 June 2009 | 165.5 | 234.4 | 100.9 | 74.5 | 104.8 | 57.6 |
1 July 2009 | 162.7 | 229.7 | 99.0 | 73.7 | 102.7 | 56.8 |
2 July 2009 | 160.2 | 229.1 | 101.3 | 72.9 | 105.6 | 58.0 |
3 July 2009 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
6 July 2009 | 157.8 | 219.2 | 103.3 | 73.6 | 108.6 | 59.6 |
7 July 2009 | 159.6 | 217.1 | 100.9 | 73.8 | 110.7 | 58.2 |
8 July 2009 | 173.0 | 222.5 | 106.7 | 78.3 | 115.6 | 61.1 |
9 July 2009 | 169.9 | 222.8 | 101.3 | 78.4 | 116.3 | 61.4 |
10 July 2009 | 174.1 | 222.4 | 100.9 | 78.7 | 118.8 | 62.3 |
13 July 2009 | 174.2 | 222.4 | 103.3 | 80.1 | 118.9 | 62.4 |
14 July 2009 | 171.0 | 219.6 | 101.4 | 78.9 | 116.3 | 61.6 |
15 July 2009 | 162.6 | 210.1 | 96.1 | 75.3 | 109.1 | 57.9 |
16 July 2009 | 158.7 | 210.4 | 96.0 | 74.8 | 107.6 | 57.4 |
17 July 2009 | 154.9 | 211.4 | 91.8 | 73.8 | 101.0 | 56.1 |
20 July 2009 | 142.9 | 201.7 | 84.4 | 65.9 | 95.1 | 53.7 |
21 July 2009 | 140.3 | 200.7 | 83.4 | 64.0 | 94.9 | 54.1 |
22 July 2009 | 139.8 | 196.9 | 80.1 | 62.5 | 93.5 | 51.4 |
23 July 2009 | 132.5 | 181.4 | 74.7 | 58.3 | 89.4 | 48.2 |
24 July 2009 | 138.5 | 176.4 | 70.6 | 57.5 | 90.2 | 47.8 |
27 July 2009 | 135.9 | 174.9 | 66.8 | 57.0 | 85.9 | 45.9 |
28 July 2009 | 130.8 | 173.4 | 67.9 | 57.3 | 85.6 | 45.4 |
29 July 2009 | 124.2 | 168.0 | 61.8 | 56.7 | 84.0 | 45.2 |
30 July 2009 | 119.1 | 164.0 | 59.3 | 54.6 | 82.3 | 44.0 |
31 July 2009 | 122.0 | 166.4 | 62.8 | 54.6 | 86.0 | 43.4 |
3 August 2009 | 119.9 | 166.1 | 62.0 | 54.8 | 82.8 | 43.7 |
4 August 2009 | 119.9 | 162.1 | 61.3 | 55.1 | 81.7 | 44.3 |
5 August 2009 | 116.6 | 161.1 | 59.4 | 56.4 | 80.8 | 44.8 |
6 August 2009 | 114.7 | 160.2 | 60.4 | 55.3 | 78.9 | 45.0 |
7 August 2009 | 110.2 | 151.6 | 54.4 | 49.2 | 70.3 | 40.8 |
10 August 2009 | 107.9 | 142.5 | 52.1 | 44.6 | 66.9 | 35.2 |
11 August 2009 | 109.1 | 144.5 | 52.9 | 44.8 | 71.5 | 36.6 |
12 August 2009 | 113.3 | 150.2 | 58.7 | 47.4 | 73.6 | 38.3 |
13 August 2009 | 116.3 | 150.2 | 59.5 | 46.9 | 77.2 | 40.2 |
14 August 2009 | 120.7 | 154.3 | 63.6 | 51.4 | 82.4 | 45.6 |
17 August 2009 | 126.2 | 155.0 | 65.0 | 53.6 | 83.8 | 47.9 |
18 August 2009 | 123.7 | 154.9 | 62.9 | 51.6 | 81.8 | 48.4 |
19 August 2009 | 130.1 | 158.0 | 65.7 | 53.7 | 85.8 | 50.3 |
20 August 2009 | 128.2 | 157.2 | 64.1 | 52.0 | 82.8 | 47.7 |
21 August 2009 | 120.8 | 151.5 | 61.3 | 50.0 | 76.9 | 44.5 |
24 August 2009 | 121.6 | 150.5 | 60.3 | 49.7 | 80.7 | 44.2 |
25 August 2009 | 118.0 | 147.3 | 59.3 | 49.4 | 79.3 | 44.0 |
26 August 2009 | 119.5 | 154.8 | 61.5 | 49.3 | 80.5 | 44.4 |
27 August 2009 | 118.8 | 153.4 | 60.4 | 49.6 | 78.9 | 43.5 |
28 August 2009 | 118.1 | 154.4 | 63.1 | 50.5 | 80.4 | 43.6 |
31 August 2009 | 123.5 | 159.0 | 63.6 | 51.8 | 81.9 | 45.0 |
1 September 2009 | 130.5 | 164.4 | 68.2 | 57.8 | 84.9 | 47.6 |
2 September 2009 | 134.4 | 166.9 | 71.4 | 60.3 | 87.5 | 49.3 |
3 September 2009 | 142.8 | 169.1 | 74.9 | 64.5 | 89.9 | 51.5 |
4 September 2009 | 142.3 | 168.5 | 75.0 | 63.1 | 89.7 | 49.7 |
7 September 2009 | 146.3 | 170.6 | 75.7 | 66.8 | 91.7 | 50.1 |
8 September 2009 | 140.9 | 170.1 | 71.2 | 65.3 | 88.7 | 49.3 |
9 September 2009 | 132.3 | 165.3 | 64.2 | 59.7 | 80.6 | 44.6 |
10 September 2009 | 134.0 | 163.7 | 62.9 | 55.9 | 81.0 | 42.7 |
11 September 2009 | 130.2 | 162.0 | 63.5 | 55.0 | 80.2 | 41.9 |
14 September 2009 | 129.2 | 164.3 | 62.2 | 57.8 | 80.3 | 42.6 |
15 September 2009 | 123.9 | 159.8 | 60.0 | 55.2 | 76.8 | 40.1 |
16 September 2009 | 118.4 | 154.8 | 57.9 | 53.8 | 72.5 | 38.4 |
17 September 2009 | 117.1 | 150.2 | 58.4 | 52.1 | 71.4 | 37.4 |
18 September 2009 | 115.4 | 146.7 | 56.4 | 52.5 | 69.9 | 38.1 |
21 September 2009 | 117.9 | 148.4 | 58.2 | 53.1 | 71.1 | 40.0 |
22 September 2009 | 115.9 | 145.0 | 56.7 | 50.7 | 70.6 | 39.3 |
23 September 2009 | 116.4 | 142.1 | 56.5 | 49.5 | 73.2 | 39.0 |
24 September 2009 | 115.6 | 142.9 | 56.0 | 48.9 | 73.3 | 38.5 |
25 September 2009 | 121.1 | 143.3 | 57.3 | 51.2 | 74.4 | 39.5 |
28 September 2009 | 122.0 | 144.2 | 57.7 | 52.6 | 75.5 | 40.6 |
29 September 2009 | 123.1 | 141.4 | 60.0 | 55.1 | 76.9 | 41.7 |
30 September 2009 | 130.0 | 145.4 | 63.1 | 58.8 | 79.5 | 44.4 |
1 October 2009 | 138.0 | 159.7 | 71.2 | 63.7 | 95.7 | 50.6 |
2 October 2009 | 134.5 | 163.8 | 70.1 | 64.0 | 93.8 | 50.0 |
5 October 2009 | 130.4 | 167.2 | 66.8 | 62.8 | 92.4 | 49.6 |
6 October 2009 | 131.0 | 161.4 | 63.8 | 62.2 | 90.4 | 49.2 |
7 October 2009 | 131.8 | 158.0 | 64.6 | 62.4 | 90.0 | 48.8 |
8 October 2009 | 130.1 | 155.7 | 64.5 | 61.2 | 88.7 | 48.7 |
9 October 2009 | 126.1 | 153.9 | 62.3 | 59.1 | 85.8 | 47.6 |
12 October 2009 | 127.1 | 154.1 | 62.8 | 59.6 | 87.1 | 47.6 |
13 October 2009 | 131.5 | 157.0 | 65.7 | 63.4 | 91.4 | 51.0 |
14 October 2009 | 130.5 | 156.0 | 63.1 | 61.5 | 90.1 | 48.8 |
15 October 2009 | 132.4 | 154.0 | 62.4 | 60.5 | 90.5 | 47.7 |
16 October 2009 | 136.9 | 153.4 | 60.3 | 58.6 | 88.4 | 46.0 |
19 October 2009 | 135.3 | 153.6 | 59.4 | 56.6 | 85.7 | 43.8 |
20 October 2009 | 134.6 | 151.3 | 58.8 | 56.8 | 85.5 | 42.8 |
21 October 2009 | 131.2 | 146.3 | 53.2 | 53.7 | 83.8 | 38.9 |
22 October 2009 | 131.3 | 146.9 | 53.2 | 52.9 | 83.8 | 37.9 |
23 October 2009 | 134.2 | 147.2 | 54.5 | 52.5 | 84.2 | 36.8 |
26 October 2009 | 133.5 | 144.9 | 54.1 | 51.3 | 82.7 | 36.0 |
27 October 2009 | 136.9 | 145.6 | 55.2 | 53.1 | 82.7 | 37.6 |
28 October 2009 | 136.3 | 145.9 | 54.2 | 52.9 | 82.4 | 37.1 |
29 October 2009 | 138.2 | 145.3 | 54.6 | 54.6 | 82.3 | 39.0 |
30 October 2009 | 142.3 | 146.8 | 56.2 | 55.7 | 84.3 | 40.2 |
2 November 2009 | 139.5 | 147.1 | 53.1 | 54.7 | 82.6 | 39.7 |
3 November 2009 | 139.1 | 145.5 | 51.7 | 55.3 | 82.0 | 39.3 |
4 November 2009 | 138.2 | 143.9 | 49.8 | 53.8 | 79.3 | 37.7 |
5 November 2009 | 137.6 | 140.9 | 49.0 | 53.5 | 77.6 | 37.3 |
6 November 2009 | 138.2 | 140.3 | 49.9 | 53.1 | 76.8 | 36.9 |
9 November 2009 | 137.5 | 140.1 | 49.6 | 53.2 | 76.8 | 36.8 |
10 November 2009 | 138.7 | 142.8 | 49.5 | 53.0 | 76.2 | 36.6 |
11 November 2009 | 132.2 | 136.7 | 42.1 | 46.4 | 69.4 | 30.7 |
12 November 2009 | 132.0 | 136.2 | 42.0 | 46.4 | 69.0 | 30.4 |
13 November 2009 | 140.0 | 139.9 | 43.6 | 49.2 | 71.7 | 32.5 |
16 November 2009 | 153.9 | 148.3 | 48.1 | 52.5 | 74.7 | 35.8 |
17 November 2009 | 147.7 | 139.8 | 47.6 | 50.3 | 74.0 | 33.7 |
18 November 2009 | 156.0 | 142.9 | 49.0 | 52.3 | 75.1 | 33.6 |
19 November 2009 | 169.7 | 149.2 | 53.0 | 55.3 | 78.9 | 36.4 |
20 November 2009 | 172.3 | 153.2 | 55.3 | 57.2 | 80.7 | 38.7 |
23 November 2009 | 166.2 | 149.8 | 54.0 | 56.6 | 78.8 | 38.1 |
24 November 2009 | 173.6 | 152.0 | 53.6 | 56.3 | 79.3 | 38.2 |
25 November 2009 | 179.4 | 155.3 | 54.5 | 55.6 | 79.5 | 37.4 |
26 November 2009 | 201.6 | 168.5 | 62.0 | 59.5 | 88.8 | 42.0 |
27 November 2009 | 194.2 | 170.6 | 62.3 | 60.8 | 87.1 | 42.5 |
30 November 2009 | 183.6 | 168.5 | 59.5 | 58.8 | 85.8 | 40.8 |
1 December 2009 | 172.9 | 164.4 | 57.5 | 58.1 | 83.5 | 40.6 |
2 December 2009 | 168.7 | 162.8 | 56.9 | 58.3 | 82.0 | 40.3 |
3 December 2009 | 171.3 | 160.9 | 56.0 | 57.3 | 81.1 | 40.3 |
4 December 2009 | 176.5 | 159.8 | 52.8 | 54.3 | 76.1 | 37.7 |
7 December 2009 | 195.2 | 163.5 | 58.0 | 55.9 | 76.7 | 38.6 |
8 December 2009 | 221.0 | 170.5 | 65.5 | 60.7 | 82.8 | 41.1 |
9 December 2009 | 246.8 | 189.7 | 77.4 | 69.5 | 87.5 | 45.4 |
10 December 2009 | 227.0 | 178.5 | 74.4 | 68.6 | 85.4 | 45.0 |
11 December 2009 | 208.4 | 165.9 | 68.8 | 62.6 | 81.9 | 41.6 |
14 December 2009 | 228.8 | 164.2 | 67.4 | 61.2 | 82.3 | 39.9 |
15 December 2009 | 249.8 | 162.4 | 67.8 | 61.1 | 79.9 | 40.0 |
16 December 2009 | 231.8 | 153.7 | 66.6 | 59.1 | 79.9 | 36.5 |
17 December 2009 | 253.2 | 158.7 | 71.7 | 64.6 | 82.5 | 38.3 |
18 December 2009 | 265.9 | 160.5 | 78.6 | 70.5 | 84.0 | 41.6 |
21 December 2009 | 276.9 | 159.1 | 81.5 | 73.7 | 84.4 | 41.4 |
22 December 2009 | 248.3 | 151.8 | 72.8 | 65.9 | 76.3 | 37.8 |
23 December 2009 | 242.3 | 147.7 | 69.5 | 63.3 | 72.7 | 35.3 |
24 December 2009 | 241.7 | 147.7 | 68.6 | 62.1 | 72.6 | 34.5 |
25 December 2009 | 242.4 | 148.2 | 69.4 | 62.6 | 73.1 | 34.9 |
28 December 2009 | 238.0 | 147.4 | 68.8 | 60.6 | 71.2 | 33.7 |
29 December 2009 | 236.6 | 146.2 | 67.5 | 58.7 | 73.5 | 29.4 |
30 December 2009 | 238.7 | 144.7 | 68.8 | 58.8 | 75.4 | 32.5 |
31 December 2009 | 238.7 | 145.2 | 68.2 | 59.1 | 75.5 | 32.2 |
1 January 2010 | 238.7 | 145.1 | 69.0 | 59.1 | 75.5 | 32.2 |
4 January 2010 | 233.1 | 138.0 | 67.3 | 57.9 | 71.7 | 32.1 |
5 January 2010 | 227.9 | 141.8 | 67.6 | 59.2 | 72.8 | 33.9 |
6 January 2010 | 227.1 | 151.2 | 69.1 | 62.2 | 73.9 | 35.3 |
7 January 2010 | 227.3 | 144.8 | 67.3 | 61.3 | 72.4 | 33.7 |
8 January 2010 | 220.0 | 140.2 | 61.2 | 57.0 | 69.3 | 31.0 |
11 January 2010 | 217.5 | 140.6 | 65.8 | 61.6 | 71.0 | 31.8 |
12 January 2010 | 234.5 | 144.2 | 69.4 | 63.5 | 74.2 | 33.2 |
13 January 2010 | 257.7 | 151.5 | 76.4 | 65.9 | 78.6 | 34.5 |
14 January 2010 | 277.6 | 157.4 | 88.6 | 69.8 | 80.6 | 59.9 |
15 January 2010 | 273.4 | 156.7 | 92.9 | 70.4 | 81.1 | 59.6 |
18 January 2010 | 268.1 | 156.9 | 94.3 | 72.5 | 81.2 | 59.4 |
19 January 2010 | 264.3 | 147.4 | 92.3 | 73.1 | 78.6 | 57.9 |
20 January 2010 | 293.8 | 161.3 | 104.4 | 79.6 | 85.2 | 59.9 |
21 January 2010 | 288.1 | 156.7 | 104.4 | 80.2 | 86.8 | 59.4 |
22 January 2010 | 304.8 | 159.5 | 109.2 | 81.5 | 86.3 | 60.2 |
25 January 2010 | 297.7 | 149.7 | 98.0 | 74.0 | 82.9 | 54.9 |
26 January 2010 | 303.7 | 149.7 | 93.3 | 82.6 | 81.7 | 52.5 |
27 January 2010 | 355.6 | 155.8 | 105.5 | 90.3 | 88.6 | 54.9 |
28 January 2010 | 396.1 | 165.4 | 121.6 | 98.6 | 94.8 | 58.4 |
29 January 2010 | 365.8 | 165.1 | 121.4 | 92.4 | 91.9 | 57.0 |
1 February 2010 | 344.0 | 162.1 | 120.7 | 84.2 | 86.3 | 55.0 |
2 February 2010 | 353.6 | 160.8 | 129.1 | 86.1 | 86.1 | 55.3 |
3 February 2010 | 349.7 | 162.7 | 147.0 | 88.9 | 85.6 | 54.6 |
4 February 2010 | 352.7 | 166.4 | 159.2 | 96.7 | 90.1 | 57.8 |
5 February 2010 | 350.5 | 174.4 | 161.3 | 100.1 | 94.4 | 60.3 |
8 February 2010 | 362.5 | 178.7 | 162.7 | 99.9 | 95.0 | 59.9 |
9 February 2010 | 324.4 | 169.3 | 147.4 | 90.9 | 90.1 | 55.3 |
10 February 2010 | 282.8 | 156.0 | 135.2 | 79.0 | 82.4 | 52.3 |
11 February 2010 | 273.2 | 146.0 | 118.4 | 76.0 | 80.8 | 49.6 |
12 February 2010 | 296.1 | 149.3 | 123.9 | 79.6 | 86.3 | 52.5 |
15 February 2010 | 304.9 | 153.4 | 123.4 | 82.3 | 86.0 | 55.2 |
16 February 2010 | 320.4 | 154.7 | 125.0 | 81.0 | 85.5 | 55.3 |
17 February 2010 | 318.4 | 154.6 | 118.4 | 80.2 | 85.2 | 54.5 |
18 February 2010 | 329.3 | 151.2 | 117.5 | 77.8 | 81.7 | 52.3 |
19 February 2010 | 317.5 | 147.5 | 112.1 | 75.1 | 80.8 | 49.7 |
22 February 2010 | 315.6 | 144.8 | 110.0 | 72.6 | 82.0 | 49.7 |
23 February 2010 | 332.0 | 146.6 | 111.7 | 74.4 | 86.2 | 51.7 |
24 February 2010 | 338.9 | 150.7 | 114.6 | 75.6 | 88.8 | 53.6 |
25 February 2010 | 355.1 | 155.7 | 117.4 | 79.6 | 93.6 | 56.6 |
26 February 2010 | 326.1 | 150.9 | 111.4 | 76.0 | 89.5 | 55.8 |
1 March 2010 | 316.0 | 143.3 | 98.6 | 71.3 | 86.9 | 53.9 |
2 March 2010 | 304.7 | 140.9 | 94.4 | 73.8 | 85.3 | 51.8 |
3 March 2010 | 285.8 | 139.4 | 91.6 | 73.2 | 83.0 | 51.0 |
4 March 2010 | 297.0 | 139.5 | 93.5 | 75.1 | 83.6 | 52.5 |
5 March 2010 | 291.1 | 135.5 | 91.0 | 70.9 | 79.9 | 51.5 |
8 March 2010 | 306.0 | 133.7 | 89.3 | 68.4 | 78.9 | 50.2 |
9 March 2010 | 313.2 | 134.6 | 93.4 | 71.0 | 80.3 | 52.2 |
10 March 2010 | 309.3 | 129.6 | 88.1 | 68.8 | 78.0 | 51.0 |
11 March 2010 | 314.8 | 128.5 | 106.0 | 69.3 | 77.9 | 49.7 |
12 March 2010 | 305.9 | 127.9 | 106.8 | 69.9 | 79.1 | 50.1 |
15 March 2010 | 305.5 | 129.8 | 110.4 | 71.9 | 79.7 | 50.1 |
16 March 2010 | 299.9 | 129.3 | 111.1 | 71.7 | 79.5 | 49.5 |
17 March 2010 | 299.7 | 135.0 | 114.7 | 73.6 | 80.5 | 51.1 |
18 March 2010 | 313.7 | 137.9 | 116.2 | 75.8 | 81.9 | 51.1 |
19 March 2010 | 323.9 | 141.3 | 120.6 | 77.6 | 84.5 | 51.7 |
22 March 2010 | 337.3 | 144.9 | 125.8 | 78.4 | 86.4 | 52.3 |
23 March 2010 | 324.9 | 142.7 | 123.9 | 76.8 | 85.4 | 50.9 |
24 March 2010 | 328.2 | 149.6 | 125.9 | 75.4 | 84.1 | 49.9 |
25 March 2010 | 312.8 | 143.2 | 123.8 | 71.7 | 78.4 | 47.0 |
26 March 2010 | 305.2 | 139.9 | 114.4 | 68.5 | 77.2 | 46.9 |
29 March 2010 | 316.1 | 138.5 | 114.2 | 69.5 | 78.6 | 46.3 |
30 March 2010 | 333.1 | 138.7 | 116.0 | 70.9 | 78.7 | 45.7 |
31 March 2010 | 343.7 | 138.3 | 112.7 | 72.4 | 88.9 | 44.9 |
1 April 2010 | 345.5 | 134.8 | 108.7 | 71.7 | 86.4 | 44.8 |
2 April 2010 | 345.7 | 134.2 | 108.1 | 71.3 | 86.0 | 44.9 |
5 April 2010 | 345.2 | 134.3 | 107.9 | 71.6 | 85.8 | 45.1 |
6 April 2010 | 383.9 | 135.7 | 110.2 | 73.6 | 87.0 | 46.0 |
7 April 2010 | 405.0 | 137.1 | 116.2 | 75.6 | 88.5 | 46.2 |
8 April 2010 | 426.8 | 139.7 | 127.8 | 76.4 | 89.1 | 45.2 |
9 April 2010 | 398.5 | 135.3 | 119.9 | 71.5 | 83.3 | 40.7 |
12 April 2010 | 349.5 | 131.4 | 116.7 | 66.7 | 80.9 | 38.7 |
13 April 2010 | 366.5 | 134.3 | 120.4 | 70.4 | 83.4 | 39.9 |
14 April 2010 | 394.0 | 138.5 | 129.2 | 72.0 | 84.8 | 41.5 |
15 April 2010 | 400.6 | 141.6 | 126.3 | 71.6 | 84.1 | 40.5 |
16 April 2010 | 430.3 | 147.4 | 139.4 | 74.8 | 86.5 | 41.8 |
19 April 2010 | 453.5 | 152.5 | 151.8 | 76.5 | 87.2 | 41.7 |
20 April 2010 | 478.3 | 146.6 | 154.8 | 76.5 | 86.4 | 40.8 |
21 April 2010 | 501.4 | 152.4 | 169.3 | 79.1 | 89.5 | 43.5 |
22 April 2010 | 578.7 | 172.4 | 190.6 | 88.8 | 94.7 | 49.9 |
23 April 2010 | 559.5 | 171.4 | 191.0 | 92.0 | 94.8 | 49.4 |
26 April 2010 | 651.5 | 186.7 | 218.2 | 100.5 | 97.7 | 52.1 |
27 April 2010 | 675.1 | 216.9 | 277.0 | 112.5 | 110.9 | 65.2 |
28 April 2010 | 693.4 | 224.7 | 277.2 | 108.2 | 107.7 | 57.5 |
29 April 2010 | 597.4 | 210.6 | 241.5 | 99.1 | 100.7 | 51.1 |
30 April 2010 | 594.5 | 210.0 | 212.2 | 101.3 | 99.8 | 47.0 |
3 May 2010 | 543.6 | 204.8 | 207.0 | 97.1 | 93.7 | 44.1 |
4 May 2010 | 644.8 | 233.8 | 252.0 | 115.6 | 105.8 | 49.4 |
5 May 2010 | 731.1 | 270.4 | 294.5 | 131.7 | 120.5 | 53.0 |
6 May 2010 | 851.6 | 300.2 | 334.7 | 162.9 | 148.9 | 68.6 |
7 May 2010 | 965.2 | 305.9 | 348.8 | 164.2 | 147.1 | 72.4 |
10 May 2010 | 481.1 | 176.8 | 169.6 | 97.2 | 101.4 | 47.0 |
11 May 2010 | 450.6 | 164.9 | 158.9 | 99.0 | 101.6 | 48.5 |
12 May 2010 | 430.1 | 163.1 | 164.0 | 97.2 | 99.1 | 45.5 |
13 May 2010 | 441.6 | 163.7 | 162.8 | 99.0 | 92.7 | 43.5 |
14 May 2010 | 485.4 | 174.2 | 179.0 | 108.4 | 104.3 | 44.9 |
17 May 2010 | 519.2 | 183.5 | 183.9 | 112.4 | 103.6 | 44.9 |
18 May 2010 | 473.4 | 179.3 | 179.2 | 116.9 | 106.7 | 40.1 |
19 May 2010 | 505.6 | 182.2 | 182.7 | 125.8 | 112.7 | 40.2 |
20 May 2010 | 509.6 | 196.3 | 193.3 | 138.6 | 127.4 | 43.9 |
21 May 2010 | 515.8 | 200.5 | 197.5 | 138.6 | 126.8 | 45.2 |
24 May 2010 | 513.3 | 201.0 | 197.0 | 140.5 | 125.4 | 45.9 |
25 May 2010 | 514.8 | 215.3 | 204.4 | 155.7 | 138.0 | 50.8 |
26 May 2010 | 505.2 | 216.6 | 205.5 | 155.2 | 137.4 | 51.7 |
27 May 2010 | 500.0 | 214.2 | 200.6 | 152.4 | 139.5 | 48.7 |
28 May 2010 | 498.5 | 214.6 | 202.3 | 153.0 | 145.3 | 48.8 |
31 May 2010 | 504.7 | 214.7 | 202.1 | 159.8 | 148.4 | 49.0 |
1 June 2010 | 517.5 | 223.0 | 211.0 | 165.2 | 149.8 | 57.1 |
2 June 2010 | 536.9 | 229.2 | 225.2 | 176.7 | 159.7 | 65.9 |
3 June 2010 | 540.4 | 233.1 | 235.6 | 184.2 | 161.5 | 75.7 |
4 June 2010 | 555.7 | 252.5 | 254.6 | 194.4 | 167.0 | 92.3 |
7 June 2010 | 556.0 | 258.6 | 263.7 | 203.8 | 176.8 | 102.3 |
8 June 2010 | 560.7 | 258.3 | 271.6 | 208.2 | 178.1 | 104.6 |
9 June 2010 | 558.5 | 253.5 | 266.7 | 200.4 | 157.2 | 97.1 |
10 June 2010 | 553.1 | 248.8 | 255.2 | 186.5 | 141.1 | 84.7 |
11 June 2010 | 561.6 | 254.3 | 253.4 | 189.6 | 146.2 | 79.4 |
14 June 2010 | 570.1 | 263.6 | 258.8 | 204.2 | 144.2 | 83.0 |
15 June 2010 | 640.8 | 281.0 | 277.7 | 206.4 | 136.7 | 80.0 |
16 June 2010 | 667.0 | 289.3 | 293.9 | 221.1 | 138.0 | 81.7 |
17 June 2010 | 667.6 | 290.0 | 292.4 | 211.1 | 136.1 | 82.0 |
18 June 2010 | 669.2 | 281.1 | 287.5 | 186.3 | 124.7 | 74.7 |
21 June 2010 | 672.1 | 269.6 | 285.7 | 169.8 | 121.4 | 67.0 |
22 June 2010 | 710.6 | 271.7 | 293.1 | 182.5 | 132.6 | 75.4 |
23 June 2010 | 772.1 | 281.0 | 307.7 | 189.3 | 140.5 | 85.7 |
24 June 2010 | 780.8 | 285.8 | 309.6 | 185.0 | 143.1 | 88.1 |
25 June 2010 | 780.7 | 291.0 | 312.6 | 185.3 | 146.8 | 94.6 |
28 June 2010 | 800.2 | 295.5 | 313.5 | 195.1 | 153.9 | 91.5 |
29 June 2010 | 789.3 | 295.1 | 316.4 | 205.0 | 157.1 | 91.0 |
30 June 2010 | 784.9 | 292.3 | 312.2 | 198.4 | 151.7 | 86.7 |
1 July 2010 | 770.9 | 290.5 | 301.4 | 200.9 | 151.2 | 82.5 |
2 July 2010 | 762.8 | 273.7 | 278.7 | 194.0 | 143.9 | 72.7 |
5 July 2010 | 766.0 | 272.7 | 277.1 | 206.6 | 146.8 | 69.2 |
6 July 2010 | 755.9 | 269.2 | 280.0 | 208.3 | 147.6 | 68.7 |
7 July 2010 | 756.0 | 269.7 | 283.8 | 205.7 | 148.5 | 69.0 |
8 July 2010 | 764.4 | 262.6 | 278.2 | 201.8 | 141.9 | 64.9 |
9 July 2010 | 763.7 | 261.9 | 274.9 | 205.9 | 138.9 | 61.0 |
12 July 2010 | 764.3 | 267.0 | 280.4 | 207.3 | 144.2 | 61.5 |
13 July 2010 | 755.5 | 266.3 | 284.6 | 200.5 | 142.3 | 58.2 |
14 July 2010 | 760.7 | 282.3 | 291.2 | 207.2 | 146.8 | 60.2 |
15 July 2010 | 766.9 | 284.6 | 287.3 | 197.1 | 147.7 | 62.8 |
16 July 2010 | 764.3 | 282.6 | 285.5 | 185.6 | 147.3 | 65.3 |
19 July 2010 | 778.0 | 283.9 | 282.9 | 175.7 | 140.2 | 66.3 |
20 July 2010 | 782.7 | 276.6 | 282.9 | 169.1 | 136.5 | 67.3 |
21 July 2010 | 785.8 | 275.8 | 281.8 | 167.9 | 137.4 | 68.1 |
22 July 2010 | 774.1 | 276.9 | 287.4 | 169.6 | 135.7 | 69.1 |
23 July 2010 | 767.4 | 271.5 | 284.3 | 164.9 | 131.8 | 65.5 |
26 July 2010 | 761.0 | 259.1 | 274.3 | 148.2 | 123.5 | 61.2 |
27 July 2010 | 749.9 | 238.8 | 242.9 | 137.4 | 120.4 | 55.6 |
28 July 2010 | 747.3 | 223.0 | 233.3 | 147.6 | 123.3 | 57.3 |
29 July 2010 | 750.3 | 232.4 | 238.7 | 152.1 | 125.6 | 59.2 |
30 July 2010 | 762.8 | 236.1 | 252.4 | 154.2 | 128.5 | 63.2 |
2 August 2010 | 749.2 | 227.5 | 246.3 | 146.2 | 122.2 | 62.2 |
3 August 2010 | 748.1 | 230.2 | 250.1 | 152.0 | 126.6 | 63.3 |
4 August 2010 | 762.4 | 229.3 | 251.2 | 154.0 | 125.3 | 61.0 |
5 August 2010 | 763.4 | 239.2 | 251.4 | 155.2 | 127.1 | 59.2 |
6 August 2010 | 762.8 | 236.7 | 249.2 | 152.5 | 126.5 | 56.6 |
9 August 2010 | 764.4 | 250.0 | 247.5 | 150.7 | 125.3 | 54.6 |
10 August 2010 | 777.9 | 267.0 | 254.2 | 164.3 | 131.7 | 57.8 |
11 August 2010 | 793.2 | 289.7 | 272.7 | 167.9 | 137.9 | 60.7 |
12 August 2010 | 797.4 | 287.6 | 271.9 | 175.9 | 141.8 | 61.1 |
13 August 2010 | 809.0 | 293.1 | 283.7 | 185.8 | 147.9 | 65.7 |
16 August 2010 | 836.5 | 299.2 | 287.3 | 186.7 | 152.3 | 68.1 |
17 August 2010 | 832.6 | 291.8 | 281.2 | 174.0 | 146.2 | 66.4 |
18 August 2010 | 824.2 | 288.3 | 278.0 | 168.0 | 140.4 | 63.0 |
19 August 2010 | 833.5 | 293.1 | 286.7 | 173.3 | 146.0 | 64.3 |
20 August 2010 | 848.1 | 303.3 | 294.4 | 178.9 | 151.4 | 68.2 |
23 August 2010 | 862.1 | 305.1 | 297.1 | 178.0 | 149.1 | 66.2 |
24 August 2010 | 885.0 | 318.1 | 306.6 | 184.0 | 157.2 | 68.0 |
25 August 2010 | 926.1 | 343.6 | 324.0 | 184.4 | 161.1 | 70.1 |
26 August 2010 | 925.8 | 345.5 | 325.8 | 185.8 | 161.0 | 70.0 |
27 August 2010 | 924.6 | 352.0 | 329.5 | 185.8 | 157.5 | 70.0 |
30 August 2010 | 927.1 | 352.6 | 331.8 | 192.6 | 165.9 | 69.7 |
31 August 2010 | 923.2 | 356.4 | 333.0 | 193.2 | 171.0 | 71.5 |
1 September 2010 | 910.2 | 347.5 | 326.0 | 180.9 | 157.5 | 68.6 |
2 September 2010 | 900.9 | 342.3 | 324.6 | 172.7 | 151.9 | 64.6 |
3 September 2010 | 896.8 | 340.3 | 324.8 | 167.1 | 145.4 | 63.7 |
6 September 2010 | 914.3 | 342.6 | 333.4 | 174.1 | 147.8 | 68.8 |
7 September 2010 | 941.9 | 372.8 | 354.0 | 180.6 | 154.2 | 74.1 |
8 September 2010 | 951.9 | 371.2 | 350.7 | 174.1 | 149.5 | 70.9 |
9 September 2010 | 936.7 | 354.0 | 342.1 | 172.0 | 145.4 | 70.2 |
10 September 2010 | 933.2 | 341.3 | 337.3 | 171.4 | 143.7 | 72.9 |
13 September 2010 | 894.4 | 339.1 | 330.4 | 172.6 | 145.4 | 74.0 |
14 September 2010 | 899.9 | 348.6 | 334.4 | 178.6 | 150.0 | 80.0 |
15 September 2010 | 907.8 | 350.1 | 336.6 | 175.7 | 147.8 | 80.3 |
16 September 2010 | 907.2 | 355.9 | 348.0 | 172.5 | 143.4 | 81.7 |
17 September 2010 | 913.3 | 386.6 | 365.8 | 177.3 | 150.6 | 86.0 |
20 September 2010 | 909.3 | 401.5 | 392.7 | 176.2 | 151.3 | 88.1 |
21 September 2010 | 884.1 | 383.2 | 385.1 | 175.0 | 148.1 | 82.8 |
22 September 2010 | 869.0 | 394.4 | 379.4 | 178.5 | 153.5 | 82.4 |
23 September 2010 | 874.9 | 418.4 | 401.7 | 183.7 | 161.2 | 88.9 |
24 September 2010 | 870.5 | 412.8 | 404.9 | 180.6 | 158.3 | 90.2 |
27 September 2010 | 862.9 | 429.9 | 414.8 | 186.8 | 163.7 | 85.6 |
28 September 2010 | 856.1 | 449.3 | 426.6 | 193.4 | 169.1 | 88.4 |
29 September 2010 | 840.5 | 446.0 | 423.3 | 195.7 | 169.7 | 89.1 |
30 September 2010 | 817.4 | 429.5 | 402.5 | 184.5 | 160.1 | 85.8 |
1 October 2010 | 786.0 | 402.3 | 384.1 | 180.7 | 157.6 | 81.5 |
4 October 2010 | 776.7 | 402.4 | 382.7 | 179.9 | 157.3 | 87.3 |
5 October 2010 | 773.8 | 410.3 | 393.0 | 178.0 | 154.2 | 86.9 |
6 October 2010 | 765.8 | 422.0 | 400.6 | 177.6 | 153.8 | 88.6 |
7 October 2010 | 755.2 | 422.8 | 401.5 | 176.8 | 152.7 | 90.4 |
8 October 2010 | 751.7 | 421.6 | 398.1 | 173.7 | 149.0 | 88.7 |
11 October 2010 | 699.7 | 417.6 | 389.6 | 171.0 | 145.7 | 85.2 |
12 October 2010 | 678.7 | 421.9 | 398.1 | 175.0 | 148.7 | 85.9 |
13 October 2010 | 650.2 | 413.9 | 390.3 | 174.5 | 146.9 | 87.2 |
14 October 2010 | 659.1 | 387.4 | 376.0 | 170.1 | 144.9 | 85.8 |
15 October 2010 | 652.3 | 374.9 | 336.9 | 161.7 | 138.8 | 82.5 |
18 October 2010 | 649.4 | 361.6 | 314.4 | 161.6 | 137.7 | 83.2 |
19 October 2010 | 660.1 | 383.2 | 318.5 | 163.1 | 138.1 | 84.7 |
20 October 2010 | 660.9 | 387.5 | 329.2 | 161.8 | 135.7 | 87.5 |
21 October 2010 | 681.2 | 403.0 | 338.0 | 166.9 | 137.9 | 87.1 |
22 October 2010 | 688.3 | 404.7 | 338.8 | 166.1 | 137.7 | 87.4 |
25 October 2010 | 691.0 | 398.8 | 323.7 | 161.6 | 134.6 | 83.8 |
26 October 2010 | 715.9 | 392.9 | 312.9 | 156.7 | 131.6 | 78.3 |
27 October 2010 | 782.6 | 420.6 | 329.1 | 161.2 | 136.7 | 80.7 |
28 October 2010 | 784.1 | 424.4 | 337.5 | 162.7 | 136.9 | 80.1 |
29 October 2010 | 804.3 | 440.0 | 343.4 | 169.3 | 142.4 | 80.4 |
1 November 2010 | 822.3 | 461.9 | 362.1 | 176.3 | 145.5 | 81.3 |
2 November 2010 | 832.0 | 482.6 | 376.9 | 181.9 | 149.2 | 84.4 |
3 November 2010 | 843.6 | 502.6 | 387.9 | 187.0 | 152.4 | 84.0 |
4 November 2010 | 881.6 | 526.0 | 421.1 | 194.4 | 156.6 | 86.8 |
5 November 2010 | 904.1 | 520.6 | 409.8 | 194.7 | 155.9 | 88.5 |
8 November 2010 | 901.7 | 546.9 | 438.6 | 201.6 | 164.4 | 93.9 |
9 November 2010 | 891.1 | 553.2 | 435.6 | 198.6 | 162.6 | 92.8 |
10 November 2010 | 911.0 | 619.5 | 459.5 | 206.0 | 166.1 | 94.8 |
11 November 2010 | 916.0 | 646.1 | 460.0 | 220.0 | 179.7 | 98.7 |
12 November 2010 | 887.7 | 562.9 | 423.2 | 201.9 | 164.6 | 92.2 |
15 November 2010 | 885.7 | 540.0 | 417.6 | 195.8 | 158.6 | 87.8 |
16 November 2010 | 899.7 | 562.0 | 414.3 | 198.5 | 160.2 | 89.2 |
17 November 2010 | 903.3 | 554.4 | 410.6 | 202.0 | 161.2 | 88.9 |
18 November 2010 | 889.5 | 541.4 | 405.6 | 201.3 | 159.4 | 89.5 |
19 November 2010 | 886.1 | 541.5 | 404.4 | 201.9 | 154.8 | 88.1 |
22 November 2010 | 918.3 | 544.1 | 407.1 | 208.8 | 156.1 | 89.8 |
23 November 2010 | 932.9 | 586.3 | 435.4 | 234.5 | 171.4 | 97.9 |
24 November 2010 | 921.0 | 615.3 | 430.5 | 235.3 | 163.2 | 89.9 |
25 November 2010 | 922.2 | 632.9 | 431.1 | 246.3 | 168.2 | 94.4 |
26 November 2010 | 903.9 | 646.2 | 425.3 | 244.4 | 168.3 | 94.4 |
29 November 2010 | 902.8 | 649.3 | 427.6 | 267.0 | 188.1 | 112.2 |
30 November 2010 | 918.7 | 668.5 | 430.4 | 283.3 | 199.7 | 132.7 |
1 December 2010 | 902.9 | 616.3 | 386.5 | 250.9 | 173.0 | 119.5 |
2 December 2010 | 883.3 | 568.2 | 332.2 | 225.9 | 158.3 | 109.7 |
3 December 2010 | 870.6 | 528.9 | 307.4 | 219.4 | 157.6 | 105.5 |
6 December 2010 | 877.0 | 531.6 | 309.2 | 230.4 | 164.7 | 110.4 |
7 December 2010 | 871.1 | 507.8 | 303.3 | 225.6 | 157.1 | 107.1 |
8 December 2010 | 867.6 | 501.7 | 306.5 | 222.0 | 153.4 | 98.9 |
9 December 2010 | 874.1 | 503.3 | 313.8 | 234.0 | 159.2 | 99.1 |
10 December 2010 | 872.9 | 513.0 | 330.2 | 245.2 | 160.3 | 101.2 |
13 December 2010 | 870.6 | 514.3 | 332.7 | 247.6 | 161.0 | 99.9 |
14 December 2010 | 871.4 | 521.8 | 335.2 | 248.8 | 159.0 | 101.7 |
15 December 2010 | 882.9 | 519.1 | 339.6 | 242.2 | 153.0 | 100.5 |
16 December 2010 | 885.6 | 521.4 | 339.0 | 245.1 | 156.0 | 91.9 |
17 December 2010 | 887.4 | 540.3 | 342.9 | 248.9 | 161.3 | 95.6 |
20 December 2010 | 893.4 | 565.3 | 349.3 | 252.8 | 165.7 | 99.3 |
21 December 2010 | 897.9 | 589.7 | 353.9 | 252.9 | 167.1 | 95.9 |
22 December 2010 | 906.2 | 601.3 | 361.1 | 251.8 | 171.4 | 99.6 |
23 December 2010 | 922.7 | 602.4 | 363.7 | 248.8 | 171.8 | 102.0 |
24 December 2010 | 920.4 | 602.6 | 364.5 | 248.9 | 171.4 | 101.4 |
27 December 2010 | 925.2 | 602.1 | 363.6 | 243.1 | 168.8 | 101.3 |
28 December 2010 | 931.3 | 606.2 | 362.4 | 249.8 | 177.6 | 102.3 |
29 December 2010 | 947.1 | 606.6 | 362.9 | 243.5 | 182.2 | 100.7 |
30 December 2010 | 952.5 | 608.8 | 364.9 | 249.1 | 186.2 | 100.5 |
31 December 2010 | 950.9 | 609.5 | 363.8 | 249.0 | 185.2 | 100.7 |
3 January 2011 | 959.9 | 609.3 | 369.8 | 248.9 | 181.0 | 102.6 |
4 January 2011 | 970.0 | 609.6 | 372.6 | 242.6 | 173.9 | 100.2 |
5 January 2011 | 967.9 | 607.6 | 371.2 | 237.1 | 170.7 | 100.2 |
6 January 2011 | 972.5 | 612.9 | 404.4 | 254.7 | 185.4 | 115.2 |
7 January 2011 | 973.6 | 620.1 | 423.5 | 263.8 | 192.8 | 125.9 |
10 January 2011 | 942.3 | 604.0 | 410.9 | 267.5 | 197.6 | 135.0 |
11 January 2011 | 875.8 | 566.4 | 397.5 | 255.9 | 187.3 | 134.5 |
12 January 2011 | 817.3 | 530.9 | 373.7 | 240.2 | 173.5 | 111.7 |
13 January 2011 | 811.4 | 525.2 | 370.5 | 230.5 | 166.1 | 100.3 |
14 January 2011 | 808.1 | 548.9 | 378.8 | 230.4 | 162.7 | 104.1 |
17 January 2011 | 801.2 | 553.4 | 378.0 | 239.5 | 168.2 | 108.2 |
18 January 2011 | 832.9 | 576.8 | 395.5 | 236.3 | 166.9 | 108.9 |
19 January 2011 | 838.7 | 581.6 | 395.6 | 227.1 | 162.3 | 115.3 |
20 January 2011 | 820.8 | 565.1 | 366.9 | 218.1 | 161.6 | 111.6 |
21 January 2011 | 812.7 | 561.6 | 370.7 | 202.6 | 153.5 | 102.7 |
24 January 2011 | 807.2 | 572.9 | 378.4 | 208.7 | 152.3 | 104.0 |
25 January 2011 | 819.6 | 570.4 | 391.0 | 220.0 | 159.5 | 106.7 |
26 January 2011 | 826.9 | 575.7 | 394.5 | 225.1 | 161.2 | 110.0 |
27 January 2011 | 829.7 | 591.4 | 390.2 | 229.4 | 161.7 | 112.9 |
28 January 2011 | 831.2 | 601.0 | 392.4 | 231.0 | 163.2 | 114.2 |
31 January 2011 | 818.3 | 599.7 | 389.3 | 221.3 | 156.8 | 111.4 |
1 February 2011 | 782.7 | 580.4 | 371.1 | 199.1 | 142.4 | 100.0 |
2 February 2011 | 754.5 | 556.4 | 364.2 | 183.8 | 127.7 | 88.8 |
3 February 2011 | 767.3 | 564.7 | 377.3 | 197.3 | 140.7 | 94.4 |
4 February 2011 | 768.4 | 562.1 | 379.4 | 189.2 | 134.7 | 90.0 |
7 February 2011 | 779.9 | 564.5 | 391.2 | 199.6 | 143.8 | 94.7 |
8 February 2011 | 794.1 | 566.6 | 398.1 | 205.8 | 149.8 | 97.3 |
9 February 2011 | 795.5 | 569.3 | 405.5 | 201.0 | 145.4 | 93.7 |
10 February 2011 | 810.9 | 578.1 | 399.5 | 202.9 | 146.8 | 95.2 |
11 February 2011 | 822.2 | 579.8 | 401.8 | 208.4 | 148.6 | 99.3 |
14 February 2011 | 828.8 | 585.2 | 412.6 | 215.9 | 153.1 | 100.9 |
15 February 2011 | 852.1 | 594.8 | 412.8 | 213.4 | 151.8 | 99.3 |
16 February 2011 | 862.2 | 594.5 | 416.3 | 210.0 | 149.4 | 99.3 |
17 February 2011 | 861.2 | 597.2 | 427.0 | 218.0 | 155.6 | 102.7 |
18 February 2011 | 846.7 | 594.1 | 424.3 | 212.1 | 154.1 | 98.7 |
21 February 2011 | 852.8 | 595.8 | 426.7 | 217.6 | 161.4 | 103.8 |
22 February 2011 | 861.7 | 593.5 | 430.6 | 221.6 | 166.6 | 105.4 |
23 February 2011 | 861.4 | 600.9 | 432.5 | 221.8 | 168.7 | 108.9 |
24 February 2011 | 873.0 | 618.6 | 437.2 | 224.1 | 170.8 | 111.6 |
25 February 2011 | 872.8 | 619.6 | 439.3 | 225.3 | 170.1 | 113.3 |
28 February 2011 | 876.8 | 617.1 | 433.9 | 222.0 | 167.2 | 109.9 |
1 March 2011 | 886.3 | 613.4 | 427.1 | 218.0 | 163.9 | 107.6 |
2 March 2011 | 888.3 | 618.9 | 426.8 | 213.0 | 160.7 | 106.1 |
3 March 2011 | 875.7 | 608.2 | 419.6 | 207.8 | 158.1 | 101.4 |
4 March 2011 | 897.6 | 611.1 | 420.2 | 211.5 | 161.2 | 101.3 |
7 March 2011 | 905.8 | 614.3 | 428.5 | 210.8 | 162.0 | 100.6 |
8 March 2011 | 953.5 | 626.7 | 432.1 | 217.2 | 165.2 | 104.2 |
9 March 2011 | 961.0 | 626.0 | 433.9 | 222.1 | 170.0 | 108.9 |
10 March 2011 | 950.6 | 625.1 | 424.8 | 225.9 | 172.2 | 108.9 |
11 March 2011 | 960.0 | 643.4 | 438.7 | 221.3 | 165.2 | 103.0 |
14 March 2011 | 920.7 | 626.3 | 421.3 | 204.3 | 155.8 | 91.8 |
15 March 2011 | 934.4 | 635.5 | 427.4 | 205.8 | 156.8 | 92.7 |
16 March 2011 | 923.6 | 642.7 | 441.4 | 208.4 | 160.0 | 90.0 |
17 March 2011 | 912.0 | 644.5 | 439.7 | 207.2 | 156.1 | 89.8 |
18 March 2011 | 910.0 | 632.9 | 418.2 | 197.8 | 149.5 | 88.3 |
21 March 2011 | 902.5 | 636.7 | 413.4 | 191.6 | 148.8 | 89.9 |
22 March 2011 | 925.7 | 657.7 | 423.7 | 193.3 | 151.3 | 95.1 |
23 March 2011 | 931.5 | 681.3 | 439.5 | 193.7 | 153.3 | 96.9 |
24 March 2011 | 932.6 | 675.5 | 441.6 | 192.4 | 151.2 | 95.8 |
25 March 2011 | 929.6 | 683.9 | 450.6 | 189.3 | 147.8 | 93.2 |
28 March 2011 | 933.8 | 676.9 | 463.5 | 188.7 | 148.2 | 93.9 |
29 March 2011 | 937.1 | 678.3 | 466.2 | 187.4 | 146.1 | 91.8 |
30 March 2011 | 942.4 | 676.3 | 476.2 | 186.8 | 144.2 | 92.2 |
31 March 2011 | 948.3 | 686.9 | 505.4 | 194.3 | 146.8 | 94.8 |
1 April 2011 | 937.5 | 660.6 | 514.2 | 194.2 | 143.1 | 92.3 |
4 April 2011 | 934.9 | 644.1 | 522.2 | 191.2 | 138.7 | 87.6 |
5 April 2011 | 929.2 | 629.1 | 537.5 | 190.3 | 136.7 | 87.4 |
6 April 2011 | 928.4 | 593.7 | 510.7 | 180.1 | 131.3 | 81.6 |
7 April 2011 | 939.5 | 584.1 | 517.7 | 182.0 | 132.2 | 81.8 |
8 April 2011 | 937.8 | 575.9 | 518.2 | 178.1 | 126.8 | 81.8 |
11 April 2011 | 936.8 | 566.5 | 513.3 | 175.0 | 122.1 | 78.7 |
12 April 2011 | 943.1 | 564.4 | 519.4 | 175.0 | 122.1 | 78.7 |
13 April 2011 | 948.4 | 565.2 | 530.8 | 179.7 | 125.5 | 80.9 |
14 April 2011 | 984.6 | 590.9 | 545.4 | 189.4 | 128.9 | 84.7 |
15 April 2011 | 1044.8 | 633.1 | 561.9 | 203.9 | 135.4 | 93.4 |
18 April 2011 | 1130.1 | 650.9 | 583.3 | 230.6 | 153.1 | 107.9 |
19 April 2011 | 1120.5 | 652.6 | 581.2 | 223.2 | 148.1 | 103.7 |
20 April 2011 | 1144.6 | 676.0 | 597.5 | 216.6 | 143.6 | 101.0 |
21 April 2011 | 1164.3 | 722.1 | 624.1 | 221.2 | 149.7 | 103.8 |
22 April 2011 | 1164.3 | 722.0 | 624.1 | 221.2 | 149.7 | 103.8 |
25 April 2011 | 1164.3 | 722.0 | 624.1 | 221.2 | 149.7 | 103.8 |
26 April 2011 | 1207.9 | 720.8 | 635.3 | 225.7 | 156.0 | 107.6 |
27 April 2011 | 1289.2 | 716.4 | 632.9 | 219.7 | 152.2 | 104.0 |
28 April 2011 | 1244.1 | 717.4 | 639.7 | 212.6 | 150.5 | 100.2 |
29 April 2011 | 1242.3 | 733.4 | 640.4 | 205.3 | 149.3 | 99.4 |
2 May 2011 | 1240.9 | 722.6 | 638.5 | 203.5 | 146.4 | 98.1 |
3 May 2011 | 1199.2 | 709.9 | 629.7 | 198.1 | 141.8 | 98.0 |
4 May 2011 | 1211.8 | 689.5 | 622.5 | 196.2 | 140.7 | 98.3 |
5 May 2011 | 1229.4 | 705.7 | 647.7 | 202.2 | 146.3 | 101.8 |
6 May 2011 | 1233.6 | 718.1 | 638.7 | 207.0 | 149.2 | 102.0 |
9 May 2011 | 1260.9 | 754.0 | 656.9 | 222.0 | 156.9 | 109.6 |
10 May 2011 | 1231.0 | 745.3 | 659.0 | 215.4 | 151.6 | 108.0 |
11 May 2011 | 1244.1 | 749.2 | 629.5 | 212.7 | 150.3 | 107.2 |
12 May 2011 | 1241.7 | 740.4 | 615.2 | 210.7 | 147.3 | 108.4 |
13 May 2011 | 1236.4 | 743.3 | 613.8 | 218.2 | 153.0 | 109.8 |
16 May 2011 | 1249.7 | 729.4 | 585.5 | 213.3 | 147.0 | 106.8 |
17 May 2011 | 1253.2 | 731.1 | 591.3 | 221.9 | 151.4 | 108.1 |
18 May 2011 | 1268.0 | 722.9 | 606.7 | 223.9 | 151.0 | 108.9 |
19 May 2011 | 1288.4 | 733.1 | 599.8 | 228.1 | 164.6 | 109.1 |
20 May 2011 | 1351.5 | 748.1 | 632.9 | 242.5 | 171.6 | 116.7 |
23 May 2011 | 1401.6 | 784.3 | 663.6 | 249.9 | 179.2 | 120.6 |
24 May 2011 | 1368.8 | 785.9 | 669.0 | 240.1 | 171.5 | 113.7 |
25 May 2011 | 1367.7 | 794.3 | 668.2 | 230.7 | 168.1 | 113.4 |
26 May 2011 | 1338.3 | 804.3 | 662.5 | 230.6 | 171.6 | 113.4 |
27 May 2011 | 1343.3 | 810.0 | 660.1 | 233.7 | 176.4 | 116.7 |
30 May 2011 | 1345.5 | 809.5 | 677.9 | 241.0 | 183.0 | 120.9 |
31 May 2011 | 1301.8 | 801.6 | 659.0 | 234.4 | 176.1 | 115.5 |
1 June 2011 | 1316.7 | 798.9 | 674.2 | 233.4 | 174.3 | 112.0 |
2 June 2011 | 1326.4 | 801.6 | 666.4 | 230.4 | 170.1 | 107.5 |
3 June 2011 | 1287.9 | 774.8 | 674.7 | 217.1 | 157.1 | 99.6 |
6 June 2011 | 1282.4 | 764.5 | 670.4 | 224.1 | 163.7 | 107.4 |
7 June 2011 | 1279.5 | 768.0 | 684.4 | 223.6 | 164.0 | 105.9 |
8 June 2011 | 1308.8 | 781.9 | 706.1 | 231.9 | 170.6 | 110.7 |
9 June 2011 | 1362.9 | 805.2 | 725.9 | 241.0 | 177.8 | 113.8 |
10 June 2011 | 1376.4 | 827.7 | 747.3 | 251.1 | 183.3 | 116.0 |
13 June 2011 | 1401.6 | 839.1 | 771.0 | 253.4 | 183.6 | 116.9 |
14 June 2011 | 1436.5 | 836.7 | 774.0 | 245.3 | 175.3 | 112.0 |
15 June 2011 | 1477.3 | 859.7 | 772.7 | 259.5 | 188.2 | 117.6 |
16 June 2011 | 1503.1 | 863.7 | 795.4 | 274.2 | 193.2 | 122.1 |
17 June 2011 | 1398.0 | 842.8 | 794.8 | 261.4 | 185.8 | 115.8 |
20 June 2011 | 1437.7 | 849.2 | 818.5 | 262.3 | 188.7 | 117.2 |
21 June 2011 | 1427.7 | 845.0 | 814.1 | 252.7 | 185.6 | 116.5 |
* Relative to Germany. Return to text
Top-right panel
Projected Debt-to-GDP*
Period | Greece | Ireland | Portugal | Spain | Italy |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2009 | 127 | 66 | 75 | 53 | 116 |
2010 | 143 | 97 | 92 | 62 | 117 |
2011 | 153 | 106 | 98 | 67 | 117 |
2012 | 165 | 112 | 103 | 69 | 116 |
2013 | 169 | 116 | 105 | 71 | 114 |
2014 | 168 | 115 | 104 | 71 | 112 |
2015 | 166 | 115 | 103 | 71 | 111 |
2016 | 170 | 114 | 103 | 70 | 109 |
2017 | 173 | 114 | 102 | 69 | 108 |
2018 | 177 | 113 | 102 | 68 | 106 |
2019 | 181 | 113 | 101 | 67 | 105 |
2020 | 186 | 112 | 101 | 66 | 103 |
* Assumes Greece, Ireland, and Portugal are able to access market financing on the timeline set out in their respective IMF programs. Return to text
Middle-left panel
Direct Credit Exposure of Banking Sector, December 2010
Greece | Greece, Ireland, & Portugal |
Spain | Core European Banks* |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$bil. | % Tier 1 | $bil. | % Tier 1 | $bil. | % Tier 1 | $bil. | % Tier 1 | |
United States | 7 | 1 | 64 | 7 | 47 | 5 | 560 | 64 |
Western Europe | 134 | 6 | 705 | 31 | 630 | 28 | -- | -- |
* Core Europe defined as Belgium, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom. Return to table
Source: U.S. Country Exposure Report, BIS, and ECB. Corrected for break in series and excluding exposure from derivatives contracts.
Middle-right panel
U.S. Direct Credit Exposure to Periphery
Period | Greece | Greece, Ireland, Portugal, and Spain |
---|---|---|
March 2010 | 14 | 141 |
December 2010 | 7 | 111 |
Bottom-left panel
Euro-Dollar Exchange Rate
Date | Euros per dollar (March 1, 2011 = 100) |
---|---|
1 March 2011 | 100.00 |
2 March 2011 | 99.60 |
3 March 2011 | 99.04 |
4 March 2011 | 98.78 |
7 March 2011 | 98.83 |
8 March 2011 | 99.29 |
9 March 2011 | 99.33 |
10 March 2011 | 99.93 |
11 March 2011 | 99.63 |
14 March 2011 | 98.84 |
15 March 2011 | 98.89 |
16 March 2011 | 99.22 |
17 March 2011 | 98.52 |
18 March 2011 | 97.68 |
21 March 2011 | 97.38 |
22 March 2011 | 97.19 |
23 March 2011 | 97.80 |
24 March 2011 | 97.27 |
25 March 2011 | 97.66 |
28 March 2011 | 97.94 |
29 March 2011 | 98.03 |
30 March 2011 | 98.00 |
31 March 2011 | 97.39 |
1 April 2011 | 97.17 |
4 April 2011 | 97.13 |
5 April 2011 | 97.07 |
6 April 2011 | 96.37 |
7 April 2011 | 96.68 |
8 April 2011 | 95.68 |
11 April 2011 | 95.57 |
12 April 2011 | 95.56 |
13 April 2011 | 95.41 |
14 April 2011 | 95.50 |
15 April 2011 | 95.64 |
18 April 2011 | 97.20 |
19 April 2011 | 96.47 |
20 April 2011 | 95.18 |
21 April 2011 | 94.71 |
22 April 2011 | 94.97 |
25 April 2011 | 94.77 |
26 April 2011 | 94.45 |
27 April 2011 | 94.23 |
28 April 2011 | 93.43 |
29 April 2011 | 93.20 |
2 May 2011 | 92.89 |
3 May 2011 | 92.86 |
4 May 2011 | 92.96 |
5 May 2011 | 94.72 |
6 May 2011 | 95.29 |
9 May 2011 | 96.59 |
10 May 2011 | 96.20 |
11 May 2011 | 96.80 |
12 May 2011 | 97.08 |
13 May 2011 | 97.68 |
16 May 2011 | 97.14 |
17 May 2011 | 97.58 |
18 May 2011 | 96.80 |
19 May 2011 | 96.91 |
20 May 2011 | 97.47 |
23 May 2011 | 98.56 |
24 May 2011 | 97.92 |
25 May 2011 | 97.95 |
26 May 2011 | 98.05 |
27 May 2011 | 96.68 |
30 May 2011 | ND |
31 May 2011 | 96.08 |
1 June 2011 | 95.72 |
2 June 2011 | 95.75 |
3 June 2011 | 94.58 |
6 June 2011 | 94.48 |
7 June 2011 | 94.13 |
8 June 2011 | 94.69 |
9 June 2011 | 95.04 |
10 June 2011 | 96.16 |
13 June 2011 | 96.14 |
14 June 2011 | 95.44 |
15 June 2011 | 97.13 |
16 June 2011 | 97.58 |
17 June 2011 | 96.42 |
20 June 2011 | 96.46 |
Bottom-right panel
Euro-area Stock Prices
Date | DJ Euro Stoxx | DJ Euro Stoxx Banks |
---|---|---|
1 March 2011 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
2 March 2011 | 99.25 | 99.13 |
3 March 2011 | 99.60 | 98.36 |
4 March 2011 | 99.00 | 97.15 |
7 March 2011 | 98.64 | 95.91 |
8 March 2011 | 99.03 | 96.66 |
9 March 2011 | 98.89 | 96.25 |
10 March 2011 | 97.91 | 95.26 |
11 March 2011 | 96.99 | 95.25 |
14 March 2011 | 96.06 | 97.06 |
15 March 2011 | 93.83 | 95.16 |
16 March 2011 | 92.01 | 92.29 |
17 March 2011 | 93.92 | 94.10 |
18 March 2011 | 94.26 | 94.26 |
21 March 2011 | 96.32 | 96.59 |
22 March 2011 | 95.99 | 96.37 |
23 March 2011 | 96.46 | 96.26 |
24 March 2011 | 97.89 | 97.73 |
25 March 2011 | 97.95 | 97.27 |
28 March 2011 | 98.08 | 97.46 |
29 March 2011 | 98.03 | 95.78 |
30 March 2011 | 98.90 | 95.53 |
31 March 2011 | 98.11 | 92.96 |
1 April 2011 | 99.65 | 94.92 |
4 April 2011 | 99.67 | 93.92 |
5 April 2011 | 99.56 | 93.29 |
6 April 2011 | 100.13 | 95.55 |
7 April 2011 | 99.71 | 96.65 |
8 April 2011 | 100.20 | 97.06 |
11 April 2011 | 99.84 | 96.57 |
12 April 2011 | 98.44 | 95.37 |
13 April 2011 | 99.13 | 95.47 |
14 April 2011 | 98.19 | 93.30 |
15 April 2011 | 98.26 | 92.31 |
18 April 2011 | 96.11 | 89.27 |
19 April 2011 | 96.54 | 89.40 |
20 April 2011 | 98.52 | 89.66 |
21 April 2011 | 98.93 | 91.05 |
22 April 2011 | ND | ND |
25 April 2011 | ND | ND |
26 April 2011 | 99.55 | 91.41 |
27 April 2011 | 100.17 | 92.52 |
28 April 2011 | 100.92 | 94.06 |
29 April 2011 | 101.16 | 94.39 |
2 May 2011 | 101.24 | 93.97 |
3 May 2011 | 100.83 | 93.62 |
4 May 2011 | 99.33 | 92.76 |
5 May 2011 | 98.73 | 91.43 |
6 May 2011 | 99.71 | 92.27 |
9 May 2011 | 98.55 | 89.92 |
10 May 2011 | 99.67 | 91.59 |
11 May 2011 | 99.82 | 91.68 |
12 May 2011 | 99.05 | 91.07 |
13 May 2011 | 98.56 | 90.12 |
16 May 2011 | 98.16 | 89.76 |
17 May 2011 | 96.99 | 89.17 |
18 May 2011 | 97.46 | 89.52 |
19 May 2011 | 98.23 | 89.99 |
20 May 2011 | 97.27 | 88.14 |
23 May 2011 | 95.27 | 85.95 |
24 May 2011 | 95.57 | 85.85 |
25 May 2011 | 96.01 | 87.77 |
26 May 2011 | 95.52 | 87.06 |
27 May 2011 | 96.15 | 88.09 |
30 May 2011 | 96.06 | 87.35 |
31 May 2011 | 97.50 | 89.38 |
1 June 2011 | 96.51 | 87.82 |
2 June 2011 | 95.13 | 86.79 |
3 June 2011 | 95.32 | 88.49 |
6 June 2011 | 94.70 | 86.65 |
7 June 2011 | 94.83 | 86.80 |
8 June 2011 | 93.87 | 85.51 |
9 June 2011 | 94.78 | 85.57 |
10 June 2011 | 93.31 | 84.24 |
13 June 2011 | 93.34 | 84.07 |
14 June 2011 | 94.69 | 85.87 |
15 June 2011 | 93.28 | 83.52 |
16 June 2011 | 92.91 | 83.21 |
17 June 2011 | 93.87 | 86.01 |
20 June 2011 | 93.12 | 84.99 |
21 June 2011 | 94.24 | 86.50 |
Exhibit 6
Global Outlook
Top-left panel
Real GDP*
2011 | 2012p | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | Q2p | H2p | |||
1. | Total Foreign GDP | 4.1 | 2.8 | 3.6 | 3.5 |
April Tealbook | 3.7 | 3.0 | 3.5 | 3.6 | |
2. | Advanced Foreign Economies | 2.3 | 1.4 | 2.4 | 2.3 |
3. | Euro area | 3.4 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 1.8 |
4. | Japan | -3.5 | -3.8 | 4.4 | 2.8 |
5. | Emerging Market Economies | 6.2 | 4.4 | 5.1 | 4.9 |
6. | China | 8.7 | 8.1 | 8.5 | 8.3 |
7. | Emerging Asia | 8.8 | 5.4 | 5.9 | 5.9 |
8. | Mexico | 2.1 | 2.9 | 4.6 | 3.8 |
* GDP aggregates weighted by U.S. goods exports. Return to text
Top-right panel
First-Quarter Real GDP
April Tealbook | June Tealbook | |
---|---|---|
AFE ex. Japan | 2.80 | 3.06 |
Emerging Asia | 5.92 | 8.81 |
South America | 4.67 | 6.99 |
Japan | -0.10 | -3.48 |
Middle-left panel
Foreign Mfg. PMI ex. Japan
Period | Diffusion index |
---|---|
January 2008 | 53.66 |
February 2008 | 53.57 |
March 2008 | 53.02 |
April 2008 | 52.21 |
May 2008 | 51.87 |
June 2008 | 50.07 |
July 2008 | 49.25 |
August 2008 | 48.31 |
September 2008 | 46.12 |
October 2008 | 42.94 |
November 2008 | 37.59 |
December 2008 | 36.09 |
January 2009 | 37.97 |
February 2009 | 39.92 |
March 2009 | 42.05 |
April 2009 | 45.52 |
May 2009 | 48.12 |
June 2009 | 49.47 |
July 2009 | 51.54 |
August 2009 | 53.41 |
September 2009 | 53.25 |
October 2009 | 53.72 |
November 2009 | 54.60 |
December 2009 | 54.93 |
January 2010 | 56.07 |
February 2010 | 56.07 |
March 2010 | 56.38 |
April 2010 | 57.00 |
May 2010 | 55.22 |
June 2010 | 53.93 |
July 2010 | 53.41 |
August 2010 | 53.02 |
September 2010 | 52.22 |
October 2010 | 54.02 |
November 2010 | 54.60 |
December 2010 | 55.69 |
January 2011 | 56.14 |
February 2011 | 56.00 |
March 2011 | 54.70 |
April 2011 | 54.16 |
May 2011 | 53.04 |
Middle-center panel
China
Period | Retail sales | Outstanding bank loans |
---|---|---|
January 2008 | 21.22 | 16.74 |
February 2008 | 19.12 | 15.73 |
March 2008 | 21.50 | 14.78 |
April 2008 | 22.02 | 14.72 |
May 2008 | 21.60 | 14.86 |
June 2008 | 23.00 | 14.12 |
July 2008 | 23.30 | 14.58 |
August 2008 | 23.20 | 14.29 |
September 2008 | 23.19 | 14.48 |
October 2008 | 22.02 | 14.58 |
November 2008 | 20.80 | 13.22 |
December 2008 | 19.00 | 15.94 |
January 2009 | 18.50 | 18.62 |
February 2009 | 11.60 | 21.48 |
March 2009 | 14.70 | 27.11 |
April 2009 | 14.75 | 27.10 |
May 2009 | 15.22 | 28.02 |
June 2009 | 15.03 | 31.88 |
July 2009 | 15.16 | 31.42 |
August 2009 | 15.37 | 31.60 |
September 2009 | 15.52 | 31.68 |
October 2009 | 16.21 | 31.73 |
November 2009 | 15.81 | 33.86 |
December 2009 | 17.54 | 31.74 |
January 2010 | 18.24 | 29.31 |
February 2010 | 32.29 | 27.23 |
March 2010 | 21.51 | 21.81 |
April 2010 | 23.20 | 21.96 |
May 2010 | 24.20 | 21.50 |
June 2010 | 24.02 | 18.17 |
July 2010 | 23.31 | 18.43 |
August 2010 | 24.26 | 18.58 |
September 2010 | 24.04 | 18.55 |
October 2010 | 21.91 | 19.28 |
November 2010 | 22.68 | 19.83 |
December 2010 | 21.57 | 19.89 |
January 2011 | 19.90 | 16.88 |
February 2011 | 11.63 | 16.21 |
March 2011 | 20.02 | 16.19 |
April 2011 | 18.58 | 15.83 |
May 2011 | 18.00 | 15.38 |
Middle-right panel
Japan
Period | Suppliers' delivery times (Diffusion index) |
Real consumption (January 2008 = 100) |
---|---|---|
January 2008 | 46.39 | 100.00 |
February 2008 | 47.16 | 101.95 |
March 2008 | 45.41 | 100.10 |
April 2008 | 47.89 | 99.49 |
May 2008 | 49.09 | 99.75 |
June 2008 | 47.98 | 99.87 |
July 2008 | 47.71 | 99.96 |
August 2008 | 49.51 | 99.13 |
September 2008 | 49.14 | 99.33 |
October 2008 | 50.90 | 99.30 |
November 2008 | 52.64 | 97.98 |
December 2008 | 53.95 | 97.44 |
January 2009 | 55.69 | 96.47 |
February 2009 | 56.15 | 95.41 |
March 2009 | 53.09 | 96.66 |
April 2009 | 52.35 | 97.27 |
May 2009 | 50.39 | 97.39 |
June 2009 | 50.24 | 97.76 |
July 2009 | 49.26 | 97.44 |
August 2009 | 49.51 | 97.55 |
September 2009 | 45.43 | 98.07 |
October 2009 | 47.11 | 98.38 |
November 2009 | 46.23 | 98.09 |
December 2009 | 45.74 | 99.12 |
January 2010 | 47.45 | 99.21 |
February 2010 | 44.57 | 99.00 |
March 2010 | 43.58 | 101.37 |
April 2010 | 44.55 | 100.34 |
May 2010 | 43.14 | 99.23 |
June 2010 | 45.01 | 99.70 |
July 2010 | 44.09 | 100.48 |
August 2010 | 45.78 | 101.13 |
September 2010 | 47.59 | 100.60 |
October 2010 | 50.18 | 98.75 |
November 2010 | 49.31 | 100.46 |
December 2010 | 48.97 | 99.74 |
January 2011 | 48.55 | 99.93 |
February 2011 | 47.16 | 100.95 |
March 2011 | 31.36 | 95.98 |
April 2011 | 23.14 | 98.34 |
May 2011 | 41.50 | ND |
Bottom-left panel
Headline Consumer Prices*
Period | Emerging Asia | Latin America | Advanced foreign economies |
---|---|---|---|
2008:Q1 | 6.65 | 4.41 | 2.26 |
2008:Q2 | 7.14 | 5.46 | 2.73 |
2008:Q3 | 5.97 | 6.10 | 3.48 |
2008:Q4 | 3.59 | 6.65 | 1.99 |
2009:Q1 | 1.01 | 6.35 | 1.00 |
2009:Q2 | -0.26 | 5.91 | 0.03 |
2009:Q3 | -0.38 | 4.97 | -0.77 |
2009:Q4 | 1.28 | 3.91 | 0.25 |
2010:Q1 | 2.80 | 4.64 | 1.06 |
2010:Q2 | 3.25 | 4.09 | 1.23 |
2010:Q3 | 3.53 | 3.88 | 1.38 |
2010:Q4 | 4.33 | 4.45 | 1.81 |
2011:Q1 | 4.80 | 3.81 | 2.15 |
Forecast | |||
2011:Q2 | 5.01 | 3.71 | 2.61 |
2011:Q3 | 4.88 | 3.93 | 2.64 |
2011:Q4 | 3.78 | 3.71 | 2.12 |
2012:Q1 | 3.12 | 3.63 | 1.63 |
2012:Q2 | 2.93 | 3.95 | 1.36 |
2012:Q3 | 2.86 | 4.00 | 1.39 |
2012:Q4 | 2.83 | 3.95 | 1.41 |
* Inflation aggregates weighted by U.S. non-oil goods imports. Return to text
Bottom-right panel
Implied Forward OIS Rates*
Period | April 20 | June 21 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Euro area | United Kingdom | Euro Area | United Kingdom | |
April 2011 | 1.09 | 0.52 | ND | ND |
May 2011 | 1.14 | 0.53 | ND | ND |
June 2011 | 1.20 | 0.55 | 1.19 | 0.51 |
July 2011 | 1.31 | 0.57 | 1.25 | 0.51 |
August 2011 | 1.41 | 0.60 | 1.34 | 0.50 |
September 2011 | 1.49 | 0.64 | 1.40 | 0.51 |
October 2011 | 1.56 | 0.68 | 1.44 | 0.51 |
November 2011 | 1.62 | 0.72 | 1.45 | 0.51 |
December 2011 | 1.69 | 0.76 | 1.47 | 0.52 |
January 2012 | 1.75 | 0.79 | 1.49 | 0.52 |
February 2012 | 1.79 | 0.86 | 1.51 | 0.53 |
March 2012 | 1.93 | 0.98 | 1.52 | 0.56 |
April 2012 | 1.95 | 1.02 | 1.53 | 0.60 |
May 2012 | 1.96 | 1.06 | 1.53 | 0.67 |
June 2012 | 1.98 | 1.10 | 1.54 | 0.64 |
July 2012 | 2.01 | 1.16 | 1.55 | 0.61 |
August 2012 | 2.05 | 1.22 | 1.55 | 0.58 |
September 2012 | 2.08 | 1.29 | 1.56 | 0.61 |
October 2012 | 2.14 | 1.37 | 1.56 | 0.64 |
November 2012 | 2.19 | 1.45 | 1.57 | 0.68 |
December 2012 | 2.25 | 1.53 | 1.59 | 0.75 |
* OIS rates less one basis point per month term premium adjustment. Return to text
Exhibit 7
Outlook for U.S. External Sector
Top-left panel
Trade in Real Goods and Services
Period | Exports | Imports |
---|---|---|
2010:Q1 | 11.37 | 11.21 |
2010:Q2 | 9.12 | 33.46 |
2010:Q3 | 6.76 | 16.81 |
2010:Q4 | 8.60 | -12.59 |
2011:Q1 | 7.84 | 5.46 |
Forecast | ||
2011:Q2 | 10.36 | 2.63 |
2011:Q3 | 10.31 | 10.64 |
2011:Q4 | 9.66 | 1.26 |
2012:Q1 | 9.51 | 1.70 |
2012:Q2 | 9.03 | 3.62 |
2012:Q3 | 8.74 | 5.74 |
2012:Q4 | 8.63 | 4.90 |
Top-right panel
Broad Real Dollar
Period | Broad Real Dollar | April TB |
---|---|---|
2008:Q1 | 100.00 | ND |
2008:Q2 | 98.29 | ND |
2008:Q3 | 100.81 | ND |
2008:Q4 | 109.15 | ND |
2009:Q1 | 111.47 | ND |
2009:Q2 | 107.49 | ND |
2009:Q3 | 104.50 | ND |
2009:Q4 | 101.81 | ND |
2010:Q1 | 102.54 | ND |
2010:Q2 | 103.46 | ND |
2010:Q3 | 102.02 | ND |
2010:Q4 | 98.24 | ND |
2011:Q1 | 96.92 | 96.95 |
Forecast | ||
2011:Q2 | 94.68 | 95.05 |
2011:Q3 | 94.13 | 94.39 |
2011:Q4 | 93.57 | 93.74 |
2012:Q1 | 92.96 | 93.02 |
2012:Q2 | 92.28 | 92.24 |
2012:Q3 | 91.60 | 91.45 |
2012:Q4 | 90.91 | 90.67 |
Middle-left panel
Contribution to U.S. Real GDP Growth
Period | Percentage points, a.r. |
---|---|
2010 | -0.56 |
2011:Q1 | 0.10 |
Forecast | |
2011:Q2 | 0.89 |
2011:H2 | 0.37 |
2012 | 0.59 |
[Data are approximate.]
Bottom-left panel
U.S. Core Import Prices
Period | Percent change, a.r. |
---|---|
2008:Q1 | 8.35 |
2008:Q2 | 11.44 |
2008:Q3 | 4.99 |
2008:Q4 | -9.41 |
2009:Q1 | -10.00 |
2009:Q2 | -2.36 |
2009:Q3 | 1.15 |
2009:Q4 | 4.32 |
2010:Q1 | 4.22 |
2010:Q2 | 3.06 |
2010:Q3 | -0.82 |
2010:Q4 | 4.31 |
2011:Q1 | 8.08 |
Forecast | |
2011:Q2 | 7.19 |
2011:Q3 | 3.50 |
2011:Q4 | 1.54 |
2012:Q1 | 1.38 |
2012:Q2 | 1.46 |
2012:Q3 | 1.49 |
2012:Q4 | 1.47 |
Period | Exchange rates and foreign prices |
Non-fuel primary commodity prices |
---|---|---|
2008:H1 | 3.96 | 1.65 |
2008:H2 | -0.03 | -2.20 |
2009:H1 | -2.65 | -2.90 |
2009:H2 | 2.96 | 1.81 |
2010:H1 | 1.31 | 2.59 |
2010:H2 | 1.63 | 1.84 |
Forecast | ||
2011:H1 | 3.76 | 2.68 |
2011:H2 | 1.77 | 0.51 |
2012:H1 | 1.42 | -0.01 |
2012:H2 | 1.46 | 0.00 |
Bottom-right panel
Commodity Price Outlook
Period | WTI crude oil (Dollars per barrel) | Nonfuel (Index, 2008:Q1 = 100) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Current | April Tealbook | Current | April Tealbook | |
2008:Q1 | 97.95 | ND | 100.00 | ND |
2008:Q2 | 123.96 | ND | 103.21 | ND |
2008:Q3 | 118.01 | ND | 98.04 | ND |
2008:Q4 | 58.32 | ND | 72.68 | ND |
2009:Q1 | 42.96 | ND | 68.62 | ND |
2009:Q2 | 59.55 | ND | 73.98 | ND |
2009:Q3 | 68.20 | ND | 82.75 | ND |
2009:Q4 | 76.06 | ND | 88.73 | ND |
2010:Q1 | 78.69 | ND | 96.08 | ND |
2010:Q2 | 77.89 | ND | 99.88 | ND |
2010:Q3 | 76.13 | ND | 100.57 | ND |
2010:Q4 | 85.08 | ND | 114.17 | ND |
2011:Q1 | 94.13 | 94.13 | 127.91 | 127.98 |
2011:Q2 | 103.20 | 107.61 | 126.98 | 130.46 |
Forecast | ||||
2011:Q3 | 97.83 | 108.37 | 125.29 | 130.31 |
2011:Q4 | 99.20 | 108.66 | 125.47 | 130.20 |
2012:Q1 | 100.09 | 108.40 | 125.84 | 130.23 |
2012:Q2 | 100.81 | 107.67 | 125.99 | 130.20 |
2012:Q3 | 101.23 | 106.65 | 125.89 | 129.91 |
2012:Q4 | 101.41 | 105.82 | 125.71 | 129.53 |
Exhibit 8
Forecasting Commodity Prices
Top-left panel
WTI Crude Oil Futures*
Futures in | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2003 | 27.96 | 25.03 | 23.98 | 23.74 | 23.76 | 23.78 | 23.80 | 23.86 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2004 | ND | 34.38 | 31.86 | 29.61 | 28.66 | 28.31 | 27.95 | 27.75 | 27.96 | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2005 | ND | ND | 53.71 | 55.97 | 53.47 | 51.40 | 49.98 | 49.03 | 48.28 | 47.93 | ND | ND | ND |
2006 | ND | ND | ND | 68.74 | 71.92 | 71.07 | 69.52 | 68.45 | 67.47 | 66.62 | 65.97 | ND | ND |
2007 | ND | ND | ND | ND | 61.89 | 69.72 | 70.94 | 70.12 | 68.97 | 68.25 | 67.85 | 66.60 | ND |
2008 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 111.76 | 107.39 | 102.96 | 101.15 | 100.43 | 100.23 | 100.28 | 100.55 |
* Each line represents futures prices in April of the indicated year. Return to text
Source: Bloomberg.
Top-right panel
Why Flat Futures Curves?
- Market participants can arbitrage between spot and futures prices through inventories.
- Costs and benefits of holding inventories create a wedge between spot and futures prices.
- When these costs and benefits are not large, futures will be flat.
Middle-left panel
EME Asia IP Consensus Forecasts
Forecast in | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2003 | 6.98 | 6.65 | 6.87 | 6.75 | 6.72 | 6.83 | 6.59 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2004 | ND | 9.38 | 8.03 | 8.16 | 8.60 | 8.83 | 8.35 | 8.42 | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2005 | ND | ND | 8.91 | 8.25 | 9.04 | 9.24 | 8.59 | 8.49 | 8.20 | ND | ND | ND |
2006 | ND | ND | ND | 11.29 | 10.63 | 10.65 | 10.76 | 10.44 | 10.39 | 9.83 | ND | ND |
2007 | ND | ND | ND | ND | 10.93 | 10.78 | 10.53 | 10.52 | 10.51 | 10.03 | 9.94 | ND |
2008 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 11.59 | 11.16 | 10.82 | 10.45 | 10.31 | 10.06 | 9.64 |
Source: Consensus Economics, April issues.
Middle-right panel
New Forecasting Approach
- Adjust futures to account for market surprises for global growth and the dollar.
- Predict surprises as difference between staff forecast and private forecasts.
- Map surprises into prices based on historical relationships.
Past Forecasts Under Both Methods
Bottom-left panel
WTI Crude Oil
Period | Actual historical | December 2003 futures forecast | March 2007 futures forecast | March 2007 proposed forecast | March 2009 futures forecast | March 2009 proposed forecast | January 2010 futures forecast | January 2010 proposed forecast | Current futures forecast | Current proposed forecast |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2002:Q1 | 21.61 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2002:Q2 | 26.27 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2002:Q3 | 28.33 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2002:Q4 | 28.18 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2003:Q1 | 34.12 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2003:Q2 | 29.04 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2003:Q3 | 30.22 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2003:Q4 | 31.18 | 31.18 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2004:Q1 | 35.25 | 29.44 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2004:Q2 | 38.34 | 28.31 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2004:Q3 | 43.89 | 27.26 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2004:Q4 | 48.31 | 26.47 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2005:Q1 | 49.68 | 25.91 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2005:Q2 | 53.09 | 25.54 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2005:Q3 | 63.08 | 25.27 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2005:Q4 | 60.03 | 25.12 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2006:Q1 | 63.36 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2006:Q2 | 70.54 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2006:Q3 | 70.44 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2006:Q4 | 60.07 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2007:Q1 | 57.99 | ND | 57.99 | 57.99 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2007:Q2 | 64.97 | ND | 60.55 | 59.70 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2007:Q3 | 75.48 | ND | 63.35 | 62.01 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2007:Q4 | 90.75 | ND | 64.60 | 62.79 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2008:Q1 | 97.95 | ND | 65.37 | 63.09 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2008:Q2 | 123.96 | ND | 65.84 | 63.09 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2008:Q3 | 118.01 | ND | 66.14 | 62.93 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2008:Q4 | 58.32 | ND | 66.31 | 62.65 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2009:Q1 | 42.96 | ND | ND | ND | 42.96 | 42.96 | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2009:Q2 | 59.55 | ND | ND | ND | 43.87 | 35.81 | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2009:Q3 | 68.20 | ND | ND | ND | 47.23 | 34.84 | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2009:Q4 | 76.06 | ND | ND | ND | 49.07 | 32.70 | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2010:Q1 | 78.69 | ND | ND | ND | 50.61 | 30.47 | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2010:Q2 | 77.89 | ND | ND | ND | 52.10 | 28.34 | 78.69 | 78.69 | ND | ND |
2010:Q3 | 76.13 | ND | ND | ND | 53.55 | 26.32 | 80.39 | 82.55 | ND | ND |
2010:Q4 | 85.08 | ND | ND | ND | 55.02 | 24.43 | 82.04 | 85.37 | ND | ND |
2011:Q1 | 94.13 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 83.57 | 88.12 | ND | ND |
2011:Q2 | 103.20 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 84.74 | 90.55 | 103.20 | 103.20 |
2011:Q3 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 85.56 | 92.65 | 97.83 | 97.95 |
2011:Q4 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 86.19 | 94.58 | 99.20 | 99.45 |
2012:Q1 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 86.88 | 96.61 | 100.09 | 100.47 |
2012:Q2 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 100.81 | 101.31 |
2012:Q3 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 101.23 | 101.87 |
2012:Q4 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 101.41 | 102.18 |
Source: USIT model.
Bottom-right panel
Non-fuel Commodity Prices
Period | Actual historical | December 2003 futures forecast | December 2003 proposed forecast | March 2007 futures forecast | March 2007 proposed forecast | March 2009 futures forecast | March 2009 proposed forecast | January 2010 futures forecast | January 2010 proposed forecast | Current futures forecast | Current proposed forecast |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2002:Q1 | 71.69 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2002:Q2 | 74.56 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2002:Q3 | 78.20 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2002:Q4 | 79.13 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2003:Q1 | 79.37 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2003:Q2 | 77.66 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2003:Q3 | 78.80 | 78.80 | 78.80 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2003:Q4 | 84.87 | 83.57 | 86.12 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2004:Q1 | 92.39 | 85.20 | 88.59 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2004:Q2 | 93.45 | 85.74 | 89.98 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2004:Q3 | 92.35 | 85.06 | 90.07 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2004:Q4 | 91.93 | 84.07 | 89.84 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2005:Q1 | 98.34 | 84.30 | 90.90 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2005:Q2 | 98.93 | 84.28 | 91.71 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2005:Q3 | 99.75 | 84.01 | 92.26 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2005:Q4 | 102.98 | 83.80 | 92.86 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2006:Q1 | 112.80 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2006:Q2 | 127.46 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2006:Q3 | 130.70 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2006:Q4 | 135.12 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2007:Q1 | 138.83 | ND | ND | 138.83 | 138.83 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2007:Q2 | 149.33 | ND | ND | 142.05 | 141.35 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2007:Q3 | 143.66 | ND | ND | 142.99 | 141.58 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2007:Q4 | 143.44 | ND | ND | 143.04 | 140.93 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2008:Q1 | 159.39 | ND | ND | 142.86 | 140.06 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2008:Q2 | 164.50 | ND | ND | 142.16 | 138.69 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2008:Q3 | 156.27 | ND | ND | 141.50 | 137.35 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2008:Q4 | 115.84 | ND | ND | 140.87 | 136.07 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2009:Q1 | 109.37 | ND | ND | ND | ND | 109.37 | 109.37 | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2009:Q2 | 117.92 | ND | ND | ND | ND | 105.66 | 98.37 | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2009:Q3 | 131.89 | ND | ND | ND | ND | 106.30 | 92.14 | ND | ND | ND | ND |
2009:Q4 | 141.43 | ND | ND | ND | ND | 107.05 | 86.39 | 141.43 | 141.43 | ND | ND |
2010:Q1 | 153.15 | ND | ND | ND | ND | 107.96 | 81.11 | 149.31 | 151.02 | ND | ND |
2010:Q2 | 159.19 | ND | ND | ND | ND | 108.68 | 76.02 | 149.97 | 153.42 | ND | ND |
2010:Q3 | 160.31 | ND | ND | ND | ND | 109.20 | 71.11 | 150.30 | 155.52 | ND | ND |
2010:Q4 | 181.97 | ND | ND | ND | ND | 109.65 | 66.48 | 150.38 | 157.39 | ND | ND |
2011:Q1 | 203.87 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 150.86 | 159.70 | ND | ND |
2011:Q2 | 202.39 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 151.16 | 161.85 | 202.39 | 202.39 |
2011:Q3 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 151.39 | 163.95 | 199.70 | 200.15 |
2011:Q4 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 151.64 | 166.10 | 199.99 | 200.90 |
2012:Q1 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 200.57 | 201.93 |
2012:Q2 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 200.82 | 202.63 |
2012:Q3 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 200.66 | 202.93 |
2012:Q4 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 200.36 | 203.09 |
Source: USIT model.
Exhibit 9
Forecasting Commodity Prices (Continued)
Top-left panel
Features of New Approach
- No improvement in forecasting accuracy.
- Improves consistency with Tealbook forecast.
- Provides simple framework for characterizing risks.
Top-right panel
Forecasting Performance, One Year Ahead*
Oil | Non-fuel | |
---|---|---|
Random walk | 41 | 22 |
Futures forecast | 40 | 21 |
Proposed forecast | 43 | 23 |
* From August 2002 to January 2010. Return to text
Alternative Scenarios for Oil Prices
Middle-left panel
World GDP Growth
Period | June Tealbook | Proposed forecast | World growth ½ percentage point faster |
World growth ½ percentage point slower |
---|---|---|---|---|
2010:Q1 | 78.69 | ND | ND | ND |
2010:Q2 | 77.89 | ND | ND | ND |
2010:Q3 | 76.13 | ND | ND | ND |
2010:Q4 | 85.08 | ND | ND | ND |
2011:Q1 | 94.13 | ND | ND | ND |
2011:Q2 | 103.50 | 103.50 | 103.50 | 103.50 |
Forecast | ||||
2011:Q3 | 99.57 | 99.69 | 101.46 | 97.83 |
2011:Q4 | 100.94 | 101.20 | 104.81 | 97.44 |
2012:Q1 | 101.75 | 102.13 | 107.66 | 96.50 |
2012:Q2 | 102.32 | 102.83 | 110.32 | 95.35 |
2012:Q3 | 102.61 | 103.25 | 112.73 | 93.95 |
2012:Q4 | 102.55 | 103.33 | 114.81 | 92.25 |
Middle-right panel
Dollar
Period | June Tealbook | Proposed forecast | Additional 5 percent dollar depreciation |
Additional 5 percent dollar appreciation |
---|---|---|---|---|
2010:Q1 | 78.69 | ND | ND | ND |
2010:Q2 | 77.89 | ND | ND | ND |
2010:Q3 | 76.13 | ND | ND | ND |
2010:Q4 | 85.08 | ND | ND | ND |
2011:Q1 | 94.13 | ND | ND | ND |
2011:Q2 | 103.50 | 103.50 | 103.50 | 103.50 |
Forecast | ||||
2011:Q3 | 99.57 | 99.69 | 100.91 | 98.43 |
2011:Q4 | 100.94 | 101.20 | 103.68 | 98.65 |
2012:Q1 | 101.75 | 102.13 | 105.92 | 98.29 |
2012:Q2 | 102.32 | 102.83 | 107.95 | 97.72 |
2012:Q3 | 102.61 | 103.25 | 109.72 | 96.87 |
2012:Q4 | 102.55 | 103.33 | 111.13 | 95.71 |
Alternative Scenarios for Non-fuel Commodity Prices
Bottom-left panel
World GDP Growth
Period | June Tealbook | Proposed forecast | World growth ½ percentage point faster |
World growth ½ percentage point slower |
---|---|---|---|---|
2010:Q1 | 100.00 | ND | ND | ND |
2010:Q2 | 103.94 | ND | ND | ND |
2010:Q3 | 104.68 | ND | ND | ND |
2010:Q4 | 118.82 | ND | ND | ND |
2011:Q1 | 133.12 | ND | ND | ND |
2011:Q2 | 134.04 | 134.04 | 134.04 | 134.04 |
Forecast | ||||
2011:Q3 | 133.74 | 134.04 | 135.84 | 132.16 |
2011:Q4 | 133.99 | 134.60 | 138.24 | 130.86 |
2012:Q1 | 134.31 | 135.22 | 140.74 | 129.62 |
2012:Q2 | 134.39 | 135.61 | 143.04 | 128.18 |
2012:Q3 | 134.22 | 135.74 | 145.10 | 126.50 |
2012:Q4 | 133.92 | 135.74 | 147.05 | 124.73 |
Bottom-right panel
Dollar
Period | June Tealbook | Proposed forecast | Additional 5 percent dollar depreciation |
Additional 5 percent dollar appreciation |
---|---|---|---|---|
2010:Q1 | 100.00 | ND | ND | ND |
2010:Q2 | 103.94 | ND | ND | ND |
2010:Q3 | 104.68 | ND | ND | ND |
2010:Q4 | 118.82 | ND | ND | ND |
2011:Q1 | 133.12 | ND | ND | ND |
2011:Q2 | 134.04 | 134.04 | 134.04 | 134.04 |
Forecast | ||||
2011:Q3 | 133.74 | 134.04 | 135.67 | 132.35 |
2011:Q4 | 133.99 | 134.60 | 137.89 | 131.22 |
2012:Q1 | 134.31 | 135.22 | 140.22 | 130.16 |
2012:Q2 | 134.39 | 135.61 | 142.32 | 128.89 |
2012:Q3 | 134.22 | 135.74 | 144.20 | 127.38 |
2012:Q4 | 133.92 | 135.74 | 145.95 | 125.77 |
Exhibit 10
Financial Stability
Top-left panel
Financial Market Stress
Period | Index |
---|---|
8 June 2001 | 0.19 |
15 June 2001 | 0.24 |
22 June 2001 | 0.15 |
29 June 2001 | 0.09 |
6 July 2001 | 0.07 |
13 July 2001 | 0.16 |
20 July 2001 | 0.17 |
27 July 2001 | 0.15 |
3 August 2001 | 0.10 |
10 August 2001 | 0.13 |
17 August 2001 | 0.25 |
24 August 2001 | 0.29 |
31 August 2001 | 0.26 |
7 September 2001 | 0.29 |
14 September 2001 | 0.64 |
21 September 2001 | 0.93 |
28 September 2001 | 0.83 |
5 October 2001 | 0.67 |
12 October 2001 | 0.58 |
19 October 2001 | 0.67 |
26 October 2001 | 0.66 |
2 November 2001 | 0.74 |
9 November 2001 | 0.59 |
16 November 2001 | 0.38 |
23 November 2001 | 0.32 |
30 November 2001 | 0.40 |
7 December 2001 | 0.36 |
14 December 2001 | 0.38 |
21 December 2001 | 0.43 |
28 December 2001 | 0.37 |
4 January 2002 | 0.36 |
11 January 2002 | 0.22 |
18 January 2002 | 0.22 |
25 January 2002 | 0.19 |
1 February 2002 | 0.13 |
8 February 2002 | 0.21 |
15 February 2002 | 0.16 |
22 February 2002 | 0.16 |
1 March 2002 | 0.12 |
8 March 2002 | 0.12 |
15 March 2002 | 0.11 |
22 March 2002 | 0.11 |
29 March 2002 | 0.14 |
5 April 2002 | 0.14 |
12 April 2002 | 0.14 |
19 April 2002 | 0.14 |
26 April 2002 | 0.18 |
3 May 2002 | 0.19 |
10 May 2002 | 0.20 |
17 May 2002 | 0.14 |
24 May 2002 | 0.10 |
31 May 2002 | 0.10 |
7 June 2002 | 0.12 |
14 June 2002 | 0.16 |
21 June 2002 | 0.20 |
28 June 2002 | 0.27 |
5 July 2002 | 0.26 |
12 July 2002 | 0.32 |
19 July 2002 | 0.48 |
26 July 2002 | 0.85 |
2 August 2002 | 0.77 |
9 August 2002 | 0.88 |
16 August 2002 | 0.87 |
23 August 2002 | 0.85 |
30 August 2002 | 0.74 |
6 September 2002 | 0.77 |
13 September 2002 | 0.73 |
20 September 2002 | 0.79 |
27 September 2002 | 0.90 |
4 October 2002 | 0.92 |
11 October 2002 | 0.89 |
18 October 2002 | 0.90 |
25 October 2002 | 0.86 |
1 November 2002 | 0.85 |
8 November 2002 | 0.72 |
15 November 2002 | 0.58 |
22 November 2002 | 0.46 |
29 November 2002 | 0.41 |
6 December 2002 | 0.39 |
13 December 2002 | 0.37 |
20 December 2002 | 0.35 |
27 December 2002 | 0.31 |
3 January 2003 | 0.38 |
10 January 2003 | 0.22 |
17 January 2003 | 0.21 |
24 January 2003 | 0.31 |
31 January 2003 | 0.42 |
7 February 2003 | 0.36 |
14 February 2003 | 0.43 |
21 February 2003 | 0.37 |
28 February 2003 | 0.31 |
7 March 2003 | 0.35 |
14 March 2003 | 0.50 |
21 March 2003 | 0.48 |
28 March 2003 | 0.37 |
4 April 2003 | 0.37 |
11 April 2003 | 0.23 |
18 April 2003 | 0.14 |
25 April 2003 | 0.15 |
2 May 2003 | 0.11 |
9 May 2003 | 0.05 |
16 May 2003 | 0.05 |
23 May 2003 | 0.08 |
30 May 2003 | 0.07 |
6 June 2003 | 0.09 |
13 June 2003 | 0.08 |
20 June 2003 | 0.09 |
27 June 2003 | 0.07 |
4 July 2003 | 0.06 |
11 July 2003 | 0.05 |
18 July 2003 | 0.06 |
25 July 2003 | 0.06 |
1 August 2003 | 0.15 |
8 August 2003 | 0.21 |
15 August 2003 | 0.20 |
22 August 2003 | 0.17 |
29 August 2003 | 0.15 |
5 September 2003 | 0.11 |
12 September 2003 | 0.11 |
19 September 2003 | 0.07 |
26 September 2003 | 0.08 |
3 October 2003 | 0.08 |
10 October 2003 | 0.06 |
17 October 2003 | 0.09 |
24 October 2003 | 0.11 |
31 October 2003 | 0.11 |
7 November 2003 | 0.09 |
14 November 2003 | 0.07 |
21 November 2003 | 0.08 |
28 November 2003 | 0.05 |
5 December 2003 | 0.07 |
12 December 2003 | 0.05 |
19 December 2003 | 0.04 |
26 December 2003 | 0.07 |
2 January 2004 | 0.06 |
9 January 2004 | 0.04 |
16 January 2004 | 0.03 |
23 January 2004 | 0.05 |
30 January 2004 | 0.05 |
6 February 2004 | 0.08 |
13 February 2004 | 0.06 |
20 February 2004 | 0.04 |
27 February 2004 | 0.04 |
5 March 2004 | 0.04 |
12 March 2004 | 0.05 |
19 March 2004 | 0.06 |
26 March 2004 | 0.06 |
2 April 2004 | 0.11 |
9 April 2004 | 0.14 |
16 April 2004 | 0.12 |
23 April 2004 | 0.13 |
30 April 2004 | 0.17 |
7 May 2004 | 0.18 |
14 May 2004 | 0.14 |
21 May 2004 | 0.16 |
28 May 2004 | 0.13 |
4 June 2004 | 0.09 |
11 June 2004 | 0.04 |
18 June 2004 | 0.03 |
25 June 2004 | 0.03 |
2 July 2004 | 0.03 |
9 July 2004 | 0.04 |
16 July 2004 | 0.03 |
23 July 2004 | 0.03 |
30 July 2004 | 0.03 |
6 August 2004 | 0.05 |
13 August 2004 | 0.06 |
20 August 2004 | 0.07 |
27 August 2004 | 0.06 |
3 September 2004 | 0.05 |
10 September 2004 | 0.02 |
17 September 2004 | 0.02 |
24 September 2004 | 0.02 |
1 October 2004 | 0.01 |
8 October 2004 | 0.01 |
15 October 2004 | 0.01 |
22 October 2004 | 0.01 |
29 October 2004 | 0.01 |
5 November 2004 | 0.01 |
12 November 2004 | 0.01 |
19 November 2004 | 0.01 |
26 November 2004 | 0.01 |
3 December 2004 | 0.01 |
10 December 2004 | 0.01 |
17 December 2004 | 0.01 |
24 December 2004 | 0.01 |
31 December 2004 | 0.01 |
7 January 2005 | 0.01 |
14 January 2005 | 0.00 |
21 January 2005 | 0.01 |
28 January 2005 | 0.00 |
4 February 2005 | 0.00 |
11 February 2005 | 0.00 |
18 February 2005 | 0.00 |
25 February 2005 | 0.00 |
4 March 2005 | 0.00 |
11 March 2005 | 0.00 |
18 March 2005 | 0.00 |
25 March 2005 | 0.00 |
1 April 2005 | 0.00 |
8 April 2005 | 0.01 |
15 April 2005 | 0.01 |
22 April 2005 | 0.01 |
29 April 2005 | 0.01 |
6 May 2005 | 0.01 |
13 May 2005 | 0.01 |
20 May 2005 | 0.01 |
27 May 2005 | 0.01 |
3 June 2005 | 0.01 |
10 June 2005 | 0.01 |
17 June 2005 | 0.01 |
24 June 2005 | 0.01 |
1 July 2005 | 0.01 |
8 July 2005 | 0.02 |
15 July 2005 | 0.01 |
22 July 2005 | 0.01 |
29 July 2005 | 0.01 |
5 August 2005 | 0.01 |
12 August 2005 | 0.01 |
19 August 2005 | 0.02 |
26 August 2005 | 0.02 |
2 September 2005 | 0.02 |
9 September 2005 | 0.02 |
16 September 2005 | 0.02 |
23 September 2005 | 0.02 |
30 September 2005 | 0.02 |
7 October 2005 | 0.03 |
14 October 2005 | 0.03 |
21 October 2005 | 0.02 |
28 October 2005 | 0.02 |
4 November 2005 | 0.01 |
11 November 2005 | 0.02 |
18 November 2005 | 0.02 |
25 November 2005 | 0.01 |
2 December 2005 | 0.01 |
9 December 2005 | 0.01 |
16 December 2005 | 0.01 |
23 December 2005 | 0.01 |
30 December 2005 | 0.01 |
6 January 2006 | 0.01 |
13 January 2006 | 0.00 |
20 January 2006 | 0.01 |
27 January 2006 | 0.01 |
3 February 2006 | 0.01 |
10 February 2006 | 0.01 |
17 February 2006 | 0.01 |
24 February 2006 | 0.01 |
3 March 2006 | 0.00 |
10 March 2006 | 0.01 |
17 March 2006 | 0.01 |
24 March 2006 | 0.00 |
31 March 2006 | 0.01 |
7 April 2006 | 0.01 |
14 April 2006 | 0.00 |
21 April 2006 | 0.01 |
28 April 2006 | 0.00 |
5 May 2006 | 0.00 |
12 May 2006 | 0.01 |
19 May 2006 | 0.01 |
26 May 2006 | 0.02 |
2 June 2006 | 0.02 |
9 June 2006 | 0.01 |
16 June 2006 | 0.01 |
23 June 2006 | 0.01 |
30 June 2006 | 0.01 |
7 July 2006 | 0.01 |
14 July 2006 | 0.01 |
21 July 2006 | 0.01 |
28 July 2006 | 0.01 |
4 August 2006 | 0.01 |
11 August 2006 | 0.01 |
18 August 2006 | 0.01 |
25 August 2006 | 0.00 |
1 September 2006 | 0.00 |
8 September 2006 | 0.00 |
15 September 2006 | 0.00 |
22 September 2006 | 0.00 |
29 September 2006 | 0.00 |
6 October 2006 | 0.00 |
13 October 2006 | 0.00 |
20 October 2006 | 0.00 |
27 October 2006 | 0.00 |
3 November 2006 | 0.00 |
10 November 2006 | 0.00 |
17 November 2006 | 0.00 |
24 November 2006 | 0.00 |
1 December 2006 | 0.00 |
8 December 2006 | 0.01 |
15 December 2006 | 0.01 |
22 December 2006 | 0.01 |
29 December 2006 | 0.01 |
5 January 2007 | 0.01 |
12 January 2007 | 0.01 |
19 January 2007 | 0.01 |
26 January 2007 | 0.00 |
2 February 2007 | 0.01 |
9 February 2007 | 0.01 |
16 February 2007 | 0.01 |
23 February 2007 | 0.01 |
2 March 2007 | 0.10 |
9 March 2007 | 0.15 |
16 March 2007 | 0.14 |
23 March 2007 | 0.10 |
30 March 2007 | 0.12 |
6 April 2007 | 0.09 |
13 April 2007 | 0.06 |
20 April 2007 | 0.06 |
27 April 2007 | 0.05 |
4 May 2007 | 0.05 |
11 May 2007 | 0.04 |
18 May 2007 | 0.04 |
25 May 2007 | 0.03 |
1 June 2007 | 0.03 |
8 June 2007 | 0.03 |
15 June 2007 | 0.04 |
22 June 2007 | 0.04 |
29 June 2007 | 0.07 |
6 July 2007 | 0.05 |
13 July 2007 | 0.05 |
20 July 2007 | 0.06 |
27 July 2007 | 0.25 |
3 August 2007 | 0.55 |
10 August 2007 | 0.64 |
17 August 2007 | 0.91 |
24 August 2007 | 0.82 |
31 August 2007 | 0.76 |
7 September 2007 | 0.78 |
14 September 2007 | 0.83 |
21 September 2007 | 0.60 |
28 September 2007 | 0.45 |
5 October 2007 | 0.29 |
12 October 2007 | 0.15 |
19 October 2007 | 0.25 |
26 October 2007 | 0.43 |
2 November 2007 | 0.37 |
9 November 2007 | 0.62 |
16 November 2007 | 0.75 |
23 November 2007 | 0.93 |
30 November 2007 | 0.92 |
7 December 2007 | 0.93 |
14 December 2007 | 0.91 |
21 December 2007 | 0.91 |
28 December 2007 | 0.86 |
4 January 2008 | 0.90 |
11 January 2008 | 0.85 |
18 January 2008 | 0.89 |
25 January 2008 | 0.94 |
1 February 2008 | 0.89 |
8 February 2008 | 0.93 |
15 February 2008 | 0.93 |
22 February 2008 | 0.95 |
29 February 2008 | 0.92 |
7 March 2008 | 0.98 |
14 March 2008 | 0.98 |
21 March 2008 | 0.96 |
28 March 2008 | 0.92 |
4 April 2008 | 0.78 |
11 April 2008 | 0.59 |
18 April 2008 | 0.60 |
25 April 2008 | 0.45 |
2 May 2008 | 0.25 |
9 May 2008 | 0.22 |
16 May 2008 | 0.28 |
23 May 2008 | 0.34 |
30 May 2008 | 0.51 |
6 June 2008 | 0.67 |
13 June 2008 | 0.79 |
20 June 2008 | 0.68 |
27 June 2008 | 0.75 |
4 July 2008 | 0.74 |
11 July 2008 | 0.83 |
18 July 2008 | 0.84 |
25 July 2008 | 0.73 |
1 August 2008 | 0.69 |
8 August 2008 | 0.56 |
15 August 2008 | 0.60 |
22 August 2008 | 0.70 |
29 August 2008 | 0.76 |
5 September 2008 | 0.58 |
12 September 2008 | 0.68 |
19 September 2008 | 1.00 |
26 September 2008 | 1.00 |
3 October 2008 | 1.00 |
10 October 2008 | 1.00 |
17 October 2008 | 1.00 |
24 October 2008 | 1.00 |
31 October 2008 | 1.00 |
7 November 2008 | 1.00 |
14 November 2008 | 1.00 |
21 November 2008 | 1.00 |
28 November 2008 | 1.00 |
5 December 2008 | 1.00 |
12 December 2008 | 1.00 |
19 December 2008 | 1.00 |
26 December 2008 | 1.00 |
2 January 2009 | 1.00 |
9 January 2009 | 1.00 |
16 January 2009 | 1.00 |
23 January 2009 | 1.00 |
30 January 2009 | 1.00 |
6 February 2009 | 1.00 |
13 February 2009 | 1.00 |
20 February 2009 | 1.00 |
27 February 2009 | 1.00 |
6 March 2009 | 1.00 |
13 March 2009 | 1.00 |
20 March 2009 | 1.00 |
27 March 2009 | 0.99 |
3 April 2009 | 0.99 |
10 April 2009 | 0.97 |
17 April 2009 | 0.92 |
24 April 2009 | 0.91 |
1 May 2009 | 0.90 |
8 May 2009 | 0.83 |
15 May 2009 | 0.81 |
22 May 2009 | 0.87 |
29 May 2009 | 0.92 |
5 June 2009 | 0.84 |
12 June 2009 | 0.85 |
19 June 2009 | 0.81 |
26 June 2009 | 0.77 |
3 July 2009 | 0.72 |
10 July 2009 | 0.87 |
17 July 2009 | 0.90 |
24 July 2009 | 0.78 |
31 July 2009 | 0.68 |
7 August 2009 | 0.77 |
14 August 2009 | 0.76 |
21 August 2009 | 0.78 |
28 August 2009 | 0.69 |
4 September 2009 | 0.68 |
11 September 2009 | 0.58 |
18 September 2009 | 0.59 |
25 September 2009 | 0.60 |
2 October 2009 | 0.59 |
9 October 2009 | 0.54 |
16 October 2009 | 0.59 |
23 October 2009 | 0.57 |
30 October 2009 | 0.62 |
6 November 2009 | 0.64 |
13 November 2009 | 0.46 |
20 November 2009 | 0.38 |
27 November 2009 | 0.40 |
4 December 2009 | 0.41 |
11 December 2009 | 0.32 |
18 December 2009 | 0.21 |
25 December 2009 | 0.24 |
1 January 2010 | 0.21 |
8 January 2010 | 0.23 |
15 January 2010 | 0.15 |
22 January 2010 | 0.18 |
29 January 2010 | 0.25 |
5 February 2010 | 0.22 |
12 February 2010 | 0.30 |
19 February 2010 | 0.20 |
26 February 2010 | 0.12 |
5 March 2010 | 0.08 |
12 March 2010 | 0.06 |
19 March 2010 | 0.04 |
26 March 2010 | 0.05 |
2 April 2010 | 0.04 |
9 April 2010 | 0.04 |
16 April 2010 | 0.02 |
23 April 2010 | 0.03 |
30 April 2010 | 0.05 |
7 May 2010 | 0.47 |
14 May 2010 | 0.51 |
21 May 2010 | 0.76 |
28 May 2010 | 0.83 |
4 June 2010 | 0.78 |
11 June 2010 | 0.84 |
18 June 2010 | 0.61 |
25 June 2010 | 0.48 |
2 July 2010 | 0.48 |
9 July 2010 | 0.42 |
16 July 2010 | 0.28 |
23 July 2010 | 0.23 |
30 July 2010 | 0.17 |
6 August 2010 | 0.19 |
13 August 2010 | 0.26 |
20 August 2010 | 0.41 |
27 August 2010 | 0.63 |
3 September 2010 | 0.68 |
10 September 2010 | 0.67 |
17 September 2010 | 0.60 |
24 September 2010 | 0.51 |
1 October 2010 | 0.51 |
8 October 2010 | 0.42 |
15 October 2010 | 0.39 |
22 October 2010 | 0.36 |
29 October 2010 | 0.30 |
5 November 2010 | 0.15 |
12 November 2010 | 0.18 |
19 November 2010 | 0.17 |
26 November 2010 | 0.17 |
3 December 2010 | 0.29 |
10 December 2010 | 0.23 |
17 December 2010 | 0.21 |
24 December 2010 | 0.11 |
31 December 2010 | 0.10 |
7 January 2011 | 0.11 |
14 January 2011 | 0.06 |
21 January 2011 | 0.05 |
28 January 2011 | 0.04 |
4 February 2011 | 0.04 |
11 February 2011 | 0.03 |
18 February 2011 | 0.03 |
25 February 2011 | 0.05 |
4 March 2011 | 0.05 |
11 March 2011 | 0.06 |
18 March 2011 | 0.14 |
25 March 2011 | 0.09 |
1 April 2011 | 0.07 |
8 April 2011 | 0.06 |
15 April 2011 | 0.07 |
22 April 2011 | 0.06 |
29 April 2011 | 0.06 |
6 May 2011 | 0.07 |
13 May 2011 | 0.07 |
20 May 2011 | 0.09 |
27 May 2011 | 0.10 |
3 June 2011 | 0.12 |
10 June 2011 | 0.18 |
17 June 2011 | 0.34 |
Note: Shaded bars indicate periods of business recession as defined by the National Bureau of Economic Research: March 2001-November 2001, and December 2007-June 2009.
Source: Staff calculations.
Top-right panel
Nonfinancial Debt
Period | Federal government | State and local governments | Private | Sum |
---|---|---|---|---|
2001:Q1 | 0.34 | 0.12 | 1.36 | 1.82 |
2001:Q2 | 0.32 | 0.12 | 1.37 | 1.81 |
2001:Q3 | 0.32 | 0.12 | 1.39 | 1.83 |
2001:Q4 | 0.33 | 0.13 | 1.41 | 1.87 |
2002:Q1 | 0.33 | 0.13 | 1.41 | 1.87 |
2002:Q2 | 0.33 | 0.13 | 1.42 | 1.88 |
2002:Q3 | 0.33 | 0.13 | 1.43 | 1.89 |
2002:Q4 | 0.34 | 0.13 | 1.45 | 1.92 |
2003:Q1 | 0.34 | 0.14 | 1.46 | 1.94 |
2003:Q2 | 0.35 | 0.14 | 1.47 | 1.96 |
2003:Q3 | 0.35 | 0.14 | 1.47 | 1.96 |
2003:Q4 | 0.35 | 0.14 | 1.48 | 1.97 |
2004:Q1 | 0.36 | 0.14 | 1.48 | 1.98 |
2004:Q2 | 0.36 | 0.14 | 1.49 | 1.99 |
2004:Q3 | 0.36 | 0.14 | 1.50 | 2.00 |
2004:Q4 | 0.36 | 0.14 | 1.51 | 2.01 |
2005:Q1 | 0.37 | 0.14 | 1.51 | 2.02 |
2005:Q2 | 0.36 | 0.14 | 1.53 | 2.03 |
2005:Q3 | 0.36 | 0.14 | 1.55 | 2.05 |
2005:Q4 | 0.36 | 0.14 | 1.57 | 2.07 |
2006:Q1 | 0.37 | 0.14 | 1.57 | 2.08 |
2006:Q2 | 0.36 | 0.14 | 1.60 | 2.10 |
2006:Q3 | 0.36 | 0.14 | 1.62 | 2.12 |
2006:Q4 | 0.36 | 0.15 | 1.64 | 2.15 |
2007:Q1 | 0.37 | 0.15 | 1.65 | 2.17 |
2007:Q2 | 0.35 | 0.15 | 1.66 | 2.16 |
2007:Q3 | 0.36 | 0.15 | 1.69 | 2.20 |
2007:Q4 | 0.36 | 0.15 | 1.71 | 2.22 |
2008:Q1 | 0.37 | 0.16 | 1.72 | 2.25 |
2008:Q2 | 0.36 | 0.15 | 1.72 | 2.23 |
2008:Q3 | 0.40 | 0.15 | 1.73 | 2.28 |
2008:Q4 | 0.45 | 0.16 | 1.76 | 2.37 |
2009:Q1 | 0.49 | 0.16 | 1.77 | 2.42 |
2009:Q2 | 0.51 | 0.16 | 1.77 | 2.44 |
2009:Q3 | 0.53 | 0.16 | 1.74 | 2.43 |
2009:Q4 | 0.55 | 0.17 | 1.71 | 2.43 |
2010:Q1 | 0.57 | 0.17 | 1.68 | 2.42 |
2010:Q2 | 0.59 | 0.16 | 1.66 | 2.41 |
2010:Q3 | 0.61 | 0.16 | 1.64 | 2.41 |
2010:Q4 | 0.63 | 0.17 | 1.63 | 2.43 |
2011:Q1 | 0.64 | 0.16 | 1.62 | 2.42 |
Middle-left panel
Commercial Bank Assets Funded by Non-deposit Short-term Debt
Period | Percent of assets |
---|---|
2001:Q1 | 31.19 |
2001:Q2 | 31.04 |
2001:Q3 | 30.72 |
2001:Q4 | 28.63 |
2002:Q1 | 28.44 |
2002:Q2 | 28.46 |
2002:Q3 | 28.00 |
2002:Q4 | 27.95 |
2003:Q1 | 27.52 |
2003:Q2 | 27.80 |
2003:Q3 | 27.84 |
2003:Q4 | 27.82 |
2004:Q1 | 28.33 |
2004:Q2 | 29.11 |
2004:Q3 | 28.64 |
2004:Q4 | 27.98 |
2005:Q1 | 28.67 |
2005:Q2 | 28.83 |
2005:Q3 | 29.36 |
2005:Q4 | 29.48 |
2006:Q1 | 30.27 |
2006:Q2 | 31.47 |
2006:Q3 | 32.51 |
2006:Q4 | 31.81 |
2007:Q1 | 31.46 |
2007:Q2 | 32.39 |
2007:Q3 | 33.06 |
2007:Q4 | 33.19 |
2008:Q1 | 33.02 |
2008:Q2 | 33.30 |
2008:Q3 | 33.06 |
2008:Q4 | 31.42 |
2009:Q1 | 30.32 |
2009:Q2 | 29.51 |
2009:Q3 | 28.84 |
2009:Q4 | 27.02 |
2010:Q1 | 26.80 |
2010:Q2 | 25.89 |
2010:Q3 | 25.82 |
2010:Q4 | 24.90 |
2011:Q1 | 24.62 |
Note: Shaded bars indicate periods of business recession as defined by the National Bureau of Economic Research: March 2001-November 2001, and December 2007-June 2009.
Source: Call Report
Middle-right panel
Nonfinancial Sector Liabilities Funded by Non-deposit Short-term Debt
Period | Percent of total liabilities |
---|---|
2001:Q1 | 19.58 |
2001:Q2 | 19.37 |
2001:Q3 | 19.78 |
2001:Q4 | 18.95 |
2002:Q1 | 18.61 |
2002:Q2 | 18.45 |
2002:Q3 | 18.41 |
2002:Q4 | 18.47 |
2003:Q1 | 18.63 |
2003:Q2 | 18.60 |
2003:Q3 | 18.48 |
2003:Q4 | 18.16 |
2004:Q1 | 17.96 |
2004:Q2 | 17.89 |
2004:Q3 | 18.10 |
2004:Q4 | 17.67 |
2005:Q1 | 17.91 |
2005:Q2 | 17.72 |
2005:Q3 | 17.89 |
2005:Q4 | 18.02 |
2006:Q1 | 18.43 |
2006:Q2 | 18.87 |
2006:Q3 | 19.40 |
2006:Q4 | 19.29 |
2007:Q1 | 19.17 |
2007:Q2 | 19.28 |
2007:Q3 | 20.20 |
2007:Q4 | 20.52 |
2008:Q1 | 21.37 |
2008:Q2 | 21.31 |
2008:Q3 | 21.46 |
2008:Q4 | 21.51 |
2009:Q1 | 20.36 |
2009:Q2 | 19.63 |
2009:Q3 | 18.24 |
2009:Q4 | 17.00 |
2010:Q1 | 15.86 |
2010:Q2 | 15.19 |
2010:Q3 | 14.72 |
2010:Q4 | 14.21 |
Note: Shaded bars indicate periods of business recession as defined by the National Bureau of Economic Research: March 2001-November 2001, and December 2007-June 2009.
Source: Staff calculations
Bottom-left panel
U.S. MMF European Exposures*
Period | Spain | Italy | Ireland | Other Europe |
---|---|---|---|---|
19 May 2010 | 3.34 | 2.14 | 0.35 | 49.53 |
2 June 2010 | 2.72 | 1.67 | 0.39 | 49.12 |
16 June 2010 | 2.57 | 1.48 | 0.43 | 51.26 |
30 June 2010 | 2.67 | 1.74 | 0.49 | 49.75 |
14 July 2010 | 2.58 | 1.53 | 0.50 | 54.29 |
28 July 2010 | 2.45 | 1.51 | 0.50 | 55.96 |
11 August 2010 | 2.85 | 2.20 | 0.48 | 55.94 |
25 August 2010 | 2.73 | 2.12 | 0.48 | 57.15 |
8 September 2010 | 2.80 | 2.30 | 0.22 | 56.70 |
22 September 2010 | 2.81 | 2.06 | 0.20 | 56.29 |
6 October 2010 | 2.90 | 2.13 | 0.04 | 56.27 |
20 October 2010 | 2.95 | 1.90 | 0.00 | 55.57 |
3 November 2010 | 2.90 | 1.82 | 0.00 | 57.15 |
17 November 2010 | 2.25 | 1.72 | 0.00 | 57.73 |
1 December 2010 | 1.80 | 1.52 | 0.00 | 57.04 |
15 December 2010 | 1.15 | 1.22 | 0.00 | 55.77 |
29 December 2010 | 1.15 | 1.25 | 0.00 | 55.26 |
12 January 2011 | 1.16 | 1.19 | 0.00 | 53.92 |
26 January 2011 | 1.11 | 1.55 | 0.00 | 54.37 |
9 February 2011 | 1.10 | 1.37 | 0.00 | 54.64 |
23 February 2011 | 0.84 | 1.02 | 0.00 | 54.48 |
9 March 2011 | 0.91 | 1.06 | 0.00 | 54.91 |
23 March 2011 | 0.89 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 55.50 |
6 April 2011 | 0.95 | 1.03 | 0.00 | 55.57 |
20 April 2011 | 1.05 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 54.91 |
4 May 2011 | 1.04 | 1.12 | 0.00 | 55.41 |
18 May 2011 | 0.84 | 1.02 | 0.00 | 56.13 |
1 June 2011 | 0.75 | 0.93 | 0.00 | 56.29 |
* Unsecured debt, ABCP, and repurchase agreements. Return to text
Source: Investment Company Institute.
Bottom-right panel
Distribution of U.S. MMF Exposures to Spain
Percent of fund assets | Number of funds |
---|---|
0 - 0.5 | 188 |
0.5 - 3 * | 46 |
3 - 5 * | 23 |
5+ * | 5 |
* Exposures large enough such that defaults on Spanish paper could cause MMFs to "break the buck" Return to table
Source: SEC form N-MFP filings.
Exhibit 11
LISCC Firm Market Indicators
Top-left panel
Stock Prices
Period | Bank of America | Citigroup | Other* |
---|---|---|---|
7 May 2010 | 131.91 | 88.69 | 98.17 |
14 May 2010 | 133.22 | 88.25 | 98.04 |
21 May 2010 | 130.36 | 83.14 | 94.93 |
28 May 2010 | 128.31 | 87.80 | 93.48 |
4 June 2010 | 125.20 | 84.03 | 90.00 |
11 June 2010 | 127.25 | 86.03 | 90.03 |
18 June 2010 | 129.05 | 88.91 | 90.71 |
25 June 2010 | 125.78 | 87.36 | 89.04 |
2 July 2010 | 112.85 | 84.03 | 82.31 |
9 July 2011 | 123.24 | 89.58 | 89.11 |
16 July 2010 | 113.99 | 86.47 | 89.24 |
23 July 2010 | 112.03 | 89.13 | 92.81 |
30 July 2010 | 114.48 | 90.91 | 92.88 |
6 August 2011 | 113.83 | 90.02 | 94.28 |
13 August 2010 | 107.94 | 86.03 | 89.02 |
20 August 2010 | 104.99 | 83.14 | 87.98 |
27 August 2010 | 103.11 | 83.37 | 85.58 |
3 September 2010 | 110.23 | 86.69 | 91.05 |
10 September 2010 | 110.64 | 86.69 | 91.56 |
17 September 2010 | 109.41 | 87.58 | 91.49 |
24 September 2010 | 111.05 | 86.47 | 90.33 |
1 October 2010 | 108.59 | 90.69 | 90.01 |
8 October 2010 | 107.61 | 92.90 | 91.54 |
15 October 2010 | 97.79 | 87.58 | 88.94 |
22 October 2010 | 93.37 | 91.13 | 90.84 |
29 October 2010 | 93.45 | 92.46 | 91.76 |
5 November 2010 | 100.90 | 99.56 | 100.56 |
12 November 2010 | 98.94 | 95.12 | 96.48 |
19 November 2010 | 95.17 | 94.68 | 96.50 |
26 November 2010 | 90.75 | 91.13 | 93.58 |
3 December 2010 | 96.89 | 98.67 | 98.00 |
10 December 2010 | 104.58 | 105.77 | 101.51 |
17 December 2010 | 102.70 | 104.21 | 99.83 |
24 December 2010 | ND | ND | ND |
31 December 2010 | 109.00 | 104.88 | 103.30 |
7 January 2011 | 116.45 | 109.54 | 105.38 |
14 January 2011 | 124.63 | 113.75 | 109.67 |
21 January 2011 | 116.45 | 108.43 | 108.52 |
28 January 2011 | 111.13 | 104.66 | 105.50 |
4 February 2011 | 116.78 | 106.88 | 106.96 |
11 February 2011 | 120.70 | 108.21 | 109.56 |
18 February 2011 | 120.54 | 108.87 | 109.55 |
25 February 2011 | 116.04 | 104.21 | 106.80 |
4 March 2011 | 115.47 | 100.67 | 104.08 |
11 March 2011 | 117.59 | 101.33 | 103.53 |
18 March 2011 | 114.81 | 99.78 | 102.86 |
25 March 2011 | 109.08 | 98.89 | 102.78 |
1 April 2011 | 109.33 | 98.67 | 104.34 |
8 April 2011 | 110.23 | 101.11 | 104.52 |
15 April 2011 | 104.83 | 98.00 | 101.47 |
22 April 2011 | ND | ND | ND |
29 April 2011 | 100.41 | 101.77 | 100.31 |
11 May 2011 | 100.65 | 100.22 | 98.69 |
13 May 2011 | 97.55 | 92.08 | 95.49 |
20 May 2011 | 94.68 | 90.95 | 95.16 |
27 May 2011 | 95.58 | 90.86 | 94.85 |
3 June 2011 | 92.31 | 88.38 | 91.60 |
10 June 2011 | 88.38 | 84.10 | 90.22 |
17 June 2011 | 87.40 | 84.94 | 91.17 |
* Composed of Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, State Street, Wells Fargo, and BONY. Return to table
Source: Bloomberg.
Top-right panel
5-year CDS Spreads
Period | Bank of America | Citigroup | Other* |
---|---|---|---|
7 May 2010 | 1.75 | 2.16 | 1.69 |
14 May 2010 | 1.46 | 1.77 | 1.40 |
21 May 2010 | 1.62 | 1.97 | 1.64 |
28 May 2010 | 1.54 | 1.75 | 1.56 |
4 June 2010 | 1.61 | 1.91 | 1.63 |
11 June 2010 | 1.69 | 2.10 | 1.94 |
18 June 2010 | 1.41 | 1.70 | 1.56 |
25 June 2010 | 1.54 | 1.82 | 1.73 |
2 July 2010 | 1.62 | 1.87 | 1.74 |
9 July 2010 | 1.43 | 1.70 | 1.54 |
16 July 2010 | 1.50 | 1.78 | 1.51 |
23 July 2010 | 1.44 | 1.69 | 1.40 |
30 July 2010 | 1.48 | 1.64 | 1.38 |
6 August 2010 | 1.46 | 1.62 | 1.33 |
13 August 2010 | 1.53 | 1.74 | 1.43 |
20 August 2010 | 1.64 | 1.78 | 1.46 |
27 August 2010 | 1.88 | 1.90 | 1.44 |
3 September 2010 | 1.70 | 1.75 | 1.27 |
10 September 2010 | 1.63 | 1.71 | 1.21 |
17 September 2010 | 1.60 | 1.74 | 1.21 |
24 September 2010 | 1.68 | 1.75 | 1.21 |
1 October 2010 | 1.65 | 1.72 | ND |
8 October 2010 | 1.59 | 1.57 | ND |
15 October 2010 | 2.07 | 1.76 | 1.26 |
22 October 2010 | 2.05 | 1.59 | 1.23 |
29 October 2010 | 1.89 | 1.50 | 1.22 |
5 November 2010 | 1.77 | 1.39 | 1.11 |
12 November 2010 | 1.85 | 1.60 | ND |
19 November 2010 | 1.83 | 1.52 | 1.17 |
26 November 2010 | 1.98 | 1.64 | 1.25 |
3 December 2010 | 1.94 | 1.58 | 1.18 |
10 December 2010 | 1.90 | 1.45 | 1.15 |
17 December 2010 | 1.77 | 1.40 | 1.14 |
24 December 2010 | 1.84 | 1.50 | 1.14 |
31 December 2010 | 1.82 | 1.49 | 1.16 |
7 January 2011 | 1.78 | 1.58 | 1.19 |
14 January 2011 | 1.67 | 1.48 | 1.13 |
21 January 2011 | 1.61 | 1.43 | 1.12 |
28 January 2011 | 1.66 | 1.43 | 1.11 |
4 February 2011 | 1.45 | 1.27 | 1.09 |
11 February 2011 | 1.39 | 1.28 | ND |
18 February 2011 | 1.33 | 1.25 | ND |
25 February 2011 | 1.42 | 1.36 | ND |
4 March 2011 | 1.40 | 1.26 | ND |
11 March 2011 | 1.45 | 1.33 | ND |
18 March 2011 | 1.41 | 1.33 | ND |
25 March 2011 | 1.35 | 1.25 | ND |
1 April 2011 | 1.32 | 1.23 | ND |
8 April 2011 | 1.31 | 1.21 | 1.01 |
15 April 2011 | 1.34 | 1.24 | 1.05 |
22 April 2011 | 1.35 | 1.24 | 1.05 |
29 April 2011 | 1.33 | 1.23 | 1.06 |
11 May 2011 | 1.31 | 1.24 | 1.07 |
13 May 2011 | 1.36 | 1.25 | 1.10 |
20 May 2011 | 1.39 | 1.26 | 1.11 |
27 May 2011 | 1.45 | 1.27 | 1.13 |
3 June 2011 | 1.52 | 1.36 | 1.18 |
10 June 2011 | 1.72 | 1.52 | 1.23 |
17 June 2011 | 1.72 | 1.51 | 1.22 |
* Composed of Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, State Street, Wells Fargo, and BONY. Return to table
Source: Markit.
Middle-left panel
Heat Map of Market Indicator Levels
CDS Spreads |
CDS Relative1 Spreads |
EDFs | Relative1 EDFs |
Market Equity Ratio |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bank of America | yellow | orange | red | red | yellow |
Morgan Stanley | orange | yellow | yellow | ||
Goldman Sachs | yellow | yellow | yellow | ||
Citigroup | yellow | ||||
JP Morgan | |||||
State Street | |||||
Wells Fargo | |||||
BONY | yellow | red |
Note: Yellow denotes current values from the 75th to 90th percentiles of the measure's distribution over the past 5 years, while orange denotes values between the 90th and 95th percentiles, and red denotes greater than the 95th percentile.
1 "Relative" implies a comparison to A-rated financial firms. Return to table
Source: For CDS Spreads and Market equity ratio, Bloomberg; for EDFs, Moody's.
Middle-right panel
Downside Risks to LISCC Firms
- Downgrade of short-term ratings of Bank of America or Citigroup.
- Housing market deteriorates further.
- Risk from peripheral Europe through core European firms.
Bottom-left panel
Conditional Value at Risk (CoVaR)
- CoVaR is an estimate of the downside risk to the financial sector, conditional on a stress event for a firm.
Bottom-right panel
CoVar
Period | Billions of dollars |
---|---|
January 2007 | 23.84 |
February 2007 | 22.35 |
March 2007 | 38.32 |
April 2007 | 30.06 |
May 2007 | 31.43 |
June 2007 | 34.22 |
July 2007 | 41.52 |
August 2007 | 67.39 |
September 2007 | 56.89 |
October 2007 | 43.46 |
November 2007 | 68.52 |
December 2007 | 57.14 |
January 2008 | 68.20 |
February 2008 | 72.30 |
March 2008 | 77.95 |
April 2008 | 53.78 |
May 2008 | 45.97 |
June 2008 | 57.87 |
July 2008 | 66.34 |
August 2008 | 51.01 |
September 2008 | 79.38 |
October 2008 | 200.74 |
November 2008 | 190.61 |
December 2008 | 159.19 |
January 2009 | 132.44 |
February 2009 | 143.71 |
March 2009 | 142.49 |
April 2009 | 113.63 |
May 2009 | 96.73 |
June 2009 | 84.95 |
July 2009 | 78.73 |
August 2009 | 70.52 |
September 2009 | 77.78 |
October 2009 | 78.86 |
November 2009 | 76.47 |
December 2009 | 59.31 |
January 2010 | 64.04 |
February 2010 | 72.77 |
March 2010 | 47.59 |
April 2010 | 45.68 |
May 2010 | 105.83 |
June 2010 | 98.43 |
July 2010 | 80.35 |
August 2010 | 80.57 |
September 2010 | 68.49 |
October 2010 | 66.59 |
November 2010 | 61.35 |
December 2010 | 51.89 |
January 2011 | 53.91 |
February 2011 | 51.36 |
March 2011 | 66.08 |
April 2011 | 50.13 |
May 2011 | 55.24 |
Note: The line represents the sum of the CoVar ratings for Bank of America, Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs, Citigroup, JP Morgan, State Street, Wells Fargo, and BONY.
Exhibit 12 (Last)
Emerging Risks: Asset Valuations and New Products
Top-left panel
Forward Spreads on High-yield Corporate Bonds
Period | Near-term* | Far-term** |
---|---|---|
January 2001 | 8.24 | 4.97 |
February 2001 | 7.35 | 4.47 |
March 2001 | 7.58 | 4.54 |
April 2001 | 8.46 | 4.34 |
May 2001 | 7.72 | 3.87 |
June 2001 | 7.80 | 3.96 |
July 2001 | 7.99 | 3.97 |
August 2001 | 8.13 | 3.64 |
September 2001 | 9.24 | 3.37 |
October 2001 | 10.10 | 3.51 |
November 2001 | 10.00 | 3.02 |
December 2001 | 8.60 | 2.86 |
January 2002 | 8.28 | 3.03 |
February 2002 | 7.87 | 3.22 |
March 2002 | 7.18 | 2.73 |
April 2002 | 6.90 | 2.87 |
May 2002 | 7.09 | 3.13 |
June 2002 | 7.33 | 3.97 |
July 2002 | 7.89 | 4.06 |
August 2002 | 8.69 | 4.57 |
September 2002 | 8.45 | 4.81 |
October 2002 | 9.50 | 5.18 |
November 2002 | 8.32 | 4.66 |
December 2002 | 7.55 | 4.51 |
January 2003 | 7.47 | 3.68 |
February 2003 | 7.65 | 3.91 |
March 2003 | 7.50 | 3.77 |
April 2003 | 7.09 | 3.05 |
May 2003 | 7.20 | 2.98 |
June 2003 | 7.10 | 2.91 |
July 2003 | 6.26 | 2.33 |
August 2003 | 6.55 | 2.13 |
September 2003 | 6.24 | 1.99 |
October 2003 | 6.07 | 1.73 |
November 2003 | 5.86 | 1.76 |
December 2003 | 5.57 | 1.55 |
January 2004 | 5.44 | 1.28 |
February 2004 | 5.79 | 1.50 |
March 2004 | 6.04 | 1.73 |
April 2004 | 5.38 | 1.51 |
May 2004 | 5.43 | 1.84 |
June 2004 | 5.30 | 1.95 |
July 2004 | 5.32 | 2.01 |
August 2004 | 5.38 | 2.10 |
September 2004 | 5.29 | 2.04 |
October 2004 | 5.17 | 1.98 |
November 2004 | 4.62 | 1.80 |
December 2004 | 4.44 | 1.73 |
January 2005 | 4.43 | 1.91 |
February 2005 | 4.23 | 1.92 |
March 2005 | 4.01 | 1.81 |
April 2005 | 4.75 | 2.24 |
May 2005 | 5.16 | 3.01 |
June 2005 | 4.79 | 3.06 |
July 2005 | 4.37 | 2.87 |
August 2005 | 4.17 | 2.89 |
September 2005 | 4.55 | 2.94 |
October 2005 | 4.42 | 3.11 |
November 2005 | 4.21 | 3.29 |
December 2005 | 4.09 | 3.43 |
January 2006 | 3.99 | 3.41 |
February 2006 | 3.88 | 3.32 |
March 2006 | 3.90 | 3.04 |
April 2006 | 3.73 | 2.75 |
May 2006 | 3.85 | 2.66 |
June 2006 | 4.10 | 3.01 |
July 2006 | 4.30 | 3.21 |
August 2006 | 4.29 | 3.31 |
September 2006 | 4.29 | 3.37 |
October 2006 | 4.14 | 3.28 |
November 2006 | 4.00 | 3.36 |
December 2006 | 3.87 | 3.41 |
January 2007 | 3.49 | 3.31 |
February 2007 | 3.36 | 3.18 |
March 2007 | 3.72 | 3.25 |
April 2007 | 3.65 | 2.97 |
May 2007 | 3.44 | 2.84 |
June 2007 | 3.28 | 2.76 |
July 2007 | 4.20 | 3.16 |
August 2007 | 5.16 | 3.30 |
September 2007 | 5.31 | 3.09 |
October 2007 | 5.04 | 2.96 |
November 2007 | 5.94 | 3.39 |
December 2007 | 6.39 | 3.37 |
January 2008 | 7.42 | 3.83 |
February 2008 | 8.01 | 3.62 |
March 2008 | 8.42 | 3.87 |
April 2008 | 7.53 | 4.00 |
May 2008 | 7.00 | 4.02 |
June 2008 | 7.00 | 4.08 |
July 2008 | 7.45 | 4.32 |
August 2008 | 7.17 | 4.50 |
September 2008 | 7.17 | 5.17 |
October 2008 | 11.16 | 7.21 |
November 2008 | 14.96 | 9.48 |
December 2008 | 16.10 | 11.68 |
January 2009 | 13.00 | 9.30 |
February 2009 | 12.60 | 8.76 |
March 2009 | 13.56 | 10.67 |
April 2009 | 11.35 | 8.33 |
May 2009 | 10.17 | 7.38 |
June 2009 | 9.34 | 6.18 |
July 2009 | 9.13 | 5.69 |
August 2009 | 8.18 | 5.01 |
September 2009 | 8.11 | 4.56 |
October 2009 | 7.42 | 4.06 |
November 2009 | 7.61 | 3.66 |
December 2009 | 7.11 | 3.43 |
January 2010 | 6.98 | 2.51 |
February 2010 | 7.50 | 2.53 |
March 2010 | 7.08 | 2.45 |
April 2010 | 6.95 | 2.20 |
May 2010 | 7.88 | 2.77 |
June 2010 | 8.52 | 3.08 |
July 2010 | 8.44 | 2.91 |
August 2010 | 8.44 | 2.93 |
September 2010 | 8.22 | 2.76 |
October 2010 | 8.04 | 2.08 |
November 2010 | 7.77 | 1.75 |
December 2010 | 7.24 | 1.74 |
January 2011 | 6.89 | 1.49 |
February 2011 | 6.26 | 1.41 |
March 2011 | 6.52 | 1.50 |
April 2011 | 6.36 | 1.36 |
May 2011 | 6.71 | 1.42 |
17 June 2011 | 7.44 | 1.39 |
* Near-term forward spreads between years two and three. Return to table
** Far-term forward spreads between years nine and ten. Return to table
Top-right panel
Gross Issuance of Junk Bonds*
Period | Billions of dollars |
---|---|
2005 | 6.66 |
2006 | 10.52 |
2007 | 9.76 |
2008 | 2.58 |
2009 | 10.34 |
2010 | 17.51 |
2011:Q1 | 17.67 |
2011:Q2e | 23.73 |
* Includes public, 144a, euro, and MTN issues. Return to text
e. Estimate based on data through June 16, 2011. Return to table
Middle-left panel
Institutional Leveraged-loan Issuance
Period | New money | Refinancings | Sum |
---|---|---|---|
2005 | 11.69 | 8.39 | 20.08 |
2006 | 22.84 | 7.67 | 30.51 |
2007 | 26.26 | 9.23 | 35.49 |
2008 | 4.96 | 0.84 | 5.80 |
2009 | 2.03 | 2.67 | 4.70 |
2010 | 8.69 | 8.53 | 17.22 |
2011:Q1 | 12.81 | 14.32 | 27.13 |
2011:Q2e | ND | ND | 32.46 |
e. Estimate based on data through May 2011 (approximate). Return to table
Middle-right panel
Other Valuation Pressures
- Real house prices in Taiwan and Hong Kong continue to rise rapidly despite actions taken by authorities to restrain increases.
- Some equity markets in Latin America have elevated PE ratios, and in emerging Asia may reflect overly optimistic earnings outlooks.
- In domestic markets, valuations for small capitalization stocks elevated relative to larger firms. Farm land valuations also high.
Bottom-left panel
Use of Leverage by Most Favored Hedge Funds
Percent of respondents | |
---|---|
At or below trough | 0.00 |
Near trough | 5.88 |
Moderately above trough | 11.76 |
Middle | 64.71 |
Moderately below peak | 17.65 |
Near peak | 0.00 |
At or above peak | 0.00 |
Sources: Senior Credit Officer Opinion Survey on Dealer Financing Terms.
Bottom-right panel
New Products
- Respond to new liquidity regulations inducing banks to lengthen liabilities, and new MMF rules further restricting investments in longer-term securities.
- Putable CDs allow banks to issue long-maturity securities, while investors have the option to shorten.
- Extendible repurchase agreements allow banks to issue short-maturity securities, but have the option to lengthen maturies.
Appendix 5: Materials used by Mr. Carpenter
Material for Briefing on
FOMC Participants' Economic Projections
Seth Carpenter
June 21, 2011
Exhibit 1. Central tendencies and ranges of economic projections, 2011-13 and over the longer run
Actual values for years 2006 through 2010.
2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | Longer run | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual | 2.4 | 2.3 | -2.8 | 0.2 | 2.8 | - | - | - | - |
Upper End of Range | - | - | - | - | - | 3.0 | 4.0 | 4.5 | 3.0 |
Upper End of Central Tendency | - | - | - | - | - | 2.9 | 3.7 | 4.2 | 2.8 |
Lower End of Central Tendency | - | - | - | - | - | 2.7 | 3.3 | 3.5 | 2.5 |
Lower End of Range | - | - | - | - | - | 2.5 | 2.2 | 3.0 | 2.4 |
2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | Longer run | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual | 4.5 | 4.8 | 6.9 | 10.0 | 9.6 | - | - | - | - |
Upper End of Range | - | - | - | - | - | 9.1 | 8.7 | 8.3 | 6.0 |
Upper End of Central Tendency | - | - | - | - | - | 8.9 | 8.2 | 7.5 | 5.6 |
Lower End of Central Tendency | - | - | - | - | - | 8.6 | 7.8 | 7.0 | 5.2 |
Lower End of Range | - | - | - | - | - | 8.4 | 7.5 | 6.5 | 5.0 |
2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | Longer run | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual | 1.9 | 3.5 | 1.7 | 1.5 | 1.1 | - | - | - | - |
Upper End of Range | - | - | - | - | - | 3.5 | 2.8 | 2.5 | 2.0 |
Upper End of Central Tendency | - | - | - | - | - | 2.5 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Lower End of Central Tendency | - | - | - | - | - | 2.3 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.7 |
Lower End of Range | - | - | - | - | - | 2.1 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.5 |
2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual | 2.3 | 2.4 | 2.0 | 1.7 | 0.8 | - | - | - |
Upper End of Range | - | - | - | - | - | 2.3 | 2.5 | 2.5 |
Upper End of Central Tendency | - | - | - | - | - | 1.8 | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Lower End of Central Tendency | - | - | - | - | - | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.4 |
Lower End of Range | - | - | - | - | - | 1.5 | 1.2 | 1.3 |
Exhibit 2. Economic projections for 2011-2013 and over the longer run (percent)
2011 | 2012 | 2013 | Longer run | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Central Tendency | 2.7 to 2.9 | 3.3 to 3.7 | 3.5 to 4.2 | 2.5 to 2.8 |
April projections | 3.1 to 3.3 | 3.5 to 4.2 | 3.5 to 4.3 | 2.5 to 2.8 |
Range | 2.5 to 3.0 | 2.2 to 4.0 | 3.0 to 4.5 | 2.4 to 3.0 |
April projections | 2.9 to 3.7 | 2.9 to 4.4 | 3.0 to 5.0 | 2.4 to 3.0 |
Memo: Tealbook | 2.7 | 3.5 | 4.2 | 2½ |
April Tealbook | 3.2 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 2½ |
2011 | 2012 | 2013 | Longer run | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Central Tendency | 8.6 to 8.9 | 7.8 to 8.2 | 7.0 to 7.5 | 5.2 to 5.6 |
April projections | 8.4 to 8.7 | 7.6 to 7.9 | 6.8 to 7.2 | 5.2 to 5.6 |
Range | 8.4 to 9.1 | 7.5 to 8.7 | 6.5 to 8.3 | 5.0 to 6.0 |
April projections | 8.1 to 8.9 | 7.1 to 8.4 | 6.0 to 8.4 | 5.0 to 6.0 |
Memo: Tealbook | 8.9 | 8.1 | 7.1 | 5¼ |
April Tealbook | 8.7 | 7.7 | 7.0 | 5¼ |
2011 | 2012 | 2013 | Longer run | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Central Tendency | 2.3 to 2.5 | 1.5 to 2.0 | 1.5 to 2.0 | 1.7 to 2.0 |
April projections | 2.1 to 2.8 | 1.2 to 2.0 | 1.4 to 2.0 | 1.7 to 2.0 |
Range | 2.1 to 3.5 | 1.2 to 2.8 | 1.3 to 2.5 | 1.5 to 2.0 |
April projections | 2.0 to 3.6 | 1.0 to 2.8 | 1.2 to 2.5 | 1.5 to 2.0 |
Memo: Tealbook | 2.3 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 2 |
April Tealbook | 2.2 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 2 |
2011 | 2012 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|
Central Tendency | 1.5 to 1.8 | 1.4 to 2.0 | 1.4 to 2.0 |
April projections | 1.3 to 1.6 | 1.3 to 1.8 | 1.4 to 2.0 |
Range | 1.5 to 2.3 | 1.2 to 2.5 | 1.3 to 2.5 |
April projections | 1.1 to 2.0 | 1.1 to 2.0 | 1.2 to 2.0 |
Memo: Tealbook | 1.7 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
April Tealbook | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.5 |
Note: The changes in real GDP and inflation are measured Q4/Q4
Exhibit 3. Risks and uncertainty in economic projections
Top-left panel
Uncertainty about GDP growth
Lower | Similar | Higher | |
---|---|---|---|
June projections | 0 | 4 | 13 |
April projections | 1 | 5 | 11 |
Top-right panel
Risks to GDP growth
Downside | Balanced | Upside | |
---|---|---|---|
June projections | 11 | 6 | 0 |
April projections | 5 | 9 | 3 |
Bottom-left panel
Uncertainty about PCE inflation
Lower | Similar | Higher | |
---|---|---|---|
June projections | 1 | 2 | 14 |
April projections | 1 | 3 | 13 |
Bottom-right panel
Risks to PCE inflation
Downside | Balanced | Upside | |
---|---|---|---|
June projections | 1 | 10 | 6 |
April projections | 1 | 7 | 9 |
Exhibit 4. Central tendencies and ranges of economic projections, 2011-13 and over the longer run
Actual values for years 2006 through 2010.
[Note: Appendix 5, Exhibit 4 shows fan-chart versions of the first three charts in Appendix 5, Exhibit 1.]
2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | Longer run | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual | 2.4 | 2.3 | -2.8 | 0.2 | 2.8 | - | - | - | - |
Upper End of Range | - | - | - | - | - | 3.0 | 4.0 | 4.5 | 3.0 |
Upper End of Central Tendency | - | - | - | - | - | 2.9 | 3.7 | 4.2 | 2.8 |
Lower End of Central Tendency | - | - | - | - | - | 2.7 | 3.3 | 3.5 | 2.5 |
Lower End of Range | - | - | - | - | - | 2.5 | 2.2 | 3.0 | 2.4 |
2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | Longer run | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual | 4.5 | 4.8 | 6.9 | 10.0 | 9.6 | - | - | - | - |
Upper End of Range | - | - | - | - | - | 9.1 | 8.7 | 8.3 | 6.0 |
Upper End of Central Tendency | - | - | - | - | - | 8.9 | 8.2 | 7.5 | 5.6 |
Lower End of Central Tendency | - | - | - | - | - | 8.6 | 7.8 | 7.0 | 5.2 |
Lower End of Range | - | - | - | - | - | 8.4 | 7.5 | 6.5 | 5.0 |
2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | Longer run | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual | 1.9 | 3.5 | 1.7 | 1.5 | 1.1 | - | - | - | - |
Upper End of Range | - | - | - | - | - | 3.5 | 2.8 | 2.5 | 2.0 |
Upper End of Central Tendency | - | - | - | - | - | 2.5 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Lower End of Central Tendency | - | - | - | - | - | 2.3 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.7 |
Lower End of Range | - | - | - | - | - | 2.1 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.5 |
Appendix 6: Materials used by Mr. English
Material for
FOMC Briefing on Monetary Policy Alternatives
Bill English
June 22, 2011
April FOMC Statement
- Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in March indicates that the economic recovery is proceeding at a moderate pace and overall conditions in the labor market are improving gradually. Household spending and business investment in equipment and software continue to expand. However, investment in nonresidential structures is still weak, and the housing sector continues to be depressed. Commodity prices have risen significantly since last summer, and concerns about global supplies of crude oil have contributed to a further increase in oil prices since the Committee met in March. Inflation has picked up in recent months, but longer-term inflation expectations have remained stable and measures of underlying inflation are still subdued.
- Consistent with its statutory mandate, the Committee seeks to foster maximum employment and price stability. The unemployment rate remains elevated, and measures of underlying inflation continue to be somewhat low, relative to levels that the Committee judges to be consistent, over the longer run, with its dual mandate. Increases in the prices of energy and other commodities have pushed up inflation in recent months. The Committee expects these effects to be transitory, but it will pay close attention to the evolution of inflation and inflation expectations. The Committee continues to anticipate a gradual return to higher levels of resource utilization in a context of price stability.
- To promote a stronger pace of economic recovery and to help ensure that inflation, over time, is at levels consistent with its mandate, the Committee decided today to continue expanding its holdings of securities as announced in November. In particular, the Committee is maintaining its existing policy of reinvesting principal payments from its securities holdings and will complete purchases of $600 billion of longer-term Treasury securities by the end of the current quarter. The Committee will regularly review the size and composition of its securities holdings in light of incoming information and is prepared to adjust those holdings as needed to best foster maximum employment and price stability.
- The Committee will maintain the target range for the federal funds rate at 0 to ¼ percent and continues to anticipate that economic conditions, including low rates of resource utilization, subdued inflation trends, and stable inflation expectations, are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels for the federal funds rate for an extended period.
- The Committee will continue to monitor the economic outlook and financial developments and will employ its policy tools as necessary to support the economic recovery and to help ensure that inflation, over time, is at levels consistent with its mandate.
[Note: In the June FOMC Statement Alternatives, emphasis (strike-through) indicates strike-through text in the original document, and strong emphasis (bold) indicates bold red underlined text in the original document.]
June FOMC Statement--Alternative A
- Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in April suggests that the economic recovery is continuing at a moderate pace, though more slowly than the Committee had expected. Moreover, a number of indicators suggest a loss of momentum in the labor market. The slower pace of the recovery reflects in part some factors that are likely to be temporary, including the damping effect of higher food and energy prices on consumer purchasing power and spending as well as supply chain disruptions associated with the tragic events in Japan. Household spending and business investment in equipment and software continue to expand. However, investment in nonresidential structures is still weak, and the housing sector continues to be depressed. Inflation has picked up in recent months, mainly reflecting higher prices for some commodities and imported goods, as well as the recent supply chain disruptions. Although firms are facing cost pressures from high commodity prices, the pass-through into the prices of non-energy consumer goods and services has been relatively limited, and longer-term inflation expectations have remained stable.
- Consistent with its statutory mandate, the Committee seeks to foster maximum employment and price stability. The unemployment rate remains elevated; however, the Committee expects the pace of recovery to pick up over coming quarters and the unemployment rate to resume its gradual decline toward levels that the Committee judges to be consistent with its dual mandate. The Committee perceives that the downside risks to the economic outlook have increased somewhat. Inflation has moved up recently, but the Committee anticipates that inflation will subside to levels at or below those consistent with the Committee's dual mandate as the effects on inflation of past energy and other commodity price increases dissipate.
- To promote the ongoing economic recovery and to help ensure that inflation, over time, is at levels consistent with its mandate, the Committee is keeping the target range for the federal funds rate at 0 to ¼ percent and now anticipates that economic conditions--including low rates of resource utilization and a subdued outlook for inflation over the medium run--are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels for the federal funds rate at least through the end of 2012. The Committee likewise anticipates that economic conditions will warrant the maintenance of its existing policy of reinvesting principal payments from its securities holdings at least through mid-2012. The Committee will complete its purchases of $600 billion of longer-term Treasury securities by the end of this month. The Committee will regularly review the size and composition of its securities holdings and is prepared to expand those holdings if needed.
- The Committee will monitor the economic outlook and financial developments and will act as needed to best foster maximum employment and price stability.
June FOMC Statement--Alternative B
- Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in April indicates that the economic recovery is continuing at a moderate pace, though somewhat more slowly than the Committee had expected. Some indicators also suggest a loss of momentum in the labor market. The slower pace of the recovery reflects in part some factors that are likely to be temporary, including the damping effect of higher food and energy prices on consumer purchasing power and spending as well as supply chain disruptions associated with the tragic events in Japan. Household spending and business investment in equipment and software continue to expand. However, investment in nonresidential structures is still weak, and the housing sector continues to be depressed. Inflation has picked up in recent months, mainly reflecting higher prices for some commodities and imported goods, as well as the recent supply chain disruptions. However, longer-term inflation expectations have remained stable.
- Consistent with its statutory mandate, the Committee seeks to foster maximum employment and price stability. The unemployment rate remains elevated; however, the Committee expects the pace of recovery to pick up over coming quarters and the unemployment rate to resume its gradual decline toward levels that the Committee judges to be consistent with its dual mandate. Inflation has moved up recently, but the Committee anticipates that inflation will subside to levels at or below those consistent with the Committee's dual mandate as the effects on inflation of past energy and other commodity price increases dissipate. However, the Committee will continue to pay close attention to the evolution of inflation and inflation expectations.
- To promote the ongoing economic recovery and to help ensure that inflation, over time, is at levels consistent with its mandate, the Committee decided today to maintain the current degree of monetary policy accommodation. In particular, the Committee will keep the target range for the federal funds rate at 0 to ¼ percent and continues to anticipate that economic conditions--including low rates of resource utilization and a subdued outlook for inflation over the medium run--are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels for the federal funds rate for an extended period. The Committee will complete its purchases of $600 billion of longer-term Treasury securities by the end of this month and will maintain its existing policy of reinvesting principal payments from its securities holdings. The Committee will regularly review the size and composition of its securities holdings and is prepared to adjust those holdings as appropriate.
- The Committee will monitor the economic outlook and financial developments and will act as needed to best foster maximum employment and price stability.
June FOMC Statement--Alternative C
- Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in April indicates that the economic recovery is continuing at a moderate pace, though somewhat more slowly than the Committee had expected. Some indicators also suggest a loss of momentum in the labor market. The slower pace of the recovery reflects in part some factors that are likely to be temporary, including the damping effect of higher food and energy prices on consumer purchasing power and spending as well as supply chain disruptions associated with the tragic events in Japan. Household spending and business investment in equipment and software continue to expand. However, investment in nonresidential structures is still weak, and the housing sector continues to be depressed. Inflation has picked up in recent months, as firms are facing cost pressures from increased commodity prices and import prices have risen. Longer-term inflation expectations have remained stable.
- Consistent with its statutory mandate, the Committee seeks to foster maximum employment and price stability. The unemployment rate remains elevated; however, the Committee expects the pace of recovery to pick up over coming quarters and the unemployment rate to resume its gradual decline toward levels that the Committee judges to be consistent with its dual mandate. Inflation has moved up recently, but the Committee anticipates that inflation will subside to levels at or below those consistent with the Committee's dual mandate as the effects on inflation of past energy and other commodity price increases dissipate. However, the upside risks to inflation have increased somewhat, and the Committee will continue to pay close attention to the evolution of inflation and inflation expectations.
- In order to help ensure that economic activity and inflation, over time, are at levels consistent with its mandate, the Committee decided today to keep the target range for the federal funds rate at 0 to ¼ percent and anticipates that economic conditions--including low rates of resource utilization and a subdued outlook for inflation over the medium run--are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels for the federal funds rate for some time. The Committee will complete its purchases of $600 billion of longer-term Treasury securities by the end of this month. In July, the Committee will begin a gradual reduction in the current extraordinary degree of policy accommodation by discontinuing its policy of reinvesting principal payments from its holdings of agency securities and Treasury securities. The Committee will regularly review the size and composition of its securities holdings and is prepared to adjust those holdings as appropriate.
- The Committee will monitor the economic outlook and financial developments and will act as needed to best foster maximum employment and price stability.
April 2011 FOMC Directive
The Federal Open Market Committee seeks monetary and financial conditions that will foster price stability and promote sustainable growth in output. To further its long-run objectives, the Committee seeks conditions in reserve markets consistent with federal funds trading in a range from 0 to ¼ percent. The Committee directs the Desk to execute purchases of longer-term Treasury securities in order to increase the total face value of domestic securities held in the System Open Market Account to approximately $2.6 trillion by the end of June 2011. The Committee also directs the Desk to reinvest principal payments from agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities in longer-term Treasury securities. The System Open Market Account Manager and the Secretary will keep the Committee informed of ongoing developments regarding the System's balance sheet that could affect the attainment over time of the Committee's objectives of maximum employment and price stability.
[Note: In the June 2011 FOMC Directive Alternatives, emphasis (strike-through) indicates strike-through text in the original document, and strong emphasis (bold) indicates bold red underlined text in the original document.]
June 2011 FOMC Directive -- Alternative A
The Federal Open Market Committee seeks monetary and financial conditions that will foster price stability and promote sustainable growth in output. To further its long-run objectives, the Committee seeks conditions in reserve markets consistent with federal funds trading in a range from 0 to ¼ percent. The Committee directs the Desk to execute complete purchases of $600 billion of longer-term Treasury securities in order to increase the total face value of domestic securities held in the System Open Market Account to approximately $2.6 trillion by the end of June 2011 this month. The Committee also directs the Desk to maintain its existing policy of reinvesting principal payments from agency debt and agency mortgage backed on all domestic securities in the System Open Market Account in longer term Treasury securities in order to maintain the total face value of domestic securities at approximately $2.6 trillion. The System Open Market Account Manager and the Secretary will keep the Committee informed of ongoing developments regarding the System's balance sheet that could affect the attainment over time of the Committee's objectives of maximum employment and price stability.
June 2011 FOMC Directive -- Alternative B
The Federal Open Market Committee seeks monetary and financial conditions that will foster price stability and promote sustainable growth in output. To further its long-run objectives, the Committee seeks conditions in reserve markets consistent with federal funds trading in a range from 0 to ¼ percent. The Committee directs the Desk to execute complete purchases of $600 billion of longer-term Treasury securities in order to increase the total face value of domestic securities held in the System Open Market Account to approximately $2.6 trillion by the end of June 2011 this month. The Committee also directs the Desk to maintain its existing policy of reinvesting principal payments from agency debt and agency mortgage backed on all domestic securities in the System Open Market Account in longer term Treasury securities in order to maintain the total face value of domestic securities at approximately $2.6 trillion. The System Open Market Account Manager and the Secretary will keep the Committee informed of ongoing developments regarding the System's balance sheet that could affect the attainment over time of the Committee's objectives of maximum employment and price stability.
June 2011 FOMC Directive -- Alternative C
The Federal Open Market Committee seeks monetary and financial conditions that will foster price stability and promote sustainable growth in output. To further its long-run objectives, the Committee seeks conditions in reserve markets consistent with federal funds trading in a range from 0 to ¼ percent. The Committee directs the Desk to execute complete purchases of $600 billion of longer-term Treasury securities in order to increase the total face value of domestic securities held in the System Open Market Account to approximately $2.6 trillion by the end of June 2011 this month. The Committee also directs the Desk to cease all reinvestment of principal payments from agency debt and agency mortgage backed securities in longer term Treasury on domestic securities in the System Open Market Account from the beginning of July 2011. The System Open Market Account Manager and the Secretary will keep the Committee informed of ongoing developments regarding the System's balance sheet that could affect the attainment over time of the Committee's objectives of maximum employment and price stability.
Appendix 7: Materials used by Ms. Yellen
FOMC Policy on External Communications of Federal Reserve System Staff1
Preamble
In the course of making monetary policy decisions, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) makes extensive use of background materials prepared by the staff of the Federal Reserve System, and senior staff give regular briefings at FOMC meetings. In addition, staff are directly involved in the implementation and communication of the Committee's policy decisions.
Federal Reserve System staff have contacts with members of the public in the process of gathering information about current economic and financial conditions. In addition, staff synthesize that information using a variety of analytical methods and statistical tools, and the continual refinement of these methods and tools is facilitated by ongoing interactions with academic researchers, staff at foreign central banks, and other outside analysts. Finally, staff play a significant role in helping the public understand the rationale for FOMC decisions.
To reinforce the public's confidence in the transparency and integrity of the monetary policy process, the FOMC has established the following principles to govern the public contacts of Federal Reserve System staff who have access to confidential FOMC information.2 The FOMC maintains responsibility for ensuring that all System staff abide by these principles. Specifically, the President of each Federal Reserve Bank is responsible for ensuring the confidentiality of FOMC information at that Bank and for the conduct and discretion of that Bank's staff with regard to the use of that information, and the Chairman fulfills this role for Board staff.
General Principles
- Federal Reserve staff play a significant role in enhancing public understanding of the FOMC's actions, thereby promoting the effectiveness of monetary policy. In all communications with the public regarding monetary policy issues, members of the official staff should refrain from publicly expressing their own personal views regarding prospective monetary policy decisions and should never speculate about future monetary policy decisions or actions that have not been announced by the Committee. In explaining the rationale for announced FOMC decisions, staff should draw on Committee communications, the Chairman's press conference remarks, and other published materials as appropriate. Whenever staff make public comments on monetary policy, they should clearly indicate that those comments are solely their own responsibility and should not be interpreted as representing the views of the FOMC, its principals, or any other person associated with the Federal Reserve System.
- To foster the ongoing frank exchange of views at FOMC meetings, staff will refrain from characterizing such discussions--apart from what has been published in the minutes of each FOMC meeting--in any contact with an individual, firm, or organization outside of the Federal Reserve System.
- To protect the independence of the FOMC's decision-making process from short-term political pressures, members of the official staff will strive to avoid any appearance of political partisanship in their contacts with the public.
- Staff will carefully safeguard all confidential FOMC information.3 No confidential information may be released except pursuant to Committee instructions or with written authorization from the Chairman and prompt notification to the Committee.
- To ensure that no member of the public is able to profit financially from acquiring nonpublic information about economic and financial conditions or about the methods and tools that are currently being used to assess those conditions, staff will not provide such information to any individual, firm, or organization outside of the Federal Reserve System unless the information has been cleared for publication and is made widely available to the public.
- Staff will strive to ensure that their contacts with members of the public do not provide any profit-making person or organization with a prestige advantage over its competitors. They will consider this principle carefully and rigorously in considering invitations to speak at meetings sponsored by profit-making organizations and in scheduling meetings with anyone who might benefit financially from apparently-exclusive contacts with Federal Reserve staff.
- To facilitate the effectiveness of the Committee's policy deliberations and the clarity of its communications, staff observe the blackout period on monetary policy communication that begins on the Tuesday morning of the week prior to each regularly-scheduled FOMC meeting and ends at midnight Eastern Time on the Thursday following the meeting. During each blackout period, staff refrain from providing information to members of the public about macroeconomic or financial developments or about current or prospective monetary policy issues unless that information has already been cleared for publication and made widely available to the public prior to the blackout period.
Practical Examples
To assist Federal Reserve System staff in understanding the application of these principles, the FOMC has considered how the principles should be applied to some common requests for public contact. For example, the following contacts would generally be consistent with the Committee's policy on external communications, as long as the staff member carefully adheres to all of the principles listed above during the contact itself:
- A presentation at a widely-attended meeting, where the event is organized by a non-profit entity and does not involve fundraising. Such a meeting might be sponsored by an academic institution, non-profit organization, or civic or trade association (such as a chamber of commerce or a state or national bankers' association).
- A private meeting with members of the public--such as bankers, community representatives, industry representatives, or labor representatives--to collect information about current economic and financial conditions, without disseminating any information that is not widely available to the public. Whenever practical, at least two Federal Reserve staff should be present at such a meeting.
In contrast, the following contacts would not be consistent with the principles set out above:
- Disclosure of confidential FOMC information.
- Disclosure or characterization of the views expressed at an FOMC meeting.
- Disclosure of an FOMC participant's personal views on monetary policy that have not previously been communicated to the public.
- Public communications in which a Federal Reserve officer expresses personal opinions about prospective monetary policy decisions.
- A prediction to members of the public about Committee action prior to the Committee's announcement of such decisions.
- A private meeting with selected clients of a regulated entity or financial firm to discuss monetary policy.
Of course, the foregoing examples are not intended to serve as an exhaustive list, and hence good judgment will be essential in applying these principles. Moreover, whenever staff are unsure about whether specific contacts with the public would be appropriate, they should consult in advance with the appropriate staff person or with the head of their respective institution--namely, the Chairman in the case of staff at the Board of Governors, and the President in the case of staff at a Federal Reserve Bank.
1 This document complements the FOMC policy regarding the external communications of Committee participants, which is set forth in a separate document. Return to text
2 This policy is fully consistent with and complements the rules for ethical conduct prescribed for the staff of the Board of Governors and for staff at each Federal Reserve Bank. Return to text
3 The Committee's regulations concerning the designation and handling of confidential FOMC information are set forth in a separate document, "Program for Security of FOMC Information." Return to text
FOMC Policy on External Communications of Committee Participants1
Preamble
The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) is committed to providing clear and timely information to the public about the Committee's monetary policy actions and the rationale for those decisions. Indeed, considerable evidence indicates that central bank transparency increases the effectiveness of monetary policy and enables households and businesses to make better-informed decisions.
Two-way communication with the public is a crucial element in the FOMC's monetary policy process. Committee participants have regular contacts with members of the public as part of the process of gathering the information the Committee needs to understand current economic and financial conditions. In addition, the FOMC's public accountability is strengthened by open discussion of Committee participants' views about the economic outlook as well as their judgments about the appropriate course of monetary policy.
Therefore, to reinforce the public's confidence in the transparency and integrity of the monetary policy process, the FOMC has established the following principles to govern Committee participants' contacts with members of the public. The FOMC itself maintains responsibility for ensuring that all Committee participants--that is, the members of the Federal Reserve Board and the presidents of the Federal Reserve Banks--abide by these principles.2
General Principles
- Committee participants will endeavor to enhance the public's understanding of monetary policy. They are free to explain their individual views but are expected to do so in a spirit of collegiality and to refrain from characterizing the views of other individuals on the Committee. In explaining the rationale for announced FOMC decisions, participants will draw on Committee communications and the Chairman's press conference remarks as appropriate.
- To foster the ongoing frank exchange of views at FOMC meetings, Committee participants will refrain from publicly characterizing such discussions beyond what has been published in the minutes of each FOMC meeting.
- To protect the independence of the FOMC's decision-making process from short-term political pressures, participants will strive to avoid any appearance of political partisanship and will be prudent in selecting venues for their speaking engagements.
- FOMC participants will carefully safeguard all confidential information.3 No confidential FOMC information may be released except pursuant to Committee instructions or with written authorization from the Chairman and prompt notification to the FOMC.
- To the fullest extent possible, Committee participants will refrain from describing their personal views about monetary policy in any meeting or conversation with any individual, firm, or organization who could profit financially from acquiring that information unless those views have already been expressed in their public communications.
- Committee participants will strive to ensure that their contacts with members of the public do not provide any profit-making person or organization with a prestige advantage over its competitors. They will consider this principle carefully and rigorously in scheduling meetings with anyone who might benefit financially from apparently exclusive contacts with Federal Reserve officials and in considering invitations to speak at meetings that are sponsored by profit-making organizations or that are closed to the public and the media.
- To facilitate the effectiveness of the Committee's policy deliberations and the clarity of its communications, participants observe a blackout period on monetary policy communication that begins on the Tuesday morning of the week prior to each regularly-scheduled FOMC meeting and ends at midnight Eastern Time on the Thursday following the meeting. During each blackout period, participants refrain from expressing their views about macroeconomic developments or monetary policy issues in meetings or conversations with members of the public.
Practical Examples
To assist FOMC participants in understanding the application of these principles, the Committee has considered how the principles should be applied to some common requests for public contact. For example, the following contacts would generally be consistent with the Committee's policy on external communications, as long as the participant carefully adheres to all of the principles listed above during the contact itself:
- A speech on a monetary policy topic at a widely-attended event with press in attendance, where the event is organized by a non-profit entity and does not involve fundraising. Such a speech might be given at an academic institution, a conference sponsored by a non-profit organization, or a meeting sponsored by a civic or trade association (such as a chamber of commerce or a state or national bankers' association).
- An interview with the press regarding the participant's personal views on monetary policy issues.
- A private meeting with members of the public--such as bankers, community representatives, industry representatives, or labor representatives--to collect information about the economy without disseminating any information about the participant's personal views on monetary policy unless those views have already been expressed in their public communications. Whenever practical, a public information officer or other Federal Reserve staff should be present at such a meeting.
In contrast, the following contacts would not be consistent with the principles set out above:
- Disclosure in any setting of confidential FOMC information.
- Disclosure or characterization in any setting of the views that others expressed at an FOMC meeting.
- A prediction about Committee action in advance of the Committee announcement of its decision.
- A private meeting with selected clients of a regulated entity or financial firm to discuss monetary policy.
Of course, the foregoing examples are not intended to serve as an exhaustive list, and hence good judgment will be essential in applying these principles.
1 The Committee's policy governing the external communications of Federal Reserve System staff is set forth in a separate document. Return to text
2 This policy is fully consistent with and complements the more general policies for ethical conduct published in the Federal Reserve Administrative Manual (FRAM) section 2-026.1 ("Ethics--Voluntary Guide to Conduct for Senior Officials"). That section recognizes the overarching principle that senior Federal Reserve officials "have a special responsibility for maintaining the integrity, dignity, and reputation of the System" and "should scrupulously avoid conduct that might in any way tend to embarrass the System or impair the effectiveness of its operations." The policy in this document focuses specifically on external communications and is binding on all FOMC participants. Return to text
3 The Committee's regulations concerning the designation and handling of confidential FOMC information are set forth in a separate document, "Program for Security of FOMC Information." Return to text
Appendix 8: Materials used by Chairman Bernanke
Exit Strategy Principles
In light of discussions at the April and June FOMC meetings, the Committee has reached broad agreement on the key elements of the strategy that it expects to follow in normalizing the stance and conduct of monetary policy:
- The Committee will determine the timing and pace of policy normalization to promote its statutory mandate of maximum employment and price stability.
- To begin the process of policy normalization, the Committee will likely first cease reinvesting some or all payments of principal on the securities holdings in the System Open Market Account (SOMA).
- At the same time or sometime relatively soon thereafter, the Committee will modify its forward guidance on the path of the federal funds rate and will initiate temporary reserve-draining operations aimed at supporting the implementation of increases in the federal funds rate when appropriate.
- When economic conditions warrant, the Committee's next step in the process of policy normalization will be to begin raising its target for the federal funds rate, and from that point on, changing the level or range of the federal funds rate target will be the primary means of adjusting the stance of monetary policy. During the normalization process, adjustments to the interest rate on excess reserves and to the level of reserves in the banking system will be used to bring the funds rate toward its target.
- Sales of agency securities from the SOMA will likely commence sometime after the first increase in the target for the federal funds rate, probably within a few months. The timing and pace of sales will be communicated to the public in advance; that pace is anticipated to be relatively gradual and steady, but it could be adjusted up or down in response to material changes in the economic outlook or financial conditions.
- The pace of sales is expected to be aimed at eliminating our holdings of agency securities over a period of [ three | four ] to five years, thereby minimizing the extent to which the SOMA portfolio might affect the allocation of credit across sectors of the economy. Sales at this pace would be expected to normalize the size of the SOMA securities portfolio over a period of [ two to three | about three ] years. In particular, the size of the securities portfolio and the associated quantity of bank reserves are expected to be reduced to the smallest levels that would be consistent with the efficient implementation of monetary policy through the use of conventional open market operations to keep the federal funds rate near its target.
- The Committee is prepared to make adjustments to its exit strategy if necessary in light of economic and financial developments.