Accessible Version

Meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee
November 1-2, 2011 Presentation Materials

Presentation Materials (PDF)

Pages 239 to 282 of the Transcript

Appendix 1: Materials used by Mr. Kiley

Material for
Alternative Monetary Policy Frameworks

Briefing by Michael T. Kiley
November 1, 2011

Exhibit 1
Alternative Monetary Policy Frameworks

Top panel
Flexible-Inflation Targeting and Commitment

  • Flexible inflation targeting combines commitment to a medium-run inflation objective with the flexibility to moderate deviations of employment from its "full employment" level.
  • We assumed that the Committee aims to achieve:
    • An inflation rate of 2 percent.
    • An unemployment rate in the range of 5 to 6 percent.
  • We focused on how strategies that involve making conditional commitments can contribute to improved macroeconomic outcomes.

Middle-left panel
Federal Funds Rate

percent
Period Optimal control,
commitment
Optimal control,
discretion
September TB
baseline
2011:Q10.160.160.16
2011:Q20.090.090.09
2011:Q30.080.080.08
2011:Q40.100.090.12
2012:Q10.100.090.12
2012:Q20.090.100.12
2012:Q30.080.110.12
2012:Q40.070.100.12
2013:Q10.070.110.12
2013:Q20.070.110.12
2013:Q30.070.120.12
2013:Q40.070.130.12
2014:Q10.080.140.13
2014:Q20.080.180.17
2014:Q30.090.240.32
2014:Q40.100.400.56
2015:Q10.110.630.91
2015:Q20.120.921.35
2015:Q30.141.231.75
2015:Q40.251.572.11
2016:Q10.521.902.42
2016:Q20.912.222.68
2016:Q31.362.532.91
2016:Q41.852.823.11
2017:Q12.353.093.28
2017:Q22.843.333.43
2017:Q33.303.543.57
2017:Q43.723.723.68
2018:Q14.103.883.78
2018:Q24.434.013.86
2018:Q34.714.123.93
2018:Q44.954.223.99

Middle-right panel
Unemployment Rate

percent
Period Optimal control,
commitment
Optimal control,
discretion
September TB
baseline
2011:Q18.938.938.93
2011:Q29.079.079.07
2011:Q39.099.099.09
2011:Q49.119.119.11
2012:Q19.079.089.10
2012:Q28.908.958.98
2012:Q38.708.798.86
2012:Q48.458.608.70
2013:Q18.188.388.52
2013:Q27.988.248.41
2013:Q37.768.078.28
2013:Q47.537.908.14
2014:Q17.227.647.91
2014:Q26.937.397.69
2014:Q36.667.177.49
2014:Q46.416.967.31
2015:Q16.176.757.12
2015:Q25.916.536.92
2015:Q35.686.336.73
2015:Q45.476.146.55
2016:Q15.285.976.38
2016:Q25.125.816.22
2016:Q34.995.676.07
2016:Q44.875.535.92
2017:Q14.835.465.84
2017:Q24.815.405.76
2017:Q34.815.355.69
2017:Q44.835.315.63
2018:Q14.875.285.58
2018:Q24.925.265.53
2018:Q34.995.245.49
2018:Q45.075.245.45

Bottom-left panel
PCE Prices

4-qtr percent change
Period Optimal control,
commitment
Optimal control,
discretion
September TB
baseline
2011:Q11.781.781.78
2011:Q22.512.512.51
2011:Q32.832.832.83
2011:Q42.802.722.64
2012:Q12.182.041.90
2012:Q21.831.621.41
2012:Q31.751.461.18
2012:Q41.791.501.21
2013:Q11.931.621.31
2013:Q21.961.641.31
2013:Q31.961.641.30
2013:Q41.961.631.29
2014:Q12.001.681.33
2014:Q22.041.711.36
2014:Q32.061.741.39
2014:Q42.091.781.43
2015:Q12.091.781.43
2015:Q22.101.791.44
2015:Q32.111.821.47
2015:Q42.131.841.49
2016:Q12.151.861.52
2016:Q22.181.891.55
2016:Q32.211.921.58
2016:Q42.241.951.61
2017:Q12.271.981.65
2017:Q22.302.011.68
2017:Q32.322.041.71
2017:Q42.342.061.74
2018:Q12.352.071.76
2018:Q22.352.091.79
2018:Q32.342.101.81
2018:Q42.332.101.83

Bottom-right panel
Lessons

  • Optimal policies involve commitments to hold the nominal funds rate near zero persistently.
  • Unemployment falls below its natural rate and inflation may rise above its target later in the decade.
  • Optimal policies do not result in inflation above 2½ percent for a protracted period under the modal outlook.

Exhibit 2
Practical Approaches

Top-left panel
Strategies

  • Notable improvements in resource utilization were achieved by two strategies:
    • Inertial version of the Taylor 1999 rule
    • Nominal income targeting
  • Price-level targeting resulted in poorer performance, on average.

Top-right panel
Nominal GDP

Billions of dollars
Period Assumed target September TB
2007:Q113,758.5413,758.54
2007:Q213,976.8313,976.83
2007:Q314,126.1714,126.17
2007:Q414,253.1614,253.16
2008:Q114,399.4714,273.92
2008:Q214,547.2814,415.46
2008:Q314,696.6114,395.05
2008:Q414,847.4714,081.72
2009:Q114,961.5413,893.74
2009:Q215,076.4913,854.08
2009:Q315,192.3213,920.55
2009:Q415,309.0414,087.43
2010:Q115,450.1414,277.90
2010:Q215,592.5514,467.84
2010:Q315,736.2714,605.47
2010:Q415,881.3114,755.01
2011:Q116,045.6314,867.81
2011:Q216,211.6515,008.01
2011:Q316,379.3915,203.68
2011:Q416,548.8615,348.13
2012:Q116,720.4115,456.87
2012:Q216,893.7515,628.42
2012:Q317,068.8815,781.92
2012:Q417,245.8215,946.93
2013:Q117,426.8216,109.37
2013:Q217,609.7116,327.93
2013:Q317,794.5316,523.00
2013:Q417,981.2816,719.57
2014:Q118,182.1016,941.37
2014:Q218,386.2617,165.69
2014:Q318,593.6417,406.28
2014:Q4 18,804.0317,652.41
2015:Q119,017.4817,919.94
2015:Q219,234.1318,199.26
2015:Q319,454.3518,464.79
2015:Q419,677.9318,728.95
2016:Q119,904.9518,988.72
2016:Q220,134.9119,248.92
2016:Q320,367.7019,506.77
2016:Q420,603.2819,764.87

Middle-left panel
Federal Funds Rate

percent
Period Inertial Taylor
(1999)
Nominal-income
targeting
September TB
baseline
2011:Q10.160.160.16
2011:Q20.090.090.09
2011:Q30.080.080.08
2011:Q40.120.120.12
2012:Q10.120.120.12
2012:Q20.120.120.12
2012:Q30.120.120.12
2012:Q40.120.120.12
2013:Q10.120.120.12
2013:Q20.120.120.12
2013:Q30.160.120.12
2013:Q40.240.120.12
2014:Q10.350.120.13
2014:Q20.490.140.17
2014:Q30.660.210.32
2014:Q40.860.330.56
2015:Q11.100.510.91
2015:Q21.360.741.35
2015:Q31.640.991.75
2015:Q41.931.282.11
2016:Q12.211.572.42
2016:Q22.501.882.68
2016:Q32.772.192.91
2016:Q43.032.493.11
2017:Q13.282.793.28
2017:Q23.503.083.43
2017:Q33.713.353.57
2017:Q43.893.603.68
2018:Q14.003.793.78
2018:Q24.103.963.86
2018:Q34.194.133.93
2018:Q44.264.283.99

Middle-center panel
Unemployment Rate

percent
Period Inertial Taylor
(1999)
Nominal-income
targeting
September TB
baseline
2011:Q18.938.938.93
2011:Q29.079.079.07
2011:Q39.099.099.09
2011:Q49.119.119.11
2012:Q19.079.079.10
2012:Q28.918.918.98
2012:Q38.718.728.86
2012:Q48.488.498.70
2013:Q18.218.238.52
2013:Q28.028.048.41
2013:Q37.807.838.28
2013:Q47.587.628.14
2014:Q17.287.317.91
2014:Q26.997.027.69
2014:Q36.736.767.49
2014:Q46.496.517.31
2015:Q16.256.277.12
2015:Q26.016.026.92
2015:Q35.785.786.73
2015:Q45.565.576.55
2016:Q15.365.376.38
2016:Q25.185.206.22
2016:Q35.015.046.07
2016:Q44.864.915.92
2017:Q14.794.865.84
2017:Q24.744.825.76
2017:Q34.704.815.69
2017:Q44.674.815.63
2018:Q14.664.845.58
2018:Q24.664.875.53
2018:Q34.684.925.49
2018:Q44.704.975.45

Middle-right panel
PCE Prices

4-qtr percent change
Period Inertial Taylor
(1999)
Nominal-income
targeting
September TB
baseline
2011:Q11.781.781.78
2011:Q22.512.512.51
2011:Q32.832.832.83
2011:Q42.862.792.64
2012:Q12.322.171.90
2012:Q22.051.821.41
2012:Q32.051.751.18
2012:Q42.131.801.21
2013:Q12.291.941.31
2013:Q22.351.971.31
2013:Q32.371.981.30
2013:Q42.391.971.29
2014:Q12.442.021.33
2014:Q22.492.061.36
2014:Q32.532.081.39
2014:Q42.572.111.43
2015:Q12.572.111.43
2015:Q22.582.111.44
2015:Q32.592.131.47
2015:Q42.602.131.49
2016:Q12.612.151.52
2016:Q22.622.161.55
2016:Q32.632.181.58
2016:Q42.632.191.61
2017:Q12.632.201.65
2017:Q22.632.211.68
2017:Q32.622.211.71
2017:Q42.612.211.74
2018:Q12.592.201.76
2018:Q22.562.191.79
2018:Q32.532.181.81
2018:Q42.502.151.83

Bottom panel
Key Results

  • The inertial Taylor 1999 rule approach brings about a notable improvement in the unemployment rate at the cost of higher inflation.
  • Nominal income targeting also improves outcomes for unemployment while bringing inflation closer to 2 percent.
  • Each strategy involves clear and credible commitments over the next five-to-ten years.
    • Laying out the course of the federal funds rate or communicating the conditions that may trigger the onset of tightening could facilitate achieving better outcomes.

Exhibit 3
Robustness

Top-left panel
Recession Scenario

  • Aggregate demand weakens enough to bring the unemployment rate to over 11½ percent for much of 2012 and 2013 under the baseline strategy.
  • For the baseline strategy we use the outcome-based rule reported in the Tealbook.
  • This could be interpreted as a continuation of the Committee's historical approach.

Top-right panel
Federal Funds Rate

percent
Period Inertial Taylor
(1999)
Nominal-income
targeting
Outcome-based
rule
2011:Q10.160.160.16
2011:Q20.090.090.09
2011:Q30.080.080.08
2011:Q40.120.120.12
2012:Q10.120.120.12
2012:Q20.120.120.12
2012:Q30.120.120.12
2012:Q40.120.120.12
2013:Q10.120.120.12
2013:Q20.120.120.12
2013:Q30.120.120.12
2013:Q40.120.120.12
2014:Q10.120.120.12
2014:Q20.120.120.12
2014:Q30.120.120.12
2014:Q40.120.120.12
2015:Q10.120.120.12
2015:Q20.120.120.12
2015:Q30.140.120.12
2015:Q40.260.120.12
2016:Q10.450.140.19
2016:Q20.710.260.42
2016:Q31.020.460.77
2016:Q41.360.721.20
2017:Q11.721.041.67
2017:Q22.091.412.13
2017:Q32.461.812.56
2017:Q42.832.232.95
2018:Q13.122.613.29
2018:Q23.413.013.59
2018:Q33.683.423.84
2018:Q43.933.834.04

Middle-left panel
Unemployment Rate

percent
Period Inertial Taylor
(1999)
Nominal-income
targeting
Outcome-based
rule
2011:Q18.938.938.93
2011:Q29.079.079.07
2011:Q39.099.099.09
2011:Q49.659.659.64
2012:Q110.2110.1910.25
2012:Q210.7910.7210.90
2012:Q311.0910.9611.30
2012:Q411.2611.0611.57
2013:Q111.2210.9511.64
2013:Q211.1510.8211.68
2013:Q310.9710.5711.59
2013:Q410.7210.2611.44
2014:Q110.349.8211.14
2014:Q29.939.3610.80
2014:Q39.508.8910.45
2014:Q49.078.4110.07
2015:Q18.617.909.66
2015:Q28.117.379.22
2015:Q37.626.848.76
2015:Q47.146.338.31
2016:Q16.675.837.86
2016:Q26.235.367.43
2016:Q35.814.937.02
2016:Q45.434.536.63
2017:Q15.144.236.35
2017:Q24.903.996.10
2017:Q34.693.795.89
2017:Q44.523.645.71
2018:Q14.403.545.57
2018:Q24.313.495.46
2018:Q34.253.495.38
2018:Q44.223.525.32

Middle-right panel
PCE Prices

4-qtr percent change
Period Inertial Taylor
(1999)
Nominal-income
targeting
Outcome-based
rule
2011:Q11.781.781.78
2011:Q22.512.512.51
2011:Q32.832.832.83
2011:Q42.532.682.23
2012:Q11.651.941.10
2012:Q21.021.460.17
2012:Q30.631.24-0.53
2012:Q40.621.25-0.59
2013:Q10.681.35-0.62
2013:Q20.661.36-0.70
2013:Q30.651.37-0.76
2013:Q40.641.38-0.79
2014:Q10.701.44-0.75
2014:Q20.771.52-0.70
2014:Q30.841.59-0.64
2014:Q40.931.68-0.56
2015:Q11.001.74-0.49
2015:Q21.091.82-0.39
2015:Q31.201.92-0.27
2015:Q41.322.03-0.13
2016:Q11.462.140.02
2016:Q21.602.270.19
2016:Q31.752.390.37
2016:Q41.902.520.55
2017:Q12.042.640.74
2017:Q22.192.760.93
2017:Q32.322.871.11
2017:Q42.442.961.28
2018:Q12.543.041.44
2018:Q22.633.101.58
2018:Q32.703.151.71
2018:Q42.753.171.82

Bottom panel
Summary

  • We also considered an inflationary scenario:
    • Nominal income targeting stabilized both unemployment and inflation.
    • The inertial Taylor 1999 rule stabilized unemployment, but amplified the impact on inflation.
  • Nominal income targeting also achieved improvements in inflation and unemployment in simulations of other models.
  • Price-level targeting performed poorly in the FRB/US model and the small model, but well in the EDO (DSGE) model.

Exhibit 4
Questions for Committee Discussion of Monetary Policy Frameworks


  1. Under flexible inflation targeting, the central bank pursues an explicit inflation objective, maintains the flexibility to stabilize economic activity, and seeks to communicate its forecasts and policy plans as clearly as possible. Would you view such a framework as consistent with the Federal Reserve's dual mandate of maximum employment and price stability? If so, do you think the Federal Reserve should enunciate such a framework? More generally, would it be helpful to formulate a consensus statement on the Committee's policy framework, perhaps using an approach similar to that of the exit strategy statement that the Committee developed earlier in the year?
  2. The staff memo on alternative frameworks noted that, in principle, the Committee's best choice would be to announce and commit to the optimal policy path under commitment. Would it be helpful for the Committee to make such conditional commitments? If so, what are the most effective way(s) to communicate those conditional commitments, for example, by providing policy "thresholds" about the expected future course of policy or other options illustrated in Alternative A1 of the policy alternatives distributed on October 25?
  3. The staff memo also described policy strategies that might broadly approximate commitment to the optimal policy path, including a price level target and a nominal income target. Taking into account their relative merits and pitfalls, under what circumstances, if any, would it be appropriate to pursue one of these strategies?
  4. What steps, if any, should the Committee take to provide more information to the public about the expected future course of policy?



Appendix 2: Materials used by Mr. Sack

Material for
FOMC Presentation: Financial Market Developments and Desk Operations

Brian Sack
November 1, 2011

Class II FOMC - Restricted FR

Exhibit 1

Top-left panel
(1)

Title: Treasury Yields
Series: 2-year, 5-year, 10-year, and 30-year Treasury yields
Horizon: August 3, 2009 - October 28, 2011
Description: Treasury yields increased across the yield curve in the intermeeting period, with particularly large moves at the longer end of the curve.

Source: Bloomberg

Top-right panel
(2)

Title: Economic News Index
Series: Citigroup Economic Surprise Index
Horizon: August 3, 2009 - October 28, 2011
Description: An index tracking surprises in economic data turned positive for the first time in months, indicating that recent releases of economic data have been better than expected.

Source: Citigroup

Middle-left panel
(3)

Title: Changes in One-Year Forward Rates Over the Intermeeting Period
Series: 1-year forward Treasury rate changes for start years 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, 10, 20, and 30
Horizon: September 20, 2011 - October 28, 2011
Description: Forward rates at the front and middle of the Treasury yield curve increased, while those at the back end of the yield curve decreased, indicating a change in the shape of the yield curve.

Source: Federal Reserve Board of Governors

Middle-right panel
(4) Effects of September FOMC Decisions*

Variable Movement Around
Announcement**
Dealer Estimated
Effect***
2-Year Treasury+3+7
10-Year Treasury-8-10
30-Year Treasury-21-20
30-Year Swap Rate-15N/A
MBS Spread-8-15

*All figures in basis points.  Return to text

** From close on day before announcement to close on day of announcement.  Return to table

***Median effects as estimated in November Policy Survey.  Return to table

Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York Policy Survey, Barclays Capital, Bloomberg

Bottom-left panel
(5)

Title: Probability Distribution of First Increase in Federal Funds Target Rate
Series: Average probabilities of first increase in federal funds target rate across different quarters, as assessed in September and November Federal Reserve Bank of New York Policy Surveys of primary dealers
Horizon: 2011:Q4 to 2014:Q1 or later
Description: Dealers pushed out their estimates for the first increase in the federal funds rate farther into the future.

Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York Policy Survey

Bottom-right panel
(6)

Title: MBS Option-Adjusted Spread to Treasury
Series: FNMA current coupon option-adjusted spread to Treasury spliced with 3.5% coupon OAS to Treasury when current coupon rate is below 3.5%
Horizon: March 3, 2011 - October 28, 2011
Description: MBS spreads tightened in the intermeeting period, with a particularly pronounced tightening directly after the September FOMC and some subsequent intermeeting volatility.

Source: Barclays Capital


Exhibit 2

Top-left panel
(7)

Title: Equity Prices
Series: S&P 500 and EuroStoxx Index, indexed to 4/1/2010
Horizon: April 1, 2010 - October 28, 2011
Description: Domestic and European stocks increased sharply in the intermeeting period.

Source: Bloomberg

Top-right panel
(8)

Title: Corporate Bond Spreads to Treasury
Series: Bank of America-Merrill Lynch indices of high yield and investment grade bond spreads to Treasuries
Horizon: April 1, 2010 - October 28, 2011
Description: After initially widening, bond spreads fell fairly significantly in the latter part of the intermeeting period.

Source: Bank of America-Merrill Lynch

Middle-left panel
(9)

Title: Dollar Exchange Rates
Series: Dollar-euro exchange rate, Federal Reserve Board of Governors' trade-weighted dollar measure, and dollar-yen exchange rate
Horizon: April 1, 2010 - October 28, 2011
Description: The dollar depreciated against major currencies in the intermeeting period after exhibiting signs of strength early in the period. It remains particularly low against the yen.

Source: Bloomberg, Federal Reserve Board of Governors

Middle-right panel
(10)

Title: Euro Area Sovereign Debt Spreads
Series: Spanish, Italian, and French 10-year spreads to Germany
Horizon: April 1, 2010 - October 28, 2011
Description: Spanish, Italian, and French debt spreads to Germany remain elevated as compared to recent levels, with some notable volatility in recent weeks.

Source: Bloomberg

Bottom-left panel
(11)

Title: Dollar Funding Spreads to OIS
Series: Spreads of 3-month, 3-months forward Libor and spot Libor to OIS
Horizon: April 1, 2010 - October 28, 2011
Description: These measures of funding stress remain somewhat elevated, with the Libor-OIS spread rising slowly but steadily over the intermeeting period.

Source: Bloomberg

Bottom-right panel
(12)

Title: 5-Year Financial CDS Spreads
Series: Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs, and JP Morgan 5-year credit default swap spreads
Horizon: January 1, 2011 - October 28, 2011
Description: After spiking after the September FOMC, CDS spreads for Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs retraced to levels similar to those at the September FOMC. The cost of protection against losses on JP Morgan's debt, however, has not exhibited much change.

Source: Markit


Exhibit 3

Top-left panel
(13)

Title: Treasury Market Cost of Transacting
Series: Price impact of simultaneously buying and selling $500 million of benchmark 2-year and 10-year securities, calculated using five best bids and offers
Horizon: April 1, 2010 - October 28, 2011
Description: The Treasury market continues to function normally as exhibited by this metric.

Source: Brokertec, Federal Reserve Bank of New York

Top-right panel
(14)

Title: SOMA Purchases and Gross Issuance (Projections Through June 2012)
Series: Forecasted SOMA purchases and market issuance of 6-8 year, 8-10 year, 10-20 year, and 20-30 year Treasuries, 6-30 year TIPS, and MBS*
Horizon: October 2011 - June 2012
Description: The Maturity Extension Program is forecasted to absorb the equivalent of roughly half of new issuance of Treasuries up to 10 years, a significant amount of issuance in the 10-30 year sector, and very few TIPS. The MBS reinvestment program is forecasted to absorb roughly half of new issuance of MBS.

* Projections based on gross issuance of low-coupon securities.  Return to text

Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York

Middle-left panel
(15)

Title: Probability of Additional Policy Actions
Series: November Dealer Survey additional policy action responses
Horizon: Current meeting to 1 year
Description: Respondents did not expect any further easing at the current meeting, but there was some expectation for further easing within the next year.

Policy actions shown in the chart are "Increase SOMA Duration," "Reduce IOER," "Provide SOMA Guidance," "Increase SOMA Size," and "Change Rate Guidance."

Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York Policy Survey

Middle-right panel
(16)

Title: Expected SOMA Portfolio Holdings
Series: SOMA portfolio holdings (through 10/14/11), November Dealer Survey responses to the expected size of the portfolio (after 10/14/11)
Horizon: January 1, 2007 - December 31, 2016
Description: Some dealers are incorporating further asset purchases into their forecasts for the SOMA portfolio, although the median forecast is for no further expansion and a slow rolling down of the portfolio starting in 2014.

Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York Policy Survey

Bottom-left panel
(17)

Title: Euro RRP Rate Offers on 10/28/2011
Series: Spot/next offers, excluding Goldman Sachs' offers, to the New York Fed's trading desk in reverse repurchase transactions on October 28, 2011
Horizon: October 28, 2011
Description: On the first day of differentiating between different types of European collateral in the Fed's reverse repurchase agreements for its euro portfolio, rate offers were as expected, with higher rates for potentially riskier collateral and relatively tight offer ranges across counterparties.

Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York

Bottom-right panel
(18) Liability Structure of Financial Institutions*

Type MF Global MS JPM
Repo & Trading Liabilities61%36%15%
LT Unsecured Debt1%24%12%
Deposits0%8%47%
Other Liabilities35%24%18%
Equity3%8%8%
Total100%100%100%

* Expressed as percent of assets.  Return to text

Source: MF Global, Morgan Stanley, JP Morgan




Appendix 3: Materials used by Mr. Wilcox

Material for Forecast Summary

David Wilcox
November 1, 2011

Forecast Summary

Confidence Intervals Based on Tealbook Track Record

Top-left panel
Real GDP

Percent change, annual rate
Period October Tealbook September Tealbook
2010:Q13.94ND
2010:Q23.79ND
2010:Q32.51ND
2010:Q42.35ND
2011:Q10.36ND
2011:Q21.341.34
Forecast
2011:Q32.682.47
2011:Q42.501.98
2012:Q12.362.17
2012:Q22.462.33
2012:Q32.582.72
2012:Q42.693.02
2013:Q12.943.20
2013:Q23.143.30
2013:Q33.353.50
2013:Q43.523.60

The 70% confidence interval begins at about 1.34 in 2011:Q2, follows the contour of the October Tealbook curve, and ends at about [1.4,5.2].

Top-right panel
PCE Prices

Percent change, annual rate
Period October Tealbook September Tealbook
2010:Q11.86ND
2010:Q20.33ND
2010:Q30.98ND
2010:Q41.95ND
2011:Q13.90ND
2011:Q23.303.30
Forecast
2011:Q32.332.26
2011:Q41.201.21
2012:Q11.430.92
2012:Q21.381.25
2012:Q31.351.33
2012:Q41.341.35
2013:Q11.391.30
2013:Q21.361.27
2013:Q31.371.29
2013:Q41.391.30

The 70% confidence interval begins at about 3.30 in 2011:Q2, follows the contour of the October Tealbook curve, and ends at about [0.1,2.6].

Middle-left panel
Unemployment Rate

Percent
Period October Tealbook September Tealbook
2010:Q19.70ND
2010:Q29.60ND
2010:Q39.60ND
2010:Q49.60ND
2011:Q18.90ND
2011:Q29.109.10
Forecast
2011:Q39.099.09
2011:Q49.089.11
2012:Q19.039.10
2012:Q28.908.98
2012:Q38.768.86
2012:Q48.608.70
2013:Q18.448.52
2013:Q28.368.41
2013:Q38.278.28
2013:Q48.148.14

The 70% confidence interval begins at about 9.10 in 2011:Q2, follows the contour of the October Tealbook curve, and ends at about [7.05,9.25].

Middle-right panel
PCE Prices Excluding Food and Energy

Percent change, annual rate
Period October Tealbook September Tealbook
2010:Q11.13ND
2010:Q21.28ND
2010:Q30.75ND
2010:Q40.66ND
2011:Q11.56ND
2011:Q22.262.26
Forecast
2011:Q32.072.10
2011:Q41.471.66
2012:Q11.641.64
2012:Q21.571.51
2012:Q31.461.43
2012:Q41.401.41
2013:Q11.401.33
2013:Q21.401.31
2013:Q31.401.35
2013:Q41.411.35

The 70% confidence interval begins at about 2.26 in 2011:Q2, follows the contour of the October Tealbook curve, and ends at about [0.5,2.25].

Bottom-left panel
Change in Private Payroll Employment

Thousands of employees
Period Three-month moving average
January 2000241.67
February 2000188.33
March 2000216.00
April 2000216.67
May 2000145.00
June 2000103.67
July 200092.33
August 2000143.00
September 2000147.67
October 200079.33
November 2000139.00
December 200094.00
January 200185.33
February 200112.67
March 2001-40.33
April 2001-134.67
May 2001-159.00
June 2001-215.33
July 2001-163.33
August 2001-199.00
September 2001-209.33
October 2001-273.00
November 2001-325.67
December 2001-305.67
January 2002-234.67
February 2002-172.33
March 2002-125.00
April 2002-106.67
May 2002-80.33
June 2002-54.67
July 2002-54.33
August 2002-46.33
September 2002-54.33
October 200213.33
November 200227.33
December 2002-25.33
January 2003-42.33
February 2003-90.00
March 2003-99.67
April 2003-130.00
May 2003-71.33
June 2003-18.00
July 2003-7.33
August 2003-3.00
September 200363.67
October 2003112.00
November 2003113.67
December 200396.00
January 2004105.00
February 2004103.33
March 2004167.00
April 2004184.67
May 2004277.33
June 2004209.00
July 2004148.33
August 200479.00
September 200498.33
October 2004193.67
November 2004168.67
December 2004162.33
January 200585.00
February 2005153.00
March 2005157.00
April 2005240.67
May 2005211.33
June 2005250.00
July 2005228.00
August 2005242.67
September 2005183.67
October 2005122.33
November 2005161.33
December 2005180.00
January 2006253.00
February 2006246.67
March 2006286.00
April 2006236.00
May 2006143.33
June 200684.00
July 200681.67
August 2006127.67
September 2006129.67
October 200678.67
November 200693.33
December 2006120.00
January 2007194.67
February 2007150.67
March 2007152.67
April 200791.67
May 2007113.00
June 200776.00
July 200759.33
August 2007-5.33
September 2007-19.00
October 20072.67
November 200752.00
December 200761.00
January 200854.33
February 2008-16.00
March 2008-69.00
April 2008-154.33
May 2008-181.00
June 2008-220.67
July 2008-235.33
August 2008-261.33
September 2008-326.00
October 2008-399.67
November 2008-567.33
December 2008-645.00
January 2009-764.67
February 2009-740.67
March 2009-783.67
April 2009-771.33
May 2009-633.67
June 2009-513.33
July 2009-344.67
August 2009-313.67
September 2009-233.00
October 2009-211.67
November 2009-152.67
December 2009-131.33
January 2010-67.33
February 2010-62.33
March 201024.67
April 2010102.33
May 2010139.33
June 2010123.00
July 201089.33
August 2010104.00
September 2010111.67
October 2010146.33
November 2010148.33
December 2010156.67
January 2011131.00
February 2011172.00
March 2011212.33
April 2011260.67
May 2011211.00
June 2011158.00
July 2011128.33
August 2011109.67
September 2011147.67

Shaded bars indicate periods of business recession as defined by the National Bureau of Economic Research: March 2001-November 2001, and December 2007-June 2009.

Bottom-right panel
Consumer Sentiment

Period University of Michigan
(1966 = 100)
Conference Board
(1985 = 100)
January 2000112.00144.70
February 2000111.30140.80
March 2000107.10137.10
April 2000109.20137.70
May 2000110.70144.70
June 2000106.40139.20
July 2000108.30143.00
August 2000107.30140.80
September 2000106.80142.50
October 2000105.80135.80
November 2000107.60132.60
December 200098.40128.60
January 200194.70115.70
February 200190.60109.20
March 200191.50116.90
April 200188.40109.90
May 200192.00116.10
June 200192.60118.90
July 200192.40116.30
August 200191.50114.00
September 200181.8097.00
October 200182.7085.30
November 200183.9084.90
December 200188.8094.60
January 200293.0097.80
February 200290.7095.00
March 200295.70110.70
April 200293.00108.50
May 200296.90110.30
June 200292.40106.30
July 200288.1097.40
August 200287.6094.50
September 200286.1093.70
October 200280.6079.60
November 200284.2084.90
December 200286.7080.70
January 200382.4078.80
February 200379.9064.80
March 200377.6061.40
April 200386.0081.00
May 200392.1083.60
June 200389.7083.50
July 200390.9077.00
August 200389.3081.70
September 200387.7077.00
October 200389.6081.70
November 200393.7092.50
December 200392.6094.80
January 2004103.8097.70
February 200494.4088.50
March 200495.8088.50
April 200494.2093.00
May 200490.2093.10
June 200495.60102.80
July 200496.70105.70
August 200495.9098.70
September 200494.2096.70
October 200491.7092.90
November 200492.8092.60
December 200497.10102.70
January 200595.50105.10
February 200594.10104.40
March 200592.60103.00
April 200587.7097.50
May 200586.90103.10
June 200596.00106.20
July 200596.50103.60
August 200589.10105.50
September 200576.9087.50
October 200574.2085.20
November 200581.6098.30
December 200591.50103.80
January 200691.20106.80
February 200686.70102.70
March 200688.90107.50
April 200687.40109.80
May 200679.10104.70
June 200684.90105.40
July 200684.70107.00
August 200682.00100.20
September 200685.40105.90
October 200693.60105.10
November 200692.10105.30
December 200691.70110.00
January 200796.90110.20
February 200791.30111.20
March 200788.40108.20
April 200787.10106.30
May 200788.30108.50
June 200785.30105.30
July 200790.40111.90
August 200783.40105.60
September 200783.4099.50
October 200780.9095.20
November 200776.1087.80
December 200775.5090.60
January 200878.4087.30
February 200870.8076.40
March 200869.5065.90
April 200862.6062.80
May 200859.8058.10
June 200856.4051.00
July 200861.2051.90
August 200863.0058.50
September 200870.3061.40
October 200857.6038.80
November 200855.3044.70
December 200860.1038.60
January 200961.2037.40
February 200956.3025.30
March 200957.3026.90
April 200965.1040.80
May 200968.7054.80
June 200970.8049.30
July 200966.0047.40
August 200965.7054.50
September 200973.5053.40
October 200970.6048.70
November 200967.4050.60
December 200972.5053.60
January 201074.4056.50
February 201073.6046.40
March 201073.6052.30
April 201072.2057.70
May 201073.6062.70
June 201076.0054.30
July 201067.8051.00
August 201068.9053.20
September 201068.2048.60
October 201067.7049.90
November 201071.6057.80
December 201074.5063.40
January 201174.2064.80
February 201177.5072.00
March 201167.5063.80
April 201169.8066.00
May 201174.3061.70
June 201171.5057.60
July 201163.7059.20
August 201155.8045.20
September 201159.5046.40
October 201160.8040.90

Shaded bars indicate periods of business recession as defined by the National Bureau of Economic Research: March 2001-November 2001, and December 2007-June 2009.




Appendix 4: Material distributed by Ms. Leonard

Material for Briefing on
FOMC Participants' Economic Projections

Deborah Leonard
November 1, 2011

Exhibit 1. Central tendencies and ranges of economic projections, 2011-14 and over the longer run

Actual values for years 2006 through 2010.

Change in real GDP
Percent
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Longer run
Actual2.42.2-3.3-0.53.1-----
Upper End of Range-----1.83.54.04.53.0
Upper End of Central Tendency-----1.72.93.53.92.7
Lower End of Central Tendency-----1.62.53.03.02.4
Lower End of Range-----1.62.32.72.72.2
Unemployment rate
Percent
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Longer run
Actual4.54.86.910.09.6-----
Upper End of Range-----9.18.98.48.06.0
Upper End of Central Tendency-----9.18.78.27.76.0
Lower End of Central Tendency-----9.08.57.86.85.2
Lower End of Range-----8.98.17.56.55.0
PCE inflation
Percent
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Longer run
Actual1.93.51.71.51.3-----
Upper End of Range-----3.32.82.52.42.0
Upper End of Central Tendency-----2.92.02.02.02.0
Lower End of Central Tendency-----2.71.41.51.51.7
Lower End of Range-----2.51.41.41.51.5
Core PCE inflation
Percent
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Actual2.32.42.01.71.0----
Upper End of Range-----2.02.12.12.2
Upper End of Central Tendency-----1.92.01.92.0
Lower End of Central Tendency-----1.81.51.41.5
Lower End of Range-----1.71.31.41.4

Exhibit 2. Economic projections for 2011 (percent)

Change in real GDP
2011 2011:H1 2011:H2
Central Tendency1.6 to 1.70.8 to 0.82.4 to 2.6
June projections2.7 to 2.92.0 to 2.13.3 to 3.6
Range1.6 to 1.80.8 to 0.82.4 to 2.8
June projections2.5 to 3.01.9 to 2.22.9 to 4.0
Memo: Tealbook1.70.82.6
June Tealbook2.72.03.4
Unemployment Rate
2011:Q4
Central Tendency9.0 to 9.1
June projections8.6 to 8.9
Range8.9 to 9.1
June projections8.4 to 9.1
Memo: Tealbook9.1
June Tealbook8.9
PCE Inflation
2011 2011:H1 2011:H2
Central Tendency2.7 to 2.93.6 to 3.61.8 to 2.2
June projections2.3 to 2.53.5 to 3.61.0 to 1.7
Range2.5 to 3.33.6 to 3.61.4 to 3.0
June projections2.1 to 3.53.1 to 4.00.6 to 3.0
Memo: Tealbook2.73.61.8
June Tealbook2.33.61.1
Core PCE Inflation
2011 2011:H1 2011:H2
Central Tendency1.8 to 1.91.9 to 1.91.7 to 1.9
June projections1.5 to 1.81.7 to 1.8 1.3 to 1.8
Range1.7 to 2.01.9 to 2.01.5 to 2.1
June projections1.5 to 2.31.6 to 1.9 1.2 to 2.7
Memo: Tealbook1.81.91.8
June Tealbook1.71.81.5

Note: For change in real GDP and inflation, the values for 2011, 2011:H1, and 2011:H2 are at annual rates in percent, measured in terms of Q4/Q4, Q2/Q4, and Q4/Q2, respectively.


Exhibit 3. Economic projections for 2012-2014 and over the longer run (percent)

Change in real GDP
2012 2013 2014 Longer run
Central Tendency2.5 to 2.93.0 to 3.53.0 to 3.92.4 to 2.7
June projections3.3 to 3.73.5 to 4.2---2.5 to 2.8
Range2.3 to 3.52.7 to 4.02.7 to 4.52.2 to 3.0
June projections2.2 to 4.03.0 to 4.5---2.4 to 3.0
Memo: Tealbook2.53.23.9
June Tealbook3.54.24.0
Unemployment rate
2012 2013 2014 Longer run
Central Tendency8.5 to 8.77.8 to 8.26.8 to 7.75.2 to 6.0
June projections7.8 to 8.27.0 to 7.5---5.2 to 5.6
Range8.1 to 8.97.5 to 8.46.5 to 8.05.0 to 6.0
June projections7.5 to 8.76.5 to 8.3---5.0 to 6.0
Memo: Tealbook8.68.17.3
June Tealbook8.17.16.0
PCE inflation
2012 2013 2014 Longer run
Central Tendency1.4 to 2.01.5 to 2.01.5 to 2.01.7 to 2.0
June projections1.5 to 2.01.5 to 2.0---1.7 to 2.0
Range1.4 to 2.81.4 to 2.51.5 to 2.41.5 to 2.0
June projections1.2 to 2.81.3 to 2.5---1.5 to 2.0
Memo: Tealbook1.41.41.5 2
June Tealbook1.51.51.5 2
Core PCE inflation
2012 2013 2014
Central Tendency1.5 to 2.01.4 to 1.91.5 to 2.0
June projections1.4 to 2.01.4 to 2.0 ---
Range1.3 to 2.11.4 to 2.11.4 to 2.2
June projections1.2 to 2.51.3 to 2.5 ---
Memo: Tealbook1.51.41.4
June Tealbook1.51.51.6

Note: The changes in real GDP and inflation are measured Q4/Q4


Exhibit 4. Risks and uncertainty in economic projections

Uncertainty about GDP growth
Number of participants
Lower   Similar    Higher
November projections0116
June projections0413
Risks to GDP growth
Number of participants
Downside Balanced Upside
November projections1160
June projections1160
Uncertainty about Unemployment
Number of participants
Lower   Similar    Higher
November projections0314
June projections0413
Risks to Unemployment
Number of participants
Downside Balanced Upside
November projections0611
June projections089
Uncertainty about PCE inflation
Number of participants
Lower   Similar    Higher
November projections1412
June projections1214
Risks to PCE inflation
Number of participants
Downside Balanced Upside
November projections4103
June projections1106
Uncertainty about Core PCE inflation
Number of participants
Lower   Similar    Higher
November projections1511
June projections1412
Risks to Core PCE inflation
Number of participants
Downside Balanced Upside
November projections4103
June projections296



Appendix 5: Material distributed by Ms. Mester

Material for Briefing on
Trial-Run Policy Projections

Loretta J. Mester
November 1, 2011

Exhibit 1: Central tendencies and ranges

Top panel
Fed Funds Rate

(percent)
2011 2012 2013 2014 Longer run
Central Tendency0.13 to 0.130.13 to 0.670.13 to 1.500.13 to 2.504.00 to 4.50
Range0.13 to 0.500.13 to 1.500.13 to 2.500.13 to 4.003.75 to 4.75

Note: Projections of the target federal funds rate in the fourth quarter of the year indicated. The fed funds rate projection corresponds to the participant's assessment of appropriate monetary policy.

Bottom panel
Fed Funds Rate

Percent
  2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Longer Run
Actual5.254.521.040.130.13-----
Upper End of Range-----0.501.502.504.004.75
Upper End of Central Tendency-----0.130.671.502.504.50
Lower End of Central Tendency-----0.130.130.130.134.00
Lower End of Range-----0.130.130.130.133.75

Exhibit 2. Distribution of federal funds rate projections

Histograms, five panels.

Number of participants
Percent range 2011 2012 2013 2014 Longer run
0.0 - 0.316131150
0.4 - 0.711120
0.8 - 1.102140
1.2 - 1.501200
1.6 - 1.900010
2.0 - 2.300100
2.4 - 2.700130
2.8 - 3.100010
3.2 - 3.500000
3.6 - 3.900003
4.0 - 4.300019
4.4 - 4.700004
4.8 - 5.100001
5.2 - 5.500000
5.6 - 5.900000

Exhibit 3. Distribution of participants' projections for year of first fed funds rate increase

Top panel

Projected year Number of participants
20111
20123
20132
20147
20153
20161

Bottom panel
Key factors underlying policy path:

For those favoring lift-off in 2014 or later:

  • Slow growth and high unemployment + moderate inflation
  • Large and persistent output and unemployment gaps
  • Zero lower bound is limiting support of monetary policy

For those favoring lift-off in 2013 or earlier:

  • Stronger inflation pressures despite elevated unemployment
  • To forestall build-up of financial and structural imbalances
  • To keep inflation expectations anchored

Exhibit 4. Projections aligned by year of lift-off

Panel A. Central tendencies and ranges in 2011, the year before lift-off, and the year of lift-off *

Percent
Change in Real GDP Unemployment Rate PCE Inflation
2011 Year
before
first rise
Year
of
first rise
2011 Year
before
first rise
Year
of
first rise
2011 Year
before
first rise
Year
of
first rise
Upper End of Range1.84.04.59.19.69.03.33.02.9
Upper End of Central Tendency1.73.84.19.18.98.12.92.82.2
Lower End of Central Tendency1.62.62.89.07.76.62.71.51.6
Lower End of Range1.61.61.78.97.26.52.51.31.5

* Projections for the year before the first federal funds rate increase (i.e., for the year before lift-off) are not available for the participant projecting this increase will occur in 2016.  Return to text

Panel B. Scatter plots of projections in year of lift-off*

Bottom-left panel
Plotted point Change in Real GDP Unemployment Rate
11.79.0
22.58.7
32.77.5
42.88.8
5 (Lift-off in 2014)2.98.0
63.27.9
7 (Lift-off in 2012)3.28.1
83.37.6
93.47.1
103.56.5
113.87.5
123.97.3
134.06.5
144.16.6
154.26.9
164.36.5
174.56.7
Bottom-center panel
Plotted point Change in Real GDP PCE Inflation
11.72.9
22.52.0
32.72.2
42.82.0
52.91.9
63.21.7
73.22.2
83.32.0
93.41.6
103.52.9
113.82.5
123.91.5
134.01.8
144.11.5
154.21.5
164.32.0
174.52.0
Bottom-right panel
Plotted point Unemployment Rate PCE Inflation
16.51.8
26.52.0
36.52.9
46.61.5
56.72.0
66.91.5
77.11.6
87.31.5
97.52.2
107.52.5
117.62.0
127.91.7
138.01.9
148.12.2
158.72.0
168.82.0
179.02.9

* Each dot represents the combination of projected values of the two variables for an individual participant.  Return to text




Appendix 6: Material distributed by Mr. English

Material for
FOMC Briefing on Monetary Policy Alternatives

Bill English
November 2, 2011

Table 1: Overview of Alternatives for the Nov. 2 FOMC Statement

Selected
Elements
September
Statement
November Alternatives
A1 A2 B C
Balance Sheet
MEP$400 billion;
complete by
end of June 2012
unchangedunchangedunchangedcut to $200 billion;
complete by
end of March 2012
Reinvestmentspayments of agency
debt and MBS into
agency MBS;
Treasuries into
Treasuries
unchangedunchangedunchangedunchanged
Additional
Purchases
nonenone$600 billion of
Treasuries
by end of Sept. 2012
OR
$300 billion each of
Treasuries and
agency MBS
by end of June 2012
nonenone
Forward Guidance
First Optionat least through
mid-2013
at least through
mid-2014
unchangedunchangedat least through
2012
Second Optionthrough end of 2014
and forecasts of
unemployment and
inflation at that time
at least for the next
six to seven quarters
at least for the next
four quarters
Third Optionat least as long as
unemployment and
inflation conditions
hold; expect such
conditions to prevail
through end of 2014

September FOMC Statement


  • 1. Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in August indicates that economic growth remains slow. Recent indicators point to continuing weakness in overall labor market conditions, and the unemployment rate remains elevated. Household spending has been increasing at only a modest pace in recent months despite some recovery in sales of motor vehicles as supply-chain disruptions eased. Investment in nonresidential structures is still weak, and the housing sector remains depressed. However, business investment in equipment and software continues to expand. Inflation appears to have moderated since earlier in the year as prices of energy and some commodities have declined from their peaks. Longer-term inflation expectations have remained stable.
  • 2. Consistent with its statutory mandate, the Committee seeks to foster maximum employment and price stability. The Committee continues to expect some pickup in the pace of recovery over coming quarters but anticipates that the unemployment rate will decline only gradually toward levels that the Committee judges to be consistent with its dual mandate. Moreover, there are significant downside risks to the economic outlook, including strains in global financial markets. The Committee also anticipates that inflation will settle, over coming quarters, at levels at or below those consistent with the Committee's dual mandate as the effects of past energy and other commodity price increases dissipate further. However, the Committee will continue to pay close attention to the evolution of inflation and inflation expectations.
  • 3. To support a stronger economic recovery and to help ensure that inflation, over time, is at levels consistent with the dual mandate, the Committee decided today to extend the average maturity of its holdings of securities. The Committee intends to purchase, by the end of June 2012, $400 billion of Treasury securities with remaining maturities of 6 years to 30 years and to sell an equal amount of Treasury securities with remaining maturities of 3 years or less. This program should put downward pressure on longer-term interest rates and help make broader financial conditions more accommodative. The Committee will regularly review the size and composition of its securities holdings and is prepared to adjust those holdings as appropriate.
  • 4. To help support conditions in mortgage markets, the Committee will now reinvest principal payments from its holdings of agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities in agency mortgage-backed securities. In addition, the Committee will maintain its existing policy of rolling over maturing Treasury securities at auction.
  • 5. The Committee also decided to keep the target range for the federal funds rate at 0 to ¼ percent and currently anticipates that economic conditions--including low rates of resource utilization and a subdued outlook for inflation over the medium run--are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels for the federal funds rate at least through mid-2013.
  • 6. The Committee discussed the range of policy tools available to promote a stronger economic recovery in a context of price stability. It will continue to assess the economic outlook in light of incoming information and is prepared to employ its tools as appropriate.

[Note: In the November FOMC Statement Alternatives, emphasis (strike-through) indicates strike-through text, strong emphasis (bold) indicates bold red underlined text, and curly brackets { } indicate bold blue underlined text, respectively, in the original document.]

November FOMC Statement--Alternative A1


  • 1. Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in August September indicates that economic growth remains slow strengthened somewhat in the third quarter, but the pickup was due predominantly to a reversal of the temporary factors that had weighed on growth earlier in the year. Recent indicators point to continuing weakness in overall labor market conditions, and the unemployment rate remains elevated. Household spending has been increaseding at only a modest a somewhat faster pace in recent months despite some recovery in sales of motor vehicles as supply chain disruptions have eased. However, Business investment in equipment and software has continueds to expand, but investment in nonresidential structures is still weak and the housing sector remains depressed. Inflation appears to have has moderated since earlier in the year as prices of energy and some commodities have declined from their peaks. Longer-term inflation expectations have remained stable.
  • 2. Consistent with its statutory mandate, the Committee seeks to foster maximum employment and price stability. The Committee continues to expect some pickup in the a moderate pace of recovery economic growth over coming quarters but and consequently anticipates that the unemployment rate will decline only gradually toward levels that the Committee judges to be consistent with its dual mandate. Moreover However, there are significant downside risks to the economic outlook, including strains in global financial markets. The Committee also anticipates that inflation will settle, over coming quarters, at levels at or below those consistent with the Committee's dual mandate as the effects of past energy and other commodity price increases dissipate further. However, The Committee will continue to pay close attention to the evolution of inflation and inflation expectations.
  • 3. To support a stronger economic recovery and to help ensure that inflation, over time, is at levels consistent with the dual mandate, the Committee decided today to continue its program to extend the average maturity of its holdings of securities as announced in September. The Committee intends to purchase, by the end of June 2012, $400 billion of Treasury securities with remaining maturities of 6 years to 30 years and to sell an equal amount of Treasury securities with remaining maturities of 3 years or less. This program should put downward pressure on longer-term interest rates and help make broader financial conditions more accommodative. To help support conditions in mortgage markets, The Committee will now is maintaining its existing policies of reinvesting principal payments from its holdings of agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities in agency mortgage-backed securities. In addition the Committee will maintain its existing policy and of rolling over maturing Treasury securities at auction. The Committee will regularly review the size and composition of its securities holdings and is prepared to adjust those holdings as appropriate.
  • 4. The Committee also decided to keep the target range for the federal funds rate at 0 to ¼ percent. and currently The Committee now anticipates that economic conditions--including low rates of resource utilization and a subdued outlook for inflation over the medium run--are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels for the federal funds rate at least through mid-2013 mid-2014.

    OR

  • 4′. The Committee also decided to keep the target range for the federal funds rate at 0 to ¼ percent. and currently The Committee now anticipates that economic conditions--including low rates of resource utilization and a subdued outlook for inflation over the medium run--are likely to warrant this exceptionally low levels range for the federal funds rate at least through mid-2013 through the end of 2014. On the basis of currently available information, the Committee projects the unemployment rate to be about [ 6½ to 7 ] percent and the inflation rate (as measured by the price index for Personal Consumption Expenditures) to be around [ 1¾ to 2¼ ] percent at that time.

    OR

  • 4″. The Committee also decided to keep the target range for the federal funds rate at 0 to ¼ percent. and currently The Committee anticipates that economic conditions--including low rates of resource utilization and a subdued outlook for inflation over the medium run--are likely to warrant this exceptionally low levels range for the federal funds rate will be appropriate at least as long as the unemployment rate exceeds [ 7 ] percent, inflation (as measured by the price index for Personal Consumption Expenditures) is projected to be at or below [ 2½ ] percent in the medium term, and longer-term inflation expectations continue to be well anchored. On the basis of currently available information, the Committee expects these conditions to prevail through the end of 2014.
  • 5. The Committee discussed the range of policy tools available will continue to assess the economic outlook in light of incoming information and is prepared to employ its tools as appropriate to promote a stronger economic recovery in a context of price stability.

November FOMC Statement--Alternative A2


  • 1. Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in August September indicates that economic growth remains slow strengthened somewhat in the third quarter, but the pickup was due predominantly to a reversal of the temporary factors that had weighed on growth earlier in the year. Recent indicators point to continuing weakness in overall labor market conditions, and the unemployment rate remains elevated. Household spending has been increaseding at only a modest a somewhat faster pace in recent months despite some recovery in sales of motor vehicles as supply chain disruptions have eased. However, Business investment in equipment and software has continueds to expand, but investment in nonresidential structures is still weak and the housing sector remains depressed. Inflation appears to have has moderated since earlier in the year as prices of energy and some commodities have declined from their peaks. Longer-term inflation expectations have remained stable.
  • 2. Consistent with its statutory mandate, the Committee seeks to foster maximum employment and price stability. The Committee continues to expects some pickup in the pace of recovery economic growth over coming quarters to be relatively modest but and consequently anticipates that the unemployment rate will decline only gradually toward levels that the Committee judges to be consistent with its dual mandate. Moreover However, there are significant downside risks to the economic outlook, including strains in global financial markets. The Committee also anticipates that inflation will settle, over coming quarters, at levels at or below those consistent with the Committee's dual mandate as the effects of past energy and other commodity price increases dissipate further. However, The Committee will continue to pay close attention to the evolution of inflation and inflation expectations.
  • 3. To support a stronger economic recovery and to help ensure that inflation, over time, is at levels consistent with the dual mandate, the Committee decided today to continue its program to extend the average maturity of its holdings of securities as announced in September. The Committee intends to purchase, by the end of June 2012, $400 billion of Treasury securities with remaining maturities of 6 years to 30 years and to sell an equal amount of Treasury securities with remaining maturities of 3 years or less. In addition, the Committee intends to purchase a further [ $600 billion of longer-term Treasury securities by the end of September 2012 | $300 billion of longer-term Treasury securities and $300 billion of agency mortgage-backed securities by the end of June 2012 ]. This These programs should put downward pressure on longer-term interest rates and help make broader financial conditions more accommodative. To help support conditions in mortgage markets, The Committee will now is maintaining its existing policies of reinvesting principal payments from its holdings of agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities in agency mortgage-backed securities. In addition the Committee will maintain its existing policy and of rolling over maturing Treasury securities at auction. The Committee will regularly review the size and composition of its securities holdings and is prepared to adjust those holdings as appropriate.
  • 4. The Committee also decided to keep the target range for the federal funds rate at 0 to ¼ percent and currently anticipates that economic conditions--including low rates of resource utilization and a subdued outlook for inflation over the medium run--are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels for the federal funds rate at least through mid-2013.
  • 5. The Committee discussed the range of policy tools available will continue to assess the economic outlook in light of incoming information and is prepared to employ its tools as appropriate to promote a stronger economic recovery in a context of price stability.

Note: If policymakers decide it is appropriate to reduce the remuneration rate on reserve balances, the Board of Governors would issue an accompanying statement that might read:

In a related action, the Board of Governors voted today to reduce the interest rate paid on required and excess reserve balances from 25 basis points to 10 basis points effective with the reserve maintenance period that begins on November 17, 2011.

November FOMC Statement--Alternative B


  • 1. Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in August September indicates that economic growth remains slow strengthened somewhat in the third quarter, reflecting in part a reversal of the temporary factors that had weighed on growth earlier in the year. Nonetheless, recent indicators point to continuing weakness in overall labor market conditions, and the unemployment rate remains elevated. Household spending has been increaseding at only a modest a somewhat faster pace in recent months despite some recovery in sales of motor vehicles as supply chain disruptions have eased. However, Business investment in equipment and software has continueds to expand, but investment in nonresidential structures is still weak, and the housing sector remains depressed. Inflation appears to have moderated since earlier in the year as prices of energy and some commodities have declined from their peaks. Longer-term inflation expectations have remained stable.
  • 2. Consistent with its statutory mandate, the Committee seeks to foster maximum employment and price stability. The Committee continues to expect some pickup in the a moderate pace of recovery economic growth over coming quarters but and consequently anticipates that the unemployment rate will decline only gradually toward levels that the Committee judges to be consistent with its dual mandate. Moreover, there are { [ significant ] } downside risks to the economic outlook remain, including strains in global financial markets. The Committee also anticipates that inflation will settle, over coming quarters, at levels at or below those consistent with the Committee's dual mandate as the effects of past energy and other commodity price increases dissipate further. However, the Committee will continue to pay close attention to the evolution of inflation and inflation expectations.
  • 3. To support a stronger economic recovery and to help ensure that inflation, over time, is at levels consistent with the dual mandate, the Committee decided today to continue its program to extend the average maturity of its holdings of securities as announced in September. The Committee intends to purchase, by the end of June 2012, $400 billion of Treasury securities with remaining maturities of 6 years to 30 years and to sell an equal amount of Treasury securities with remaining maturities of 3 years or less. This program should put downward pressure on longer-term interest rates and help make broader financial conditions more accommodative. To help support conditions in mortgage markets, The Committee will now is maintaining its existing policies of reinvesting principal payments from its holdings of agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities in agency mortgage-backed securities. In addition the Committee will maintain its existing policy and of rolling over maturing Treasury securities at auction. The Committee will regularly review the size and composition of its securities holdings and is prepared to adjust those holdings as appropriate.
  • 4. The Committee also decided to keep the target range for the federal funds rate at 0 to ¼ percent and currently anticipates that economic conditions--including low rates of resource utilization and a subdued outlook for inflation over the medium run--are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels for the federal funds rate at least [ through mid-2013 | for the next six to seven quarters ].
  • 5. The Committee discussed the range of policy tools available will continue to assess the economic outlook in light of incoming information and is prepared to employ its tools to promote a stronger economic recovery in a context of price stability.

November FOMC Statement--Alternative C


  • 1. Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in August September indicates that economic growth remains slow of late has been somewhat stronger than the Committee had expected. Recent indicators point to continuing weakness in overall labor market conditions, and Although the unemployment rate remains elevated, household spending has been increaseding at only a modest a faster pace in recent months despite some recovery in sales of motor vehicles as supply chain disruptions have eased. However, Business investment in equipment and software continues to expand, and investment in nonresidential structures is still weak has increased. and The housing sector remains depressed. Inflation appears to have moderated only somewhat since earlier in the year, despite a decline in the as prices of energy and some commodities have declined from their peaks. Longer-term inflation expectations have remained stable.
  • 2. Consistent with its statutory mandate, the Committee seeks to foster maximum employment and price stability. The Committee continues to expect some pickup in the a moderate pace of recovery growth over coming quarters but and anticipates that the unemployment rate will decline only gradually toward levels that the Committee judges to be consistent with its dual mandate. Moreover, there are significant downside risks to the economic outlook, including strains in global financial markets. The Committee also anticipates that inflation will settle, over coming quarters, at levels at or below those consistent with the Committee's dual mandate as the effects of past energy and other commodity price increases dissipate further. However, the Committee will continue to pay close attention to the evolution of inflation and inflation expectations.
  • 3. To support a stronger economic recovery and to help ensure that inflation, over time, is at levels consistent with the dual mandate In light of the recent improvement in the economic outlook, the Committee decided today to reduce by half the size of the program to extend the average maturity of its holdings of securities that it announced in September. The Committee intends to purchase, by the end of June 2012, $400 billion of Treasury securities with remaining maturities of 6 years to 30 years and to sell an equal amount of Treasury securities with remaining maturities of 3 years or less. This program should put downward pressure on longer-term interest rates and help make broader financial conditions more accommodative. In particular, the Committee intends to limit purchases and sales of securities under this program to $200 billion each and to complete these operations by the end of March 2012. To help support conditions in mortgage markets, The Committee will now is maintaining its existing policies of reinvesting principal payments from its holdings of agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities in agency mortgage-backed securities. In addition the Committee will maintain its existing policy and of rolling over maturing Treasury securities at auction. The Committee will regularly review the size and composition of its securities holdings and is prepared to adjust those holdings as appropriate.
  • 4. The Committee also decided to keep the target range for the federal funds rate at 0 to ¼ percent and currently, now anticipates that economic conditions--including low rates of resource utilization and a subdued outlook for inflation over the medium run--are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels for the federal funds rate at least [ through 2012 mid-2013 | for the next four quarters ].
  • 5. The Committee discussed the range of policy tools available to promote a stronger economic recovery in the context of price stability. It will continue to assess the economic outlook in light of incoming information and is prepared to employ its tools as appropriate to promote its objectives of maximum employment and stable prices.

September 2011 FOMC Directive

The Federal Open Market Committee seeks monetary and financial conditions that will foster price stability and promote sustainable growth in output. To further its long-run objectives, the Committee seeks conditions in reserve markets consistent with federal funds trading in a range from 0 to 1/4 percent. The Committee directs the Desk to purchase, by the end of June 2012, Treasury securities with remaining maturities of approximately 6 years to 30 years with a total face value of $400 billion, and to sell Treasury securities with remaining maturities of 3 years or less with a total face value of $400 billion. The Committee also directs the Desk to maintain its existing policy of rolling over maturing Treasury securities into new issues and to reinvest principal payments on all agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities in the System Open Market Account in agency mortgage-backed securities in order to maintain the total face value of domestic securities at approximately $2.6 trillion. The Committee directs the Desk to engage in dollar roll transactions as necessary to facilitate settlement of the Federal Reserve's agency MBS transactions. The System Open Market Account Manager and the Secretary will keep the Committee informed of ongoing developments regarding the System's balance sheet that could affect the attainment over time of the Committee's objectives of maximum employment and price stability.

[Note: In the November 2011 FOMC Directive Alternatives, emphasis (strike-through) indicates strike-through text in the original document, and strong emphasis (bold) indicates bold red underlined text in the original document.]

November 2011 FOMC Directive -- Alternative A1

The Federal Open Market Committee seeks monetary and financial conditions that will foster price stability and promote sustainable growth in output. To further its long-run objectives, the Committee seeks conditions in reserve markets consistent with federal funds trading in a range from 0 to 1/4 percent. The Committee directs the Desk to continue the maturity extension program it began in September to purchase, by the end of June 2012, Treasury securities with remaining maturities of approximately 6 years to 30 years with a total face value of $400 billion, and to sell Treasury securities with remaining maturities of 3 years or less with a total face value of $400 billion. The Committee also directs the Desk to maintain its existing policyies of rolling over maturing Treasury securities into new issues and to of reinvesting principal payments on all agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities in the System Open Market Account in agency mortgage-backed securities in order to maintain the total face value of domestic securities at approximately $2.6 trillion. The Committee directs the Desk to engage in dollar roll transactions as necessary to facilitate settlement of the Federal Reserve's agency MBS transactions. The System Open Market Account Manager and the Secretary will keep the Committee informed of ongoing developments regarding the System's balance sheet that could affect the attainment over time of the Committee's objectives of maximum employment and price stability.

November 2011 FOMC Directive -- Alternative A2

The Federal Open Market Committee seeks monetary and financial conditions that will foster price stability and promote sustainable growth in output. To further its long-run objectives, the Committee seeks conditions in reserve markets consistent with federal funds trading in a range from 0 to 1/4 percent. The Committee directs the Desk to continue the maturity extension program it began in September to purchase, by the end of June 2012, Treasury securities with remaining maturities of approximately 6 years to 30 years with a total face value of $400 billion, and to sell Treasury securities with remaining maturities of 3 years or less with a total face value of $400 billion. The Committee also directs the Desk to execute purchases of longer-term Treasury securities in order to increase the total face value of domestic securities held in the System Open Market Account to approximately $3.3 trillion by the end of September 2012. The Committee also directs the Desk to maintain its existing policyies of rolling over maturing Treasury securities into new issues and to of reinvesting principal payments on all agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities in the System Open Market Account in agency mortgage-backed securities in order to maintain the total face value of domestic securities at approximately $2.6 trillion. The Committee directs the Desk to engage in dollar roll transactions as necessary to facilitate settlement of the Federal Reserve's agency MBS transactions. The System Open Market Account Manager and the Secretary will keep the Committee informed of ongoing developments regarding the System's balance sheet that could affect the attainment over time of the Committee's objectives of maximum employment and price stability.

OR

The Federal Open Market Committee seeks monetary and financial conditions that will foster price stability and promote sustainable growth in output. To further its long-run objectives, the Committee seeks conditions in reserve markets consistent with federal funds trading in a range from 0 to 1/4 percent. The Committee directs the Desk to continue the maturity extension program it began in September to purchase, by the end of June 2012, Treasury securities with remaining maturities of approximately 6 years to 30 years with a total face value of $400 billion, and to sell Treasury securities with remaining maturities of 3 years or less with a total face value of $400 billion. The Committee also directs the Desk to execute purchases of longer-term Treasury securities and of agency mortgage-backed securities of approximately equal face amounts in order to increase the total face value of domestic securities held in the System Open Market Account to approximately $3.3 trillion by the end of June 2012. The Committee also directs the Desk to maintain its existing policyies of rolling over maturing Treasury securities into new issues and to of reinvesting principal payments on all agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities in the System Open Market Account in agency mortgage-backed securities in order to maintain the total face value of domestic securities at approximately $2.6 trillion. The Committee directs the Desk to engage in dollar roll transactions as necessary to facilitate settlement of the Federal Reserve's agency MBS transactions. The System Open Market Account Manager and the Secretary will keep the Committee informed of ongoing developments regarding the System's balance sheet that could affect the attainment over time of the Committee's objectives of maximum employment and price stability.

November 2011 FOMC Directive -- Alternative B

The Federal Open Market Committee seeks monetary and financial conditions that will foster price stability and promote sustainable growth in output. To further its long-run objectives, the Committee seeks conditions in reserve markets consistent with federal funds trading in a range from 0 to 1/4 percent. The Committee directs the Desk to continue the maturity extension program it began in September to purchase, by the end of June 2012, Treasury securities with remaining maturities of approximately 6 years to 30 years with a total face value of $400 billion, and to sell Treasury securities with remaining maturities of 3 years or less with a total face value of $400 billion. The Committee also directs the Desk to maintain its existing policyies of rolling over maturing Treasury securities into new issues and to of reinvesting principal payments on all agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities in the System Open Market Account in agency mortgage-backed securities in order to maintain the total face value of domestic securities at approximately $2.6 trillion. The Committee directs the Desk to engage in dollar roll transactions as necessary to facilitate settlement of the Federal Reserve's agency MBS transactions. The System Open Market Account Manager and the Secretary will keep the Committee informed of ongoing developments regarding the System's balance sheet that could affect the attainment over time of the Committee's objectives of maximum employment and price stability.

November 2011 FOMC Directive -- Alternative C

The Federal Open Market Committee seeks monetary and financial conditions that will foster price stability and promote sustainable growth in output. To further its long-run objectives, the Committee seeks conditions in reserve markets consistent with federal funds trading in a range from 0 to 1/4 percent. The Committee directs the Desk to modify the maturity extension program it began in September so as to purchase, by the end of MarchJune 2012, Treasury securities with remaining maturities of approximately 6 years to 30 years with a total face value of $200$400 billion, and to sell Treasury securities with remaining maturities of 3 years or less with a total face value of $200$400 billion. The Committee also directs the Desk to maintain its existing policyies of rolling over maturing Treasury securities into new issues and to of reinvesting principal payments on all agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities in the System Open Market Account in agency mortgage-backed securities in order to maintain the total face value of domestic securities at approximately $2.4$2.6 trillion. The Committee directs the Desk to engage in dollar roll transactions as necessary to facilitate settlement of the Federal Reserve's agency MBS transactions. The System Open Market Account Manager and the Secretary will keep the Committee informed of ongoing developments regarding the System's balance sheet that could affect the attainment over time of the Committee's objectives of maximum employment and price stability.


Return to topReturn to top



Home | Monetary policy | FOMC | FOMC transcripts
Accessibility | Contact Us
Last update: January 12, 2017