Lease
Example Disclaimer. This example illustrates one application
of the method. The results shown here and the results in your situation
may differ. These differences occur for three reasons: (1) Laws
vary from state to state, (2) the computer programs used by lessors
differ, and (3) the contracts used by lessors differ. In the example,
the monthly rent charge is calculated as 1/12 of the annual rent
charge. Your lease agreement, even if it uses this method, may not
work like the lease in this example. The example addresses the rebating
of rent charges only, not any other charges that may be included
in the lease. |
Example: Constant Yield (Actuarial) Method
Adjusted capitalized cost
|
$18,800.00 |
Term
|
48 months |
Base monthly payment
(without sales tax)
|
$244.69 |
Residual value |
$12,350.00 |
First payment rent charge |
= |
($18,800.00 - $244.69) 8.497% ÷ 12 |
= |
$131.39 |
First payment depreciation |
= |
$244.69 - $131.39 |
= |
$113.30 |
End of month 1 lease balance |
= |
$18,800.00 - $113.30 |
= |
$18,686.70 |
Second payment rent charge |
= |
($18,686.70 - $244.69) × 8.497% ÷ 12 |
= |
$130.59 |
Second payment depreciation |
= |
$244.69 - $130.59 |
= |
$114.10 |
End of month 2 lease balance |
= |
$18,686.70 - $114.10 |
= |
$18,572.60 |
Full-term rent charge |
= |
Total base payments - Depreciation |
Total base payments |
= |
$244.69 × 48 |
= |
$11,745.12 |
Depreciation |
= |
Adjusted capitalized cost - Residual
value |
Full-term rent charge |
= |
($11,745.12) - ($18,800 - $12,350) |
= |
$5,295.12 |
Additional payments do not reduce the lease balance in the month paid.
If an additional $1,000 payment is made at the end of month 1, it is treated
as prepayment of the monthly payments due at the end of months 2, 3, 4,
and 5. If the remaining payments are made on time or within the grace
period, there is no savings of the full-term projected rent charge because
the amount of rent charge of each payment is precomputed. If the lease
is prepaid after 24 payments, the balance will be $15,847.42, which is
$1,024.34 lower than the balance would be under the Rule of 78 method.
|