| Table 1 New Currency Budget (calendar year) |
| 2008 Budget (thousands) | 2008 Estimate (thousands) | 2009 Budget (thousands) | Percent Change 2008E/2008B | Percent Change 2009B/2008E | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Print order (number of notes) |
8,304,067 |
7,404,800 |
7,017,600 |
-10.8 |
-5.2 |
| Printing costs for FR notes | $578,461 | $473,849 | $606,070 | -18.1 | 27.9 |
| Currency transportation costs | $15,910 | $14,527 | $17,145 | -8.7 | 18.0 |
| Shipping FR Notes from BEP (new) | $10,774 | $7,689 | $10,170 | -28.6 | 32.3 |
| Intra-System shipments (fit and unprocessed) | $5,090 | $6,785 | $6,920 | 33.3 | 2.0 |
| Shipping pallets back to BEP | $46 | $53 | $55 | 15.2 | 3.8 |
| Counterfeit-deterrence research | $3,730 | $3,686 | $4,240 | -1.2 | 15.0 |
| Central Bank Counterfeit Deterrence Group | $3,695 | $3,651 | $4,205 | -1.2 | 15.2 |
| Reprographic Research Center | $35 | $35 | $35 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Treasury's Office of Compliance | $4,271 | $3,812 | $4,022 | -10.8 | 5.5 |
| Total Expenses | $602,372 | $495,874 | $631,477 | -17.7 | 27.3 |
|
2008 New Currency Expenses
2008 Printing Costs
2008 Transportation Costs 2009 New Currency Budget
2009 Printing Costs
|
| Table 2 BEP Billing Rates |
| Note typea | 2008 billing rates per thousand notes | 2009 billing rates per thousand notes | Projected number of notes for 2009 (millions) |
2009 printing cost (thousands) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $1, $2b | $47.07 | $52.68 | 2,745.6 | $144,638 |
| Series 1996 $100 | $79.11 | $97.23 | 851.2 | $82,762 |
| Series 2004 $5 | $74.20 | $90.08 | 780.8 | $70,334 |
| Series 2004 $10 | $76.50 | $93.50 | 140.8 | $13,165 |
| Series 2004 $20, $50 | $91.63 | $99.18 | 1,177.6 | $116,794 |
| Series 2004 $100c | n.a. | $134.97 | 1,321.6 | $178,376 |
| Total | 7,017.6 | $606,070 | ||
| Memo: Average rated | $69.66 | $86.36 |
|
a $1 and $2 notes do not include the security features that are in the Series 1996 and Series 2004 design notes; Series 1996 $100 notes include a watermark and color-shifting ink; Series 2004 $5 notes include two watermarks and additional security features; and Series 2004 $10, $20, and $50 notes include watermarks, additional security features, and a new color shifting ink. Return to table. b The Board did not order any $2 notes in fiscal year 2009 (a decision the director of RBOPS approved in July 2008) because Reserve Banks have sufficient inventories to meet estimated public demand for several years. Return to table. c The BEP is currently production testing the Series 2004 $100 note. The billing rate included in the table is an estimate. Return to table. d Volume weighted. Return to table. |
|
The cost components of the billing rates are currency production, production support, capital investment, and public education. Figure 1 shows the contribution of these factors to the total printing cost of currency.
Currency Production Costs Production Support Costs Capital Investment Costs In addition, the BEP plans to improve its infrastructure at the Washington D.C., facility. The BEP is currently investigating various infrastructure upgrade options, and we expect significant changes in capital charges over the next 10 years as both the facility and production equipment upgrades proceed. Also, the BEP has allocated funds to comply with the Homeland Security Presidential Directive that requires a uniform government access badge and to upgrade information technology and physical security at both of its facilities. Public Education Costs Number and Denomination Mix of Notes Printed |
| Table 3 Number of Notes Printed (millions per calendar year) |
| Denomination | 2008 Estimated | 2009 Budget | Percent change 2009B/2008E |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1 | 3,404.8 | 2,745.6 | -19.4 |
| $2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| $5 | 1,267.2 | 780.8 | -38.4 |
| $10 | 966.4 | 140.8 | -85.4 |
| $20 | 409.6 | 876.8 | 114.1 |
| $50 | 60.8 | 300.8 | 394.7 |
| $100 | 1,296.0 | 2,172.8 | 67.7 |
| Total | 7,404.8 | 7,017.6 | -5.2 |
|
As part of the annual print order process, we forecast five years of projected currency demand and allocate, as evenly as possible, the number and denomination of notes that we expect to order over that period.9 In 2006, we recognized that BEP production capacity would be temporarily constrained by the approximately 3.5 billion Series 2004 $100 notes that we estimated it would need to produce in fiscal years 2009 and 2010.10 Although the release date for the Series 2004 $100 note remains uncertain, for budget planning purposes we assumed that Reserve Banks will begin to issue the notes in early 2010.11 In order to allow the BEP sufficient capacity to produce these notes, we included a significant number of notes in the fiscal year 2007, 2008, and 2009 print orders to meet estimated future-year demand. Accordingly, the fiscal year 2008 and 2009 orders include all the $5, $10, and $50 notes that we estimate Reserve Banks will need to meet demand through 2010. As a result, we expect that the print orders for fiscal years 2009 and 2010 will be similar in volume and that the 2010 order will include $1, $20, and $100 notes only.12 In addition to the increase in billing rates, the 2009 print budget is also higher than 2008 estimated expenses because it contains a larger share of more-expensive new-design notes than did the 2008 budget. Series 2004 notes comprise 49 percent of the calendar year 2009 budget, compared with 46 percent of the 2008 budgeted order. Specifically, the proposed 2009 budget includes 1.3 billion Series 2004 $100 notes at the billing rate of $134.97 per thousand, amounting to $178.4 million, or 29.4 percent of the total proposed printing costs for the new currency budget. The BEP is currently testing the note extensively; therefore, the actual timeline for production and the final billing rate are uncertain at this time. 2009 Print Budget Risks In addition to the Series 2004 $100 note risk, increased international demand for new Series 1996 $100 notes as a result of the recent financial market turmoil makes demand levels uncertain over the mid- to longer term.13 The original print order assumed a 3.5 percent annual growth rate for $100 note payments, but we currently estimate the calendar year 2008 annual growth rate to be in excess of 13 percent. The Reserve Banks paid nearly 66 percent more $100 notes to circulation in October 2008 than in October 2007. Because of this increased activity, we requested that the BEP accelerate the $100 note printing schedule, and we currently estimate that the BEP will produce more than 50 percent of the fiscal year 2009 $100 note order within the first three months. We plan to evaluate demand in January and will adjust the fiscal year 2009 print order if necessary. 2009 Currency Transportation The 2009 budget for currency transportation increased 18 percent from 2008 estimates. The overall increase reflects a two percent increase in intra-System, and a 32.3 percent increase in new-currency shipment costs. Intra-System shipment carriers adjusted costs throughout 2008 to include fuel price changes, yielding the 33.3 percent overage in the 2008 estimate. The 2009 intra-System shipment budget only increased 2 percent compared with the 2008 estimate because we assumed, for budget planning purposes, no additional significant price increases in 2009. The new currency shipment budget, however, increased 32.3 percent over 2008 estimated expenses primarily because we assumed significant price increases for carriers that did not seek fuel surcharge relief in 2008. We are currently negotiating 2009 annual contracts with these carriers, but, for planning purposes, have based the budget on their bids, which assume continued high fuel and air travel costs. We plan to work with the carriers to refine their cost estimates. In addition to expected rate increases, the $2.6 million increase in the new currency shipment budget includes $1.1 million to ship Series 2004 $100 notes to the Reserve Banks to build inventories before issuance. Without these $100 note shipments, new currency shipment expenses would increase only 18 percent, reflecting the potentially higher carrier rates. Counterfeit-Deterrence Research
Treasury's Office of Compliance (OC) |
| Data for Chart 1 |
| YEAR | 1990 | 1991 | 1992 | 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008E | 2009B |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nominal Cost in millions of dollars | 190 | 260 | 295 | 355 | 368 | 373 | 403 | 367 | 408 | 487 | 456 | 344 | 430 | 514 | 514 | 497 | 489 | 576 | 496 | 631 |
| Real Cost (CPI Adjusted) in millions of dollars | 190 | 249 | 275 | 321 | 324 | 320 | 336 | 299 | 327 | 382 | 346 | 254 | 312 | 365 | 356 | 333 | 317 | 363 | 296 | 363 |
| Data for Chart 2 |
| YEAR | 1990 | 1991 | 1992 | 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008E | 2009B |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Billions of notes | 7.00 | 8.02 | 8.45 | 8.03 | 9.33 | 9.96 | 9.44 | 9.58 | 9.20 | 10.80 | 8.97 | 8.18 | 7.39 | 8.39 | 8.88 | 8.30 | 8.50 | 8.80 | 7.4 | 7.0 |
| Billions of dollars | 84.47 | 107.96 | 103.19 | 104.89 | 128.82 | 148.24 | 194.64 | 142.23 | 163.26 | 285.49 | 67.46 | 50.20 | 123.30 | 126.20 | 157.00 | 140.8 | 146.1 | 178.1 | 160.2 | 257.9 |
| Data for Chart 3 |
| YEAR | 1990 | 1991 | 1992 | 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008E | 2009B |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Billions of notes | 7.00 | 8.02 | 8.45 | 8.03 | 9.33 | 9.96 | 9.44 | 9.58 | 9.20 | 10.8 | 8.97 | 8.18 | 7.39 | 8.39 | 8.89 | 8.29 | 8.46 | 8.8 | 7.4 | 7.0 |
| Cost per 1000 notes | $26.00 | $30.00 | $36.00 | $41.00 | $38.00 | $37.00 | $40.00 | $43.00 | $47.00 | $43.00 | $47.00 | $49.00 | $50.00 | $58.25 | $55.67 | $55.32 | $55.74 | $63.30 | $63.99 | $86.36 |
| 1 | The BEP requested that we reallocate 640 million notes from the fiscal year 2008 to the fiscal year 2009 currency order to avoid excessive overtime due to delays associated with the installation and testing of new presses. Return to text. |
| 2 | The Series 2004 $100 note is the final denomination issued as part of the Series 2004 design family. This design family, which incorporates new color backgrounds, began with the issuance of the Series 2004 $20 note in October 2003, followed by the $50 note in September 2004, the $10 note in March 2006, and the $5 note in March 2008. Return to text. |
| 3 | The percent decline in transportation expenses exceeds the percent decline in the number of notes produced because the majority of the eliminated shipments were for high-denomination notes. It is more expensive to ship $20 and $100 notes because armored carriers reach insurance limits with smaller quantities of those notes than they do with lower denominations. As a result, we need to schedule more shipments of $20 and $100 notes than of lower denominations to move the same volume of notes. Return to text. |
| 4 | While some new currency shipment carriers requested and were granted fuel-surcharge relief, the carriers that were responsible for the majority of our shipments kept their prices at annual contracted rates. Intra-System shipment prices, however, are bid throughout the year and reflect current fuel prices. Return to text. |
| 5 | Charts 1-3 in the attachment show the new currency expenses, the value and number of notes printed, and the number and cost of notes printed from 1990 through the 2009 budget period. Return to text. |
| 6 | On May 20, 2008, the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit upheld a district court ruling in favor of the American Council for the Blind that directs the United States Treasury Department to make U.S. paper currency more accessible to the blind and visually impaired. Return to text. |
| 7 | Overprinting equipment includes presses that produce both the Treasury and Federal Reserve seals and the serial numbers. A full BEP production line also includes offset presses, which the BEP purchased beginning in 2001. Return to text. |
| 8 | The large format of the new intaglio presses is capable of printing 50 Federal Reserve-sized notes per page instead of 32 notes per page. Assuming that the size of a Federal Reserve note remains unchanged, the large format increases the capacity of each machine by more than 50 percent. Return to text. |
| 9 | The BEP produces notes most cost effectively when it can plan its production schedule over a multiple-year period. Return to text. |
| 10 | As with the $100 redesign introductions in 1991 and 1996, Reserve Banks do not plan to co-circulate Series 1996 and Series 2004 $100 notes, consistent with the recommendation of the Advanced Counterfeit Deterrence Steering Committee. Return to text. |
| 11 | We estimate that the BEP will need between 6 and 9 months to produce the number of notes required for initial issuance. Return to text. |
| 12 | These estimates are based on staff's current forecasts of future-year currency needs. The actual volume of notes for the 2010 print order will depend on conditions at the time the order is placed. Return to text. |
| 13 | While Reserve Banks meet most domestic demand with previously circulated currency, foreign wholesale banknote dealers will only purchase new notes in BEP packaging for their customers. International users perceive new notes as more valuable than previously circulated currency because new notes have a longer useful life and decrease the concern among downstream commercial banks about obtaining counterfeits. Return to text. |
| 14 | The estimated RRC payment of $35 thousand represents the remaining one percent of the counterfeit-deterrence research budget. The RRC is a state-of-the-art facility hosted by the National Bank of Denmark for adversarial testing of banknote designs and counterfeit deterrent features for its 13 member countries. Return to text. |