Accessible Version
Accessible Version
Figure 1.
Civilian Unemployment Rate
Monthly
Period | Percent |
---|---|
January 2011 | 9.1 |
February 2011 | 9.0 |
March 2011 | 9.0 |
April 2011 | 9.1 |
May 2011 | 9.0 |
June 2011 | 9.1 |
July 2011 | 9.0 |
August 2011 | 9.0 |
September 2011 | 9.0 |
October 2011 | 8.8 |
November 2011 | 8.6 |
December 2011 | 8.5 |
January 2012 | 8.3 |
February 2012 | 8.3 |
March 2012 | 8.2 |
April 2012 | 8.2 |
May 2012 | 8.2 |
June 2012 | 8.2 |
July 2012 | 8.2 |
August 2012 | 8.1 |
September 2012 | 7.8 |
October 2012 | 7.8 |
November 2012 | 7.7 |
December 2012 | 7.9 |
January 2013 | 8.0 |
February 2013 | 7.7 |
March 2013 | 7.5 |
April 2013 | 7.6 |
May 2013 | 7.5 |
June 2013 | 7.5 |
July 2013 | 7.3 |
August 2013 | 7.2 |
September 2013 | 7.2 |
October 2013 | 7.2 |
November 2013 | 6.9 |
December 2013 | 6.7 |
January 2014 | 6.6 |
February 2014 | 6.7 |
March 2014 | 6.7 |
April 2014 | 6.3 |
May 2014 | 6.3 |
June 2014 | 6.1 |
July 2014 | 6.2 |
August 2014 | 6.2 |
September 2014 | 5.9 |
October 2014 | 5.7 |
November 2014 | 5.8 |
December 2014 | 5.6 |
January 2015 | 5.7 |
February 2015 | 5.5 |
March 2015 | 5.5 |
April 2015 | 5.4 |
May 2015 | 5.5 |
June 2015 | 5.3 |
July 2015 | 5.2 |
August 2015 | 5.1 |
September 2015 | 5.0 |
October 2015 | 5.0 |
November 2015 | 5.0 |
December 2015 | 5.0 |
January 2016 | 4.9 |
February 2016 | 4.9 |
March 2016 | 5.0 |
April 2016 | 5.0 |
May 2016 | 4.7 |
June 2016 | 4.9 |
July 2016 | 4.9 |
August 2016 | 4.9 |
September 2016 | 5.0 |
October 2016 | 4.9 |
November 2016 | 4.6 |
December 2016 | 4.7 |
January 2017 | 4.8 |
February 2017 | 4.7 |
March 2017 | 4.5 |
April 2017 | 4.4 |
May 2017 | 4.3 |
June 2017 | 4.3 |
July 2017 | 4.3 |
August 2017 | 4.4 |
September 2017 | 4.2 |
October 2017 | 4.1 |
November 2017 | 4.1 |
December 2017 | 4.1 |
January 2018 | 4.1 |
February 2018 | 4.1 |
March 2018 | 4.1 |
April 2018 | 3.9 |
May 2018 | 3.8 |
June 2018 | 4.0 |
July 2018 | 3.9 |
August 2018 | 3.9 |
September 2018 | 3.7 |
October 2018 | 3.7 |
November 2018 | 3.7 |
Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis via Haver Analytics.
Alternative Measures of PCE Inflation
Monthly
Percent
Period | Total | Excluding food and energy | Trimmed mean |
---|---|---|---|
January 2011 | 1.48 | 1.02 | 0.99 |
February 2011 | 1.79 | 1.14 | 1.15 |
March 2011 | 2.07 | 1.16 | 1.28 |
April 2011 | 2.46 | 1.35 | 1.41 |
May 2011 | 2.75 | 1.49 | 1.55 |
June 2011 | 2.79 | 1.58 | 1.62 |
July 2011 | 2.89 | 1.74 | 1.70 |
August 2011 | 3.00 | 1.86 | 1.79 |
September 2011 | 3.06 | 1.88 | 1.84 |
October 2011 | 2.76 | 1.81 | 1.93 |
November 2011 | 2.77 | 1.91 | 2.00 |
December 2011 | 2.60 | 2.06 | 2.06 |
January 2012 | 2.63 | 2.13 | 2.10 |
February 2012 | 2.58 | 2.10 | 2.03 |
March 2012 | 2.35 | 2.11 | 2.02 |
April 2012 | 2.06 | 2.04 | 2.00 |
May 2012 | 1.63 | 1.89 | 1.93 |
June 2012 | 1.59 | 1.88 | 1.90 |
July 2012 | 1.45 | 1.82 | 1.85 |
August 2012 | 1.54 | 1.67 | 1.79 |
September 2012 | 1.70 | 1.72 | 1.80 |
October 2012 | 1.99 | 1.91 | 1.78 |
November 2012 | 1.72 | 1.80 | 1.70 |
December 2012 | 1.65 | 1.71 | 1.62 |
January 2013 | 1.47 | 1.59 | 1.58 |
February 2013 | 1.60 | 1.55 | 1.62 |
March 2013 | 1.28 | 1.48 | 1.57 |
April 2013 | 1.07 | 1.41 | 1.43 |
May 2013 | 1.25 | 1.42 | 1.40 |
June 2013 | 1.53 | 1.49 | 1.50 |
July 2013 | 1.62 | 1.51 | 1.55 |
August 2013 | 1.43 | 1.57 | 1.54 |
September 2013 | 1.16 | 1.55 | 1.52 |
October 2013 | 1.03 | 1.52 | 1.53 |
November 2013 | 1.25 | 1.58 | 1.61 |
December 2013 | 1.46 | 1.63 | 1.66 |
January 2014 | 1.47 | 1.52 | 1.63 |
February 2014 | 1.14 | 1.45 | 1.56 |
March 2014 | 1.48 | 1.58 | 1.60 |
April 2014 | 1.77 | 1.69 | 1.76 |
May 2014 | 1.85 | 1.74 | 1.81 |
June 2014 | 1.76 | 1.69 | 1.78 |
July 2014 | 1.80 | 1.77 | 1.81 |
August 2014 | 1.63 | 1.69 | 1.76 |
September 2014 | 1.62 | 1.71 | 1.76 |
October 2014 | 1.43 | 1.58 | 1.74 |
November 2014 | 1.23 | 1.52 | 1.72 |
December 2014 | 0.84 | 1.46 | 1.68 |
January 2015 | 0.17 | 1.34 | 1.58 |
February 2015 | 0.27 | 1.39 | 1.64 |
March 2015 | 0.28 | 1.35 | 1.62 |
April 2015 | 0.14 | 1.32 | 1.63 |
May 2015 | 0.24 | 1.28 | 1.61 |
June 2015 | 0.33 | 1.30 | 1.63 |
July 2015 | 0.27 | 1.22 | 1.61 |
August 2015 | 0.30 | 1.28 | 1.67 |
September 2015 | 0.13 | 1.29 | 1.67 |
October 2015 | 0.15 | 1.22 | 1.62 |
November 2015 | 0.31 | 1.26 | 1.60 |
December 2015 | 0.41 | 1.25 | 1.58 |
January 2016 | 0.97 | 1.47 | 1.69 |
February 2016 | 0.75 | 1.55 | 1.71 |
March 2016 | 0.68 | 1.48 | 1.70 |
April 2016 | 0.96 | 1.56 | 1.71 |
May 2016 | 0.89 | 1.60 | 1.75 |
June 2016 | 0.86 | 1.58 | 1.72 |
July 2016 | 0.85 | 1.69 | 1.75 |
August 2016 | 1.00 | 1.78 | 1.77 |
September 2016 | 1.25 | 1.72 | 1.78 |
October 2016 | 1.49 | 1.86 | 1.88 |
November 2016 | 1.46 | 1.78 | 1.89 |
December 2016 | 1.74 | 1.85 | 1.96 |
January 2017 | 2.05 | 1.90 | 2.02 |
February 2017 | 2.18 | 1.87 | 1.97 |
March 2017 | 1.86 | 1.64 | 1.90 |
April 2017 | 1.78 | 1.64 | 1.86 |
May 2017 | 1.61 | 1.59 | 1.82 |
June 2017 | 1.51 | 1.62 | 1.81 |
July 2017 | 1.48 | 1.50 | 1.74 |
August 2017 | 1.54 | 1.41 | 1.72 |
September 2017 | 1.77 | 1.48 | 1.73 |
October 2017 | 1.71 | 1.58 | 1.73 |
November 2017 | 1.87 | 1.61 | 1.76 |
December 2017 | 1.81 | 1.64 | 1.78 |
January 2018 | 1.75 | 1.63 | 1.79 |
February 2018 | 1.85 | 1.66 | 1.80 |
March 2018 | 2.07 | 1.96 | 1.86 |
April 2018 | 2.05 | 1.89 | 1.84 |
May 2018 | 2.25 | 1.98 | 1.91 |
June 2018 | 2.28 | 1.95 | 1.97 |
July 2018 | 2.34 | 2.02 | 2.02 |
August 2018 | 2.19 | 1.93 | 2.00 |
September 2018 | 1.97 | 1.94 | 1.97 |
October 2018 | 1.98 | 1.78 | 1.91 |
Note: The data extend through October 2018; changes are from one year earlier.
Source: For trimmed mean, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas; for all else, Bureau of Economic Analysis via Haver Analytics.
Figure 2. Financial Conditions Indexes
A line chart. The x-axis measures time and ranges from years 1990 to 2018. The y-axis ranges from -3 to 5 standard deviations. The data are weekly. There are two variables plotted on the chart. The first line, labeled "Goldman Sachs," is designated by a red line and ranges from about -2 to 5 standard deviations. This line begins at around 1.75 in 1990, decreases to about zero at the end of 1993, increases rapidly to about 1.5 at the end of 1994, decreases to about -1.75 in the beginning of 2000, increases to about 2.75 in 2002, decreases between 2003 and 2008 to about -0.5, increases sharply to about 4.75 from 2008 to the beginning of 2009, declines sharply to about 0.25 at the end of 2009, declines to about -1.5 in 2014, increases to about 0.5 at the end of 2015, decreases to about -1.25 from 2016 to the end of 2017, and increases to end at about -0.5. The second line, labeled "Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago," is designated by a solid black line and ranges from about -1 to 2 standard deviations. This line begins at about zero in 1990, increases to about 0.25 at the end of 1990, decreases to about -0.75 between 1991 and mid-1998, increases to about zero at the end of 1998, gradually declines to about -0.75 in 2007, rapidly increases from mid-2007 through the end of 2008 to about 2.5, decreases sharply to about zero from the end of 2008 to the beginning of 2010, and then decreases more gradually to end at about -0.75.
Note: The indexes are standardized; values above (below) zero represent tighter (easier) than average financial conditions. The shaded bars indicate periods of business recession as defined by the National Bureau of Economic Research: July 1990-March 1991, March 2001-November 2001, and December 2007-June 2009. The Goldman Sachs FCI is a weighted average of five financial variables (the federal funds rate, the 10-year Treasury yield, the corporate BBB Treasury yields spread, the S&P price-to-earnings ratio, and the broad value of the U.S. dollar), with weights chosen based on the effects of these variables on real GDP growth using a VAR model. The Chicago NFCI is based on 100 financial variables spanning three market segments: money market, debt and equity market, and the banking sector. The Chicago NFCI is weekly and is derived using a dynamic factor model, which optimally weights each variable by taking into account both the cross-correlations of the variables in the index and the historical evolution of the index itself.
Source: Bloomberg Finance LP; Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Chicago Fed National Financial Conditions Index [NFCI], retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis; https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/NFCI.
Figure 3. Household-Sector Credit-to-GDP Ratio
Quarterly
Period | Ratio |
---|---|
1980:Q1 | 0.4798 |
1980:Q2 | 0.4833 |
1980:Q3 | 0.4836 |
1980:Q4 | 0.4757 |
1981:Q1 | 0.4617 |
1981:Q2 | 0.4664 |
1981:Q3 | 0.4597 |
1981:Q4 | 0.4653 |
1982:Q1 | 0.4719 |
1982:Q2 | 0.4695 |
1982:Q3 | 0.4656 |
1982:Q4 | 0.4696 |
1983:Q1 | 0.4630 |
1983:Q2 | 0.4617 |
1983:Q3 | 0.4610 |
1983:Q4 | 0.4637 |
1984:Q1 | 0.4640 |
1984:Q2 | 0.4664 |
1984:Q3 | 0.4690 |
1984:Q4 | 0.4767 |
1985:Q1 | 0.4914 |
1985:Q2 | 0.4989 |
1985:Q3 | 0.5069 |
1985:Q4 | 0.5242 |
1986:Q1 | 0.5288 |
1986:Q2 | 0.5360 |
1986:Q3 | 0.5456 |
1986:Q4 | 0.5566 |
1987:Q1 | 0.5562 |
1987:Q2 | 0.5632 |
1987:Q3 | 0.5680 |
1987:Q4 | 0.5595 |
1988:Q1 | 0.5672 |
1988:Q2 | 0.5685 |
1988:Q3 | 0.5718 |
1988:Q4 | 0.5712 |
1989:Q1 | 0.5713 |
1989:Q2 | 0.5742 |
1989:Q3 | 0.5784 |
1989:Q4 | 0.5856 |
1990:Q1 | 0.5890 |
1990:Q2 | 0.5907 |
1990:Q3 | 0.5938 |
1990:Q4 | 0.6035 |
1991:Q1 | 0.6097 |
1991:Q2 | 0.6097 |
1991:Q3 | 0.6069 |
1991:Q4 | 0.6117 |
1992:Q1 | 0.6103 |
1992:Q2 | 0.6059 |
1992:Q3 | 0.6049 |
1992:Q4 | 0.6034 |
1993:Q1 | 0.6052 |
1993:Q2 | 0.6070 |
1993:Q3 | 0.6108 |
1993:Q4 | 0.6100 |
1994:Q1 | 0.6113 |
1994:Q2 | 0.6109 |
1994:Q3 | 0.6136 |
1994:Q4 | 0.6169 |
1995:Q1 | 0.6210 |
1995:Q2 | 0.6269 |
1995:Q3 | 0.6307 |
1995:Q4 | 0.6327 |
1996:Q1 | 0.6404 |
1996:Q2 | 0.6385 |
1996:Q3 | 0.6394 |
1996:Q4 | 0.6389 |
1997:Q1 | 0.6414 |
1997:Q2 | 0.6393 |
1997:Q3 | 0.6399 |
1997:Q4 | 0.6414 |
1998:Q1 | 0.6465 |
1998:Q2 | 0.6528 |
1998:Q3 | 0.6519 |
1998:Q4 | 0.6539 |
1999:Q1 | 0.6603 |
1999:Q2 | 0.6677 |
1999:Q3 | 0.6709 |
1999:Q4 | 0.6712 |
2000:Q1 | 0.6828 |
2000:Q2 | 0.6793 |
2000:Q3 | 0.6904 |
2000:Q4 | 0.6935 |
2001:Q1 | 0.7019 |
2001:Q2 | 0.7101 |
2001:Q3 | 0.7331 |
2001:Q4 | 0.7375 |
2002:Q1 | 0.7463 |
2002:Q2 | 0.7528 |
2002:Q3 | 0.7638 |
2002:Q4 | 0.7792 |
2003:Q1 | 0.7916 |
2003:Q2 | 0.8142 |
2003:Q3 | 0.8172 |
2003:Q4 | 0.8250 |
2004:Q1 | 0.8355 |
2004:Q2 | 0.8465 |
2004:Q3 | 0.8539 |
2004:Q4 | 0.8672 |
2005:Q1 | 0.8701 |
2005:Q2 | 0.8852 |
2005:Q3 | 0.8934 |
2005:Q4 | 0.9026 |
2006:Q1 | 0.9136 |
2006:Q2 | 0.9286 |
2006:Q3 | 0.9417 |
2006:Q4 | 0.9488 |
2007:Q1 | 0.9519 |
2007:Q2 | 0.9620 |
2007:Q3 | 0.9673 |
2007:Q4 | 0.9713 |
2008:Q1 | 0.9845 |
2008:Q2 | 0.9702 |
2008:Q3 | 0.9765 |
2008:Q4 | 0.9717 |
2009:Q1 | 0.9782 |
2009:Q2 | 0.9792 |
2009:Q3 | 0.9725 |
2009:Q4 | 0.9560 |
2010:Q1 | 0.9444 |
2010:Q2 | 0.9281 |
2010:Q3 | 0.9135 |
2010:Q4 | 0.9013 |
2011:Q1 | 0.8993 |
2011:Q2 | 0.8838 |
2011:Q3 | 0.8727 |
2011:Q4 | 0.8602 |
2012:Q1 | 0.8488 |
2012:Q2 | 0.8396 |
2012:Q3 | 0.8344 |
2012:Q4 | 0.8310 |
2013:Q1 | 0.8218 |
2013:Q2 | 0.8186 |
2013:Q3 | 0.8108 |
2013:Q4 | 0.8036 |
2014:Q1 | 0.8041 |
2014:Q2 | 0.7959 |
2014:Q3 | 0.7861 |
2014:Q4 | 0.7839 |
2015:Q1 | 0.7806 |
2015:Q2 | 0.7763 |
2015:Q3 | 0.7728 |
2015:Q4 | 0.7721 |
2016:Q1 | 0.7737 |
2016:Q2 | 0.7708 |
2016:Q3 | 0.7724 |
2016:Q4 | 0.7697 |
2017:Q1 | 0.7686 |
2017:Q2 | 0.7684 |
2017:Q3 | 0.7643 |
2017:Q4 | 0.7643 |
2018:Q1 | 0.7621 |
2018:Q2 | 0.7535 |
Note: The shaded bars indicate periods of business recession as defined by the National Bureau of Economic Research: January 1980-July 1980, July 1981-November 1982, July 1990-March 1991, March 2001-November 2001, and December 2007-June 2009. GDP is gross domestic product.
Source: Federal Reserve Board staff calculations based on Bureau of Economic Analysis, national income and product accounts, and Federal Reserve Board, Statistical Release Z.1, "Financial Accounts of the United States."
Figure 4. Common Equity Tier 1 Ratio of Banks
A line chart. The x-axis measures time and ranges from years 2001 to 2018. The y-axis ranges from 0 to 14. Unit is percent of risk-weighted assets. The data are quarterly. There are two variables plotted on the chart. The first line, labeled "Other BHCs," is designated by a solid red line and ranges from 8 to just over 12. This variable decreases slightly over 2001 to 2008 from 10 to 8, increases rapidly from 8 in 2009 to 12 in 2012, and has remained near 12 through 2018:Q2. The second line, labeled "Large BHCs," is designated by a solid black line and ranges from about 5 to 12. This variable increases slowly from about 6 in 2001 to nearly 8 in 2006, decreases sharply to 5 in 2008, and increases rapidly to just below 12 through the end of 2013, where it has remained through 2018:Q2.
Note: The data are seasonally adjusted by Board staff. Sample includes banks as of 2018:Q2. Before 2014:Q1, the numerator of the common equity Tier 1 ratio is Tier 1 common capital for advanced-approaches bank holding companies (BHCs) (before 2015:Q1, for non-advanced-approaches BHCs). Afterward, the numerator is common equity Tier 1 capital. Large BHCs are those with greater than $50 billion in total assets. The denominator is risk-weighted assets. The shaded bars indicate periods of business recession as defined by the National Bureau of Economic Research: March 2001-November 2001, and December 2007-June 2009.
Source: Federal Reserve Board, Form FR Y-9C, Consolidated Financial Statements for Holding Companies.
Figure 5. Domestic Money Market Fund Assets
A stacked line chart. The x-axis measures time and ranges from the years 2000 to 2018. The y-axis is in billions of dollars (real) and ranges from 0 to 4,000 in increments of 500. The data are monthly. There are shaded areas in this chart. The bottom area, represented in red, is institutional prime fund assets. The institutional prime curve begins at about 300 in early 2000, increases to about 700 by late 2002, decreases to about 500 by mid-2005, increases to about 1200 by mid-2008, dips by late 2008 and remains in a range of about 800 to 1000 until 2016, decreases to about 100 by late 2016, and increases to end at about 200 in September 2018. The area above the institutional prime region is light orange and represents retail prime fund assets. The curve begins at about 750 in early 2000, increases to about 1200 by late 2002, decreases to about 950 by mid-2005, increases to about 1800 by mid-2008, dips to about 1500 by late 2008, increases to about 1650 by mid-2009, decreases to about 1400 by late 2015, decreases to about 350 by late 2016, and increases to end at about 500 in September 2018. The third shaded region from the bottom is light blue and represents tax-exempt fund assets. The curve begins at about 900 in early 2000, increases to about 1300 by late 2002, decreases to about 1200 by mid-2005, increases to about 2300 by mid-2008, dips to about 1900 by late 2008, increases to about 2000 by mid-2009, decreases to about 1600 by late 2015, decreases to about 500 by late 2016, and increases to end at about 650 in September 2018. The top shaded area is dark blue and represents government-only fund assets. The curve begins at about 1100 in early 2000, increases to about 1700 by late 2002, decreases to about 1500 by mid-2005, increases to about 3300 by early 2009, decreases to about 2450 by mid-2010, remains near that level until mid-2015, and increases to end at about 2900 in September 2018.
Note: The data are converted to constant 2018 dollars using the consumer price index. Key identifies regions in order from top to bottom.
Source: Federal Reserve Board staff calculations based on Investment Company Institute data; Bureau of Labor Statistics, consumer price index via Haver Analytics.
Figure 6. Business-Sector Credit-to-GDP Ratio
Quarterly
Period | Ratio |
---|---|
1980:Q1 | 0.4959 |
1980:Q2 | 0.5020 |
1980:Q3 | 0.5011 |
1980:Q4 | 0.4939 |
1981:Q1 | 0.4830 |
1981:Q2 | 0.4953 |
1981:Q3 | 0.4961 |
1981:Q4 | 0.5055 |
1982:Q1 | 0.5192 |
1982:Q2 | 0.5241 |
1982:Q3 | 0.5317 |
1982:Q4 | 0.5312 |
1983:Q1 | 0.5349 |
1983:Q2 | 0.5299 |
1983:Q3 | 0.5274 |
1983:Q4 | 0.5261 |
1984:Q1 | 0.5301 |
1984:Q2 | 0.5384 |
1984:Q3 | 0.5473 |
1984:Q4 | 0.5594 |
1985:Q1 | 0.5621 |
1985:Q2 | 0.5690 |
1985:Q3 | 0.5700 |
1985:Q4 | 0.5787 |
1986:Q1 | 0.5848 |
1986:Q2 | 0.5960 |
1986:Q3 | 0.6044 |
1986:Q4 | 0.6151 |
1987:Q1 | 0.6200 |
1987:Q2 | 0.6198 |
1987:Q3 | 0.6232 |
1987:Q4 | 0.6210 |
1988:Q1 | 0.6268 |
1988:Q2 | 0.6276 |
1988:Q3 | 0.6290 |
1988:Q4 | 0.6310 |
1989:Q1 | 0.6303 |
1989:Q2 | 0.6317 |
1989:Q3 | 0.6295 |
1989:Q4 | 0.6343 |
1990:Q1 | 0.6299 |
1990:Q2 | 0.6264 |
1990:Q3 | 0.6250 |
1990:Q4 | 0.6288 |
1991:Q1 | 0.6218 |
1991:Q2 | 0.6125 |
1991:Q3 | 0.5997 |
1991:Q4 | 0.5888 |
1992:Q1 | 0.5800 |
1992:Q2 | 0.5693 |
1992:Q3 | 0.5612 |
1992:Q4 | 0.5509 |
1993:Q1 | 0.5494 |
1993:Q2 | 0.5480 |
1993:Q3 | 0.5474 |
1993:Q4 | 0.5426 |
1994:Q1 | 0.5434 |
1994:Q2 | 0.5399 |
1994:Q3 | 0.5407 |
1994:Q4 | 0.5389 |
1995:Q1 | 0.5433 |
1995:Q2 | 0.5489 |
1995:Q3 | 0.5477 |
1995:Q4 | 0.5493 |
1996:Q1 | 0.5485 |
1996:Q2 | 0.5463 |
1996:Q3 | 0.5473 |
1996:Q4 | 0.5436 |
1997:Q1 | 0.5458 |
1997:Q2 | 0.5464 |
1997:Q3 | 0.5514 |
1997:Q4 | 0.5555 |
1998:Q1 | 0.5652 |
1998:Q2 | 0.5757 |
1998:Q3 | 0.5804 |
1998:Q4 | 0.5840 |
1999:Q1 | 0.5937 |
1999:Q2 | 0.5982 |
1999:Q3 | 0.6098 |
1999:Q4 | 0.6089 |
2000:Q1 | 0.6192 |
2000:Q2 | 0.6208 |
2000:Q3 | 0.6265 |
2000:Q4 | 0.6302 |
2001:Q1 | 0.6325 |
2001:Q2 | 0.6352 |
2001:Q3 | 0.6422 |
2001:Q4 | 0.6447 |
2002:Q1 | 0.6423 |
2002:Q2 | 0.6389 |
2002:Q3 | 0.6356 |
2002:Q4 | 0.6350 |
2003:Q1 | 0.6311 |
2003:Q2 | 0.6245 |
2003:Q3 | 0.6151 |
2003:Q4 | 0.6042 |
2004:Q1 | 0.6093 |
2004:Q2 | 0.6041 |
2004:Q3 | 0.6048 |
2004:Q4 | 0.6032 |
2005:Q1 | 0.6031 |
2005:Q2 | 0.6072 |
2005:Q3 | 0.6067 |
2005:Q4 | 0.6121 |
2006:Q1 | 0.6155 |
2006:Q2 | 0.6237 |
2006:Q3 | 0.6284 |
2006:Q4 | 0.6395 |
2007:Q1 | 0.6493 |
2007:Q2 | 0.6622 |
2007:Q3 | 0.6765 |
2007:Q4 | 0.6882 |
2008:Q1 | 0.7037 |
2008:Q2 | 0.7098 |
2008:Q3 | 0.7180 |
2008:Q4 | 0.7328 |
2009:Q1 | 0.7361 |
2009:Q2 | 0.7322 |
2009:Q3 | 0.7193 |
2009:Q4 | 0.6940 |
2010:Q1 | 0.6883 |
2010:Q2 | 0.6736 |
2010:Q3 | 0.6701 |
2010:Q4 | 0.6567 |
2011:Q1 | 0.6561 |
2011:Q2 | 0.6517 |
2011:Q3 | 0.6530 |
2011:Q4 | 0.6499 |
2012:Q1 | 0.6460 |
2012:Q2 | 0.6461 |
2012:Q3 | 0.6520 |
2012:Q4 | 0.6583 |
2013:Q1 | 0.6558 |
2013:Q2 | 0.6605 |
2013:Q3 | 0.6627 |
2013:Q4 | 0.6587 |
2014:Q1 | 0.6679 |
2014:Q2 | 0.6642 |
2014:Q3 | 0.6636 |
2014:Q4 | 0.6705 |
2015:Q1 | 0.6786 |
2015:Q2 | 0.6831 |
2015:Q3 | 0.6879 |
2015:Q4 | 0.6958 |
2016:Q1 | 0.7094 |
2016:Q2 | 0.7080 |
2016:Q3 | 0.7127 |
2016:Q4 | 0.7117 |
2017:Q1 | 0.7175 |
2017:Q2 | 0.7204 |
2017:Q3 | 0.7212 |
2017:Q4 | 0.7202 |
2018:Q1 | 0.7184 |
2018:Q2 | 0.7246 |
Note: The shaded bars indicate periods of business recession as defined by the National Bureau of Economic Research: January 1980-July 1980, July 1981-November 1982, July 1990-March 1991, March 2001-November 2001, and December 2007-June 2009. GDP is gross domestic product.
Source: Federal Reserve Board staff calculations based on Bureau of Economic Analysis, national income and product accounts, and Federal Reserve Board, Statistical Release Z.1, "Financial Accounts of the United States."
Figure 7. Gross Balance Sheet Leverage of Public Nonfinancial Corporations
Quarterly
Percent
Period | All firms | Risky firms |
---|---|---|
1999:Q1 | 31.08 | 39.64 |
1999:Q2 | 30.85 | 39.38 |
1999:Q3 | 30.72 | 38.62 |
1999:Q4 | 30.72 | 38.38 |
2000:Q1 | 30.64 | 37.97 |
2000:Q2 | 29.85 | 37.32 |
2000:Q3 | 29.30 | 36.27 |
2000:Q4 | 29.52 | 36.82 |
2001:Q1 | 29.53 | 38.24 |
2001:Q2 | 29.66 | 39.03 |
2001:Q3 | 29.65 | 38.18 |
2001:Q4 | 30.32 | 39.25 |
2002:Q1 | 30.94 | 39.51 |
2002:Q2 | 30.02 | 37.98 |
2002:Q3 | 29.81 | 37.86 |
2002:Q4 | 29.57 | 37.93 |
2003:Q1 | 29.24 | 37.79 |
2003:Q2 | 28.42 | 37.68 |
2003:Q3 | 28.05 | 36.73 |
2003:Q4 | 27.08 | 36.52 |
2004:Q1 | 26.55 | 35.35 |
2004:Q2 | 25.94 | 34.86 |
2004:Q3 | 25.63 | 35.02 |
2004:Q4 | 25.41 | 34.22 |
2005:Q1 | 25.16 | 34.17 |
2005:Q2 | 25.02 | 32.65 |
2005:Q3 | 24.28 | 31.48 |
2005:Q4 | 24.35 | 32.21 |
2006:Q1 | 24.82 | 33.08 |
2006:Q2 | 24.66 | 32.82 |
2006:Q3 | 24.63 | 33.06 |
2006:Q4 | 24.91 | 34.52 |
2007:Q1 | 25.19 | 35.12 |
2007:Q2 | 25.45 | 34.74 |
2007:Q3 | 25.86 | 35.52 |
2007:Q4 | 26.16 | 35.84 |
2008:Q1 | 26.41 | 36.49 |
2008:Q2 | 26.53 | 36.23 |
2008:Q3 | 27.56 | 38.45 |
2008:Q4 | 29.15 | 40.50 |
2009:Q1 | 29.37 | 40.72 |
2009:Q2 | 28.35 | 38.84 |
2009:Q3 | 27.38 | 36.94 |
2009:Q4 | 27.13 | 37.63 |
2010:Q1 | 26.73 | 36.54 |
2010:Q2 | 26.60 | 36.53 |
2010:Q3 | 26.57 | 36.66 |
2010:Q4 | 26.33 | 36.20 |
2011:Q1 | 26.12 | 36.08 |
2011:Q2 | 26.19 | 36.14 |
2011:Q3 | 26.51 | 36.07 |
2011:Q4 | 26.40 | 35.48 |
2012:Q1 | 26.34 | 35.92 |
2012:Q2 | 26.90 | 36.75 |
2012:Q3 | 27.03 | 36.96 |
2012:Q4 | 27.33 | 37.86 |
2013:Q1 | 27.28 | 37.60 |
2013:Q2 | 27.72 | 38.28 |
2013:Q3 | 27.98 | 38.25 |
2013:Q4 | 28.19 | 38.71 |
2014:Q1 | 28.82 | 39.28 |
2014:Q2 | 28.61 | 38.18 |
2014:Q3 | 28.75 | 38.08 |
2014:Q4 | 29.30 | 38.99 |
2015:Q1 | 30.17 | 39.63 |
2015:Q2 | 30.70 | 39.73 |
2015:Q3 | 31.23 | 41.02 |
2015:Q4 | 32.16 | 40.55 |
2016:Q1 | 32.77 | 42.18 |
2016:Q2 | 32.96 | 41.78 |
2016:Q3 | 33.04 | 41.62 |
2016:Q4 | 33.00 | 40.98 |
2017:Q1 | 33.22 | 40.79 |
2017:Q2 | 33.61 | 41.72 |
2017:Q3 | 33.42 | 41.90 |
2017:Q4 | 33.26 | 41.16 |
2018:Q1 | 33.34 | 40.80 |
2018:Q2 | 33.27 | 41.16 |
Note: Gross leverage is the ratio of the book value of total debt to the book value of total assets. The sample of risky firms is composed of firms with positive short-term or long-term debt that either have an S&P firm rating of speculative-grade or have no S&P rating. The shaded bars indicate periods of business recession as defined by the National Bureau of Economic Research: March 2001-November 2001, and December 2007-June 2009.
Source: Federal Reserve Board staff calculations based on S&P Global, Compustat.
Figure 8. Distribution of Large Institutional Leveraged Loan Volumes, by Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio
Annual
Percent
Period | Debt multiples ≤ 4x | Debt multiples 4x-4.99x | Debt multiples 5x-5.99x | Debt multiples ≥ 6x |
---|---|---|---|---|
2001 | 61.1 | 26.2 | 10.1 | 2.7 |
2002 | 54.6 | 27.3 | 12.2 | 5.9 |
2003 | 52.6 | 29.3 | 11.5 | 6.7 |
2004 | 45.0 | 28.6 | 17.6 | 8.8 |
2005 | 41.8 | 25.1 | 25.1 | 8.0 |
2006 | 36.4 | 26.3 | 21.1 | 16.3 |
2007 | 31.2 | 23.7 | 17.5 | 27.7 |
2008 | 63.1 | 14.2 | 12.1 | 10.7 |
2009 | 53.1 | 17.7 | 11.5 | 17.7 |
2010 | 53.7 | 22.6 | 17.9 | 5.8 |
2011 | 43.8 | 22.6 | 19.2 | 14.4 |
2012 | 35.9 | 26.6 | 21.8 | 15.8 |
2013 | 31.5 | 29.0 | 23.1 | 16.4 |
2014 | 28.7 | 22.6 | 21.5 | 27.2 |
2015 | 29.9 | 24.8 | 26.5 | 18.9 |
2016 | 22.0 | 32.3 | 24.7 | 21.0 |
2017 | 22.4 | 28.2 | 27.7 | 21.7 |
2018:Q1 | 23.0 | 23.0 | 29.0 | 25.2 |
2018:Q2 | 26.2 | 24.0 | 24.0 | 25.7 |
2018:Q3 | 13.4 | 20.6 | 32.0 | 34.0 |
Note: The data for 2018 are quarterly. Volumes are for large corporations with earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) greater than $50 million and exclude existing tranches of add-ons and amendments and restatements with no new money. Data may not sum to totals due to rounding. Key identifies bar segments in order from bottom to top.
Source: S&P Global, Leveraged Commentary & Data.
Figure 9. Large Bank Lending to Nonbank Financial Firms: Committed Amounts
A stacked line chart. The x-axis measures time and ranges from years 2013 to 2018. The y-axis measures billions of dollars and ranges from 0 to 1200. The data are quarterly. There are eight variables charted on the plot, which sum up to represent total committed amounts extended to nonbank financials by large banks. The overall trend has been steadily increasing from about 600 in 2013 to about 1000 in 2018:Q2. The first variable, "Other financial vehicles," is designated by black shading. This variable remains fairly constant from 2013:Q1 to 2015:Q2 at about 200 but begins to increase at a steady rate thereafter, reaching about 400 in 2018:Q2. The second variable, "Financial planning and pension funds," is designated by gray shading. This variable increases from about 30 in 2013:Q1 to about 40 in 2014:Q3, then begins to increase steadily to about 50 in 2018:Q2. The third variable, "Open-end investment funds," is designated by green shading. This variable increases steadily from about 70 in 2013:Q1 to about 120 in 2018:Q2. The fourth variable, "Insurance," is designated by purple shading. This variable remains constant through 2015:Q2 at about 90, increases sharply in 2015:Q3 to about 110, decreases to about 100 in 2016:Q2, increases to about 120 in 2016:Q4, falls to about 100 in 2017:Q2, and increases through 2018:Q1 to about 140 before falling to about 125 in 2018:Q2. The fifth variable, "Broker-dealers," is designated by light blue shading. This variable increases steadily from about 70 in 2013:Q1 to about 110 in 2015:Q3, and remains near 100 through 2018:Q2. The sixth variable, "Other lenders," is designated by red shading. This variable has remained near 35 through 2018:Q2. The seventh variable, "Real estate lenders," is designated by beige shading. This variable has increased steadily from about 20 in 2013:Q1 to nearly 50 in 2018:Q2. The eighth variable, "Consumer lenders," is designated by dark blue shading. This variable increased slightly from near 60 in 2013:Q1 to about 75 in 2015:Q4, before falling to about 70 in 2016:Q2, and increases to about 90 in 2017:Q4, where it has remained through 2018:Q2.
Note: Committed amounts on credit lines and term loans extended to nonbank financial firms by a balanced panel of 25 bank holding companies that have filed Form FR Y-14Q in every quarter since 2012:Q3. Nonbank financial firms are identified based on reported NAICS (North American Industry Classification System) codes, excluding other domestic and foreign banks, monetary authorities, and credit unions. Broker-dealers also include commodity contracts dealing and brokerages and other securities and commodity exchanges. Other financial vehicles include closed-end investment and mutual funds, real estate investment trusts, special purpose vehicles, and other vehicles.
Source: Federal Reserve Board, Form FR Y-14Q, Capital Assessments and Stress Testing.
Figure 10. Summary Measure of Valuations Pressures and Risk Appetite
Quarterly
Period | Percentile |
---|---|
1993:Q4 | 73.82 |
1994:Q1 | 79.68 |
1994:Q2 | 67.68 |
1994:Q3 | 70.83 |
1994:Q4 | 55.75 |
1995:Q1 | 65.30 |
1995:Q2 | 59.61 |
1995:Q3 | 51.35 |
1995:Q4 | 50.22 |
1996:Q1 | 58.36 |
1996:Q2 | 62.34 |
1996:Q3 | 64.00 |
1996:Q4 | 69.34 |
1997:Q1 | 76.65 |
1997:Q2 | 81.86 |
1997:Q3 | 74.93 |
1997:Q4 | 66.26 |
1998:Q1 | 83.17 |
1998:Q2 | 72.98 |
1998:Q3 | 29.96 |
1998:Q4 | 34.21 |
1999:Q1 | 48.88 |
1999:Q2 | 55.02 |
1999:Q3 | 53.98 |
1999:Q4 | 53.51 |
2000:Q1 | 48.92 |
2000:Q2 | 34.42 |
2000:Q3 | 43.32 |
2000:Q4 | 26.84 |
2001:Q1 | 24.15 |
2001:Q2 | 27.16 |
2001:Q3 | 21.23 |
2001:Q4 | 23.00 |
2002:Q1 | 34.75 |
2002:Q2 | 32.49 |
2002:Q3 | 14.79 |
2002:Q4 | 18.74 |
2003:Q1 | 32.78 |
2003:Q2 | 48.70 |
2003:Q3 | 67.97 |
2003:Q4 | 80.86 |
2004:Q1 | 89.38 |
2004:Q2 | 88.54 |
2004:Q3 | 88.36 |
2004:Q4 | 93.96 |
2005:Q1 | 94.37 |
2005:Q2 | 83.77 |
2005:Q3 | 84.18 |
2005:Q4 | 80.71 |
2006:Q1 | 89.00 |
2006:Q2 | 86.28 |
2006:Q3 | 69.81 |
2006:Q4 | 80.55 |
2007:Q1 | 82.31 |
2007:Q2 | 83.70 |
2007:Q3 | 36.77 |
2007:Q4 | 20.33 |
2008:Q1 | 6.85 |
2008:Q2 | 8.21 |
2008:Q3 | 4.18 |
2008:Q4 | 2.35 |
2009:Q1 | 2.80 |
2009:Q2 | 5.08 |
2009:Q3 | 8.27 |
2009:Q4 | 12.72 |
2010:Q1 | 19.68 |
2010:Q2 | 15.96 |
2010:Q3 | 12.51 |
2010:Q4 | 18.92 |
2011:Q1 | 26.56 |
2011:Q2 | 26.31 |
2011:Q3 | 9.11 |
2011:Q4 | 8.11 |
2012:Q1 | 17.47 |
2012:Q2 | 14.61 |
2012:Q3 | 19.08 |
2012:Q4 | 23.63 |
2013:Q1 | 36.70 |
2013:Q2 | 39.91 |
2013:Q3 | 39.70 |
2013:Q4 | 45.63 |
2014:Q1 | 50.06 |
2014:Q2 | 60.73 |
2014:Q3 | 56.58 |
2014:Q4 | 48.82 |
2015:Q1 | 55.69 |
2015:Q2 | 65.17 |
2015:Q3 | 42.23 |
2015:Q4 | 40.97 |
2016:Q1 | 28.06 |
2016:Q2 | 36.58 |
2016:Q3 | 47.70 |
2016:Q4 | 57.75 |
2017:Q1 | 72.69 |
2017:Q2 | 77.23 |
2017:Q3 | 81.09 |
2017:Q4 | 85.47 |
2018:Q1 | 90.69 |
2018:Q2 | 94.10 |
2018:Q3 (e) | 92.23 |
Note: The indicator plotted is an aggregate of valuation measures from equity, housing, corporate debt, and commercial real estate markets and of indicators of standards or risk characteristics in these markets. The values are percentiles of the historical distribution for this composite over the time period shown. Data for the third quarter of 2018 are estimates (e). Shaded bars indicate periods of recession as defined by the National Bureau of Economic Research: March 2001-November 2001, and December 2007-June 2009.
Source: David Aikman, Michael T. Kiley, Seung Jung Lee, Michael G. Palumbo, and Missaka N. Warusawitharana (2015) "Mapping Heat in the U.S. Financial System," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2015-059 (Washington: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June), http://dx.doi.org/10.17016/FEDS.2015.059.