Accessible Version

Estimated Index of Common Inflation Expectations (projected onto SPF 10-year-ahead PCE inflation expectations)

Percent

Make Full Screen
Date CIE index, projected onto SPF, 10−year PCE inflation
1/1/1999 2.0354
4/1/1999 2.0643
7/1/1999 2.0922
10/1/1999 2.0987
1/1/2000 2.0837
4/1/2000 2.0671
7/1/2000 2.0591
10/1/2000 2.0673
1/1/2001 2.0779
4/1/2001 2.0886
7/1/2001 2.0828
10/1/2001 2.0819
1/1/2002 2.0907
4/1/2002 2.1013
7/1/2002 2.1027
10/1/2002 2.0987
1/1/2003 2.0938
4/1/2003 2.0908
7/1/2003 2.1071
10/1/2003 2.1274
1/1/2004 2.1396
4/1/2004 2.1422
7/1/2004 2.1335
10/1/2004 2.1240
1/1/2005 2.1171
4/1/2005 2.1134
7/1/2005 2.1114
10/1/2005 2.1152
1/1/2006 2.1178
4/1/2006 2.1242
7/1/2006 2.1198
10/1/2006 2.1064
1/1/2007 2.0911
4/1/2007 2.0895
7/1/2007 2.0945
10/1/2007 2.1074
1/1/2008 2.1283
4/1/2008 2.1364
7/1/2008 2.1158
10/1/2008 2.0831
1/1/2009 2.0749
4/1/2009 2.0989
7/1/2009 2.1240
10/1/2009 2.1269
1/1/2010 2.1180
4/1/2010 2.1027
7/1/2010 2.0952
10/1/2010 2.1090
1/1/2011 2.1287
4/1/2011 2.1338
7/1/2011 2.1176
10/1/2011 2.0978
1/1/2012 2.0968
4/1/2012 2.1009
7/1/2012 2.1022
10/1/2012 2.1024
1/1/2013 2.1012
4/1/2013 2.0918
7/1/2013 2.0837
10/1/2013 2.0815
1/1/2014 2.0820
4/1/2014 2.0711
7/1/2014 2.0503
10/1/2014 2.0247
1/1/2015 2.0105
4/1/2015 2.0087
7/1/2015 2.0063
10/1/2015 1.9896
1/1/2016 1.9708
4/1/2016 1.9616
7/1/2016 1.9655
10/1/2016 1.9827
1/1/2017 1.9951
4/1/2017 1.9929
7/1/2017 1.9870
10/1/2017 1.9886
1/1/2018 2.0001
4/1/2018 2.0062
7/1/2018 2.0011
10/1/2018 1.9904
1/1/2019 1.9825
4/1/2019 1.9771
7/1/2019 1.9705
10/1/2019 1.9653
1/1/2020 1.9697

Note: The shaded area denotes a 95% confidence interval. The horizontal dotted line is marked at 2%. SPF is Survey of Professional Forecasters; PCE is personal consumption expenditures; CIE is common inflation expectations.

Source: Ahn and Fulton (2020).

Stochastic Simulation Result of FRB/US Model under Model-Consistent Expectations
Make Full Screen
  ELB frequency (percent) Mean duration of ELB (quarters) Mean output gap Mean inflation rate RMSD of output gap RMSD of inflation rate Loss
1. Taylor 38.3 10.9 -1.1 1.2 3.5 2.2 17.2
2. Taylor (inertial) 33.6 20.7 -1.4 1.0 3.9 2.4 20.7
3. Flexible price-level target 32.6 8.5 -.4 2.0 3.6 1.5 15.2
4. Flexible price-level target (inertial) 24.6 13.8 -.6 2.0 4.4 1.5 21.8
5. Flexible temporary price-level target 17.6 12.9 .3 2.4 3.4 1.6 14.5
6. Temporary price-level target 16.3 12.5 .0 2.3 3.1 1.7 12.6
7. Temporary price-level target (3-yr. memory) 15.6 11.2 .3 2.4 2.7 1.6 9.6
8. Temporary price-level target (1-yr. memory) 15.1 9.4 .2 2.3 2.5 1.5 8.5
9. Reifschneider-Williams 28.1 10.1 .2 2.1 2.4 1.6 8.0
10. Kiley-Roberts change rule 37.0 16.9 -.1 2.1 1.9 1.4 5.7

Note: Results based on 500 simulations of 100 quarters each. Loss=1N1KΣKj=1ΣNt=1[(πt,jπ)2+ˆγ2t,j] for t, j period-simulations. FRB/US is the Federal Reserve’s principal simulation model; ELB is effective lower bound; RMSD is root mean square deviation.

Source: Bernanke, Kiley, and Roberts (2019).

Last Update: January 13, 2021