Accessible Version - Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test 2019: Supervisory Stress Test Results - June 2019

Figure 1. Historical and stressed tier 1 common ratio and common equity tier 1 ratio
Period Ratio Percent
Q3 2012 Actual tier 1 common 11.1
Q3 2013 Actual tier 1 common 11.5
Q3 2014 Actual tier 1 common 11.9
Q4 2015 Actual tier 1 common 12.3
Q4 2016 Actual CET 1 12.5
Q4 2017 Actual CET 1 12.3
Q4 2018 Actual CET 1 12.3
Q1 2021 Stressed CET 1 9.7

Source: FR Y-9C, FR Y-14A, and supervisory estimates under the severely adverse scenario.

Return to text
Figure 2. Loan loss rates, severely adverse scenario
Period Percent
DFAST 2013 7.5
DFAST 2014 6.9
DFAST 2015 6.1
DFAST 2016 6.1
DFAST 2017 5.8
DFAST 2018 6.4
DFAST 2019 5.7

Note: Loan Loss rates as a percent of average total loan balances is calculated for all firms subject to the supervisory stress test in each exercise.

Return to text
Figure 3. PPNR as a percent of average total assets, severely adverse scenario
Period Percent
DFAST 2013 2.4
DFAST 2014 2.3
DFAST 2015 2.1
DFAST 2016 2.5
DFAST 2017 2.6
DFAST 2018 3.0
DFAST 2019 2.4

Note: PPNR as a percent of average total assets is calculated for all firms subject to the supervisory stress test in each exercise.

Return to text
Figure 4. Pre-tax net income as a percent of average total assets, severely adverse scenario
Period Percent
DFAST 2013 -1.7
DFAST 2014 -1.6
DFAST 2015 -1.5
DFAST 2016 -1.3
DFAST 2017 -0.7
DFAST 2018 -0.8
DFAST 2019 -0.8

Note: Pre-tax net income as a percent of average total assets is calculated for all firms subject to the supervisory stress test in each exercise.

Return to text
Figure 5. Unemployment rate in the severely adverse and adverse scenarios, 2014:Q1–2022:Q1
  Severely adverse Adverse
2014:Q1 6.7 6.7
2014:Q2 6.2 6.2
2014:Q3 6.1 6.1
2014:Q4 5.7 5.7
2015:Q1 5.5 5.5
2015:Q2 5.4 5.4
2015:Q3 5.1 5.1
2015:Q4 5.0 5.0
2016:Q1 4.9 4.9
2016:Q2 4.9 4.9
2016:Q3 4.9 4.9
2016:Q4 4.8 4.8
2017:Q1 4.6 4.6
2017:Q2 4.4 4.4
2017:Q3 4.3 4.3
2017:Q4 4.1 4.1
2018:Q1 4.1 4.1
2018:Q2 3.9 3.9
2018:Q3 3.8 3.8
2018:Q4 3.8 3.8
2019:Q1 4.7 4.3
2019:Q2 6.3 5.1
2019:Q3 7.5 5.7
2019:Q4 8.4 6.2
2020:Q1 9.2 6.6
2020:Q2 9.7 6.8
2020:Q3 10.0 7.0
2020:Q4 9.9 7.0
2021:Q1 9.7 6.9
2021:Q2 9.5 6.7
2021:Q3 9.2 6.6
2021:Q4 8.9 6.4
2022:Q1 8.6 6.3

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics and Federal Reserve assumptions in the supervisory scenarios.

Return to text
Figure 6. Real GDP growth rate in the severely adverse and adverse scenarios, 2014:Q1–2022:Q1
  Severely adverse Adverse
2014:Q1 -1.0 -1.0
2014:Q2 5.1 5.1
2014:Q3 4.9 4.9
2014:Q4 1.9 1.9
2015:Q1 3.3 3.3
2015:Q2 3.3 3.3
2015:Q3 1.0 1.0
2015:Q4 0.4 0.4
2016:Q1 1.5 1.5
2016:Q2 2.3 2.3
2016:Q3 1.9 1.9
2016:Q4 1.8 1.8
2017:Q1 1.8 1.8
2017:Q2 3.0 3.0
2017:Q3 2.8 2.8
2017:Q4 2.3 2.3
2018:Q1 2.2 2.2
2018:Q2 4.2 4.2
2018:Q3 3.4 3.4
2018:Q4 2.7 2.7
2019:Q1 -5.0 -1.6
2019:Q2 -9.4 -4.0
2019:Q3 -7.2 -2.8
2019:Q4 -5.0 -1.6
2020:Q1 -3.8 -1.0
2020:Q2 -1.5 0.2
2020:Q3 -0.3 0.9
2020:Q4 2.9 2.5
2021:Q1 3.6 2.9
2021:Q2 4.1 3.1
2021:Q3 4.4 3.3
2021:Q4 4.6 3.4
2022:Q1 4.6 3.4

Bureau of Economic Analysis and Federal Reserve assumptions in the supervisory scenarios.

Return to text
Figure 7. Dow Jones Total Stock Market Index in the severely adverse and adverse scenarios, 2014:Q1–2022:Q1
  Severely adverse Adverse
2014:Q1 19711.2 19711.2
2014:Q2 20568.7 20568.7
2014:Q3 20458.8 20458.8
2014:Q4 21424.6 21424.6
2015:Q1 21707.6 21707.6
2015:Q2 21630.9 21630.9
2015:Q3 19959.3 19959.3
2015:Q4 21100.9 21100.9
2016:Q1 21179.4 21179.4
2016:Q2 21621.5 21621.5
2016:Q3 22468.6 22468.6
2016:Q4 23276.7 23276.7
2017:Q1 24508.3 24508.3
2017:Q2 25125.0 25125.0
2017:Q3 26148.5 26148.5
2017:Q4 27673.2 27673.2
2018:Q1 27383.0 27383.0
2018:Q2 28313.8 28313.8
2018:Q3 30189.6 30189.6
2018:Q4 25724.5 25724.5
2019:Q1 17836.0 24068.1
2019:Q2 14694.1 21695.0
2019:Q3 13317.2 20526.9
2019:Q4 12862.3 20044.8
2020:Q1 13461.8 20200.1
2020:Q2 14421.0 20609.0
2020:Q3 15479.0 21023.5
2020:Q4 16846.6 21633.3
2021:Q1 17788.4 22247.8
2021:Q2 19352.4 23032.8
2021:Q3 21038.8 23792.1
2021:Q4 22940.3 24621.4
2022:Q1 25136.9 25537.2

Dow Jones and Federal Reserve assumptions in the supervisory scenarios.

Return to text
Figure 8. National House Price Index in the severely adverse and adverse scenarios, 2014:Q1–2022:Q1
  Severely adverse Adverse
2014:Q1 160.2 160.2
2014:Q2 161.3 161.3
2014:Q3 163.5 163.5
2014:Q4 166.0 166.0
2015:Q1 168.1 168.1
2015:Q2 170.2 170.2
2015:Q3 172.6 172.6
2015:Q4 175.1 175.1
2016:Q1 177.3 177.3
2016:Q2 179.4 179.4
2016:Q3 182.0 182.0
2016:Q4 184.9 184.9
2017:Q1 187.3 187.3
2017:Q2 189.9 189.9
2017:Q3 193.2 193.2
2017:Q4 196.2 196.2
2018:Q1 199.3 199.3
2018:Q2 201.7 201.7
2018:Q3 203.9 203.9
2018:Q4 205.2 205.2
2019:Q1 199.2 201.4
2019:Q2 192.5 197.7
2019:Q3 185.9 194.2
2019:Q4 177.7 189.6
2020:Q1 170.0 185.4
2020:Q2 162.8 181.3
2020:Q3 155.8 177.5
2020:Q4 152.0 175.7
2021:Q1 151.1 175.8
2021:Q2 152.7 177.5
2021:Q3 154.3 179.3
2021:Q4 157.0 181.7
2022:Q1 159.9 184.2

Source: CoreLogic (seasonally adjusted by Federal Reserve) and Federal Reserve assumptions in the supervisory scenarios.

Return to text
Figure 9. U.S. BBB corporate yield in the severely adverse and adverse scenarios, 2014:Q1–2022:Q1
  Severely adverse Adverse
2014:Q1 4.6 4.6
2014:Q2 4.3 4.3
2014:Q3 4.2 4.2
2014:Q4 4.2 4.2
2015:Q1 4.0 4.0
2015:Q2 4.2 4.2
2015:Q3 4.5 4.5
2015:Q4 4.6 4.6
2016:Q1 4.6 4.6
2016:Q2 4.1 4.1
2016:Q3 3.7 3.7
2016:Q4 4.1 4.1
2017:Q1 4.2 4.2
2017:Q2 4.0 4.0
2017:Q3 3.9 3.9
2017:Q4 3.9 3.9
2018:Q1 4.2 4.2
2018:Q2 4.6 4.6
2018:Q3 4.6 4.6
2018:Q4 5.0 5.0
2019:Q1 5.3 4.1
2019:Q2 6.1 4.6
2019:Q3 6.5 4.8
2019:Q4 6.5 4.9
2020:Q1 6.2 4.7
2020:Q2 5.8 4.6
2020:Q3 5.5 4.4
2020:Q4 5.1 4.3
2021:Q1 5.0 4.3
2021:Q2 4.7 4.2
2021:Q3 4.4 4.1
2021:Q4 4.0 4.0
2022:Q1 3.7 3.8

Source: Merrill Lynch (adjusted by Federal Reserve using a Nelson-Siegel smoothed yield curve model) and Federal Reserve assumptions in the supervisory scenarios.

Return to text
Figure 10. U.S. Market Volatility Index (VIX) in the severely adverse and adverse scenarios, 2014:Q1–2022:Q1
  Severely adverse Adverse
2014:Q1 21.4 21.4
2014:Q2 17.0 17.0
2014:Q3 17.0 17.0
2014:Q4 26.3 26.3
2015:Q1 22.4 22.4
2015:Q2 18.9 18.9
2015:Q3 40.7 40.7
2015:Q4 24.4 24.4
2016:Q1 28.1 28.1
2016:Q2 25.8 25.8
2016:Q3 18.1 18.1
2016:Q4 22.5 22.5
2017:Q1 13.1 13.1
2017:Q2 16.0 16.0
2017:Q3 16.0 16.0
2017:Q4 13.1 13.1
2018:Q1 37.3 37.3
2018:Q2 23.6 23.6
2018:Q3 16.1 16.1
2018:Q4 36.1 36.1
2019:Q1 67.8 44.4
2019:Q2 70.0 43.1
2019:Q3 61.3 39.2
2019:Q4 49.9 34.9
2020:Q1 38.4 30.5
2020:Q2 31.2 27.3
2020:Q3 26.9 25.3
2020:Q4 23.3 23.5
2021:Q1 22.5 22.5
2021:Q2 21.4 21.4
2021:Q3 20.8 20.8
2021:Q4 20.3 20.3
2022:Q1 20.1 20.1

Source: Chicago Board Options Exchange (converted to quarterly by Federal Reserve using the maximum quarterly close-of-day value) and Federal Reserve assumptions in the supervisory scenarios.

Return to text
Figure 11. Projecting net income and regulatory capital

A flowchart with five steps, leading from one to the next.

  • Net interest income plus noninterest income, minus noninterest expense, equals pre-provision net revenue (PPNR).
    (Note: PPNR includes income from mortgage servicing rights and losses from operational-risk events and OREO costs.)
  • PPNR plus other revenue, minus provisions, minus AFS/HTM securities losses, minus HFS/FVO loan losses, minus trading and counterparty losses, equals pre-tax net income.
    (Note: Change in the allowance for loan and lease losses, plus net charge-offs, equals provisions.)
  • Pre-tax net income minus taxes, minus income attributable to minority interest, minus change in the valuation allowance, equals after-tax net income.
  • After-tax net income minus net distributions to common and preferred shareholders and other net reductions to shareholder's equity from DFAST assumptions plus other comprehensive income, equals change in equity capital.
  • Change in equity capital minus change in adjustments and deductions from regulatory capital, plus other additions to regulatory capital, equals change in regulatory capital.
Return to text
Figure 12. Projected losses in the severely adverse scenario
Source of loss Billions of dollars
First-lien mortgages, domestic, 14 14.1
Junior liens and HELOCs, 5 5.1
Commercial and industrial loans, 73 72.7
Commercial real estate, domestic, 33 32.9
Credit cards, 107 107.2
Other consumer loans, 21 21.1
Other loans, 43 42.7
Securities losses, 5 4.9
Trading and counterparty losses, 90 90.2
Other losses, 19 19.1
Return to text
Figure 13. Change from 2018:Q4 to minimum CET1 ratio in the severely adverse scenario
Firm Percent
Bank of America 2.0
Bank of NY-Mellon 0.4
Barclays US 2.9
Capital One 5.2
Citigroup 3.7
Credit Suisse USA 7.4
DB USA 8.1
Goldman Sachs 5.7
HSBC 4.2
JPMorgan Chase 3.9
Morgan Stanley 8.0
Northern Trust 2.2
PNC 1.2
State Street 0.8
TD Group 3.3
UBS Americas 5.8
U.S. Bancorp 1.0
Wells Fargo 2.2
Median 3.5

Note: Estimates are for the nine-quarter period from 2019:Q1–2021:Q1 as a percent of risk-weighted assets.

Return to text
Figure 14. Total loan loss rates in the severely adverse scenario
Firm Percent
Bank of America 4.4
Bank of NY-Mellon 2.5
Barclays US 10.3
Capital One 15.1
Citigroup 6.6
Credit Suisse USA 0.6
DB USA 3.6
Goldman Sachs 8.9
HSBC 5.1
JPMorgan Chase 5.9
Morgan Stanley 3.2
Northern Trust 4.7
PNC 4.7
State Street 3.8
TD Group 5.5
UBS Americas 2.2
U.S. Bancorp 5.6
Wells Fargo 4.5
Median 4.7

Note: Estimates are for the nine-quarter period from 2019:Q1–2021:Q1 as a percent of average balances.

Return to text
Figure 15. PPNR rates in the severely adverse scenario
Firm Percent
Bank of America 1.8
Bank of NY-Mellon 2.0
Barclays US 3.0
Capital One 8.2
Citigroup 2.9
Credit Suisse USA 1.9
DB USA -0.3
Goldman Sachs 1.4
HSBC -0.3
JPMorgan Chase 2.3
Morgan Stanley 0.4
Northern Trust 2.2
PNC 3.1
State Street 1.4
TD Group 1.7
UBS Americas 1.6
U.S. Bancorp 3.9
Wells Fargo 3.3
Median 1.95

Note: Estimates are for the nine-quarter period from 2019:Q1–2021:Q1 as a percent of average assets.

Return to text
Figure 16. Pre-tax net income rates in the severely adverse scenario
Firm Percent
Bank of America -0.7
Bank of NY-Mellon 1.2
Barclays US -0.4
Capital One -3.6
Citigroup -0.6
Credit Suisse USA -2.1
DB USA -1.7
Goldman Sachs -1.9
HSBC -2.4
JPMorgan Chase -1.1
Morgan Stanley -2.0
Northern Trust 0.7
PNC 0.0
State Street 0.4
TD Group -0.7
UBS Americas -0.6
U.S. Bancorp 0.1
Wells Fargo 0.1
Median -0.7

Note: Estimates are for the nine-quarter period from 2019:Q1-2021:Q1 as a percent of average assets.

Return to text
Figure 17. Projected losses in the adverse scenario
Source of loss Percent
First-lien mortgages, domestic, 6 6.3
Junior liens and HELOCs, 3 2.8
Commercial and industrial loans, 48 47.7
Commercial real estate, domestic, 14 14.1
Credit cards, 79 79.3
Other consumer loans, 17 17.0
Other loans, 26 26.4
Securities losses, 2 2.4
Trading and counterparty losses, 46 46.0
Other losses, 13 13.3

Note: The projected losses are not comparable to DFAST 2018. There were 35 participating firms in DFAST 2018 and 18 participating firms in DFAST 2019.

Return to text
Figure 18. Change from 2018:Q4 to minimum CET1 ratio in the adverse scenario
Firm Percent
Bank of America 0.2
Bank of NY-Mellon -0.5
Barclays US 1.1
Capital One 1.3
Citigroup 1.1
Credit Suisse USA 4.9
DB USA 5.3
Goldman Sachs 2.0
HSBC 1.8
JPMorgan Chase 1.4
Morgan Stanley 3.8
Northern Trust 1.6
PNC -0.2
State Street -0.4
TD Group 1.3
UBS Americas 3.1
U.S. Bancorp -0.5
Wells Fargo 0.3
Median 1.3

Note: Estimates are for the nine-quarter period from 2019:Q1-2021:Q1 as a percent of risk-weighted assets.

Return to text
Figure 19. Total loan loss rates in the adverse scenario
Firm Percent
Bank of America 2.8
Bank of NY-Mellon 1.6
Barclays US 7.5
Capital One 11.0
Citigroup 4.7
Credit Suisse USA 0.6
DB USA 1.8
Goldman Sachs 5.7
HSBC 2.7
JPMorgan Chase 3.8
Morgan Stanley 1.8
Northern Trust 2.7
PNC 2.8
State Street 2.5
TD Group 3.5
UBS Americas 1.4
U.S. Bancorp 3.5
Wells Fargo 2.6
Median 2.75

Note: Estimates are for the nine-quarter period from 2019:Q1-2021:Q1 as a percent of average balances.

Return to text
Figure 20. PPNR rates in the adverse scenario
Firm Percent
Bank of America 2.3
Bank of NY-Mellon 2.2
Barclays US 3.3
Capital One 8.3
Citigroup 3.3
Credit Suisse USA 2.2
DB USA 0.1
Goldman Sachs 2.2
HSBC 0.0
JPMorgan Chase 2.7
Morgan Stanley 1.0
Northern Trust 2.1
PNC 3.5
State Street 1.4
TD Group 1.7
UBS Americas 1.9
U.S. Bancorp 4.1
Wells Fargo 3.6
Median 2.2

Note: Estimates are for the nine-quarter period from 2019:Q1-2021:Q1 as a percent of average assets.

Return to text
Figure 21. Pre-tax net income rates in the adverse scenario
Firm Percent
Bank of America 0.8
Bank of NY-Mellon 1.6
Barclays US 1.2
Capital One 0.1
Citigroup 1.2
Credit Suisse USA -0.4
DB USA -0.7
Goldman Sachs 0.4
HSBC -1.0
JPMorgan Chase 0.7
Morgan Stanley -0.3
Northern Trust 1.2
PNC 1.8
State Street 0.8
TD Group 0.3
UBS Americas 0.8
U.S. Bancorp 2.0
Wells Fargo 1.9
Median 0.8

Note: Estimates are for the nine-quarter period from 2019:Q1–2021:Q1 as a percent of average assets.

Return to text
Figure C.1. First-lien mortgages, domestic loss rates in the severely adverse scenario

Percent

Firm Percent
Bank of America 1.2
Bank of NY-Mellon 1.7
Barclays US 0.0
Capital One 2.2
Citigroup 2.1
Credit Suisse USA 0.0
DB USA 2.3
Goldman Sachs 22.9
HSBC 1.8
JPMorgan Chase 1.3
Morgan Stanley 1.4
Northern Trust 1.5
PNC 1.2
State Street 0.0
TD Group 1.6
UBS Americas 1.7
U.S. Bancorp 1.4
Wells Fargo 1.1
Median 1.6

Estimates are for the nine-quarter period from 2019:Q1-2021:Q1 as a percent of average balances.

Return to text
Figure C.2. Junior liens and HELOCs, domestic loss rates in the severely adverse scenario

Percent

Firm Percent
Bank of America 1.9
Bank of NY-Mellon 8.7
Barclays US 0.0
Capital One 5.1
Citigroup 4.3
Credit Suisse USA 0.0
DB USA 5.4
Goldman Sachs 3.6
HSBC 3.0
JPMorgan Chase 2.4
Morgan Stanley 3.6
Northern Trust 6.1
PNC 1.5
State Street 0.0
TD Group 3.9
UBS Americas 0.0
U.S. Bancorp 3.9
Wells Fargo 2.8
Median 3.75

Estimates are for the nine-quarter period from 2019:Q1-2021:Q1 as a percent of average balances.

Return to text
Figure C.3. Commercial and industrial loss rates in the severely adverse scenario

Percent

Firm Percent
Bank of America 4.8
Bank of NY-Mellon 3.2
Barclays US 22.6
Capital One 11.8
Citigroup 4.4
Credit Suisse USA 0.0
DB USA 1.0
Goldman Sachs 13.1
HSBC 5.4
JPMorgan Chase 9.6
Morgan Stanley 8.6
Northern Trust 5.5
PNC 6.0
State Street 6.9
TD Group 6.0
UBS Americas 8.5
U.S. Bancorp 6.3
Wells Fargo 5.6
Median 6.0

Estimates are for the nine-quarter period from 2019:Q1-2021:Q1 as a percent of average balances.

Return to text
Figure C.4. Commercial real estate, domestic loss rates in the severely adverse scenario

Percent

Firm Percent
Bank of America 6.7
Bank of NY-Mellon 7.0
Barclays US 6.3
Capital One 5.3
Citigroup 8.5
Credit Suisse USA 0.0
DB USA 9.5
Goldman Sachs 14.2
HSBC 8.3
JPMorgan Chase 3.4
Morgan Stanley 7.6
Northern Trust 6.1
PNC 7.0
State Street 6.2
TD Group 5.3
UBS Americas 5.5
U.S. Bancorp 8.2
Wells Fargo 7.7
Median 7.0

Estimates are for the nine-quarter period from 2019:Q1-2021:Q1 as a percent of average balances.

Return to text
Figure C.5. Credit card loss rates in the severely adverse scenario

Percent

Firm Percent
Bank of America 14.7
Bank of NY-Mellon 0.0
Barclays US 15.1
Capital One 23.0
Citigroup 15.2
Credit Suisse USA 0.0
DB USA 0.0
Goldman Sachs 5.6
HSBC 16.4
JPMorgan Chase 15.0
Morgan Stanley 0.0
Northern Trust 0.0
PNC 16.3
State Street 0.0
TD Group 20.2
UBS Americas 16.4
U.S. Bancorp 16.4
Wells Fargo 17.2
Median 16.35

Estimates are for the nine-quarter period from 2019:Q1-2021:Q1 as a percent of average balances.

Return to text
Figure C.6. Other consumer loss rates in the severely adverse scenario

Percent

Firm Percent
Bank of America 2.0
Bank of NY-Mellon 9.9
Barclays US 13.7
Capital One 9.1
Citigroup 10.5
Credit Suisse USA 13.7
DB USA 7.1
Goldman Sachs 14.0
HSBC 9.2
JPMorgan Chase 3.4
Morgan Stanley 0.6
Northern Trust 13.7
PNC 3.7
State Street 0.6
TD Group 2.9
UBS Americas 0.7
U.S. Bancorp 3.6
Wells Fargo 5.8
Median 6.45

Estimates are for the nine-quarter period from 2019:Q1-2021:Q1 as a percent of average balances.

Return to text
Figure C.7. Other loans loss rates in the severely adverse scenario

Percent

Firm Percent
Bank of America 3.0
Bank of NY-Mellon 1.6
Barclays US 0.7
Capital One 6.3
Citigroup 3.0
Credit Suisse USA 0.6
DB USA 1.9
Goldman Sachs 5.8
HSBC 5.5
JPMorgan Chase 4.8
Morgan Stanley 3.1
Northern Trust 4.9
PNC 2.3
State Street 3.0
TD Group 3.2
UBS Americas 3.1
U.S. Bancorp 4.6
Wells Fargo 3.4
Median 3.1

Estimates are for the nine-quarter period from 2019:Q1-2021:Q1 as a percent of average balances.

Return to text
Figure C.8. First-lien mortgages, domestic loss rates in the adverse scenario

Percent

Firm Percent
Bank of America 0.5
Bank of NY-Mellon 0.9
Barclays US 0.0
Capital One 1.1
Citigroup 1.0
Credit Suisse USA 0.0
DB USA 1.4
Goldman Sachs 19.0
HSBC 0.7
JPMorgan Chase 0.5
Morgan Stanley 0.7
Northern Trust 0.6
PNC 0.7
State Street 0.0
TD Group 1.0
UBS Americas 0.8
U.S. Bancorp 0.6
Wells Fargo 0.4
Median 0.7

Estimates are for the nine-quarter period from 2019:Q1-2021:Q1 as a percent of average balances.

Return to text
Figure C.9. Junior liens and HELOCs, domestic loss rates in the adverse scenario

Percent

Firm Percent
Bank of America 0.8
Bank of NY-Mellon 5.2
Barclays US 0.0
Capital One 3.4
Citigroup 2.4
Credit Suisse USA 0.0
DB USA 4.1
Goldman Sachs 2.7
HSBC 1.9
JPMorgan Chase 1.5
Morgan Stanley 2.7
Northern Trust 4.2
PNC 0.6
State Street 0.0
TD Group 2.8
UBS Americas 0.0
U.S. Bancorp 2.6
Wells Fargo 1.4
Median 2.65

Estimates are for the nine-quarter period from 2019:Q1-2021:Q1 as a percent of average balances.

Return to text
Figure C.10. Commercial and industrial loss rates in the adverse scenario

Percent

Firm Percent
Bank of America 3.0
Bank of NY-Mellon 2.0
Barclays US 18.5
Capital One 7.9
Citigroup 3.1
Credit Suisse USA 0.0
DB USA 0.6
Goldman Sachs 8.3
HSBC 3.4
JPMorgan Chase 6.3
Morgan Stanley 5.3
Northern Trust 3.3
PNC 3.8
State Street 4.1
TD Group 3.7
UBS Americas 5.2
U.S. Bancorp 4.2
Wells Fargo 3.6
Median 3.8

Estimates are for the nine-quarter period from 2019:Q1-2021:Q1 as a percent of average balances.

Return to text
Figure C.11. Commercial real estate, domestic loss rates in the adverse scenario

Percent

Firm Percent
Bank of America 2.9
Bank of NY-Mellon 2.6
Barclays US 2.4
Capital One 2.2
Citigroup 3.5
Credit Suisse USA 0.0
DB USA 3.4
Goldman Sachs 5.7
HSBC 3.1
JPMorgan Chase 1.6
Morgan Stanley 2.8
Northern Trust 2.5
PNC 2.9
State Street 2.3
TD Group 2.3
UBS Americas 2.2
U.S. Bancorp 3.7
Wells Fargo 3.2
Median 2.8

Estimates are for the nine-quarter period from 2019:Q1-2021:Q1 as a percent of average balances.

Return to text
Figure C.12. Credit card loss rates in the adverse scenario

Percent

Firm Percent
Bank of America 10.6
Bank of NY-Mellon 0.0
Barclays US 11.0
Capital One 17.2
Citigroup 11.3
Credit Suisse USA 0.0
DB USA 0.0
Goldman Sachs 4.0
HSBC 11.3
JPMorgan Chase 10.7
Morgan Stanley 0.0
Northern Trust 0.0
PNC 11.3
State Street 0.0
TD Group 15.2
UBS Americas 11.3
U.S. Bancorp 12.0
Wells Fargo 12.6
Median 11.3

Estimates are for the nine-quarter period from 2019:Q1-2021:Q1 as a percent of average balances.

Return to text
Figure C.13. Other consumer loss rates in the adverse scenario

Percent

Firm Percent
Bank of America 1.4
Bank of NY-Mellon 8.0
Barclays US 11.0
Capital One 7.2
Citigroup 8.9
Credit Suisse USA 11.0
DB USA 5.8
Goldman Sachs 12.0
HSBC 7.6
JPMorgan Chase 2.6
Morgan Stanley 0.6
Northern Trust 11.0
PNC 3.0
State Street 0.6
TD Group 2.2
UBS Americas 0.6
U.S. Bancorp 2.6
Wells Fargo 4.7
Median 5.25

Estimates are for the nine-quarter period from 2019:Q1-2021:Q1 as a percent of average balances.

Return to text
Figure C.14. Other loans loss rates in the adverse scenario

Percent

Firm Percent
Bank of America 1.8
Bank of NY-Mellon 1.0
Barclays US 0.5
Capital One 3.6
Citigroup 1.9
Credit Suisse USA 0.5
DB USA 1.2
Goldman Sachs 3.6
HSBC 3.3
JPMorgan Chase 2.9
Morgan Stanley 1.9
Northern Trust 3.0
PNC 1.4
State Street 2.1
TD Group 1.9
UBS Americas 2.0
U.S. Bancorp 3.0
Wells Fargo 2.0
Median 1.95

Estimates are for the nine-quarter period from 2019:Q1-2021:Q1 as a percent of average balances.

Return to text
Back to Top
Last Update: July 22, 2019