skip to main navigation skip to secondary navigation skip to content
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
skip secondary navigation
Federal Reserve Board of Governors

Freedom of Information Office

2014 Reserve Bank Budgets

Action

On December 12, 2013, the Board approved the 2014 Reserve Bank operating budgets totaling $3,795.7 million, an increase of $163.8 million, or 4.5 percent, from the 2013 estimated expenses and $107.5 million, or 2.9 percent, from the approved 2013 budget.1 The Board also approved the 2014 Reserve Bank, Federal Reserve Information Technology (FRIT), and the Office of Employee Benefits (OEB) capital budgets, which total $475.4 million.

The capital budgets are approved with the understanding that approval for actual capital outlays will be in accordance with the Board’s Policies and Guidelines Concerning Reserve Bank Operations (FRAM 1-049). This policy states that Reserve Bank management may approve capital commitments for purchases or leases (single-item acquisitions and multicomponent projects) that were included in the Reserve Bank’s capital budget approved by the Board, unless the acquisition is designated as strategic or sensitive by the Committee on Federal Reserve Bank Affairs (BAC).2 The chair of the BAC (or the chair’s designee) will notify Reserve Bank management if any budgeted commitments and agreements have been designated as strategic or sensitive and, therefore, require the approval of the director of RBOPS or the Board.

Return to contents

Total Expense and Employment Summary


Table 1
Reserve Bank Expenses and Staffing
(dollars in millions)

  2013 Budget 2013 Estimate 2013 Bud. vs.
2013 Est.
2014 Budget 2013 Est. vs.
2014 Bud.
Amount Percent Amount Percent
Central bank services $2,781.7 $2,741.4 -$40.3 -1.4% $2,852.0 $110.6 4.0%
Monetary Policy 433.2 429.3 -3.9 -0.9% 438.3 9.0 2.1%
Open Market (NY) 169.1 170.4 1.3 0.8% 175.8 5.5 3.2%
Public Programs 197.2 196.3 -0.8 -0.4% 201.9 5.6 2.8%
Supervision 1,146.3 1,129.2 -17.1 -1.5% 1,189.4 60.2 5.3%
Cash 578.3 554.4 -23.8 -4.1% 581.7 27.2 4.9%
All Other Central Bank Services* 257.7 261.8 4.1 1.6% 265.0 3.2 1.2%
Treasury Services 522.7 511.6 -11.1 -2.1% 550.2 38.6 7.5%
Priced Services 383.8 378.9 -4.9 -1.3% 393.4 14.6 3.8%
Total Expense $3,688.2 $3,631.9 -$56.3 -1.5% $3,795.7 $163.8 4.5%

Total ANP
18,656 18,815 159 0.9% 18,979 165 0.9%
* Includes Reserve Accounts and Risk Administration, Loans to Depository Institutions and Services to Other Central Banks. Return to table.

Return to contents

2013 Budget Performance

Total 2013 expenses are estimated to be $3,631.9 million, which is $56.3 million, or 1.5 percent, less than the approved 2013 budget of $3,688.2 million, while ANP is increasing 159, largely for development work.3,4 

The 2013 budget underrun is primarily driven by lower- than-planned expenses for cash, supervision, and Treasury services. Overall net expenses for the national cash automation portfolio were lower than anticipated as the program enters its third phase of development due to an updated CashForward project strategy (-$16.3 million) and delays in processing equipment installation (-$4.3 million).5 In the supervision function, expense reduction initiatives and delays in hiring budgeted staff led to lower overall expenses (-$17.1 million). The underrun in Treasury services is due to program changes primarily for the Do Not Pay (-$4.4 million) program, volume reductions in Treasury Retail Securities (-$3.7 million), and the timing of other initiatives.6 

Chart 1: 2013 Budget to Estimate Expense Drivers (in millions of dollars): A bar chart. 2013 Budget $3,688.2; Cash -$23.8; Supervision -$17.1; Treasury -$11.1; All Other -$4.3; 2013 Estimate $3,631.9

 

Total 2013 estimated staffing of 18,815 ANP represents an increase of 159 ANP, or 0.9%, from 2013 budgeted levels of 18,656 ANP. The unbudgeted growth in ANP reflects increased application development support for updates to cash technology, supervision, and projects completed on behalf of the Treasury. Additional IT ANP growth is for customer server and storage demand and an increase in network services support due to the Reserve Bank migration to the consolidated environment. Treasury’s Go Direct initiative added temporary staff to manage higher call volumes related to the March 1, 2013 deadline to convert federal benefit check payments to electronic methods.7 Partially offsetting these increases are hiring delays in the supervision and monetary policy functions and for the Treasury’s Invoice Processing Platform (IPP).8 Other refinements include reductions in savings bond operations due to lower-than-expected volumes.


Table 2
Significant Staffing (ANP) Changes
2013 Budget to 2013 Estimate

2013 Budget 18,656
 
Additions:
Application Development* 98
IT Infrastructure 73
Treasury GoDirect 83
Reductions:
Hiring Delays -71
Other Refinements -24
 
2013 Estimate 18,815
* Application development includes local IT as well as embedded support for cash, Treasury, monetary policy, and supervision. Return to table.

Return to contents


2014 Budgets

Total Operating Expenses

The 2014 operating budgets of the Reserve Banks total $3,795.7 million, which is $163.8 million, or 4.5 percent, higher than the 2013 estimate. The largest increase is in the supervision function, which represents almost one-third of total expenses in 2014 and is adding resources to support expanded supervisory responsibilities for large financial institutions (LISCC and LBO portfolios) and continued state member bank growth. In addition, the function is dedicating resources to improve its analytical capabilities.

The budgeted expenses for services to the Treasury, which are fully reimbursable, are increasing to meet greater demand from the Treasury and the amortization of capitalized software projects that were completed and placed into service. There is significant growth related to the Treasury’s efforts to modernize its revenue collection and payment management methods including the Internet Channel (Pay.gov), IPP, and the Post Payment Systems (PPS) ($23.0 million).9 In addition, the Reserve Banks will provide increased support for the Do Not Pay ($5.1 million) and the Government-wide Treasury Account Symbol Adjusted Trial Balance System (GTAS) ($2.2 million) programs.10 The TreasuryWeb Application Infrastructure (TWAI) expenses will also increase as the number of applications hosted in the infrastructure expands ($8.0 million).

Increases in cash expenses include continued development work on the CashForward projects, cash processing machine upgrades, and increased video surveillance support. The major driver of the priced services increase is for the Fedwire, FedACH, and FedLine modernization programs and enhancements.11 Partially offsetting the increase is reduced check operations expense due to the implementation of the new check processing platform. In the monetary policy area, several Reserve Banks are adding resources to meet policy and research demands, including investments in analytical tools and efforts to enhance resiliency in open market operations.

Chart 2. 2013 Estimate to 2014 Budget Expense Drivers (in millions of dollars). A bar chart. 2013 Estimate $3,631.9; Supervision $60.2; Treasury $38.5; Cash $27.2; Priced Services $14.6; Monetary Policy $14.4; All Other Operations $8.8; 2014 Budget $3,795.6

 

Personnel Expenses and Staffing

Total 2014 projected employment for the Reserve Banks, FRIT, and OEB is 18,979 ANP, an increase of 165 ANP, or 0.9% percent, from 2013 estimated staff levels, primarily driven by supervision and IT. Supervision ANP is increasing as resources are added to support portfolio growth and expanding responsibilities. IT ANP is increasing for a number of large development projects and information security efforts. Staff is also increasing to support monetary policy, programs initiated by the Treasury, and a new video surveillance program. These staff increases are partially offset by a decrease of temporary staff hired in 2013 for GoDirect and efficiencies found in support areas.

Reserve Bank officer and staff salaries and other personnel expenses for 2014 total $2,139.6 million, an increase of $103.3 million or 5.1 percent, over 2013 estimated expenses. The increase reflects expenses associated with additional staff and budgeted salary adjustments, including merit increases, equity adjustments, promotions, and funding for variable pay.


Table 3
Significant Staffing (ANP) Changes
2013 Estimate to 2014 Budget

2013 Estimate 18,815
 
Additions:
Supervision 103
Application Development* 90
Other Treasury project and operation support 37
Monetary Policy 34
Information Security 29
Other Refinements 31
Reductions:
Treasury GoDirect -112
Support and Overhead -46
 
2014 Budget 18,979
* Application development includes local IT as well as embedded support for cash, Treasury, monetary policy, and supervision. Return to table.

The 2014 Reserve Bank budgets reflect a 3.0 percent merit program, effective January 1 for eligible officers, senior professionals, and staff totaling $48.8 million.12 Equity adjustments and promotions total $10.0 million for officers and senior professionals and $19.1 million for staff. Funding for variable pay programs for officers, senior professionals, and staff totals $156.9 million. The federal civilian employee pay freeze is scheduled to expire on December 31, 2013.

Operating expenses, net of revenue and reimbursements

More than 26 percent of Reserve Bank expenses in the 2014 budget are offset by either priced service revenues (11.2 percent) or reimbursable claims for services provided to the Treasury and other agencies (15.0 percent).13 Budgeted 2014 operating expenses, net of revenue and reimbursements, are expected to increase $138.0 million, or 5.2 percent, from 2013 estimated expenses. Budgeted 2014 priced services revenue is 3.7 percent lower than the 2013 estimated level, primarily reflecting continued declines in check volume as customers shift to other payment methods. Reimbursable claims are expected to increase 8.0 percent in 2014, reflecting increased activity on new or expanded Treasury services.


Table 4
Change in Net Expenses
(dollars in millions)

  2013
Budget
2013
Estimate
2014
Budget
Percent Change
14B vs. 13E 13E vs. 14B
Total Expense $3,688.2 $3,631.9 $3,795.7 -1.5% 4.5%
Less:
Priced Services Revenue* 423.9 439.9 423.6 3.8% -3.7%
Reimbursable Claims 539.4 527.0 569.1 -2.3% 8.0%
Net Expenses $2,724.9 $2,665.0 $2,803.0 -2.2% 5.2%
* Full cost recovery is projected in the aggregate for priced services in 2014. Return to table.

Return to contents

2014 Capital Budgets

The 2014 capital budgets submitted by the Reserve Banks, FRIT, and OEB total $475.4 million, or 3.4 percent, below the 2013 budget. The 2013 estimated capital spending is lower than the budget by $114.3 million, or 23.2 percent, because capital for ongoing multiyear programs shifts from 2013 to 2014. The increase in the 2014 capital budget is $97.6 million, or 25.8 percent, above the 2013 estimate. The few major new initiatives in the 2014 capital budget support monetary policy, optimize work space, and accommodate an increasing demand for video conferencing associated with travel reductions ($13.4 million).

In support of the Reserve Bank strategies, the 2014 budgets include three categories of capital initiatives: Reserve Bank automation projects, building and infrastructure, and Treasury initiatives.

Automation

The Reserve Banks, FRIT, and OEB included $225.5 million in funding for major IT initiatives and Reserve Bank automation projects. Multiyear projects currently underway to migrate major applications off the mainframe represent $33.5 million of the 2014 capital budget.14 The Reserve Bank consolidated network project and increased demand for storage capacity account for an additional $67.6 million. Cash services automation initiatives include $37.9 million for the CashForward project and $9.6 million for cash sensor upgrades. Other automation initiatives include development of analytical and operational tools supporting monetary policy, data security projects, and scheduled software and equipment upgrades.

Building and infrastructure

Building and infrastructure projects represent $190.8 million of the proposed capital budget. Renovations to achieve more efficient use of existing building space are proposed for FRB New York ($35.7 million), FRB Cleveland ($4.9 million), and FRB Richmond ($4.5 million), as well as floor renovation programs at FRB Boston ($7.2 million) and FRB San Francisco ($4.4 million). FRB Chicago continues its building security project ($6.2 million), and FRB Boston will modernize its elevators ($5.0 million). The remaining outlays in this category fund many other ongoing maintenance and facility improvements.

Treasury

The capital budgets also include $59.1 million for Treasury initiatives, including support for TWAI ($10.9 million), PPS ($4.7 million), IPP ($4.7 million), Treasury Retail Electronic Services ($4.6 million), and Internet Channel ($4.2 million).

Return to contents

Five-year trend in Reserve Bank expenses

Total expenses for the Reserve Banks have grown an average of 3.8 percent annually over the past five years from 2009 through the 2014 budget.


Table 5
Total Expenses of the Federal Reserve Banks, by Functional Area
(dollars in millions)

  2009
Actual
2010
Actual
2011
Actual
2012
Actual
2013
Estimate
2014
Budget
CAGR
2009-2014
Monetary and Economic Policy $501.3 $497.7 $532.3 $563.3 $599.7 $614.1 4.1%
Services to U.S. Treasury and Gov't Agencies 429.7 433.4 459.1 477.3 511.6 550.2 5.1%
Services to Financial Institutions and the Public 880.7 982.6 954.1 977.5 1,012.5 1,048.5 3.6%
Supervision 725.3 801.9 917.4 1,056.6 1,129.2 1,189.4 10.4%
Fee Based Services to Financial Institutions 605.6 467.4 398.3 387.5 378.9 393.4 -8.3%
Total $3,142.5 $3,183.0 $3,261.3 $3,462.1 $3,631.9 $3,795.7 3.8%

Trends in central bank services total expense

Central bank services have grown an average of 6.2 percent annually over the past five years. Supervision is driving a large portion of this expense increase, with an average of 10.4 percent expense growth per year over the past five years and a corresponding increase of 1,107 ANP since 2009. The additional resources and staffing were added over this period in response to the financial crisis and to implement the Dodd-Frank Act requirements. More recently, growth in the number of supervised state member banks has resulted in additional resource demands. Forecasted resource growth in supervision expense beyond 2014 is expected to moderate and remain fairly stable going forward, as the number of problem institutions are projected to decline.

Chart 3. Trend in Central Bank Service Total Expense 2009 Actual to 2014 Budget: Central bank services costs (dollars in millions). A line graph. 2009: 2,107.3; 2010: 2,282.2; 2011: 2,403.9; 2012: 2,597.3; 2013E: 2,741.4; 2014B: 2,852.0  

Monetary policy expenses have grown on average 4.1 percent annually. This growth is largely driven by increases in FRB New York to support asset purchase programs and operational and analytical tools to address the increased needs and responsibilities for financial stability monitoring. Increased resources dedicated to regional economic research are also reflected in the monetary policy growth.

Expenses in the cash area have increased on average 4.0 percent annually, as a multiyear effort to modernize the cash processing and inventory-tracking infrastructure continues. These increases have been partially offset by efficiency improvements in cash operations.

Trends in Treasury services expense

Treasury services expenses have grown on average 5.1 percent annually since 2009. Expenses have increased to meet the Treasury’s evolving needs, including continuing initiatives such as the Do Not Pay project, the Internet Channel, and other requested projects. Larger increases in the past two years are due to the automation of Treasury’s collection and payment services. A portion of the growth has been offset by staffing reductions and program changes initiated by the Treasury including the Treasury Retail Securities consolidation effort.

Chart 4. Trend in Treasury Total Expense 2009 Actual to 2014 Budget: Treasury costs (dollars in millions). A line graph. 2009: 429.7; 2010: 433.4; 2011: 459.1; 2012: 477.3; 2013E: 511.6; 2014B: 550.2  

Trends in priced services total expense

Priced services expenses have decreased at an average of 8.3 percent annually. With the continued decline of paper-check volume and the efficiencies associated with electronic check processing, check service expenses have declined an average of 21.3 percent annually since 2009. These declines have been slightly offset by increases for the Fedwire, FedACH, and FedLine modernization program and enhancements.

 Chart 5. Trend in Priced Services Total Expense 2009 Actual to 2014 Budget: Priced services total costs (dollars in millions). A line graph. 2009: 605.6; 2010: 467.4; 2011: 398.3; 2012: 387.5; 2013E: 378.9; 2014B: 393.4  

Trends in staffing

Total staffing levels are increasing at an average of 1.2% annually since 2009. The primary driver is in supervision to address Dodd-Frank Act implementation as well as portfolio growth. IT is also a driver of increased staffing to support information security efforts and large development projects. Monetary policy areas have grown modestly for financial stability and operational support. These increases are offset, in part, by decreased staffing in priced services functions.

Chart 6. Trend in Staffing (ANP) 2009 Actual to 2014 Budget: Total ANP. A line graph. 2009: 17,880; 2010: 17,459; 2011: 17,653; 2012: 18,300; 2013E: 18,815; 2014B: 18,979  

Return to contents

Risks in the 2014 budget

Risks to the budget remain largely consistent with those recognized last year. In particular, the most significant risks in the 2014 budget are related to staffing. Banks are concerned about their ability to hire and retain staff, particularly in locations where the employment market is improving. A number of Reserve Banks have aggressive hiring plans, and some Banks may experience difficulty meeting schedules for hiring staff with specialized skills and experience, particularly in supervision and IT. The primary risks in supervision relate to changes that may be needed in supervisory programs to implement key Federal Reserve responsibilities under the Dodd-Frank Act where the final rules have not yet been adopted. The Treasury continues to refine its future vision for collections, payments, and cash management systems, along with the timing of different components of its projects. The effect on Treasury-directed Reserve Bank initiatives is currently unknown and will affect projects over a longer term planning horizon.

Return to contents


Appendix
Statistical Supplement

Table A Total Expenses of the Federal Reserve Banks, by District
Table B Total Employment of the Federal Reserve Banks, by District
Table C Total Expenses of the Federal Reserve Banks, by Functional Area
Table D Budgeted Changes to the Cash Compensation Components of the Federal Reserve Banks, Officers and Staff, by District
Table E Capital Outlays of the Federal Reserve Banks, by District
Table F Capital Outlays of the Federal Reserve Banks, by Category

Notes:

In the following tables, Reserve Bank expenses include those budgeted by FRIT and OEB that are chargeable to the Reserve Banks.

Components may not add to totals because of rounding. Table-to-table comparisons may also differ due to rounding.


Table A
Total Expenses of the Federal Reserve Banks
by District, 2013 and 2014
(dollars in thousands)

District 2013
Budget
2013
Estimate
2014
Budget
Percent change
13B vs. 13E 13E vs. 14B 13B vs. 14B
Boston 207,175 203,127 220,134 -2.0% 8.4% 6.3%
New York 896,777 896,035 908,868 -0.1% 1.4% 1.3%
Philadelphia 198,951 193,694 202,612 -2.6% 4.6% 1.8%
Cleveland 158,372 156,399 176,213 -1.2% 12.7% 11.3%
Richmond 372,699 361,052 360,955 -3.1% 0.0% -3.2%
Atlanta 318,710 312,782 318,983 -1.9% 2.0% 0.1%
Chicago 326,131 322,566 340,698 -1.1% 5.6% 4.5%
St. Louis 258,046 260,562 285,778 1.0% 9.7% 10.7%
Minneapolis 189,561 184,939 199,831 -2.4% 8.1% 5.4%
Kansas City 214,515 207,971 222,383 -3.1% 6.9% 3.7%
Dallas 214,455 207,826 212,245 -3.1% 2.1% -1.0%
San Francisco 332,772 324,920 346,958 -2.4% 6.8% 4.3%
    Total 3,688,165 3,631,874 3,795,657 -1.5% 4.5% 2.9%

Return to statistical supplement index.


Table B
Total Employment of the Federal Reserve Banks
by District, 2013 and 2014
(average number of personnel)

District 2013
Budget
2013
Estimate
2014
Budget
Change
13B vs. 13E 13E vs. 14B 13B vs. 14B
Boston 1,080 1,039 1,097 -41 58 17
New York 3,326 3,295 3,247 -31 -48 -79
Philadelphia 944 913 946 -31 32 1
Cleveland 908 937 968 29 31 60
Richmond 1,541 1,555 1,586 14 31 45
Atlanta 1,630 1,626 1,627 -3 1 -3
Chicago 1,490 1,490 1,512 0 21 21
St. Louis 1,066 1,090 1,145 24 56 79
Minneapolis 1,147 1,135 1,133 -12 -1 -13
Kansas City 1,430 1,450 1,512 20 62 82
Dallas 1,239 1,304 1,217 65 -86 -21
San Francisco 1,599 1,647 1,671 48 24 72
    Subtotal 17,400 17,481 17,662 80 181 262
FRIT 1,202 1,283 1,265 80 -17 63
OEB 53 51 52 -2 1 -1
    Total 18,656 18,815 18,979 159 165 324

Return to statistical supplement index


Table C
Total Employment of the Federal Reserve Banks1 
by Service Line
(average number of personnel)

  2009 2010 2011 2012 2013E 2014B CAGR

2009-2014
Monetary and Economic Policy 1,081 1,115 1,179 1,223 1,241 1,274 3.4%
Services to U.S. Treasury and Gov't Agencies 1,147 1,092 1,114 1,071 1,142 1,114 -0.6%
Services to Financial Institutions and the Public 2,786 2,828 2,719 2,659 2,675 2,680 -0.8%
Supervision 2,863 3,052 3,339 3,725 3,867 3,969 6.8%
Fee Based Services to Financial Institutions 1,772 1,147 910 840 719 699 -17.0%
Local Support and Overhead 6,461 6,379 6,303 6,457 6,666 6,701 0.7%
Nationally Provided Support 909 972 1,084 1,274 1,314 1,343 8.1%
Centralized Service Providers 861 873 1,003 1,051 1,191 1,199 6.8%
Total 17,880 17,459 17,653 18,300 18,815 18,979 1.2%
1. Includes average number of personnel (ANP) at FRIT and OEB. Return to table.

Nationally Provided Support: Support services performed on behalf of multiple Districts under a regionalized or centralized function. In this table, select nationally provided support ANP have been included in the associated service lines.

Centralized Service Providers: Support services provided by FRIT and OEB.

Return to statistical supplement index


Table D
Budgeted Changes to Cash Compensation Programs of the Federal Reserve Banks
Officers and Staff by District, 2014
(dollars in thousands)

District Total
12/31/13
salary
liability
(a)
Additions to salary base Incremental
variable pay
(e)
Total
Merit
(b)
Equity
& market adjustments
(c)
Promotions and reclasses
(d)
Percentage
increase to
total 12/31/13
salary liability
(b+c+d) / (a)
Dollars
(b+c+d+e)
Percentage
increase to total 12/31/13 salary liability
(b+c+d+e)/(a)
Boston 107,826 3,235 824 705 4.4% 465 5,229 4.8%
New York 399,527 11,819 3,260 6,521 5.4% 1,828 23,428 5.9%
Philadelphia 78,492 2,355 631 854 4.9% 514 4,354 5.5%
Cleveland 79,376 2,365 595 812 4.8% 1,052 4,823 6.1%
Richmond 132,571 3,888 957 605 4.1% -24 5,425 4.1%
Atlanta 127,534 3,027 614 929 3.6% 556 5,127 4.0%
Chicago 144,451 3,305 759 1,056 3.5% 587 5,708 4.0%
St. Louis 89,051 2,671 455 701 4.3% 973 4,801 5.4%
Minneapolis 88,173 2,645 650 441 4.2% 397 4,133 4.7%
Kansas City 108,499 3,255 802 1,339 5.0% 1,955 7,350 6.8%
Dallas 93,910 2,157 696 516 3.6% 440 3,809 4.1%
San Francisco 159,920 4,710 1,115 968 4.2% 624 7,416 4.6%
FRIT 125,107 3,128 832 1,251 4.2% 1,373 6,584 5.3%
OEB 7,149 214 75 70 5.0% 53 412 5.8%
    Total 1,741,588 48,774 12,264 16,767 4.5% 10,793 88,599 5.1%
The table above shows the cash compensation components that add to base salary (merit, equity, and promotion) and the 2014 incremental increase in variable pay expense compared to those estimated for 2013.

December 31, 2013 Salary Liability: the annualized salary expense based on the salaries in effect on December 31.

Merit: the amount of 2014 budgeted salary expense that reflects the cumulative effect of planned salary increases based on performance.

Equity Adjustments: the amount of 2014 budgeted salary expense to bring individual salaries to the minimum of a grade range or to better align salaries based on internal or external compensation pressures.

Promotions: the amount of 2014 budgeted salary expense that reflects salary increases for individuals as a result of promotions resulting from a significant increase in job responsibilities.

Variable Pay: The change in 2014 budgeted incentive payments (payment for the achievement of pre-determined goals) and cash awards (awards in recognition of exceptional achievements) compared to the 2013 estimate.

Return to statistical supplement index


Table E
Capital Outlays of the Federal Reserve Banks
by District, 2013 and 2014
(dollars in thousands)

District 2013
Budget
2013
Estimate
2014
Budget
Percent change
13B vs. 13E 13E vs. 14B 13B vs. 14B
Boston 49,710 31,320 41,926 -37.0% 33.9% -15.7%
New York 122,460 96,803 114,967 -21.0% 18.8% -6.1%
Philadelphia 18,833 12,794 21,191 -32.1% 65.6% 12.5%
Cleveland 15,589 9,712 22,010 -37.7% 126.6% 41.2%
Richmond 32,146 26,290 15,705 -18.2% -40.3% -51.1%
Atlanta 21,874 14,122 16,724 -35.4% 18.4% -23.5%
Chicago 49,923 34,459 38,126 -31.0% 10.6% -23.6%
St. Louis 8,208 12,096 13,527 47.4% 11.8% 64.8%
Minneapolis 15,624 18,320 13,534 17.3% -26.1% -13.4%
Kansas City 8,458 14,672 15,595 73.5% 6.3% 84.4%
Dallas 15,467 9,778 18,088 -36.8% 85.0% 16.9%
San Francisco 53,137 34,542 65,093 -35.0% 88.4% 22.5%
    Subtotal 411,431 314,907 396,486 -23.5% 25.9% -3.6%
FRIT 80,510 62,905 78,449 -21.9% 24.7% -2.6%
OEB 200 -- 469 -100.0% -- 134.5%
    Total 492,141 377,812 475,404 -23.2% 25.8% -3.4%

Return to statistical supplement index


Table F
Capital Outlays of the Federal Reserve Banks1 
by Category, 2013 and 2014
(dollars in thousands)

  2013
Budget
2013
Estimate
2014
Budget
Percent change
13B vs. 13E 13E vs. 14B 13B vs. 14B
Building / infrastructure projects 207,816 141,466 190,819 -31.9% 34.9% -8.2%
IT & System automation projects 236,380 184,630 225,514 -21.9% 22.1% -4.6%
Treasury initiatives 47,945 51,716 59,071 7.9% 14.2% 23.2%
    Total 492,141 377,812 475,404 -23.2% 25.8% -3.4%
1. Includes capital outlays for the twelve Reserve Banks, FRIT, and OEB. Return to table.

Return to statistical supplement index


Footnotes

1. These expenses include those budgeted by Federal Reserve Information Technology and the Office of Employee Benefits that are chargeable to the Reserve Banks. Expenses exclude assessments for the Board of Governors operating expenses, pension costs, the cost of currency, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and the Office of Financial Research. Return to text.

2. Generally, strategic capital initiatives are initiatives that substantially affect or influence future System direction, significant research and development efforts or building projects, and certain large-dollar initiatives. Sensitive acquisitions are capital commitments, while important to meeting the Reserve Banks operating needs, represent exceptions to the Bank’s strategic plans. Return to text.

3. ANP is the average number of employees in terms of full-time positions for the period. For instance, a full-time employee who works one-half of the year counts as 0.5 ANP for that calendar year; two half-time employees who work the full year count as one ANP. Return to text.

4. Net expenses are lower although ANP is increasing because capitalizable development work is not reflected in operating expenses until the project is completed and amortization begins. Return to text.

5. The CashForward initiative will replace legacy software applications, automate business processes, and employ technologies to meet current and future needs for the cash function. Phase-1 was completed in 2010 and Phase-2 was completed in July 2012. The project’s planned completion date is scheduled for 2017. Return to text.

6. The Do Not Pay program was established to reduce the number of improper payments made through major programs administered by the federal government. Return to text.

7. Go Direct supports Treasury’s all-electronic initiative requiring that virtually all federal benefit payments be issued electronically by March 1, 2013. Return to text.

8. IPP is a secure, web-based system that manages the government’s invoicing processes. Return to text.

9. The Internet Channel application is a secure government-wide collection portal that was developed to meet Treasury’s commitment to electronic collections processing using Internet technologies. PPS will streamline post-payment processes and eliminate redundant functionality by consolidating several existing applications into a single, centralized system. Return to text.

10. The GTAS will replace current reporting systems in a single data collection system that will be used by all government agencies as the primary means of reporting trial balance data to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Return to text.

11. The Fedwire Modernization initiative involves the transition of the Fedwire Funds and Fedwire Securities applications from the legacy mainframe environment to a distributed platform. The FedACH program will transition the FedACH Service platform from the mainframe to a distributed platform. FedLine provides financial institutions with direct access to Federal Reserve System services. Return to text.

12. The Reserve Banks may not distribute 2014 officer merit and equity funds without authorization by the BAC chair, based on the disposition of the pay freeze on the Reserve Banks. Return to text.

13. Reimbursable claims include the expenses of fiscal agency and depository services provided to the U.S. Treasury, other government agencies, and other fiscal principals. Reimbursable claims are slightly higher than Treasury service expenses shown in table 1 because the reimbursable claims also include expenses associated with the government's use of the Reserve Banks' check, ACH, Fedwire Funds, and Fedwire Securities services; these expenses are included in priced services expense in table 1. Return to text.

14. The Reserve Bank migration strategy involves moving a majority of applications from the mainframe to alternate processing environments. Projects included in the 2014 budget include the migration of the Fedwire, FedACH, accounting, and statistics and reserves systems (STAR). Return to text.

Last update: December 22, 2014