3. Leverage in the financial sector

Leverage in the financial sector has remained low

Leverage at financial firms remained low relative to historical levels, as regulatory reforms enacted after the financial crisis continue to support the resilience of key financial institutions. Regulators require that banks—especially the largest banks—meet much higher standards in the amount and quality of capital on their balance sheets and in the ways they assess and manage their financial risks. Leverage at broker-dealers and insurance companies remained low. Meanwhile, hedge fund leverage—which, up to last summer, had been relatively high—appears to have declined over the past six months.

To put the relative size of the types of financial institutions discussed in this section into perspective, table 3 shows the level and growth rates of their total assets over the past year and over the past two decades. Of note, asset holdings of hedge funds and broker-dealers grew at a rapid pace over the past year, while other institutions' asset holdings grew at rates below their longer-term average rates.

Table 3. Size of Selected Sectors of the Financial System, by Types of Institutions and Vehicles
Item Total assets (billions of dollars) Growth, 2018 (percent) Average annual growth, 1997–2018 (percent)
Banks and credit unions 19,200 1.9 5.8
Mutual funds 14,670 -7.7 9.5
Insurance companies 9,850 -2.8 5.6
Life 7,444 -3.9 5.7
Property and casualty 2,406 .7 5.4
Hedge funds* 7,654 11.6 9.1
Broker-dealers 3,359 8.5 5.0
  Outstanding (billions of dollars)    
Securitization 10,249 2.4 5.5
Agency 9,090 2.8 6.0
Non-agency ** 1,159 -.9 3.1

Note: The data extend through 2018:Q4. Growth rates are measured from Q4 the year immediately preceding the period through Q4 of the final year of the period. Life insurance companies' assets include both general and separate account assets.

* Hedge fund data start in 2013:Q1 and are updated through 2018:Q2.

** Non-agency securitization excludes securitized credit held on balance sheets of banks and finance companies.

Source: Federal Reserve Board, Statistical Release Z.1, "Financial Accounts of the United States"; Federal Reserve Board staff calculations based on Securities and Exchange Commission, Form PF, Reporting Form for Investment Advisers to Private Funds and Certain Commodity Pool Operators and Commodity Trading Advisors.

Bank capitalization remained strong, while credit performance improved...

The ratio of tangible bank equity to assets changed little over the fourth quarter of 2018, while the common equity Tier 1 ratio of large banks edged down but remained well above levels seen before the financial crisis (figures 3-1 and 3-2). Buffers designed to conserve capital when capital ratios approach the minimum requirements and surcharges applicable to the largest banks became fully phased-in on January 1, 2019. Meanwhile, the largest banks have paid a sizable share of their profits to their shareholders over the past two years.

3-1. Ratio of Tangible Bank Equity to Assets
Figure 3-1. Ratio of Tangible Bank Equity to Assets
Accessible Version | Return to text

Bank equity is total equity capital net of preferred equity and intangible assets, and assets are total assets. The data are seasonally adjusted by Board staff. Large bank holding companies (BHCs) are those with greater than $50 billion in total assets. The shaded bars indicate periods of business recession as defined by the National Bureau of Economic Research: July 1990–March 1991, March 2001–November 2001 and December 2007–June 2009.

Source: Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council, Call Report Form FFIEC 031, Consolidated Reports of Condition and Income for a Bank with Domestic and Foreign Offices.

3-2. Common Equity Tier 1 Ratio of Banks
Figure 3-2. Common Equity Tier 1 Ratio of Banks
Accessible Version | Return to text

The data are seasonally adjusted by Board staff. Sample includes banks as of 2018:Q4. Before 2014:Q1, the numerator of the common equity tier 1 ratio is tier 1 common capital for advanced-approaches bank holding companies (BHCs) (before 2015:Q1, for non-advanced-approaches BHCs). Afterward, the numerator is common equity tier 1 capital. Large BHCs are those with greater than $50 billion in total assets. The denominator is risk-weighted assets. The shaded bars indicate periods of business recession as defined by the National Bureau of Economic Research: March 2001–November 2001 and December 2007–June 2009.

Source: Federal Reserve Board, Form FR Y-9C, Consolidated Financial Statements for Holding Companies.

Credit performance of bank loans continued to improve on balance. At the largest banks, delinquency rates have trended down; at all other banks, delinquency rates have remained stable. Banks reported in the SLOOS that their commercial and industrial lending standards changed little in the fourth quarter of 2018 after several quarters of easing, suggesting that banks' standards for such loans remained relatively loose, although they had not decreased further (figure 3-3). Meanwhile, the leverage of firms that borrow from the largest banks stayed high, reflecting the overall upward trend in business leverage in recent years (figure 3-4).

3-3. Change in Bank Lending Standards for C&I Loans
Figure 3-3. Change in Bank Lending Standards for C&I Loans
Accessible Version | Return to text

Banks' responses are weighted by their C&I loan market shares. Results are shown for loans to large and middle-market firms. The shaded bars indicate periods of business recession as defined by the National Bureau of Economic Research: March 2001–November 2001 and December 2007–June 2009. C&I is commercial and industrial.

Source: Federal Reserve Board, Senior Loan Officer Opinion Survey on Bank Lending Practices; Federal Reserve Board staff calculations.

3-4. Borrower Leverage for Bank C&I Loans
Figure 3-4. Borrower Leverage for Bank C&I Loans
Accessible Version | Return to text

Weighted median leverage of nonfinancial firms that borrow using commercial and industrial (C&I) loans from the 26 banks that have filed in every quarter since 2013:Q1. Leverage is measured as the ratio of the book value of total debt to the book value of total assets of the borrower, as reported by the lender, and the median is weighted by committed amounts.

Source: Federal Reserve Board, Form FR Y-14Q (Schedule H.1), Capital Assessments and Stress Testing.

...and leverage at broker-dealers and insurance companies stayed low...

Leverage of broker-dealers edged up since November 2018, the time of the previous FSR, but remains near historically low levels (figure 3-5). At life insurance companies and at property and casualty insurance firms, leverage has also stayed low, although it has been increasing slightly at life insurance companies (figure 3-6).

3-5. Leverage of Broker-Dealers
Figure 3-5. Leverage of Broker-Dealers
Accessible Version | Return to text

Leverage is calculated by dividing financial assets by equity.

Source: Federal Reserve Board, Statistical Release Z.1, "Financial Accounts of the United States."

3-6. Leverage of Insurance Companies
Figure 3-6. Leverage of Insurance Companies
Accessible Version | Return to text

The data extend through 2018:Q4. Ratio is calculated as (total assets – separate account assets)/(total capital – accumulated other comprehensive income).

Source: S&P Global Market Intelligence.

...while hedge fund leverage appears to have declined modestly after rising significantly earlier in 2018...

Gross leverage of hedge funds rose steadily over the first part of last year (figure 3-7). However, some indicators of hedge fund leverage, particularly for equity hedge funds, show that leverage decreased at the end of 2018 as equity market volatility rose. In addition, margin debt provided by New York Stock Exchange broker-dealers to fund their clients' equity positions—a measure of leverage that comprises credit extended to both individual and institutional investors including hedge funds—declined over the same period. Meanwhile, in the most recent Senior Credit Officer Opinion Survey on Dealer Financing Terms, or SCOOS, dealers indicated that the use of leverage by hedge funds remained about unchanged over the first quarter of 2019 (figure 3-8).

3-7. Gross Leverage of Hedge Funds
Figure 3-7. Gross Leverage of Hedge Funds
Accessible Version | Return to text

Leverage is computed as the ratio of hedge funds' gross notional exposure (including derivative notional exposures and the nominal value of all long and short positions) to net asset value. Data are reported on a three-quarter lag.

Source: Federal Reserve Board staff calculations based on Securities and Exchange Commission, Form PF, Reporting Form for Investment Advisers to Private Funds and Certain Commodity Pool Operators and Commodity Trading Advisors.

3-8. Change in the Use of Financial Leverage
Figure 3-8. Change in the Use of Financial Leverage
Accessible Version | Return to text

Net percentage equals the percentage of institutions that reported increased use of financial leverage over the past three months minus the percentage of institutions that reported decreased use of financial leverage over the past three months. REIT is real estate investment trust.

Source: Federal Reserve Board, Senior Credit Officer Opinion Survey on Dealer Financing Terms.

...and securitization and borrowing at other nonbank financial firms continued to increase

In a process known as "securitization," financial institutions bundle loans or other financial assets together and sell investors claims on the bundle as securities that can be traded much like bonds. Examples of the resulting securities are collateralized loan obligations (CLOs), asset-backed securities, and commercial and residential mortgage-backed securities (MBS). Issuance volumes of "private label" securities (that is, those for which the security is not guaranteed by a government-sponsored enterprise or by the federal government) have risen in recent years but remain well below the levels seen in the years ahead of the financial crisis (figure 3-9). Of note, CLO issuance has increased rapidly since 2012 and reached a record level in 2018, with these securities funding more than 50 percent of outstanding leveraged loans.

Data on bank lending to nonbank financial institutions (nonbanks) can be informative about the use of leverage by nonbanks and may shed light on how credit losses at nonbanks could be transmitted to banks.6 Committed amounts of credit from large banks to nonbanks—such as finance companies, asset managers, securitization vehicles, and mortgage real estate investment trusts—continued to increase in the second half of 2018 (figure 3-10).7 Nonbanks currently use about one-half of the amounts committed in the form of term loans and drawdowns on credit lines.

3-9. Issuance of Non-agency Securitized Products, by Asset Class
Figure 3-9. Issuance of Non-agency Securitized Products, by Asset
Class
Accessible Version | Return to text

The data from the first quarter of 2019 are annualized to create the 2019 bar. CMBS is commercial mortgage-backed securities; CDO is collateralized debt obligation; RMBS is residential-mortgage-backed securities; CLO is collateralized loan obligation. The "Other" category consists of other asset-backed securities (ABS) backed by credit card debt, student loans, equipment, floor plans, and miscellaneous receivables; re-securitized real estate mortgage investment conduit (Re-REMIC) RMBS; and Re-REMIC CMBS. The data are converted to constant 2019 dollars using the consumer price index. Key identifies bars in order from top to bottom.

Source: Harrison Scott Publications, Asset-Backed Alert (ABAlert.com) and Commercial Mortgage Alert (CMAlert.com); Bureau of Labor Statistics, consumer price index via Haver Analytics.

3-10. Large Bank Lending to Nonbank Financial Firms: Committed Amounts
Figure 3-10. Large Bank Lending to Nonbank Financial Firms: Committed
Amounts
Accessible Version | Return to text

Committed amounts on credit lines and term loans extended to nonbank financial firms by a balanced panel of 26 bank holding companies that have filed Form FR Y-14Q in every quarter since 2013:Q1. Nonbank financial firms are identified based on reported North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes. In addition to NAICS codes, a name-matching algorithm is applied to identify specific entities such as real estate investment trusts (REITs), special purpose entities, collateralized loan obligations (CLOs), and asset-backed securities (ABS). REITs incorporate both mortgage (trading) REITs and equity REITs. Broker-dealers also include commodity contracts dealers and brokerages and other securities and commodity exchanges. Other financial vehicles include closed-end investment and mutual funds and financial planning and pension funds.

Source: Federal Reserve Board, Form FR Y-14Q (Schedule H.1), Capital Assessments and Stress Testing.

References

 6. The box "Vulnerabilities Associated with Elevated Business Debt" in the previous section examines this risk in more detail. Return to text

 7. Since the November FSR, the definition of nonbank financial firms has been revised and now includes firms from the real estate and rental and leasing sector (sector 53 of the North American Industry Classification System). Because of this revision, total commitment amounts in figure 3-10 are larger than in figure 3-9 of the November FSR. For example, the total commitment amount as of the fourth quarter of 2018 is equal to $1trillion based on the November FSR definition and equal to $1.3trillion based on the current definition. Meanwhile, a more refined breakdown of the types of borrowers is used in the new figure. While the November FSR figure included 8 categories of nonbank financial firms, the new figure contains 10 categories. Return to text

Back to Top
Last Update: November 22, 2019