2. Borrowing by Businesses and Households

Vulnerabilities from business and household debt remained moderate

On balance, vulnerabilities arising from borrowing by businesses and households were little changed over the first half of 2022 and remained at moderate levels. The business debt-to-GDP ratio and gross leverage stood at high levels (although significantly lower than the record highs reached at the onset of the pandemic). In contrast, median interest coverage ratios continued to improve, bolstered by strong earnings, and have reached record highs. Taken together, vulnerabilities from business leverage appeared moderate. Indicators of household vulnerabilities, including the household debt-to-GDP ratio and the aggregate household debt service ratio, remained at modest levels, but nominal household debt continued to rise. Going forward, we expect that inflation and rising borrowing costs may pose risks to the ability of some businesses and households to service their debts, especially for those holding adjustable-rate products. An economic downturn or a correction in real estate prices would also put pressure on business and household balance sheets.

Table 2.1 shows the amounts outstanding and recent historical growth rates of forms of debt owed by nonfinancial businesses and households as of the second quarter of 2022. Total outstanding private credit was split about evenly between businesses and households, with businesses owing $19.5 trillion and households owing $18.5 trillion.

Table 2.1. Outstanding Amounts of Nonfinancial Business and Household Credit
Item Outstanding
(billions of dollars)
Growth,
2021:Q2–2022:Q2
(percent)
Average annual growth,
1997–2022:Q2
(percent)
Total private nonfinancial credit 37,955 7.3 5.6
Total nonfinancial business credit 19,457 6.8 5.8
Corporate business credit 12,560 7.3 5.3
Bonds and commercial paper 7,542 1.3 5.5
Bank lending 2,021 19.1 4.0
Leveraged loans* 1,317 12.2 13.9
Noncorporate business credit 6,897 6.0 7.0
Commercial real estate credit 2,968 9.8 6.2
Total household credit 18,498 7.8 5.4
Mortgages 12,159 8.7 5.5
Consumer credit 4,582 7.6 5.0
Student loans 1,748 1.7 8.0
Auto loans 1,364 7.0 5.0
Credit cards 1,087 14.4 3.2
Nominal GDP 24,883 9.1 4.4

Note: The data extend through 2022:Q2. Outstanding amounts are in nominal terms. Growth rates are measured from Q2 of the year immediately preceding the period through Q2 of the final year of the period. The table reports the main components of corporate business credit, total household credit, and consumer credit. Other, smaller components are not reported. The commercial real estate (CRE) row shows CRE debt owed by both corporate and noncorporate businesses. The total household-sector credit includes debt owed by other entities, such as nonprofit organizations. GDP is gross domestic product.

* Leveraged loans included in this table are an estimate of the leveraged loans that are made to nonfinancial businesses only and do not include the small amount of leveraged loans outstanding for financial businesses. The amount outstanding shows institutional leveraged loans and generally excludes loan commitments held by banks. For example, lines of credit are generally excluded from this measure. The average annual growth rate shown for leveraged loans is computed from 2000 to 2022:Q2, as this market was fairly small before 2000.

Source: For leveraged loans, Pitchbook Data, Leveraged Commentary & Data; for GDP, Bureau of Economic Analysis, national income and product accounts; for all other items, Federal Reserve Board, Statistical Release Z.1, "Financial Accounts of the United States."

The ratio of business and household debt to gross domestic product was stable and remained at a moderate level

The combined total debt of nonfinancial businesses and households grew roughly in line with nominal GDP in the first half of 2022, leaving the debt-to-GDP ratio essentially flat and close to its pre-pandemic level (figure 2.1). Regarding the individual sectors, the ratio of business debt to GDP edged up and stood at high levels, while the ratio of household debt to GDP inched down and stood at levels similar to those that existed before the buildup preceding the 2007–09 financial crisis (figure 2.2).

Figure 2.1. The debt of households and businesses relative to GDP was flat in the first half of 2022
Figure 2.1. The debt of households and businesses relative to
GDP was flat in the first half of 2022

Accessible Version | Return to text

Note: The shaded bars with top caps indicate periods of business recession as defined by the National Bureau of Economic Research: January 1980–July 1980, July 1981–November 1982, July 1990–March 1991, March 2001–November 2001, December 2007–June 2009, and February 2020–April 2020. GDP is gross domestic product.

Source: Federal Reserve Board staff calculations based on Bureau of Economic Analysis, national income and product accounts, and Federal Reserve Board, Statistical Release Z.1, "Financial Accounts of the United States."

Figure 2.2. Both business and household debt-to-GDP ratios moved sideways in the first half of 2022
Figure 2.2. Both business and household debt-to-GDP ratios moved
sideways in the first half of 2022

Accessible Version | Return to text

Note: The shaded bars with top caps indicate periods of business recession as defined by the National Bureau of ­Economic Research: January 1980–July 1980, July 1981–November 1982, July 1990–March 1991, March 2001–November 2001, December 2007–June 2009, and February 2020–April 2020. GDP is gross domestic product.

Source: Federal Reserve Board staff calculations based on Bureau of Economic Analysis, national income and product accounts, and Federal Reserve Board, Statistical Release Z.1, "Financial Accounts of the United States."

Key indicators point to little change in business debt vulnerabilities, which remained moderate relative to historical levels

Overall vulnerabilities from nonfinancial business debt remained moderate in the first half of 2022, as measures of leverage were little changed and solid earnings bolstered interest coverage ratios, while risky debt growth slowed. Nonfinancial business debt adjusted for inflation grew modestly in the same period (figure 2.3). However, net issuance of risky debt was subdued over the same period (figure 2.4). In particular, institutional leveraged loan issuance slowed notably in recent months—falling back to its historical average—as investor demand weakened amid market volatility. In addition, the net issuance of high-yield and unrated bonds remained negative so far this year.

Figure 2.3. Business debt adjusted for inflation grew modestly in the first half of 2022
Figure 2.3. Business debt adjusted for inflation grew modestly
in the first half of 2022

Accessible Version | Return to text

Note: Nominal debt growth is seasonally adjusted and is translated into real terms after subtracting the growth rate of the price deflator for the core personal consumption expenditures price.

Source: Federal Reserve Board, Statistical Release Z.1, "Financial Accounts of the United States."

Figure 2.4. Net issuance of risky debt has been subdued so far this year
Figure 2.4. Net issuance of risky debt was subdued so far this
year

Accessible Version | Return to text

Note: Institutional leveraged loans generally exclude loan commitments held by banks. The key identifies bars in order from top to bottom (except for some bars with at least one negative value).

Source: Mergent, Fixed Income Securities Database; PitchBook Data, Leveraged Commentary & Data.

Gross leverage—the ratio of debt to assets—of all publicly traded nonfinancial firms inched down in the first half of 2022, continuing the decline from its historical peak in mid-2020. That said, it remained elevated by historical standards (figure 2.5). Net leverage—the ratio of debt less cash to total assets—was also high relative to its history and edged up among all large businesses as they ran down some of their cash reserves.

Figure 2.5. Gross leverage of large businesses remained at high levels
Figure 2.5. Gross leverage of large businesses remained at high
levels

Accessible Version | Return to text

Note: Gross leverage is an asset-weighted average of the ratio of firms' book value of total debt to book value of total assets. The 75th percentile is calculated from a sample of the 2,500 largest firms by assets. The dashed sections of the lines in the first quarter of 2019 reflect the structural break in the series due to the 2019 compliance deadline for Financial Accounting Standards Board rule Accounting Standards Update 2016-02. The new accounting standard requires operating leases, previously considered off-balance-sheet activities, to be included in measures of debt and assets.

Source: Federal Reserve Board staff calculations based on S&P Global, Compustat.

The ability of large businesses to service their debt, as measured by the median ratio of earnings to interest expenses (the interest coverage ratio), continued to improve in the first half of 2022, on net, and reached its highest level in the past two decades in the first quarter of the year (figure 2.6). This development was due to solid earnings in the first half of 2022. In addition, the effect of rising interest rates was muted, as corporate bonds—which account for the majority of the debt of public firms—generally have fixed interest rates and longer-term maturities. In particular, only about 5 percent of outstanding bonds rated triple-B and 3 percent of outstanding speculative-grade bonds are due within a year. Nevertheless, further increases in interest expenses, combined with possible declines in profitability stemming from high inflation, supply chain disruptions, or an economic downturn, could curtail the ability of highly indebted firms to service their debt. Meanwhile, the median interest coverage ratio for the subset of all publicly traded non-investment-grade firms edged down in the first half of 2022 but remained at relatively high levels. While these firms represent a large share of the number of publicly traded firms (85 percent), their debt constitutes only 35 percent of the total debt in the sector.

Figure 2.6. Firms' ability to service their debt, as measured by the interest coverage ratio, remained high
Figure 2.6. Firms' ability to service their debt, as measured
by the interest coverage ratio, remained high

Accessible Version | Return to text

Note: The interest coverage ratio is earnings before interest and taxes divided by interest payments. Firms with leverage less than 5 percent and interest payments less than $500,000 are excluded.

Source: Federal Reserve Board staff calculations based on S&P Global, Compustat.

The available data for smaller middle-market firms that are privately held—which have less access to capital markets and primarily borrow from banks, private credit and equity funds, and sophisticated investors—also indicate that leverage continued to decline over the first half of 2022 and was at levels similar to those at publicly traded firms. The interest coverage ratio for the median firm in this category also improved during the same period and is above the level at publicly traded firms. However, an important caveat is that the data on smaller middle-market firms are not as comprehensive as those on large firms.

The credit performance of outstanding corporate bonds remained generally solid since the May report. The volume of downgrades and defaults remained low, but market expectations of defaults over the next year rose somewhat, as investor perceptions of the macroeconomic outlook worsened. More than half of investment-grade debt outstanding continues to be rated in the lowest category of the investment-grade range (triple-B). In an economic downturn, widespread downgrades of bonds to speculative-grade ratings could lead investors to sell the downgraded bonds rapidly, as some are constrained in their ability to hold speculative-grade debt, potentially increasing market illiquidity and downward price pressures.

The credit quality of leveraged loans remained solid through the second quarter, but it has worsened lately. Over the summer, the volume of credit rating downgrades exceeded the volume of upgrades, and default rates inched up, although from historically low levels (figure 2.7). In addition, leveraged loans feature floating interest rates, so rising interest rates, in combination with a potential slowdown in earnings growth posed by the less favorable economic outlook, could put pressure on the credit quality of outstanding debt going forward. Amid low volumes, the distribution of loans by one measure of leverage was little changed, on balance, this year. For instance, the share of newly issued loans to large corporations with debt multiples—defined as the ratio of debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization—greater than 5 decreased slightly in the second and third quarters, indicating lower tolerance for additional leverage among investors in this market, although it remained around historical highs (figure 2.8).

Figure 2.7. Default rates on leveraged loans inched up from historically low levels
Figure 2.7. Default rates on leveraged loans inched up from historically
low levels

Accessible Version | Return to text

Note: The data begin in December 1998. The default rate is calculated as the amount in default over the past 12 months divided by the total outstanding volume at the beginning of the 12-month period. The shaded bars with top caps indicate periods of business recession as defined by the National Bureau of Economic Research: March 2001–November 2001, December 2007–June 2009, and February 2020–April 2020.

Source: PitchBook Data, Leveraged Commentary & Data.

Figure 2.8. Majority of new leveraged loans this year have debt multiples above 5
Figure 2.8. Majority of new leveraged loans this year have debt
multiples above 5

Accessible Version | Return to text

Note: Volumes are for large corporations with earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization greater than $50 million and exclude existing tranches of add-ons and amendments as well as restatements with no new money. The key identifies bars in order from top to bottom.

Source: Mergent, Fixed Income Securities Database; PitchBook Data, Leveraged Commentary & Data.

Delinquencies at small businesses edged up, but credit quality remained solid

Credit quality for small businesses remained solid even as delinquency rates edged up lately from relatively low levels. Borrowing costs increased in the first half of 2022, but they remained lower than the prevailing pre-pandemic rates. In addition, the share of small businesses that borrow regularly is rising, according to the National Federation of Independent Business Small Business Economic Trends Survey, but it is still low relative to historical levels; the share of firms with unmet financing needs remained quite low.

Vulnerabilities from household debt remained moderate

Despite a sharp decline in equity prices in the first half of 2022, household balance sheets remained strong, with elevated levels of liquid assets and large home equity cushions. In addition, prime-rated consumers continued to account for most of the increases in nominal total household debt. That said, many households started to draw down the buffers of savings that had accumulated during the pandemic. Some households remain financially strained and more vulnerable to future shocks, especially with persistently high inflation and the accompanying declines in real income and increases in borrowing costs.

Borrowing by households continued to rise in line with income and is mostly concentrated among borrowers with low credit risk

Outstanding household debt adjusted for inflation edged down across the credit score distribution, remaining about flat for prime borrowers and decreasing for near-prime and subprime borrowers (figure 2.9). Nominal household debt, however, continued to grow in the first half of 2022, except for student loan debt. Borrowers with prime credit scores, which accounted for more than half of the total number of borrowers, continued to drive most of the growth. A note of caution, however, is that this trend reflects both increased borrowing by prime-rated borrowers and a significant increase in the share of households rated as prime after the distribution of pandemic-related relief payments.5

Figure 2.9. Real household debt shrank in the first half of 2022
Figure 2.9. Real household debt shrank in the first half of 2022

Accessible Version | Return to text

Note: Subprime are those with an Equifax Risk Score below 620; near prime are from 620 to 719; prime are greater than 719. Scores are measured contemporaneously. Student loan balances before 2004 are estimated using average growth from 2004 to 2007, by risk score. The data are converted to constant 2022 dollars using the consumer price index.

Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York Consumer Credit Panel/Equifax; Bureau of Labor Statistics, consumer price index via Haver Analytics.

Credit risk of outstanding household debt remained generally low

The ratio of total required household debt payments to total disposable income (the household debt service ratio) increased somewhat in the first half of 2022, suggesting that some households have become more vulnerable to shocks. However, the ratio remained at modest levels after reaching a historical low in the first quarter of 2021 amid extensive fiscal stimulus, credit card paydowns, and low interest rates. With interest rates rising, the ratio could increase further. Only a small share of household debt has a floating rate, mostly in the form of credit card debt, which should limit the effect of increased interest rates in the near term. For most other types of household debt, rising interest rates increase borrowing cost only for new loan originations.

Mortgage debt accounted for roughly two-thirds of total household debt. New mortgage extensions skewed heavily toward prime borrowers in recent years, with originations of subprime loans adjusted for inflation running at 25 percent of the peak level in 2006 (figure 2.10). The share of mortgage balances in a loss-mitigation program continued to decline and stood at low levels. However, the early payment delinquency rate—the share of balances becoming delinquent within one year of mortgage origination—started to rise. This rise resulted in an uptick in the overall delinquency rate from a historically low level (figure 2.11). Amid continued house price growth, just 1.9 percent of mortgage borrowers had negative equity in the second quarter of 2022 (figure 2.12). However, mortgages recently originated with low down payments are subject to entering negative equity quickly if house prices decline significantly. About half of recently originated purchase mortgages have loan-to-value ratios above 90 percent, a share that has been about unchanged for the past decade. In addition, these highly leveraged mortgage originations tend to be associated with somewhat lower average borrower credit scores. Other measures of riskiness remained modest. Estimates of housing leverage when measuring home values as a function of rents and other market fundamentals increased in the first half of 2022, yet they remained significantly lower than their peak levels before 2008 (figure 2.13, black line). In addition, interest rate risk for mortgage borrowers is currently limited. The share of adjustable-rate mortgages in new home purchases rose to 10 percent in recent months but has been at or below that fraction since 2009. Moreover, available data suggest that the nonqualified mortgage share of purchase originations edged up, albeit from extremely low levels.6

Figure 2.10. New mortgage extensions in real terms to near-prime and subprime borrowers have been subdued
Figure 2.10. New mortgage extensions in real terms to near-prime
and subprime borrowers have been subdued

Accessible Version | Return to text

Note: Year-over-year change in balances for the second quarter of each year among those households whose balance increased over this window. Subprime are those with an Equifax Risk Score below 620; near prime are from 620 to 719; prime are greater than 719. Scores were measured 1 year ago. The data are converted to constant 2022 dollars using the consumer price index. The key identifies bars in order from left to right.

Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York Consumer Credit Panel/Equifax; Bureau of Labor Statistics, consumer price index via Haver Analytics.

Figure 2.11. Mortgage delinquency rates remained at historically low levels
Figure 2.11. Mortgage delinquency rates remained at historically
low levels

Accessible Version | Return to text

Note: Loss mitigation includes tradelines that have a narrative code of forbearance, natural disaster, payment deferral (including partial), loan modification (including federal government plans), or loans with no scheduled payment and a nonzero balance. Delinquent includes loans reported to the credit bureau at least 30 days past due.

Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York Consumer Credit Panel/Equifax.

Figure 2.12. Very few homeowners had negative equity in their homes
Figure 2.12. Very few homeowners had negative equity in their
homes

Accessible Version | Return to text

Source: CoreLogic, Inc., Real Estate Data.

Figure 2.13. A model-based estimate of housing leverage has remained fairly steady over the past 10 years
Figure 2.13. A model-based estimate of housing leverage has remained
fairly steady over the past 10 years

Accessible Version | Return to text

Note: Housing leverage is estimated as the ratio of the average outstanding mortgage loan balance for owner-occupied homes with a mortgage to (1) current home values using the Zillow national house price index and (2) model-implied house prices estimated by a staff model based on rents, interest rates, and a time trend.

Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York Consumer Credit Panel/Equifax; Zillow, Inc., Zillow Real Estate Data; Bureau of Labor Statistics via Haver Analytics.

The remaining one-third of household debt was consumer credit, which consisted primarily of student loans, auto loans, and credit card debt (as shown in table 2.1). Inflation-adjusted consumer credit edged down with respect to the same time last year, as the increase in credit card debt was more than compensated for by the declines in student loan debt and auto debt (figure 2.14). The contraction in real auto loan balances was driven by declines among near-prime and prime borrowers, while balances for subprime borrowers remained about unchanged on net (figure 2.15). The share of auto loan balances in loss mitigation continued to decline and stood at a low level, but those in delinquent status have increased significantly in the past several quarters. Still, those increases were to levels similar to the modest rates observed during most of the previous decade (figure 2.16).

Figure 2.14. Real consumer credit edged down on lower student loan balances
Figure 2.14. Real consumer credit edged down on lower student
loan balances

Accessible Version | Return to text

Note: The data are converted to constant 2022 dollars using the consumer price index. Student loan data begin in 2005.

Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York Consumer Credit Panel/Equifax; Bureau of Labor Statistics, consumer price index via Haver Analytics.

Figure 2.15. Real auto loans outstanding fell
Figure 2.15. Real auto loans outstanding fell

Accessible Version | Return to text

Note: Subprime are those with an Equifax Risk Score below 620; near prime are from 620 to 719; prime are greater than 719. Scores are measured contemporaneously. The data are converted to constant 2022 dollars using the consumer price index.

Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York Consumer Credit Panel/Equifax; Bureau of Labor Statistics, consumer price index via Haver Analytics.

Figure 2.16. Auto loan delinquencies moved up but remained at modest levels
Figure 2.16. Auto loan delinquencies moved up but remained at
modest levels

Accessible Version | Return to text

Note: Loss mitigation includes tradelines that have a narrative code of forbearance, natural disaster, payment deferral (including partial), loan modification (including federal government plans), or loans with no scheduled payment and a nonzero balance. Delinquent includes loans reported to the credit bureau as at least 30 days past due. The data for auto loans are reported semi­annually by RADAR until 2017, after which they are reported quarterly. The data for delinquent/loss mitigation begin in the first quarter of 2001.

Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York Consumer Credit Panel/Equifax.

Aggregate real credit card balances increased across the credit score distribution from a year earlier, driven by double-digit nominal credit card debt growth (figure 2.17). This rapid increase was driven not only by a higher level of credit card spending among consumers who pay their balances in full each month, but also by an increase in revolving balances, especially during the first half of the year. Revolving balances remained about 10 percent below pre-pandemic levels. With the rise in balances, delinquency rates started to increase from a year earlier, especially among subprime borrowers, although from historically low levels (figure 2.18).7

Figure 2.17. Real credit card balances have increased this year, partially reversing earlier declines
Figure 2.17. Real credit card balances have increased this year,
partially reversing earlier declines

Accessible Version | Return to text

Note: Subprime are those with an Equifax Risk Score below 620; near prime are from 620 to 719; prime are greater than 719. Scores are measured contemporaneously. The data are converted to constant 2022 dollars using the consumer price index.

Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York Consumer Credit Panel/Equifax; Bureau of Labor Statistics, consumer price index via Haver Analytics.

Figure 2.18. Credit card delinquencies increased but remained at low levels
Figure 2.18. Credit card delinquencies increased but remained
at low levels

Accessible Version | Return to text

Note: Delinquency is at least 30 days past due, excluding severe derogatory loans. Subprime are those with an Equifax Risk Score below 620; near prime are from 620 to 719; prime are greater than 719. Credit scores are lagged 4 quarters.

Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York Consumer Credit Panel/Equifax.

After rising rapidly for over a decade, nominal student loan debt edged down in the first half of 2022 and declined significantly in inflation-adjusted terms over the same period. The decline was driven by a combination of factors, including lower loan originations; a pause on interest accumulation for most student loans; repayment; and loan discharges due to disability, school closure or misconduct, and other factors.

 

References

 

 5. Analysis suggests that the marked decline in the share of subprime-rated borrowers during the pandemic was in part driven by the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act forbearance provisions and thus might not reflect an improvement in the overall credit quality of households. Other contributing factors to this acceleration included income support programs. See Sarena Goodman, Geng Li, Alvaro Mezza, and Lucas Nathe (2021), "Developments in the Credit Score Distribution over 2020," FEDS Notes (Washington: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 30), https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/notes/feds-notes/developments-in-the-credit-score-distribution-over-2020-20210430.htmlReturn to text

 6. Nonqualified mortgages are mortgages that do not satisfy the Ability-to-Repay/Qualified Mortgage Rule, which requires a creditor to make a reasonable, good faith determination of a consumer's ability to repay a residential mortgage according to its terms. For more details, see Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (2022), "What Is a Qualified Mortgage?" webpage, https://www.consumerfinance.gov/ask-cfpb/what-is-a-qualified-mortgage-en-1789Return to text

 7. Securitized credit card outstanding balances amounted to $50 billion in the second quarter of 2022, compared with $330 billion reached during the 2007–09 financial crisis, which likely limits the effects of consumer credit delinquencies on financial stability. In addition, delinquency rates in securitized credit card pools remained lower than in the aggregate. For auto loans, securitized outstanding balances stood around $250 billion in the second quarter of 2022, above the $200 billion peak reached right before the 2007–09 financial crisis. That said, the current amount represents less than 20 percent of total outstanding balances, whereas it represented 25 percent before the 2007–09 financial crisis. Additionally, only $70 billion are classified as subprime auto asset-backed securities. Return to text

Back to Top
Last Update: November 14, 2022