Accessible Version - 2024 Federal Reserve Stress Test Results - June 2024

Figure 1. How stress testing works for large banks

Caption: The Federal Reserve conducts stress tests to ensure that large banks are sufficiently capitalized and able to lend to households and businesses even in a severe recession. The stress tests evaluate the financial resilience of banks by estimating losses, revenues, expenses, and resulting capital levels under hypothetical economic conditions.

In this infographic, there are three arrows on the left side that are facing to the right.

The first arrow says, "The Federal Reserve develops stress test scenarios."

The second arrow says, "The Federal Reserve develops or selects stress test models."

The third arrow says, "Banks submit detailed bank data.1"

The arrows are pointing to box in the middle of the figure that says, "Using the scenario data and bank data as variables in the stress test models, the Federal Reserve projects how banks are likely to perform under a hypothetical recession."

The middle box is pointing to a box on the right side that says, "The Federal Reserve uses the results of the supervisory stress test, in part, to inform capital requirements for participating banks."

Return to text
Figure 2. Aggregate common equity capital ratio for 31 banks in the 2024 stress test
Date Percent
2009:Q1 5.2
2009:Q2 6.4
2009:Q3 7.6
2009:Q4 7.9
2010:Q1 8.3
2010:Q2 8.8
2010:Q3 9.1
2010:Q4 9.5
2011:Q1 9.7
2011:Q2 10.0
2011:Q3 9.9
2011:Q4 10.2
2012:Q1 10.8
2012:Q2 10.9
2012:Q3 11.1
2012:Q4 11.2
2013:Q1 10.8
2013:Q2 11.1
2013:Q3 11.3
2013:Q4 11.4
2014:Q1 12.1
2014:Q2 12.2
2014:Q3 12.3
2014:Q4 12.4
2015:Q1 11.6
2015:Q2 11.8
2015:Q3 12.1
2015:Q4 12.3
2016:Q1 12.2
2016:Q2 12.4
2016:Q3 12.4
2016:Q4 12.5
2017:Q1 12.5
2017:Q2 12.6
2017:Q3 12.6
2017:Q4 12.2
2018:Q1 11.8
2018:Q2 12.0
2018:Q3 12.0
2018:Q4 12.0
2019:Q1 12.1
2019:Q2 12.2
2019:Q3 12.0
2019:Q4 11.9
2020:Q1 11.5
2020:Q2 12.1
2020:Q3 12.6
2020:Q4 12.7
2021:Q1 12.7
2021:Q2 12.6
2021:Q3 12.4
2021:Q4 12.3
2022:Q1 11.7
2022:Q2 11.7
2022:Q3 11.9
2022:Q4 12.1
2023:Q1 12.2
2023:Q2 12.3
2023:Q3 12.6
2023:Q4 12.7
2024:Q1 12.8

Note: The Federal Reserve’s evaluation of a bank’s common equity capital was initially measured using a tier 1 common capital ratio but now is evaluated using a common equity tier 1 capital ratio. Not all of the banks included in the 2024 stress test reported data for all periods since 2009.
Source: FR Y-9C.

Return to text
Figure 3. Aggregate maximum decline in stressed common equity tier 1 capital ratio, severely adverse scenario

Percentage points

Year Change in CET1 Ratio
2018 stress test -3.6
2019 stress test -2.3
June 2020 stress test -2.1
December 2020 stress test -2.6
2021 stress test -2.4
2022 stress test -2.7
2023 stress test -2.5
2024 stress test -2.8

Note: The bar represents the aggregate maximum common equity tier 1 (CET1) capital ratio decline of the banks in each exercise. The values for the 2018 and 2019 stress tests are estimates of the CET1 capital ratio decline had the stress capital buffer rule been in place at that time. For purposes of this figure, the 2018 and 2019 stress test values assume (1) a constant level of assets over the projection horizon, (2) no common dividend payments, (3) no issuances or repurchases of common or preferred stock (except those related to business plan changes), and (4) fully phased-in capital deductions.

Return to text
Figure 4. When BHCs, covered SLHCs, and IHCs are required to participate in the supervisory stress test

Caption: The Board conducts stress tests of bank holding companies it supervises on an annual or two-year cycle. Based on a bank holding company’s financial condition, size, complexity, risk profile, risks to the U.S. economy, or scope of operations or activities, the Board may conduct a stress test of a bank holding company more or less frequently than required.

The figure has two two-column boxes.

In the top box, in the left column, it says "Every year." In the right column, there are three bullets. The top bullet says, "U.S. global systemically important bank holding companies (Category I)." The second bullet says, "Domestic bank holding companies and U.S. intermediate holding companies of foreign banks with $700 billion or more in total assets or $75 billion or more in cross-jurisdictional activity (Category II)." The bottom bullet says, "Domestic bank holding companies and U.S. intermediate holding companies of foreign banks with $250 billion or more in total assets or $75 billion or more in weighted short-term wholesale funding, nonbank assets, or off-balance-sheet exposure (Category III)."

In the bottom box, in the left column, "Every 2 years (in years ending in an even number)." In the right column, there is one bullet and a note. The bullet says, "Domestic bank holding companies and U.S. intermediate holding companies of foreign banks with $100 billion or more in total assets that do not meet the requirements for every-year stress testing (Category IV)." The note says, "Note: Bank holding companies of this asset size may also elect to participate in a stress test in a year ending in an odd number."

Return to text
Figure A. Credit card balances and delinquency rate

Billions of dollars, Percent

Year Total balances Delinquency rate
12/31/2017 768.20 2.7%
3/31/2018 728.58 2.7%
6/30/2018 745.23 2.5%
9/30/2018 755.16 2.7%
12/31/2018 796.83 2.9%
3/31/2019 758.94 2.8%
6/30/2019 780.29 2.6%
9/30/2019 789.13 2.8%
12/31/2019 841.83 2.9%
3/31/2020 765.91 2.9%
6/30/2020 708.98 2.4%
9/30/2020 699.04 2.1%
12/31/2020 722.41 2.3%
3/31/2021 667.64 2.1%
6/30/2021 698.94 1.6%
9/30/2021 710.86 1.6%
12/31/2021 770.32 1.7%
3/31/2022 752.53 1.9%
6/30/2022 802.70 1.8%
9/30/2022 828.83 2.1%
12/31/2022 895.25 2.5%
3/31/2023 874.88 2.7%
6/30/2023 917.36 2.8%
9/30/2023 939.75 3.2%
12/31/2023 999.09 3.5%

Source: FR Y-14Q and FR Y-14M Data.

Return to text
Figure B. Probabilities of default and year-over-year change in share of commercial and industrial (C&I) loans, by rating
Investment grade Change in portfolio share Probability of default
AAA -0.10 0.03
AA -0.20 0.04
A -1.08 0.09
Non-investment grade    
BBB -1.04 0.25
BB 1.91 0.94
B 0.03 4.88
C 0.48 17.99

Note: Probability of default is the bank-provided estimate of the annual probability an obligor defaults on its debt. Graded C&I loans are those that are rated or graded using the consolidated holding company’s commercial credit rating system, as it is defined in the consolidated holding company’s normal course of business. Not all C&I loans in the sample report probabilities of default.
Source: FR Y-14Q.

Return to text
Figure C. Noninterest expense and noninterest income, as a share of assets

Percent of total assets

Year Noninterest income Noninterest expense
2017 2.3% 2.8%
2018 2.3% 2.9%
2019 2.3% 2.8%
2020 2.1% 2.5%
2021 2.2% 2.5%
2022 2.0% 2.6%
2023 2.0% 2.8%

Note: 2023 noninterest expense excludes the FDIC special assessments.
Source: FR Y-9C.

Return to text
Figure 5. Change from 2023:Q4 to minimum common equity tier 1 capital ratio in the severely adverse scenario
Bank Percentage points
Ally 2.3
American Express 1.1
Bank of America 2.7
Bank of NY-Mellon -0.2
Barclays US 4.2
BMO 5.5
Capital One 5.3
Charles Schwab Corp -0.7
Citigroup 3.7
Citizens 4.1
DB USA 13.3
Discover 2.5
Fifth Third 2.6
Goldman Sachs 5.8
HSBC 5.1
Huntington 1.8
JPMorgan Chase 2.5
KeyCorp 2.6
M&T 3.2
Morgan Stanley 4.6
Northern Trust 0.0
PNC 1.6
RBC USA 6.3
Regions 1.8
Santander 2.3
State Street 0.4
TD Group 2.2
Truist 2.2
UBS Americas 9.3
US Bancorp 2.4
Wells Fargo 3.3
Median 2.6

Note: Estimates of minimum common equity tier 1 (CET1) capital as a percent of risk-weighted assets are for the nine-quarter period from 2024:Q1 to 2026:Q1. Negative values indicate CET1 ratio increases.

Return to text
Figure 6. Pre-tax net income rates in the severely adverse scenario
Bank Percent
Ally -1.8
American Express 2.4
Bank of America -1.4
Bank of NY-Mellon 0.8
Barclays US -1.1
BMO -3.3
Capital One -3.7
Charles Schwab Corp 1.2
Citigroup -1.1
Citizens -3.0
DB USA -3.5
Discover 0.8
Fifth Third -1.9
Goldman Sachs -1.4
HSBC -2.0
Huntington -1.1
JPMorgan Chase -1.0
KeyCorp -1.9
M&T -2.3
Morgan Stanley -0.5
Northern Trust -0.7
PNC -1.0
RBC USA -3.7
Regions -1.4
Santander -0.9
State Street 0.2
TD Group -1.1
Truist -1.6
UBS Americas -1.9
US Bancorp -1.2
Wells Fargo -2.5
Median -1.4

Note: Estimates are for the nine-quarter period from 2024:Q1 to 2026:Q1 as a percent of average assets.

Return to text
Figure 7. Projected losses in the severely adverse scenario
Severely adverse scenario Billions of dollars Percent of total losses
First-lien mortgages, domestic 35.1 5
Junior liens and HELOCs 7.0 1
Credit cards 175.2 26
Other consumer loans 58.0 8
Commercial and industrial loans 141.9 21
Commercial real estate, domestic 77.2 11
Other loans 77.0 11
Securities losses 5.5 1
Trading and counterparty losses 91.4 13
Other losses 16.2 2

Note: Percent of total losses may not sum to 100 because of rounding.

Return to text
Figure 8. Pre-provision net revenue rates in the severely adverse scenario
Bank Percent
Ally 3.9
American Express 12.6
Bank of America 1.0
Bank of NY-Mellon 1.7
Barclays US 2.4
BMO 0.8
Capital One 7.4
Charles Schwab Corp 1.5
Citigroup 1.4
Citizens 1.8
DB USA -1.5
Discover 14.9
Fifth Third 2.6
Goldman Sachs 1.0
HSBC -0.2
Huntington 2.7
JPMorgan Chase 1.8
KeyCorp 2.2
M&T 2.5
Morgan Stanley 1.9
Northern Trust 2.1
PNC 2.3
RBC USA 1.3
Regions 4.1
Santander 3.8
State Street 1.2
TD Group 1.3
Truist 2.5
UBS Americas -0.2
US Bancorp 2.5
Wells Fargo 1.3
Median 1.9

Note: Estimates are for the nine-quarter period from 2024:Q1 to 2026:Q1 as a percent of average assets.

Return to text
Back to Top
Last Update: July 08, 2024