Results for Banks under the Severely Adverse Scenario
This section contains the Federal Reserve's results for the 2024 supervisory stress test under the severely adverse scenario. The results are presented both in the aggregate and for individual banks.
The aggregate results incorporate the combined sensitivities of capital, losses, revenues, and expenses across all banks to the stressed economic and financial market conditions contained in the severely adverse scenario. The range of results across individual banks indicates differences in business focus, asset composition, revenue and expense sources, and portfolio risk characteristics. Box 2 contains additional insights about the 2024 stress test results by providing information about recent trends in the banking industry. The comprehensive 2024 stress test results for individual banks are in appendix A.
Box 2. 2024 Stress Test Results Highlights
The results of the 2024 supervisory stress test indicate large banks would experience substantial losses under the severely adverse scenario but would maintain common equity tier 1 (CET1) capital ratios above the required minimum regulatory levels throughout the projection horizon.
The 2.8 percentage point decline in the aggregate CET1 capital ratio projected in the 2024 stress test is larger than the 2.5 percentage point decline in the 2023 stress test (see figure 3 in "Executive Summary"). The larger decline in this year's aggregate capital ratio owes significantly to
- growth in credit card balances and a rise in credit card delinquencies, which increase projected losses on consumer credit (see figure A);
- banks' corporate credit portfolios have shifted toward riskier loans resulting in a larger share of non-investment grade corporate credit and a significant increase in the projected loss rate (see figure B); and
- lower noninterest income in recent years and higher noninterest expenses, even after excluding FDIC special assessments, resulting in lower projected noninterest net revenue (see figure C).
Projected loan loss rates rise from 6.4 percent in the 2023 stress test to 7.1 percent in the 2024 stress test, driven significantly by riskier credit card and corporate portfolios.
Household savings have declined following the depletion of pandemic-era savings, which has caused credit card balances to reach new highs (see figure A).1 Despite modest loan growth in most sectors, credit card balances grew 12 percent in 2023 and represent 12 percent of banks' total loans, in aggregate. At the same time, credit card performance has deteriorated over recent years. The delinquency rate has steadily risen over the past several years (see figure A), while net charge-offs have sharply increased since last year. Overall, the significant growth in banks' credit card balances and performance deterioration leads to greater losses in the 2024 stress test than in recent years. In the 2024 stress test, banks are projected to lose $175 billion on credit cards, or 17.6 percent of average portfolio balances. This represents 26 percent of total projected losses.
At the same time, corporate portfolios also have become riskier, as indicated by a decline in the share of investment-grade loans. Commercial and industrial (C&I) loans comprise over 60 percent of corporate committed balances. Over the past year, the investment-grade share of banks' C&I committed balances declined by two percentage points. Non-investment grade loans are at least three times more likely to default than investment-grade loans (see figure B). In part due to the decline in corporate credit conditions, the projected C&I loan loss rate is the highest it has been in recent years (8.1 percent).2 In the 2024 stress test, banks are projected to lose $142 billion on C&I loans, representing 21 percent of total projected losses.
In 2023, banks' noninterest expense as a share of assets increased significantly, while noninterest income as a share of assets was flat (see figure C). Under stress, noninterest expenses tend to be persistent, while noninterest income tends to fall. There are structural reasons for the differences in the way noninterest expenses and income perform under stress. While some expenses can be easily reduced (such as cash bonuses), many expenses tend to be fixed (such as building leases, salaries, and benefits). Such fixed expenses tend to carry forward into recessions, as it takes time for banks to learn about the severity of the downturn and assess whether reductions in headcount or office space would be appropriate. Moreover, even after such strategic changes are implemented, the cost savings typically accrue later, as banks must absorb associated costs, such as severance payments. Meanwhile, on the income side, many of the noninterest income components are directly related to deal flow and trading volume, which tend to decrease quickly during periods of economic stress. Projections under stress reflect recent experience and, in 2023, actual noninterest expenses were higher and noninterest income lower than in previous years. As a result, projected noninterest net revenue is lower in the 2024 stress test than in recent years.
Large bank exposure to commercial real estate (CRE) debt remains an area of focus for Federal Reserve supervisors. The 2024 supervisory severely adverse scenario features heightened stress in CRE, including a 40 percent decline in CRE prices. The projected CRE loss rate in the 2024 stress test is the same as the projected loss rate in the 2023 stress test (8.8 percent), and as such, projected CRE losses, while significant at $77 billion, are not a notable driver of year-over-year changes in the stress test results. While there has been an increase in projected losses on loans to office properties, reflecting deteriorating fundamentals in the office segment, these are offset by a decline in projected losses on loans to hotels and retail properties, for which market fundamentals have improved over the last year.
Despite the increase in projected losses and decline in projected pre-provision net revenue in this year's stress test as compared to last, each bank has sufficient capital to absorb these impacts and continue to operate above CET1 capital minimum requirements under this year's hypothetical scenario.
1. Abdelrahman, Hamza, and Luiz E. Oliveira. 2023. "Data Revisions and Pandemic-Era Excess Savings." SF Fed Blog, November 8. https://www.frbsf.org/research-and-insights/blog/sf-fed-blog/2023/11/08/data-revisions-and-pandemic-era-excess-savings/ Return to text
2. C&I loan loss rate includes C&I loans, as well as corporate and business cards and small business loans. Return to text
Capital
Under the severely adverse scenario, the aggregate CET1 capital ratio is projected to decline from an actual 12.7 percent at the start of the projection horizon to a minimum of 9.9 percent before rising to 10.4 percent at the end of nine quarters (see table 4). Tables 5 and 6 present post-stress minimum capital ratios for each bank, and the change from the start of the projection horizon, which varies considerably across banks (see figure 5). This variation is due to differences in banks' business lines, portfolio composition, and securities and loan risk characteristics, which drive changes in the magnitude and timing of loss, revenue, and expense projections.
Table 4. Capital ratios and risk-weighted assets, actual 2023:Q4 and projected 2024:Q1–2026:Q1
Percent except as noted
Regulatory ratio | Actual 2023:Q4 |
Projected 2026:Q1 |
Projected minimum |
---|---|---|---|
Common equity tier 1 capital ratio | 12.7 | 10.4 | 9.9 |
Tier 1 capital ratio | 14.3 | 12.0 | 11.6 |
Total capital ratio | 16.3 | 14.1 | 13.8 |
Tier 1 leverage ratio | 7.8 | 6.5 | 6.2 |
Supplementary leverage ratio | 6.4 | 5.4 | 5.1 |
Risk-weighted assets1 (billions of dollars) | 11,465.8 | 11,331.6 |
Note: The capital ratios are calculated using the capital action assumptions provided within the supervisory stress testing rules. See 12 C.F.R. §§ 238.132(d); 252.44(c). These projections represent hypothetical estimates that involve an economic outcome that is more adverse than expected. The minimum capital ratios are for the period 2024:Q1 to 2026:Q1. Supplementary leverage ratio projections only include estimates for banks subject to Category I, II, or III standards.
1. For each quarter, risk-weighted assets are calculated under the Board's standardized approach to risk-based capital in 12 C.F.R. pt. 217, subpt. D. Return to table
Note: The Federal Reserve revised this report on August 28, 2024:
- Total capital ratio, Projected minimum has been revised from 13.7 to 13.8.
- Risk-weighted assets, Projected 026:Q1 has been revised from 11,330.5 to 11,331.6
Table 5. Projected minimum common equity tier 1 capital ratio under the severely adverse scenario, 2024:Q1–2026:Q1: 31 banks
Percent
Bank | Stressed ratios with supervisory stress testing capital action assumptions |
---|---|
Ally | 7.0 |
American Express | 9.4 |
Bank of America | 9.1 |
Bank of NY-Mellon | 12.2 |
Barclays US | 9.5 |
BMO | 5.0 |
Capital One | 7.6 |
Charles Schwab Corp | 25.2 |
Citigroup | 9.7 |
Citizens | 6.5 |
DB USA | 14.5 |
Discover | 8.8 |
Fifth Third | 7.7 |
Goldman Sachs | 8.8 |
HSBC | 6.7 |
Huntington | 8.4 |
JPMorgan Chase | 12.5 |
KeyCorp | 7.4 |
M&T | 7.7 |
Morgan Stanley | 10.6 |
Northern Trust | 11.4 |
PNC | 8.3 |
RBC USA | 9.4 |
Regions | 8.5 |
Santander | 10.1 |
State Street | 11.2 |
TD Group | 14.8 |
Truist | 7.9 |
UBS Americas | 10.0 |
US Bancorp | 7.5 |
Wells Fargo | 8.1 |
Note: The capital ratios are calculated using the capital action assumptions provided within the supervisory stress testing rules. See 12 C.F.R. §§ 238.132(d); 252.44(c). These projections represent hypothetical estimates that involve an economic outcome that is more adverse than expected. The minimum capital ratio presented is for the period 2024:Q1 to 2026:Q1.
Source: Federal Reserve estimates in the severely adverse scenario.
Note: The Federal Reserve revised this report on August 28, 2024:
- Goldman Sachs, Stressed ratios with supervisory stress testing capital action assumptions has been revised from 8.5 to 8.8.
Table 6. Capital ratios, actual 2023:Q4 and projected 2024:Q1–2026:Q1 under the severely adverse scenario: 31 banks
Percent
Bank | Common equity tier 1 capital ratio |
Tier 1 capital ratio | Total capital ratio | Tier 1 leverage ratio | Supplementary leverage ratio1 |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual 2023: Q4 |
Ending | Mini- mum |
Actual 2023: Q4 |
Ending | Mini- mum |
Actual 2023: Q4 |
Ending | Mini- mum |
Actual 2023: Q4 |
Ending | Mini- mum |
Actual 2023: Q4 |
Ending | Mini- mum |
|
Ally | 9.4 | 7.1 | 7.0 | 10.8 | 8.5 | 8.5 | 12.4 | 10.1 | 10.1 | 8.7 | 6.8 | 6.8 | |||
American Express | 10.5 | 11.8 | 9.4 | 11.3 | 12.5 | 10.2 | 13.1 | 14.4 | 12.0 | 9.9 | 10.9 | 8.7 | |||
Bank of America | 11.8 | 9.3 | 9.1 | 13.5 | 11.0 | 10.8 | 15.2 | 12.9 | 12.8 | 7.1 | 5.8 | 5.7 | 6.1 | 4.9 | 4.8 |
Bank of NY-Mellon | 12.0 | 14.8 | 12.2 | 14.8 | 17.6 | 15.0 | 15.8 | 18.6 | 16.2 | 6.0 | 7.1 | 6.1 | 7.4 | 8.7 | 7.5 |
Barclays US | 13.7 | 11.1 | 9.5 | 15.1 | 12.6 | 11.0 | 16.9 | 14.5 | 13.0 | 8.5 | 7.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 5.0 | 4.3 |
BMO | 10.5 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 11.1 | 5.7 | 5.7 | 12.9 | 7.6 | 7.6 | 8.3 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 7.2 | 3.6 | 3.6 |
Capital One | 12.9 | 7.6 | 7.6 | 14.2 | 9.0 | 9.0 | 16.0 | 10.8 | 10.8 | 11.2 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 9.6 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
Charles Schwab Corp | 24.5 | 27.3 | 25.2 | 31.7 | 34.5 | 32.4 | 31.7 | 34.8 | 32.5 | 8.5 | 9.3 | 8.7 | 8.5 | 9.3 | 8.7 |
Citigroup | 13.4 | 11.1 | 9.7 | 15.0 | 12.8 | 11.4 | 17.6 | 15.4 | 14.1 | 7.2 | 6.0 | 5.3 | 5.8 | 4.9 | 4.3 |
Citizens | 10.6 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 11.8 | 7.7 | 7.7 | 13.7 | 9.7 | 9.7 | 9.3 | 6.0 | 6.0 | |||
DB USA | 27.8 | 14.5 | 14.5 | 35.0 | 22.6 | 22.6 | 35.1 | 23.1 | 23.1 | 10.0 | 5.8 | 5.8 | 9.0 | 5.3 | 5.3 |
Discover | 11.3 | 11.0 | 8.8 | 12.1 | 11.8 | 9.6 | 13.7 | 13.4 | 11.3 | 10.7 | 10.9 | 8.5 | |||
Fifth Third | 10.3 | 7.7 | 7.7 | 11.6 | 9.0 | 9.0 | 13.7 | 11.2 | 11.2 | 8.7 | 6.8 | 6.8 | |||
Goldman Sachs | 14.4 | 11.2 | 8.8 | 15.9 | 12.7 | 10.4 | 18.1 | 14.9 | 12.9 | 7.0 | 5.5 | 4.5 | 5.5 | 4.4 | 3.5 |
HSBC | 11.8 | 6.7 | 6.7 | 13.4 | 8.3 | 8.3 | 15.5 | 10.6 | 10.6 | 6.3 | 3.8 | 3.8 | |||
Huntington | 10.2 | 8.5 | 8.4 | 12.0 | 10.2 | 10.2 | 14.2 | 12.4 | 12.4 | 9.3 | 7.6 | 7.5 | |||
JPMorgan Chase | 15.0 | 13.4 | 12.5 | 16.6 | 15.0 | 14.1 | 18.5 | 16.9 | 16.1 | 7.2 | 6.5 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 5.5 | 5.2 |
KeyCorp | 10.0 | 7.4 | 7.4 | 11.7 | 9.1 | 9.1 | 14.2 | 11.5 | 11.5 | 9.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | |||
M&T | 11.0 | 7.7 | 7.7 | 12.3 | 9.1 | 9.1 | 14.0 | 10.8 | 10.8 | 9.4 | 6.9 | 6.9 | |||
Morgan Stanley | 15.2 | 14.4 | 10.6 | 17.1 | 16.3 | 12.6 | 19.5 | 18.8 | 15.1 | 6.7 | 6.4 | 4.8 | 5.5 | 5.2 | 3.9 |
Northern Trust | 11.4 | 11.6 | 11.4 | 12.3 | 12.5 | 12.3 | 14.2 | 15.2 | 15.1 | 8.1 | 8.2 | 8.1 | 8.6 | 8.7 | 8.6 |
PNC | 9.9 | 8.3 | 8.3 | 11.4 | 9.8 | 9.8 | 13.2 | 11.6 | 11.6 | 8.7 | 7.5 | 7.4 | 7.2 | 6.2 | 6.2 |
RBC USA | 15.7 | 9.4 | 9.4 | 15.7 | 9.4 | 9.4 | 16.3 | 10.6 | 10.6 | 11.0 | 6.3 | 6.3 | |||
Regions | 10.3 | 8.5 | 8.5 | 11.6 | 9.9 | 9.8 | 13.4 | 11.8 | 11.7 | 9.7 | 8.2 | 8.2 | |||
Santander | 12.4 | 10.1 | 10.1 | 14.3 | 12.0 | 12.0 | 16.4 | 14.2 | 14.2 | 9.8 | 8.4 | 8.4 | |||
State Street | 11.6 | 13.5 | 11.2 | 13.4 | 15.3 | 13.0 | 15.2 | 17.4 | 15.1 | 5.5 | 6.3 | 5.3 | 6.2 | 7.1 | 6.0 |
TD Group | 17.1 | 14.8 | 14.8 | 17.1 | 14.8 | 14.8 | 18.3 | 16.0 | 16.0 | 9.1 | 7.9 | 7.9 | 8.2 | 7.1 | 7.1 |
Truist | 10.1 | 7.9 | 7.9 | 11.6 | 9.5 | 9.5 | 13.7 | 11.9 | 11.9 | 9.3 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 7.9 | 6.4 | 6.4 |
UBS Americas | 19.3 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 23.1 | 14.5 | 14.5 | 23.4 | 15.7 | 15.7 | 9.2 | 5.1 | 5.1 | 8.1 | 4.5 | 4.5 |
US Bancorp | 9.9 | 7.6 | 7.5 | 11.5 | 9.2 | 9.1 | 13.7 | 11.3 | 11.3 | 8.1 | 6.4 | 6.3 | 6.6 | 5.2 | 5.2 |
Wells Fargo | 11.4 | 8.1 | 8.1 | 13.0 | 9.7 | 9.7 | 15.7 | 12.4 | 12.4 | 8.5 | 6.2 | 6.2 | 7.1 | 5.2 | 5.2 |
31 banks | 12.7 | 10.4 | 9.9 | 14.3 | 12.0 | 11.6 | 16.3 | 14.1 | 13.8 | 7.8 | 6.5 | 6.2 | 6.4 | 5.4 | 5.1 |
Note: The capital ratios are calculated using the capital action assumptions provided within the supervisory stress testing rules. See 12 C.F.R. §§ 238.132(d); 252.44(c). These projections represent hypothetical estimates that involve an economic outcome that is more adverse than expected. The minimum capital ratios are for the period 2024:Q1 to 2026:Q1.
1. Supplementary leverage ratio projections only include estimates for banks subject to Category I, II, or III standards. Return to table
Source: Federal Reserve estimates in the severely adverse scenario.
Note: The Federal Reserve revised this report on August 28, 2024:
- Goldman Sachs, Common equity tier 1 capital ratio, Ending was revised from 10.7 to 11.2.
- Goldman Sachs, Common equity tier 1 capital ratio, Minimum was revised from 8.5 to 8.8.
- Goldman Sachs, Tier 1 capital ratio, Ending, was revised from 12.3 to 12.7.
- Goldman Sachs, Tier 1 capital ratio, Minimum, was revised from 10.1 to 10.4.
- Goldman Sachs, Tier 1 leverage ratio, Ending, was revised from 5.3 to 5.5.
- Goldman Sachs, Tier 1 leverage ratio, Minimum, was revised from 4.4 to 4.5.
- Goldman Sachs, Supplementary leverage ratio, Ending, was revised from 4.2 to 4.4.
- Goldman Sachs, Supplementary leverage ratio, Minimum, was revised from 3.4 to 3.5.
- 31 banks, Tier 1 capital ratio, Minimum, was revised from 13.7 to 13.8.
Pre-tax Net Income
Projections of pre-tax net income are the largest component of post-stress changes in capital.6 Over the nine quarters of the projection horizon, aggregate cumulative pre-tax net income is projected to be negative $272 billion, which equals negative 1.3 percent of average total assets (see table 7). As a percent of average assets, projected cumulative pre-tax net income is negative for 26 of the 31 banks and varies considerably across banks, ranging from negative 3.7 percent to positive 2.4 percent (see figure 6 and table 8). This range illustrates differences in the sensitivity of the various components of pre-tax net income to the economic and financial market conditions in the severely adverse scenario. These components include cumulative projections of losses and pre-provision net revenue (PPNR), which are discussed in further detail below.
Table 7. Projected aggregate losses, revenue, and net income before taxes through 2026:Q1 under the severely adverse scenario
Item | Billions of dollars | Percent of average assets 1 |
---|---|---|
Pre-provision net revenue | 413.2 | 1.9 |
equals | ||
Net interest income | 991.0 | 4.6 |
Noninterest income | 833.7 | 3.9 |
less | ||
Noninterest expense2 | 1,411.5 | 6.6 |
Other revenue3 | 0.0 | |
less | ||
Provisions for loan and lease losses | 572.6 | |
Credit losses on investment securities (AFS/HTM)4 | 5.5 | |
Trading and counterparty losses5 | 91.4 | |
Other losses/gains6 | 16.2 | |
equals | ||
Net income before taxes | −272.4 | −1.3 |
Memo items | ||
Other comprehensive income7 | 43.1 | |
Other effects on capital | Actual 2023:Q4 | 2026:Q1 |
AOCI included in capital (billions of dollars) | −91.2 | −48.1 |
1. Average assets is the nine-quarter average of total assets. Return to table
2. Noninterest expense includes losses from operational-risk events and other real estate owned (OREO) costs. Return to table
3. Other revenue includes one-time income and (expense) items not included in pre-provision net revenue. Return to table
4. For banks that have adopted ASU 2016-13, the Federal Reserve incorporated its projection of expected credit losses on securities in the allowance for credit losses. AFS/HTM (available-for-sale/held-to-maturity). Return to table
5. Trading and counterparty losses include mark-to-market and credit valuation adjustment (CVA) losses and losses arising from the counterparty default scenario component applied to derivatives, securities lending, and repurchase agreement activities. Return to table
6. Other losses/gains include projected change in fair value of loans held for sale or held for investment and measured under the fair-value option, losses/gains on hedges on loans measured at fair value or amortized cost, and goodwill impairment losses. Return to table
7. Other comprehensive income is only calculated for banks subject to Category I or II standards or banks that opt in to including accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) in their calculation of capital. Return to table
Note: The Federal Reserve revised this report on August 28, 2024:
- Pre-provision net revenue was revised from 410.5 to 413.2.
- Noninterest expense was revised from 1414.3 to 1411.5.
- Net income before taxes was revised from -275.2 to -272.4.
Table 8. Projected losses, revenue, and net income before taxes through 2026:Q1 under the severely adverse scenario: 31 banks
Billions of dollars
Bank | Sum of revenues | Minus sum of provisions and losses | Equals | Memo items |
Other effects on capital | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pre-provision net revenue 1 | Other revenue 2 |
Provisions for loan and lease losses | Credit losses on investment securities (AFS/HTM)3 | Trading and counterparty losses4 | Other losses/ gains5 |
Net income before taxes |
Other compre- hensive income6 |
AOCI included in capital (2026:Q1) |
|
Ally | 7.6 | 0.0 | 10.6 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.1 | −3.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
American Express | 32.8 | 0.0 | 26.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 6.3 | 0.0 | −3.0 |
Bank of America | 32.3 | 0.0 | 62.8 | 0.2 | 12.1 | 2.0 | −44.8 | 4.5 | −5.3 |
Bank of NY-Mellon | 6.8 | 0.0 | 1.7 | 0.3 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 3.3 | 2.1 | −2.8 |
Barclays US | 4.4 | 0.0 | 4.3 | 0.0 | 2.1 | 0.1 | −2.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
BMO | 2.4 | 0.0 | 12.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | −9.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Capital One | 35.2 | 0.0 | 52.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.1 | −17.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Charles Schwab Corp | 7.6 | 0.0 | 1.8 | −0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Citigroup | 33.9 | 0.0 | 47.7 | 0.5 | 11.7 | 1.1 | −27.0 | 8.6 | −34.7 |
Citizens | 4.0 | 0.0 | 10.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | −6.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
DB USA | −1.7 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 1.1 | 0.2 | −4.0 | 0.0 | −0.2 |
Discover | 22.6 | 0.0 | 21.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Fifth Third | 5.7 | 0.0 | 9.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | −4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Goldman Sachs | 19.3 | 0.0 | 19.3 | 0.0 | 18.0 | 2.6 | −20.6 | 1.0 | −1.9 |
HSBC | −0.3 | 0.0 | 3.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | −4.3 | 0.0 | 0.1 |
Huntington | 5.1 | 0.0 | 7.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | −2.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
JPMorgan Chase | 69.3 | 0.0 | 83.8 | 1.6 | 17.6 | 4.1 | −37.9 | 13.0 | 6.5 |
KeyCorp | 4.2 | 0.0 | 7.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | −3.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
M&T | 5.2 | 0.0 | 10.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | −4.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Morgan Stanley | 22.4 | 0.0 | 11.3 | 0.1 | 11.4 | 5.3 | −5.7 | 2.8 | −3.6 |
Northern Trust | 3.2 | 0.0 | 4.1 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | −1.0 | 1.2 | 0.1 |
PNC | 12.9 | 0.0 | 18.3 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.1 | −5.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
RBC USA | 2.1 | 0.0 | 8.0 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | −6.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Regions | 6.3 | 0.0 | 8.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | −2.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Santander | 6.2 | 0.0 | 7.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | −0.1 | −1.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
State Street | 3.4 | 0.0 | 1.7 | 0.1 | 1.1 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.9 | −0.2 |
TD Group | 6.6 | 0.0 | 12.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | −5.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Truist | 13.5 | 0.0 | 21.4 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.1 | −8.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
UBS Americas | −0.4 | 0.0 | 3.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | −3.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
US Bancorp | 16.3 | 0.0 | 24.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | −8.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Wells Fargo | 24.5 | 0.0 | 57.6 | 0.4 | 14.7 | 0.3 | −48.6 | 7.9 | −2.9 |
31 banks | 413.2 | 0.0 | 572.6 | 5.5 | 91.4 | 16.2 | −272.4 | 43.1 | −48.1 |
Note: These projections represent hypothetical estimates that involve an economic outcome that is more adverse than expected. Values may not sum precisely due to rounding.
1. Pre-provision net revenue includes losses from operational-risk events and other real estate owned (OREO) costs. Return to table
2. Other revenue includes one-time income and (expense) items not included in pre-provision net revenue. Return to table
3. For banks that have adopted ASU 2016-13, the Federal Reserve incorporated its projection of expected credit losses on securities in the allowance for credit losses. AFS/HTM (available-for-sale/held-to-maturity). Return to table
4. Trading and counterparty losses include mark-to-market and credit valuation adjustment (CVA) losses and losses arising from the counterparty default scenario component applied to derivatives, securities lending, and repurchase agreement activities. Return to table
5. Other losses/gains include projected change in fair value of loans held for sale or held for investment and measured under the fair-value option, losses/gains on hedges on loans measured at fair value or amortized cost, and goodwill impairment losses. Return to table
6. Other comprehensive income is only calculated for banks subject to Category I or II standards or banks that opt in to including accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) in their calculation of capital. Return to table
Source: Federal Reserve estimates in the severely adverse scenario.
Note: The Federal Reserve revised this report on August 28, 2024:
- Goldman Sachs, Sum of revenues, Pre-provision net revenue was revised from 16.6 to 19.3.
- Goldman Sachs, Equals, Net income before taxes was revised from -23.3 to -20.6. 31 banks, Sum of revenues, Pre-provision net revenue was revised from 410.5 to 413.2.
- 31 banks, Equals, Net income before taxes was revised from -275.2 to -272.4.
Losses
Over the projection horizon, aggregate losses on loans and other positions are projected to be $684 billion. These losses comprise
- $571 billion in loan losses, accounting for 83 percent of total losses;
- $16 billion in additional losses from items such as loans booked under the fair-value option (see table 7), accounting for 2 percent of total losses;
- $91 billion in trading and counterparty losses at the 10 banks with substantial trading, processing, or custodial operations, accounting for 13 percent of total losses; and7
- $6 billion in securities losses, accounting for 1 percent of total losses (see figure 7).8
For loans measured at amortized cost, projected aggregate losses are $571 billion, with the loan loss rate at 7.1 percent (see table 9).9 These loan losses flow into pre-tax net income through the projection of provisions for loan and lease losses, which is $573 billion in aggregate and takes into account banks' established allowances for credit losses at the start of the projection horizon.10
Table 9. Projected aggregate loan losses, by type of loan, under the severely adverse scenario, 2024:Q1–2026:Q1
Loan type | Billions of dollars | Portfolio loss rates (percent)1 |
---|---|---|
Loan losses | 571.2 | 7.1 |
First-lien mortgages, domestic | 35.1 | 2.3 |
Junior liens and HELOCs,2 domestic | 7.0 | 4.1 |
Commercial and industrial3 | 141.9 | 8.1 |
Commercial real estate, domestic | 77.2 | 8.8 |
Credit cards | 175.2 | 17.6 |
Other consumer4 | 58.0 | 7.2 |
Other loans5 | 77.0 | 4.0 |
1. Average loan balances used to calculate portfolio loss rates exclude loans held for sale, loans held for investment under the fair-value option, and Paycheck Protection Program loans and are calculated over nine quarters. Return to table
2. HELOCs (home equity lines of credit). Return to table
3. Commercial and industrial loans include small- and medium-enterprise loans and corporate cards. Return to table
4. Other consumer loans include student loans and automobile loans. Return to table
5. Other loans include international real estate loans. Return to table
Projected consumer loan losses represent a smaller share (40 percent) of total losses than commercial loan losses (43 percent). The loan portfolio that constitutes the largest amount of losses is credit cards, representing 26 percent of total losses.
Total loan loss rates vary significantly across banks, ranging between 1.3 percent and 18.7 percent (see table 10). This range results from differences in loan portfolio composition, which materially affects losses because projected loss rates vary significantly for different types of loans. For example, aggregate loan loss rates range from 2.3 percent on domestic first-lien mortgages to 17.6 percent on credit cards due to the sensitivity and historical performance of these loans. Some loan portfolios are sensitive to home prices or unemployment rates and may experience high stressed loss rates due to the considerable stress on these factors in the severely adverse scenario.11
Table 10. Projected loan losses by type of loan for 2024:Q1–2026:Q1 under the severely adverse scenario: 31 banks
Percent of average loan balances
Bank | Loan losses1 |
First-lien mortgages, domestic |
Junior liens and HELOCs, 2 domestic |
Commercial and industrial3 |
Commercial real estate, domestic |
Credit cards | Other consumer4 |
Other loans5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ally | 7.7 | 1.8 | 3.7 | 7.8 | 3.6 | 40.6 | 8.0 | 16.0 |
American Express | 12.3 | 0.0 | 4.9 | 16.1 | 0.0 | 10.1 | 17.6 | 10.6 |
Bank of America | 5.5 | 2.1 | 3.0 | 5.9 | 11.4 | 16.7 | 2.5 | 3.2 |
Bank of NY-Mellon | 2.4 | 2.6 | 8.5 | 4.9 | 8.4 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 1.7 |
Barclays US | 12.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 19.3 | 3.8 | 17.1 | 18.0 | 0.9 |
BMO | 7.5 | 3.3 | 5.1 | 7.6 | 9.8 | 18.0 | 10.1 | 7.0 |
Capital One | 16.5 | 2.9 | 7.4 | 13.6 | 14.6 | 23.2 | 10.5 | 5.7 |
Charles Schwab Corp | 1.3 | 1.8 | 5.8 | 11.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.9 |
Citigroup | 7.6 | 3.1 | 5.1 | 5.0 | 8.3 | 16.9 | 20.2 | 3.1 |
Citizens | 6.8 | 2.8 | 5.6 | 6.9 | 8.9 | 19.4 | 8.3 | 9.2 |
DB USA | 4.5 | 3.1 | 7.2 | 2.1 | 9.1 | 0.0 | 7.8 | 2.5 |
Discover | 18.7 | 2.9 | 9.2 | 21.8 | 0.0 | 20.3 | 13.9 | 6.2 |
Fifth Third | 7.9 | 2.4 | 4.5 | 8.1 | 12.3 | 19.6 | 9.2 | 5.7 |
Goldman Sachs | 8.5 | 3.3 | 4.9 | 16.2 | 15.9 | 25.4 | 4.2 | 4.5 |
HSBC | 6.4 | 3.9 | 6.2 | 7.0 | 11.0 | 18.6 | 11.1 | 7.2 |
Huntington | 6.1 | 3.2 | 4.5 | 6.4 | 10.1 | 18.6 | 6.6 | 4.6 |
JPMorgan Chase | 6.3 | 2.0 | 2.8 | 11.6 | 3.0 | 16.4 | 3.1 | 4.5 |
KeyCorp | 6.8 | 3.6 | 4.5 | 7.0 | 11.0 | 18.6 | 11.9 | 4.0 |
M&T | 7.0 | 2.9 | 4.4 | 7.3 | 7.8 | 18.6 | 9.9 | 7.9 |
Morgan Stanley | 4.1 | 2.5 | 4.9 | 14.1 | 8.0 | 0.0 | 1.1 | 4.2 |
Northern Trust | 7.0 | 3.1 | 3.4 | 7.3 | 13.0 | 0.0 | 17.8 | 6.3 |
PNC | 5.8 | 2.2 | 3.3 | 6.9 | 9.7 | 18.9 | 3.6 | 3.3 |
RBC USA | 8.5 | 3.7 | 6.0 | 12.1 | 15.8 | 18.6 | 14.7 | 3.8 |
Regions | 7.8 | 2.8 | 6.0 | 8.6 | 12.4 | 15.9 | 21.1 | 3.4 |
Santander | 11.8 | 2.7 | 5.1 | 6.9 | 5.0 | 18.6 | 18.3 | 2.6 |
State Street | 3.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 8.1 | 6.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.2 |
TD Group | 6.2 | 2.9 | 5.8 | 7.9 | 8.1 | 21.5 | 3.0 | 3.6 |
Truist | 6.4 | 2.2 | 3.8 | 6.4 | 9.6 | 16.3 | 10.2 | 4.1 |
UBS Americas | 2.9 | 3.2 | 0.0 | 3.1 | 7.4 | 18.6 | 0.6 | 7.5 |
US Bancorp | 6.8 | 2.3 | 5.6 | 8.0 | 9.8 | 17.5 | 6.9 | 5.0 |
Wells Fargo | 6.0 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 7.4 | 9.9 | 18.6 | 5.4 | 4.6 |
31 banks | 7.1 | 2.3 | 4.1 | 8.1 | 8.8 | 17.6 | 7.2 | 4.0 |
Note: These projections represent hypothetical estimates that involve an economic outcome that is more adverse than expected. Values may not sum precisely due to rounding.
1. Average loan balances used to calculate portfolio loss rates exclude loans held for sale, loans held for investment under the fair-value option, and Paycheck Protection Program loans and are calculated over nine quarters. Return to table
2. HELOCs (home equity lines of credit). Return to table
3. Commercial and industrial loans include small- and medium-enterprise loans and corporate cards. Return to table
4. Other consumer loans include student loans and automobile loans. Return to table
5. Other loans include international real estate loans. Return to table
Source: Federal Reserve estimates in the severely adverse scenario.
Loan loss rates also reflect differences in the characteristics of loans within each portfolio. For example, the median projected loss rate on commercial and industrial (C&I) loans across all banks is 7.7 percent. The loss rate on C&I loans among individual banks ranges from 2.1 percent to 21.8 percent. For credit cards, the range of projected loss rates among banks is 10.1 percent to 40.6 percent, and the median is 18.6 percent.
For loans measured at fair value, losses enter pre-tax net income through the other loans loss category (see table 8). Loans measured at amortized cost and those measured at fair value generally have similar risk factors, but the latter are exposed to risk from the effects of market fluctuations, which can lead to more severe market value losses in periods of high market volatility or asset illiquidity.
Aggregate trading and counterparty losses, which also flow into pre-tax net income, are $91 billion for the 10 banks subject to the global market shock component and/or the largest counterparty default component of the severely adverse scenario. Individual bank losses range from $1 billion to $18 billion, resulting from the specific risk characteristics of each bank's trading positions and counterparty exposures, inclusive of hedges (see table 8). Importantly, these projected losses are based on the trading positions and counterparty exposures held by banks on the same as-of date (October 13, 2023) and could have varied if they had been based on a different date.
Aggregate credit losses on investment securities are $6 billion (see table 7). In addition, unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale (AFS) debt securities are reflected in accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI).12 Other comprehensive income (OCI) is projected to be $43 billion in aggregate.
Pre-provision Net Revenue
Pre-tax net income also includes projections of post-stress income and expenses captured in PPNR. Over the projection horizon, banks are projected to generate an aggregate of $413 billion in PPNR, which is equal to 1.9 percent of their combined average assets (see table 7).
PPNR projections are generally driven by the shape of the yield curve, the path of asset prices, equity market volatility, and measures of economic activity in the severely adverse scenario. In addition, PPNR incorporates expenses stemming from operational-risk events, such as fraud, employee lawsuits, litigation-related expenses, or computer system or other operating disruptions.13 In the aggregate, operational-risk losses are $193 billion.
The ratio of PPNR to average assets varies across banks (see figure 8), primarily because of differences in business focus. For instance, the ratio of PPNR to assets tends to be higher at banks focusing on credit card lending, since credit cards generally produce higher net interest income relative to other forms of lending.14 Additionally, lower ratios of PPNR to assets do not necessarily imply lower pre-tax net income, because the same business focus and risk characteristics determining differences in PPNR across banks could also result in offsetting projected losses.
Footnotes
6. For risk-based capital ratios, the numerator is capital, which is primarily impacted from pre-tax net income and gains/losses on available-for-sale (AFS) debt securities. The denominator for risk-based capital ratios is risk-weighted assets. Risk-weighted assets change minimally throughout the projection horizon as the result of an assumption that a bank's assets generally remain unchanged. Return to text
7. The banks subject to the global market shock component and/or the largest counterparty default component are Bank of America Corporation; The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation; Barclays US LLC; Citigroup, Inc.; DB USA Corporation; The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.; JPMorgan Chase & Co.; Morgan Stanley; State Street Corporation; and Wells Fargo & Company. Return to text
8. For banks that have adopted ASU 2016-13, the Federal Reserve incorporated its projection of expected credit losses on securities in the allowance for credit losses, in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), "Financial Instruments–Credit Losses (Topic 326)," FASB ASU 2016-13 (Norwalk, CT: FASB, June 2016). Prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-13, securities credit losses were realized through other-than-temporary impairment. Return to text
9. The loss rate is calculated as total projected loan losses over the nine quarters of the projection horizon divided by average loan balances over the horizon. Return to text
10. Provisions for loan and lease losses equal projected loan losses plus the amount needed for the allowance to be at an appropriate level at the end of each quarter. Return to text
11. In addition, losses are calculated based on the exposure at default, which includes both outstanding balances and any additional drawdown of the credit line that occurs prior to default, while loss rates are calculated as a percentage of average outstanding balances over the projection horizon. Return to text
12. Only banks subject to Category I or II standards or banks that opt in are required to include unrealized gains and losses on AFS debt securities in the calculation of capital. Category III and IV banks are not required to include unrealized gains and losses on AFS debt securities in the calculation of capital. Return to text
13. These operational-risk expenses are not a supervisory estimate of banks' current or expected legal liability, as they are conditional on the severely adverse scenario and conservative assumptions, and they also incorporate the potential for substantial losses that do not involve litigation or legal exposure. Return to text
14. Credit card lending also tends to generate relatively high loss rates, suggesting that the higher PPNR rates at these banks do not necessarily indicate higher profitability. Return to text
Note: The Federal Reserve revised this report on August 28, 2024:
- In the paragraph under “Pre-tax Net Income,” the dollar amount in the second sentence was revised from $275 billion to $272 Billion.
- In the first paragraph under “Pre-provision Net Revenue,” the dollar amount in the second sentence was revised from $411 billion to $413 billion.