Appendix

Physical Risk Methodology

  • The physical risk scenario analysis presented in this document is based on submissions from pilot CSA exercise participants of loan-level PD estimates for the scenarios prescribed in the Participant Instructions.
  • Participants estimated loan-level PDs for all in-scope RRE and CRE loans to U.S. obligors in relevant NCA regions. The loan population included loans and/or credit facilities reportable in the FR Y-14M, Schedule A.1 – Domestic First Lien Closed-end 1-4 Family Residential Loan Schedule and Schedule B.1 – Domestic Home Equity and Home Equity Line Schedule that are directly held on the participant's portfolio as defined by the FR Y-14M Instructions, and in the FR Y-14Q, Schedule H.2 – Commercial Real Estate Loan Schedule.
  • For the common shock, the relevant NCA region was the Northeast. For the idiosyncratic shock, the relevant NCA region was selected by each participant and may differ across participants.
  • Unless otherwise noted, the analysis excludes one participant's estimates due to methodological differences that prevented aggregation across participants or comparison to baseline scenario estimates.
  • The analysis excludes all loans with 100 percent PD in the baseline scenario.
  • Baseline scenario figures reflect participants' estimates before the impact of the physical shock is incorporated. The baseline represents PDs reported by participants as of December 31, 2022, in their FR Y-14M Schedules A.1 and B.1 filings and FR Y-14Q Schedule H.2 filings. If a participant chose to estimate risk parameters using a different measurement approach from the one used to estimate the advanced approaches risk parameters reported in the corresponding FR Y-14 schedules as of December 31, 2022, risk parameter estimates as of December 31, 2022, were restated, using a consistent and comparable measurement approach to the one used in the pilot CSA exercise.
  • The average of participant estimates of PD is calculated as the average of loan-level PDs for in-scope loans in the relevant NCA region.
  • All averages are unweighted.

Transition Risk Methodology

  • The transition risk scenario analysis presented in this document is based on submissions from pilot CSA exercise participants of facility-level and loan-level PD estimates for the scenarios prescribed in the Participant Instructions.
  • Participants estimated loan-level PDs for in-scope Corporate and CRE loans. The loan population included active loans reportable in the FR Y-14Q, Schedule H.1 – Corporate Loan Data Schedule, and the FR Y-14Q, Schedule H.2 – Commercial Real Estate Schedule. Active facilities corresponded to Disposition Flag option 0 on FR Y-14Q, Schedule H.1, Field 98, or FR Y-14Q, Schedule H.2, Field 61.
  • The analysis excludes loans with 100 percent PD as reported by participants as of December 31, 2022, in their FR Y-14Q H.1 and H.2. filings, or restated PDs if a participant chose to report risk parameter estimates using a different measurement approach from the one used to estimate the advanced approaches risk parameters reported in the corresponding FR Y-14 schedules as of December 31, 2022.
  • Transition risk impact for an individual loan is defined as the largest annual difference in PD between the Net Zero 2050 and Current Policies scenarios over the 10-year projection horizon. See box 2 for more detail.
  • The average of participant transition risk impacts is calculated as the average transition risk impact for all in-scope loans.
  • All averages are unweighted.
  • Common obligor is defined as an obligor that has a corporate facility at more than one participant (using the obligor's legal entity identifier).
Back to Top
Last Update: May 23, 2024