Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test Publications
Accessible Version
Figure 1. How stress testing works for large banks
Caption: The Federal Reserve conducts stress tests to ensure that large banks are sufficiently capitalized and able to lend to households and businesses even in a severe recession. The stress tests evaluate the financial resilience of banks by estimating losses, revenues, expenses, and resulting capital levels under hypothetical recession scenarios.
In this infographic, there are three arrows on the left side that are facing to the right.
The first arrow says, "The Federal Reserve develops stress test scenarios."
The second arrow says, "The Federal Reserve develops or selects stress test models."
The third arrow says, "Banks submit detailed bank data."
The arrows are pointing to box in the middle of the figure that says, "Using the scenario data and bank data as variables in the stress test models, the Federal Reserve projects how banks are likely to perform under a hypothetical economic conditions."
The middle box is pointing to a box on the right side that says, "The Federal Reserve uses the results of the supervisory stress test, in part, to set capital requirements for participating banks."
Figure 2. Aggregate common equity capital ratio for 23 banks in the 2023 stress test
Date | Percent |
---|---|
2009:Q1 | 4.9 |
2009:Q2 | 6.2 |
2009:Q3 | 7.5 |
2009:Q4 | 7.9 |
2010:Q1 | 8.2 |
2010:Q2 | 8.7 |
2010:Q3 | 9.1 |
2010:Q4 | 9.4 |
2011:Q1 | 9.6 |
2011:Q2 | 9.8 |
2011:Q3 | 9.8 |
2011:Q4 | 10.1 |
2012:Q1 | 10.7 |
2012:Q2 | 10.8 |
2012:Q3 | 11.1 |
2012:Q4 | 11.3 |
2013:Q1 | 10.7 |
2013:Q2 | 11.0 |
2013:Q3 | 11.2 |
2013:Q4 | 11.4 |
2014:Q1 | 12.1 |
2014:Q2 | 12.2 |
2014:Q3 | 12.3 |
2014:Q4 | 12.4 |
2015:Q1 | 11.5 |
2015:Q2 | 11.8 |
2015:Q3 | 12.1 |
2015:Q4 | 12.4 |
2016:Q1 | 12.3 |
2016:Q2 | 12.4 |
2016:Q3 | 12.5 |
2016:Q4 | 12.6 |
2017:Q1 | 12.6 |
2017:Q2 | 12.7 |
2017:Q3 | 12.7 |
2017:Q4 | 12.4 |
2018:Q1 | 12.0 |
2018:Q2 | 12.1 |
2018:Q3 | 12.2 |
2018:Q4 | 12.2 |
2019:Q1 | 12.3 |
2019:Q2 | 12.4 |
2019:Q3 | 12.3 |
2019:Q4 | 12.1 |
2020:Q1 | 11.6 |
2020:Q2 | 12.3 |
2020:Q3 | 12.8 |
2020:Q4 | 12.9 |
2021:Q1 | 12.8 |
2021:Q2 | 12.8 |
2021:Q3 | 12.6 |
2021:Q4 | 12.5 |
2022:Q1 | 11.8 |
2022:Q2 | 11.9 |
2022:Q3 | 12.1 |
2022:Q4 | 12.4 |
"Note: The Federal Reserve’s evaluation of a bank’s common equity capital was initially measured using a tier 1 common capital ratio but now is evaluated using a common equity tier 1 capital ratio. Not all of the banks included in the 2023 stress test reported data for all periods since 2009."
Source: FR Y-9C.
Figure 3. When bank holding companies are required to participate in the stress test
Caption: The Board conducts stress tests of bank holding companies it supervises on an annual or two-year cycle. Based on a bank holding company’s financial condition, size, complexity, risk profile, risks to the U.S. economy, or scope of operations or activities, the Board may conduct a stress test of a bank holding company more or less frequently than required.
The figure has two two-column boxes.
In the top box, in the left column, it says "Every year." In the right column, there are three bullets. The top bullet says, "U.S. global systemically important bank holding companies (Category I)." The second bullet says, "Domestic and foreign bank holding companies with $700 billion or more in total assets or $75 billion or more in cross-jurisdictional activity (Category II)." The bottom bullet says, "Domestic and foreign bank holding companies with $250 billion or more in total assets or $75 billion or more in weighted short-term wholesale funding, nonbank assets, or off-balance-sheet exposure (Category III)."
In the bottom box, in the left column, "Every 2 years (in years ending in an even number)." In the right column, there is one bullet and a note. The bullet says, "Domestic and foreign bank holding companies with $100 billion or more in total assets that do not meet the requirements for every-year stress testing (Category IV)." The note says, "Note: Bank holding companies of this asset size may also elect to participate in a stress test in a year ending in an odd number."
Figure 4. Change from 2022:Q4 to minimum common equity tier 1 capital ratio in the severely adverse scenario
Percent
Bank | Percent |
---|---|
Bank of America | 1.9 |
Bank of NY-Mellon | -0.3 |
Barclays US | 4.2 |
BMO | 3.3 |
Capital One | 4.5 |
Charles Schwab Corp | -0.9 |
Citigroup | 4.0 |
Citizens | 3.6 |
Credit Suisse USA | 7.2 |
DB USA | 8.7 |
Goldman Sachs | 4.9 |
JPMorgan Chase | 2.1 |
M&T | 3.4 |
Morgan Stanley | 4.1 |
Northern Trust | -0.5 |
PNC | 1.2 |
RBC USA | 4.2 |
State Street | -0.3 |
TD Group | 1.6 |
Truist | 2.3 |
UBS Americas | 8.0 |
US Bancorp | 1.8 |
Wells Fargo | 2.4 |
Median | 3.3 |
Note: Estimates of minimum common equity tier 1 (CET1) capital as a percent of risk-weighted assets are for the nine-quarter period from 2023:Q1 to 2025:Q1. Negative values indicated CET1 ratio increases.
Figure A. Aggregate maximum decline in stressed common equity tier 1 capital ratio, severely adverse scenario
Year | Percentage points |
---|---|
2019 stress test | -2.3 |
June 2020 stress test | -2.1 |
December 2020 stress test | -2.6 |
2021 stress test | -2.4 |
2022 stress test | -2.7 |
2023 stress test | -2.5 |
Note: The bar represents the aggregate maximum common equity tier 1 (CET1) capital ratio decline of the banks in each exercise. The values for the 2019 stress test are estimates of the CET1 capital ratio decline had the stress capital buffer rule been in place at that time. For purposes of this figure, the 2019 stress test values assume (1) a constant level of assets over the projection horizon, (2) no common dividend payments, (3) no issuances or repurchases of common or preferred stock (except those related to business plan changes), and (4) fully phased-in capital deductions.
Figure B. 3-month Treasury yield, severely adverse scenario
Percent
2019 stress test | June 2020 stress test | December 2020 stress test | 2021 stress test | 2022 stress test | 2023 stress test | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Start | 2.3 | 1.6 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 4.0 |
Minimum | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
Change | -2.2 | -1.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -3.9 |
Figure C. Accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) in capital to risk-weighted assets, starting point and stressed minimum
Percent
Year | Starting AOCI in capital | Minimum quarter AOCI in capital |
---|---|---|
2019 stress test | -0.8 | -0.5 |
June 2020 stress test | -0.5 | -0.5 |
December 2020 stress test | -0.4 | -0.3 |
2021 stress test | -0.4 | -0.3 |
2022 stress test | -0.5 | -0.5 |
2023 stress test | -1.0 | -0.7 |
Note: Only firms subject to Category I or II standards or firms that opt in are required to include unrealized gains and losses on securities in the calculation of capital. Category III and IV firms are not required to include unrealized gains and losses on securities in the calculation of capital. Horizontal dashed line titled Average at -0.6.
Figure D. Cumulative consumer and wholesale loss rate through stressed minimum, severely adverse scenario
Percent
Year | Consumer loss rate | Wholesale loss rate |
---|---|---|
2019 stress test | 3.1 | 3.2 |
June 2020 stress test | 3.5 | 3.4 |
December 2020 stress test | 5.7 | 6.6 |
2021 stress test | 3.0 | 4.9 |
2022 stress test | 3.3 | 4.8 |
2023 stress test | 3.6 | 4.1 |
Note: Consumer loss rate includes losses on domestic and foreign first-lien mortgages, domestic and foreign junior-lien mortgages and home equity lines of credit, credit cards, automobile loans, student loans, and all other consumer loans. Wholesale loss rates includes losses on domestic and foreign commercial real estate and commercial and industrial loans. Losses are cumulative through the projection quarter at which the aggregate capital ratio is the lowest for each stress test.
Figure 5. Pre-tax net income rates in the severely adverse scenario
Percent
Bank | Percent |
---|---|
Bank of America | -0.8 |
Bank of NY-Mellon | 1.2 |
Barclays US | -1.5 |
BMO | -2.1 |
Capital One | -3.2 |
Charles Schwab Corp | 1.9 |
Citigroup | -1.4 |
Citizens | -2.9 |
Credit Suisse USA | -5.7 |
DB USA | -2.3 |
Goldman Sachs | -1.2 |
JPMorgan Chase | -0.8 |
M&T | -2.5 |
Morgan Stanley | -0.3 |
Northern Trust | -0.2 |
PNC | -0.6 |
RBC USA | -2.5 |
State Street | 1.2 |
TD Group | -0.8 |
Truist | -1.7 |
UBS Americas | -1.2 |
US Bancorp | -0.8 |
Wells Fargo | -1.7 |
Median | -1.2 |
Note: Estimates of minimum common equity tier 1 (CET1) capital as a percent of risk-weighted assets are for the nine-quarter period from 2023:Q1 to 2025:Q1. Negative values indicated CET1 ratio increases.
Figure 6. Projected losses in the severely adverse scenario
Billions of dollars (percent of total losses)
Severely Adverse Scenario | Loss |
---|---|
First-lien mortgages, domestic | 34 (6%) |
Junior liens and HELOCs | 7 (1%) |
Credit cards | 120 (22%) |
Other consumer loans | 35 (6%) |
Commercial and industrial loans | 99 (18%) |
Commercial real estate, domestic | 65 (12%) |
Other loans | 64 (12%) |
Securities losses | 5 (1%) |
Trading and counterparty losses | 94 (17%) |
Other losses | 18 (3%) |
Note: Percent of total losses may not sum to 100 because of rounding.
Figure A. Vacancy rate by property type
Percent
Year | Hotel | Office | Retail |
---|---|---|---|
2000 | 32.69 | 8.6 | 6.8 |
2001 | 42.78 | 14.1 | 8.3 |
2002 | 38.51 | 16.5 | 8.6 |
2003 | 36.84 | 16.8 | 8.7 |
2004 | 34.51 | 15.5 | 8.2 |
2005 | 33.27 | 13.8 | 7.4 |
2006 | 33.68 | 12.6 | 8.2 |
2007 | 33.65 | 12.6 | 9 |
2008 | 38.94 | 14.2 | 10.8 |
2009 | 39.27 | 16.6 | 12.6 |
2010 | 35.55 | 16.5 | 12.8 |
2011 | 33.55 | 16.1 | 12.8 |
2012 | 32.15 | 15.5 | 12.4 |
2013 | 30.75 | 14.9 | 11.6 |
2014 | 29.25 | 13.9 | 10.9 |
2015 | 28.95 | 13.1 | 10.5 |
2016 | 29.5 | 12.8 | 9.5 |
2017 | 28.3 | 12.9 | 9.4 |
2018 | 29.7 | 12.5 | 8.9 |
2019 | 28.7 | 12.2 | 8.5 |
2020 | 67.75 | 14.9 | 9.3 |
2021 | 40.8 | 16.6 | 8 |
2022 | 34.05 | 17.3 | 6.9 |
Note: Vacancy rate for each year uses the fourth quarter data only.
Source: CBRE Econometric Advisors.
Figure B. Office loss rate, cumulative 9-quarter
Percent
Exercise | Office Loss Rate |
---|---|
2007 -09 Global Financial Crisis loss rate | 6.4 |
2019 Stress Test | 7.9 |
June 2020 Stress Test | 6.7 |
December 2020 Stress Test | 10.6 |
2021 Stress Test | 11.0 |
2022 Stress Test | 17.0 |
2023 Stress Test | 20.0 |
Note: The 2007–09 Global Financial Crisis loss rate is based on office CMBS loans that became delinquent over the 9-quarter window in which eventual realized losses were highest. Stress test loss rates are calculated based on firms subject to the stress test each year and do not include owner occupied properties.
Source: Morningstar.
Figure 7. Pre-provision net revenue rates in the severely adverse scenario
Percent
Bank | Percent |
---|---|
Bank of America | 1.4 |
Bank of NY-Mellon | 2.1 |
Barclays US | 2.4 |
BMO | 1.4 |
Capital One | 6.8 |
Charles Schwab Corp | 2.1 |
Citigroup | 0.9 |
Citizens | 2.4 |
Credit Suisse USA | -1.3 |
DB USA | -0.4 |
Goldman Sachs | 1.9 |
JPMorgan Chase | 1.8 |
M&T | 2.4 |
Morgan Stanley | 2.1 |
Northern Trust | 2.3 |
PNC | 2.5 |
RBC USA | 1.5 |
State Street | 2.1 |
TD Group | 1.3 |
Truist | 2.1 |
UBS Americas | 0.5 |
US Bancorp | 2.6 |
Wells Fargo | 1.9 |
Median | 2.1 |
Note: Estimates are for the nine-quarter period from 2023:Q1 to 2025:Q1 as a percent of average assets.