Discount Window Announcements
June 28, 2024
- Incorrect primary credit rate applied
On June 16, 2022, five primary credit loans were made at an interest rate that was 0.75 percent above the rate approved for the program. The loans can be identified in the data by comparing the interest rate charged on the loan with the applicable rate for the primary credit program as shown in the “interest rates” sheet.
March 29, 2024
- In 2022 Q1, the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco made five loans to borrower ABA number 322079719, which moved from the 12th Federal Reserve District to the 11th Federal Reserve District on January 1, 2022. These loans were extended prior to the relevant Federal Reserve Banks being informed of the move.
March 31, 2023
- Typo in title (column A, row 2) in discount window borrowing data file for 2021:Q1 corrected
The Excel file that includes the discount window borrowing data for 2021 Q1 was reposted to correct a typo in the date range in the title in cell A2. There were no changes to any other cells in the reposted file.
March 29, 2019
- Incorrect secondary credit rate applied
Between 2016 Q4 and 2017 Q2, five secondary credit loans of $1,000 were made at interest rates that were 0.25 percentage points below the rate approved for the program. One loan was made in 2016 Q4, three loans were made in 2017 Q1, and one loan was made in 2017 Q2 (Q2 data will be released in June 2019). The loans can be identified in the data by comparing the interest rate charged on the loan with the prevailing rate for the secondary credit program. - Description of Commercial Loans changed
Changed the description of Commercial Loans in the "definitions and notes" sheet to reflect that loans to municipalities are included. Such loans have always been included in this category and this update does not reflect any change in collateral acceptance policy.
July 21, 2015
- Quarterly data for 2012:Q4 revised
Corrected the amount of a primary credit loan on Dec 18 2012 to borrower ABA number 021172784. The loan amount was previously reported as $200,000; the correct amount is $100,000.